Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ST JOSEPH'S MANORCMS #3950062 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

395006 04/25/2025 St Joseph's Manor 1616 Huntingdon Pike Meadowbrook, PA 19046
F 0580 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify each resident's responsible party of a significant weight loss for two of eight sampled residents. (Residents CL1 and 3) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Weight Management Guidelines, dated January 6, 2025, revealed that nursing staff were to report unexplained significant weight changes to the family/responsible party. Clinical record review revealed that Resident CL1 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was rarely understood. Review of the resident's weights revealed that on February 6, 2025, the resident weighed 178.6 pounds (lbs). On March 2, 2025, Resident CL1 weighed 167.8 lbs, which was confirmed with a reweigh on March 4, 2025. This reflected a six percent weight loss in one month. There was no documented evidence that Resident CL1's family/responsible party was notified of the significant weight loss. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included dementia and dysphagia. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was rarely understood. Review of the resident's weights revealed that on January 2, 2025, the resident weighed 138.8 lbs. On February 4, 2025, Resident 3 weighed 131.2 lbs. On March 4, 2025, Resident 3 weighed 131.4 lbs. This reflected a 5.4 percent weight loss between January and February that continued through March. There was no documented evidence that Resident 3's family/responsible party was notified of the significant weight loss. In an interview on April 25, 2025, at 4:21 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that there was no documented evidence that Residents CL1 and 3's families were notified of the significant weight loss, and they should have been. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services. Page 1 of 2 395006 395006 04/25/2025 St Joseph's Manor 1616 Huntingdon Pike Meadowbrook, PA 19046
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physicians' orders for two of eight sampled residents. (Residents 3 and 5) Residents Affected - Few Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure). A physician's order dated March 12, 2025, directed staff to administer a medication (lisinopril) one time a day for hypertension. Staff was not to administer the medication if the resident's blood pressure (BP) was less than 110 over 65 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg). Review of Resident 3's medication administration records (MARs) revealed that staff administered the medication one time in March 2025, and two times in April 2025, when the resident's BP was less than 110 over 65 mm/Hg. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 had diagnoses that included hypertension. On April 17, 2025, the physician ordered staff to administer a medicine (metoprolol tartrate) two times a day for hypertension. Staff was not to administer the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the first measurement of blood pressure when the heart beats and the pressure is at its highest) was less than 100 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg). Review of Resident 5's MARs revealed that staff administered the metoprolol tartrate four times in April 2025, when the resident's SBP was less than 100 mm/Hg. In an interview on April 25, 2025, at 3:40 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that the medication was administered outside the established parameters for Residents 3 and 5. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services. 395006 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • 0580GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F580 - Notification of Changes

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 25, 2025 survey of ST JOSEPH'S MANOR?

This was a inspection survey of ST JOSEPH'S MANOR on April 25, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ST JOSEPH'S MANOR on April 25, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.