Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

MEADOW VIEW REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTERCMS #3950923 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 3 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

395092 03/19/2025 Meadow View Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 225 Park Street Montrose, PA 18801
F 0550 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights. Based on a review of clinical records, resident council meeting minutes, grievances, resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by two residents out of 8 residents sampled (Residents 2 and 6). Findings include: A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated March 5, 2025, revealed residents in attendance raised concerns regarding call bell response times. The residents indicated there was an issue with receiving staff assistance for toileting. Residents in attendance raised concerns indicating call bells are not answered when residents ring for assistance. A review of the facility grievances for the month of March 2025 revealed a grievance filed March 9, 2025 noting that residents are complaining of call bell response times. The grievance revealed the facility's plan to resolve this was to conduct call bell audits on all shifts. The results of the action taken was as follows: Day Shift: Average call bell times: 2-45 minutes Evening shift: 2-45 mins Night shift: 2-10 minutes. Per the grievance form, management reports the staff members were re-educated on the need to respond to call bells more timely. An interview with Resident 2 on March 19, 2025, at approximately 12:00 PM, revealed concerns regarding delayed call bell responses. The resident stated that response times can extend up to 45 minutes to an hour, with longer delays occurring at night. The resident further explained that if assistance is not provided in a timely manner, she may remain in a soiled brief for an extended period before staff is available to assist with hygiene needs. An interview with Resident 6 on March 19, 2025, at approximately 12:30 PM, revealed concerns regarding call bell response times. The resident stated that call bells often go unanswered for 45 minutes to an hour, attributing the delays to insufficient staffing. The resident further shared that, on some occasions, prolonged wait times have resulted in incontinence before assistance could be Page 1 of 5 395092 395092 03/19/2025 Meadow View Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 225 Park Street Montrose, PA 18801
F 0550 provided. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm During an interview on March 21, 2025, at approximately 9:30 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) verified that all residents at the facility should be treated with dignity and respect and provided care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life. The NHA and DON were unable to explain why residents are reporting untimely staff responses to residents' requests for assistance and care. Residents Affected - Few 28 Pa. Code 201.29 (a) Resident rights. 395092 Page 2 of 5 395092 03/19/2025 Meadow View Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 225 Park Street Montrose, PA 18801
F 0690 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement individualized approaches for incontinence and provide maintenance care to the extent possible for two out of eight sampled residents (Resident 4 and 5). Findings include: A review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included overactive bladder and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 4's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated December 6, 2024, revealed the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder and was a poor candidate for retraining/scheduled toileting due to cognitive status. A review of the resident's care plan for Bladder and Bowel Incontinence, initiated on December 4, 2024, documented an intervention for the resident to be checked and changed every two hours and as needed (PRN). The term check and change refers to the routine monitoring and changing of a resident's incontinence products (such as adult briefs or absorbent pads) to maintain skin integrity, promote comfort, and prevent complications such as skin breakdown, moisture-associated skin damage (MASD), and urinary tract infections (UTIs). A review of the resident's Bowel and Bladder assessment dated [DATE], confirmed the resident was to be checked and changed every two hours. However, a review of the resident's clinical record did not reveal documented evidence the resident was checked and changed every two hours per the plan of care. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on March 19, 2025, at approximately 1:45 PM, confirmed that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that incontinence care was provided to Resident 4. A review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility January 4, 2024, with diagnoses including dementia (decline in mental ability that interferes with daily life) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 5's Bowel and Bladder Assessment dated November 26, 2024, revealed Resident 5 remained incontinent of bowel and bladder was not appropriate for retraining/scheduled toileting due to cognitive status. A review of the resident's care plan for Bladder and Bowel Incontinence, initiated on February 23, 2024, documented an intervention for the resident to be checked and changed every two hours and as needed (PRN). A review of Resident 5's progress notes revealed: 395092 Page 3 of 5 395092 03/19/2025 Meadow View Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 225 Park Street Montrose, PA 18801
F 0690 January 15, 2025 - The resident experienced hematuria (blood in urine) while toileting at 5:00 PM. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm January 17, 2025 - A urine culture was obtained at 6:30 AM. Residents Affected - Few January 18, 2025 - The resident was placed on an antibiotic due to a confirmed urinary tract infection (UTI) via lab results dated January 17, 2025. A review of the resident's January 2025 Documentation Survey Report revealed that on the following dates the resident was not checked every 2 hours per the care plan intervention recommendations A review of the resident's Documentation Survey Report for January, February, and March 2025 revealed multiple dates during various shift on which the resident was not checked and changed every two hours per the care plan intervention, including: January 4, 5, 7, 10, 17, 19, and 31, 2025 February 16, 20, and 23, 2025 March 14, 15, 16, and 17, 2025 An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on March 19, 2025, at approximately 1:45 PM, confirmed that the facility failed to carry out incontinence checks as planned for these residents to maintain or improve urinary continence and prevent incontinence related complications The facility failed to provide scheduled incontinence care as outlined in the residents' care plans. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services 395092 Page 4 of 5 395092 03/19/2025 Meadow View Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 225 Park Street Montrose, PA 18801
F 0755 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to to ensure the timely acquisition and administration of a prescribed medication to one of 7 sampled residents (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain tissue to die). A review of hospital discharge instructions revealed the resident was to receive diazepam 2mg (Valium an antianxiety medication) one tablet by mouth every night. A review of physician's orders dated February 6, 2025, revealed the physician prescribed diazepam 2mg one tablet by mouth at bedtime for anxiety beginning on February 6, 2025. A review of the Resident's MAR (medication administration record)) showed the diazepam was not administered on February 6 and 7, 2025, as ordered. There were no nurse signatures or documentation indicating the dose was given on those dates. A nursing progress note dated February 7, 2025, at 8:40 PM indicated the bedtime dose of diazepam was not given because the medication was unavailable. Further record review revealed the facility had not received the diazepam from the pharmacy in time for the scheduled doses on February 6 and 7, 2025. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on March 19, 2025, at approximately 1:45 PM acknowledged that the facility did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure medications were obtained and administered in a timely manner. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 211.9 (f)(2) Pharmacy services 395092 Page 5 of 5

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

3 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0690GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F690 - Incontinence

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

  • 0755GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F755 - Pharmacy Services

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • 0550GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F550 - Resident Rights

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 19, 2025 survey of MEADOW VIEW REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of MEADOW VIEW REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER on March 19, 2025. The surveyor cited 3 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at MEADOW VIEW REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE CENTER on March 19, 2025?

Yes, 3 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, an..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.