F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop and/or
implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the
comprehensive assessment for two of ten sampled residents. (Residents 1, 2)Findings include: Clinical
record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that
included vascular dementia, syncope and collapse (fainting), and cerebral infarction (stroke). According to
the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated August 27, 2025, the resident had memory impairment
and could walk without assistance. Review of the elopement assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the
resident wandered and was at risk for elopement. On August 20, 2025, a nurse noted that an alert bracelet
was applied to the resident's leg. There was no documented evidence that the facility included interventions
on the care plan to monitor the resident's risk for elopement, wandering behavior and the use of this device.
Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses
that included dementia, insomnia (difficulty falling or staying asleep), wandering, restlessness, and
agitation. According to the MDS assessment, dated September 5, 2025, the resident was Spanish speaking
and rarely understood others when spoken to in English. The MDS Care Area Assessment summary noted
that the resident's communication was to be addressed in the care plan. There was no documented
evidence that interventions to address Resident 2's communication barrier were included in the care plan.
28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 5
Event ID:
395476
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
395476
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Northampton County-Gracedale
Gracedale Avenue
Nazareth, PA 18064
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Some
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was
determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to monitor a resident's whereabouts and
prevent an elopement (unauthorized departure from the facility) for one of ten sampled residents at risk for
elopement. (Resident 2) In addition, the facility failed to provide required education to staff related to
elopement prevention on nursing unit Tower 3, affecting 29 residents assessed as at risk for elopement.
This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the facility policy
entitled, Elopements/Elopement Policy, last reviewed September 19, 2025, revealed that staff were to
assure the safety and security of all residents. Review of the facility policy entitled, One to one (1:1),
Behavioral Intervention, last reviewed September 19, 2025, revealed that staff would remain within arm's
length or within visual sight of the resident at all times when receiving 1:1 intervention. Clinical record
review revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included
dementia, insomnia (difficulty falling or staying asleep), wandering, restlessness, and agitation. According
to the Minimum Data Set assessment (a periodic evaluation of resident care needs), dated September 5,
2025, the resident had memory impairment and could walk without assistance. An elopement assessment
dated [DATE], revealed Resident 2 was at risk for elopement. Review of Resident 2's care plan revealed he
was at risk for elopement with interventions for 1:1 observation and a roam alert bracelet (an electronic
device that prevents doors from opening and/or sounds an alarm). On September 17, 2025, the physician
ordered for staff to provide 1:1 supervision due to the resident being an elopement risk. On September 2,
2025, social services documented that the resident spends his day wandering around the unit and that his
family stated he had a history of elopement and eloped via the window from his previous facility. On
September 9, 2025, the physician documented that he discussed his concerns with risk management
regarding the resident's high risk for elopement and to consider 1:1 if his behaviors persisted. On
September 12, 2025, at 1:49 p.m., a nurse documented that Resident 2 was actively exit seeking,
attempting to get on the elevators, and that he was on every 15 minute checks. At 2:49 p.m., it was
documented that the resident was able to get on the elevator. On September 13, 2025, staff documented
that Resident 2 was continuously standing by the elevator. On September 14, 2025 at 4:15 p.m., the
resident was again on the elevator and when staff removed him he punched a window multiple times. At
10:16 p.m., the resident expressed that he needed to leave. On September 15, 2025, the psychology
consultant recommended 1:1 supervision instead of every 15 minute checks. On September 16, 2025,
Resident 2 was again noted to be hovering around the elevator and needed to be removed from the
elevator multiple times by staff. On September 17, 2025, the resident was found with the elevator/door
codes written on a piece of paper in his sock. He was then placed on 1:1 observation. On September 19
2025, staff documented that the resident was pacing between stairwells and elevators with the assigned
1:1 staff member following. On September 20, 2025, at 11:21 p.m., the nursing supervisor (RN 4) observed
from her office on a different floor that the resident's alert bracelet was alarming and contacted the unit to
locate the resident. He could not be located on the unit or on the facility grounds. Resident 2 was located by
police on September 21, 2025 at 6:52 a.m., at a convenience store approximately two miles from the
facility, and was taken to the emergency room for evaluation. He was returned to the facility at 9:30 a.m.
Review of facility documentation, dated September 21, 2025, revealed that the resident's assigned 1:1 staff
member left the assignment at 8:00 p.m. on September 20, 2025, and was not replaced. The resident was
left unsupervised and did not have 1:1 observation,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
395476
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
395476
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Northampton County-Gracedale
Gracedale Avenue
Nazareth, PA 18064
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
per his physician's order and care plan, and eloped from nursing unit Tower 3 and the building unwitnessed.
Further review of facility documentation revealed that Resident 2 was later observed on camera footage
exiting through a stairwell door on Tower 3 after using the code to open the door. There was no documented
evidence that the nurse aide (NA 1) and nurse (LPN 1) assigned to Resident 2 on Tower 3 on September
20, 2025, at the time of the elopement, had received the required training prior to the start of their shifts as
indicated in the facility's Immediate Jeopardy action plan dated September 19, 2025. Review of additional
facility documentation revealed that 29 residents on Tower 3 were assessed to have been at risk for
elopement on September 20, 2025. There was no documented evidence that the facility implemented or
evaluated the psychology consultant's recommendation for 1:1 supervision until September 17, 2025. There
was no documented evidence that the door codes where changed on September 17, 2025, after the
resident was found with the codes, or on September 20, 2025, when the resident used the code to exit the
facility. In an interview on September 23, 2025, at 11:30 a.m., the Risk Management Nurse confirmed that
the door codes were not changed until September 22, 2025. On September 23, 2025, at 11:43 a.m., the
Administrator was notified that the failure to provide adequate interventions and supervision to prevent
elopement constituted an Immediate Jeopardy situation at F689-K, and the Immediate Jeopardy template
was provided. The facility was informed that a corrective action plan was required. The facility implemented
the following corrective action plan: 1. Resident 2's room was changed to a secure unit.2. The facility
changed all the door and elevator codes on September 22, 2025.3. The facility updated the 1:1 policy to
include that staff is never to walk away from the assigned resident until another staff member takes their
place.4. The facility educated all staff regarding the new 1:1 policy and not sharing door codes beginning on
September 21, 2025. The remainder of staff will be educated by September 24, 2025.5. The facility
educated staff that a search should occur immediately if a door alarm is sounding beginning on September
21, 2025. The remainder of staff will be educated by September 24, 2025.6. The facility instructed staff not
to utilize fire alarm doors for everyday use to decrease alarm fatigue.7. The facility will continue to assess
residents' risk of elopement upon admission, quarterly, and with events. 8. The Nursing Home Administrator
will update the pre-admission review of elopement risk by September 24, 2025, to ensure the facility can
safely manage a resident at risk of elopement. 9. Monthly department head meetings will be held for the
leadership team to discuss elopement events beginning September 25, 2025.10. Staff members observed
to be giving out door and elevator codes to visitors or residents will receive disciplinary action. The survey
team validated that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on September 23, 2025, at 4:05 p.m., through
review of the facility training, and review of facility procedures following the facility's implementation of the
corrective action plan for removal of the Immediate Jeopardy. 483.25(d) Accidents.Previously cited 9/19/25
28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management.28 Pa. Code
211.10(d) Resident care policies.28 Pa. Code 212.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
395476
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
395476
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Northampton County-Gracedale
Gracedale Avenue
Nazareth, PA 18064
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0725
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in
charge on each shift.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
clinical record review and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to
provide sufficient and competent staff needed to implement a resident's care plan interventions. (Resident
2)Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],
and had diagnoses that included dementia, insomnia, wandering, restlessness, and agitation. According to
the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], the resident had memory impairment and could walk
without assistance. Review of Resident 2's care plan revealed that he was at risk for elopement with
interventions for one to one (1:1) observation. On September 17, 2025, the physician ordered for staff to
provide 1:1 supervision due to the resident being an elopement risk. Review of facility documentation dated
September 21, 2025, revealed that the staff member assigned to provide 1:1 supervision for Resident 2 left
the assignment at 8:00 p.m. on September 20, 2025, and was not replaced by another staff member.
Resident 2 was then left without 1:1 supervision which resulted in him eloping from the facility on
September 20, 2025, at 11:21 p.m.Review of the facility staffing documentation for Saturday, September 20,
2025, revealed that the facility failed to meet the state required Nurse Aide ratios and minimum direct care
hours per resident.28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management.28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(4)(5) Nursing services.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
395476
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
395476
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/23/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Northampton County-Gracedale
Gracedale Avenue
Nazareth, PA 18064
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on review of facility job descriptions, clinical record review, and review of facility documentation, it
was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) did not
effectively manage the facility to ensure that adequate interventions and supervision were provided to
prevent the elopement of two of 10 sampled residents. (Residents 1 and 2) In addition, the NHA and DON
failed to ensure staff education was completed as indicated in their Immediate Jeopardy Action Plan on
nursing unit Tower 3, affecting 29 residents at risk for elopement. Findings include:Review of the NHA's job
description revealed that the Administrator was responsible to plan, direct, and control the organization and
management of administrative, patient care, ancillary, and service functions, and was to ensure the facility's
compliance with State, Federal, and other regulations governing facility licensing. Review of the DON's job
description revealed that the Director of Nursing was responsible for the planning, coordination, and control
of all services provided through the Nursing department. Work included the development and
implementation of nursing services, standards, staffing, and provision of overall administrative management
functions.Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 eloped from the facility on September 17, 2025,
after self-removing his roam alert bracelet (an electronic device that prevents doors from opening and/or
sounds an alarm). This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy Situation. The facility's action plan, dated
September 19, 2025, indicated that each nurse would receive education related to elopement prevention
prior to the start of their next scheduled work shift and that all staff would receive the education by
September 22, 2025.Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had a physician's order for staff to
provide one to one supervision due to exit seeking behavior . Further review of the clinical record revealed
that the resident had eloped from the facility on September 20, 2025, after being left unsupervised by the
staff assigned to provide 1:1 supervision. This resulted in a second Immediate Jeopardy situation. There
was no documented evidence that the nurse aide (NA 1) assigned to provide the 1:1 supervision had
received elopement training before September 22, 2025, and that the nurse (LPN 1) assigned to oversee
the nurse aide and the resident on September 20, 2025, at the time of the elopement, had received the
required training prior to the start of the shift as indicated in the facility's Immediate Jeopardy action plan
dated September 19, 2025. Review of additional facility documentation revealed that 29 residents on Tower
3 were assessed to have been at risk for elopement on September 20, 2025.The NHA and DON failed to
fulfill essential duties and responsibilities of their position to ensure that the Federal and State guidelines
and Regulations were followed, contributing to the two Immediate Jeopardy situations.28 Pa. Code
201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management.28 Pa. Code
211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services.
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
395476
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 5