Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY-GRACEDALECMS #3954761 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency, 1 of them serious (actual harm or immediate jeopardy). The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

395476 10/17/2025 Northampton County-Gracedale Gracedale Avenue Nazareth, PA 18064
F 0600 Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody. Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse for two of ten sampled residents (Residents 2 and 4), resulting in physical harm for one resident. (Resident 2)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Prevention, last reviewed March 24, 2025, revealed that residents had the right to be free from abuse. Review of the facility policy entitled, Resident to Resident Altercations, last reviewed March 24, 2025, revealed that facility staff would monitor residents for aggressive behavior towards other residents or staff. The events would be reviewed for possible measures to prevent additional incidents and necessary changes to the care plan would be made. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included mood affective disorder (condition that affects a person's emotional state), anxiety, non-compliance with medical treatment, alcohol-induced dementia, psychosis (difficulty telling the difference between what is real and what is not), and alcohol induced psychotic disorder. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident had a behavior problem and was verbally and physically aggressive towards staff and peers and refused medication, assistance, and care. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated August 19, 2025, revealed that his cognitive status was a 99 meaning the interview was not successful and the assessment could not be completed. On August 12, 2025, nursing staff noted that Resident 1 was upset with his admission to the facility, was verbally abusive with staff, and refused care. The nurse practitioner was made aware of the behaviors. On August 13, 2025, a nurse practitioner noted that the resident had a history of uncooperative, non-compliant, and verbally and physically abusive behaviors and hospitalizations for psychiatric services. The nurse practitioner noted that prior to admission to the facility, the resident continued to be anxious, hallucinated, and responded to internal stimuli. It was noted that upon admission, he was verbally abusive to staff and attempted to swing at them. Review of the clinical record revealed that throughout the resident's admission to the facility, nursing, social services, and therapy staff documented that he continued to display behavioral disturbances and verbal aggression towards staff. Redirection was often unsuccessful, and he would not permit staff to enter his room. Resident 1 raised a fist at staff when obtaining his meal tray and yelled at staff to get out of his room. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, dementia, and insomnia. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident had a language barrier, was an elopement risk due to disorientation, and exhibited behaviors such as wandering and rummaging. Interventions included that staff distract the resident from wandering by offering diversions, structured activities, food conversation, television, or a book. A care plan note dated September 30, 2025, revealed that the resident spent the majority of his time ambulating on the unit and wandering in and out of rooms. Page 1 of 2 395476 395476 10/17/2025 Northampton County-Gracedale Gracedale Avenue Nazareth, PA 18064
F 0600 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few Review of facility documentation dated October 6, 2025, revealed that Resident 2 was observed in Resident 1's room and was noted to be naked with skin tears to the top of his head, right side of the forehead, and left elbow, and ecchymosis (bruising) to the left eye. There was also blood noted coming from his right elbow and top of his buttocks. Resident 1 was observed with blood on the front of his shirt and bruising to the knuckles of his left hand. No injuries to cause bleeding were observed on Resident 1. There was also blood observed on the bed sheets, floor, and wall of Resident 1's room. When questioned about the incident by law enforcement, Resident 1 stated that someone was in his room. Resident 2 was transferred to the hospital with injuries that required treatment. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was assessed due to being the victim of an assault with head injury and required wound care for soft tissue injuries. Clinical record review revealed that on October 14, 2025, Resident 2 was observed with altered mental status, increased confusion, was unable to feed himself, and was stumbling during ambulation. The resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation and found to have a hematoma (collection of blood outside of the blood vessels) to the left gluteal (buttocks) region and an acute fracture of the coccyx (bone of the pelvis). Review of facility documentation dated October 15, 2025, confirmed that the resident sustained a fracture of the coccyx, which was documented as believed to be from the assault from Resident 1 on October 6, 2025. There was a lack of evidence to support that the facility provided adequate interventions for Resident 1, who had known and continuing aggressive behaviors, and did not wish for others to enter his room, resulting in physical abuse with actual harm to a cognitively impaired resident (Resident 2) who wandered into Resident 1's room. In an interview on October 17, 2025, at 1:33 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 1 confirmed that there was no evidence that interventions were in place to prevent other residents from entering Resident 1's room. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included mood disorder, dementia, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder (brain disorder that mainly affects the frontal and temporal regions of the brain), and hallucinations. On August 15, 2025, nursing staff documented that Resident 3 was wandering around the unit and following staff. On August 16, 2025, nursing staff documented that the resident was confused, wandered into the nurse's station, was touching everything, and was difficult to redirect. On the same date, nursing staff documented that the resident continued to wander the nursing unit, entered another resident's room, and was rummaging through the closet. On August 16, 2025, the physician documented that the resident had a history of shadowing caregivers and occasional inappropriate behavior. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnoses that included anxiety and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated August 2, 2025, revealed that the resident did not have cognitive impairment. Review of facility documentation dated August 16, 2025, revealed that Resident 4 reported to staff that Resident 3 entered his bathroom, touched his penis, and only left the room when he repeatedly told her to get out. On August 16, 2025, at 11:35 p.m., nursing staff documented that the resident was agitated and anxious from the incident with Resident 3 and requested an anti-anxiety medication (Ativan). There was no evidence that the facility implemented interventions for increased monitoring for Resident 3, a resident with wandering behaviors, to protect other residents on the nursing unit from abuse, resulting in sexual abuse to Resident 4. Based on the findings, the facility failed to ensure that Residents 2 and 4 were free from physical and sexual abuse, which resulted in actual harm to Resident 2. CFR 483.12 (a)(1) Freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation Previously cited 6/25/2025. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services 395476 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0600SeriousS&S Gactual harm

    F600 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 17, 2025 survey of NORTHAMPTON COUNTY-GRACEDALE?

This was a inspection survey of NORTHAMPTON COUNTY-GRACEDALE on October 17, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at NORTHAMPTON COUNTY-GRACEDALE on October 17, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect b..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.