Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

LAURELDALE SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTCMS #3954773 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 3 deficiencies, 2 of them serious (actual harm or immediate jeopardy). The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

395477 08/16/2024 Laureldale Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent 2125 Elizabeth Avenue Laureldale, PA 19605
F 0580 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident. Based on clinical record review, facility documentation reivew, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the responsible party was notified of a change in condition and a fall for one of three sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included muscle wasting, hypertension, history of transient ischemic attacks, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and chronic respiratory failure. On August 6, 2024, at 3:15 p.m., a nurse noted that the resident fell after using the toilet. According to the facility investigation into the fall, the resident's responsible party was not notified of the fall until the following day at 3:30 p.m. In an interview on August 16, 2024, the Director of Nursing stated that staff was to notify the responsible immediately after a fall. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services. Page 1 of 3 395477 395477 08/16/2024 Laureldale Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent 2125 Elizabeth Avenue Laureldale, PA 19605
F 0600 Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody. Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to keep one of three sampled residents free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm of a head injury. (Resident 1) Findings include. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included muscle wasting, hypertension (high blood pressure), history of transient ischemic attacks (temporary interruptions of blood supply to the brain), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (a condition of increased plaque in the arteries of the heart, potentially causing heart attacks), and chronic respiratory failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a periodic evaluation of resident care needs) dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had a history of falls and required maximum assistance to use the toilet. The care plan identified that Resident 1 was at risk for falls and required assistance with activities of daily living (basic self-care tasks such as personal hygiene and using the toilet), and that staff was to use two people to assist the resident to walk and transfer from one surface to another. On [DATE], a nurse noted that the resident fell in the bathroom while a nurse aide was attempting to assist him onto the toilet. On [DATE], the resident was evaluated by a physical therapist. The therapist noted that the resident was having more difficulty with transferring from one surface to another (such as getting on and off the toilet) and that staff was to use two or more helpers. On [DATE], a nurse noted that the resident was having difficulty standing and needed additional help. On [DATE], a nurse noted that the resident fell at 10:28 a.m., while being assisted with toileting. According to the facility incident investigation, only one nurse aide was assisting the resident at the time. While transferring off the toilet, the resident's knees buckled and he fell, striking his head on the floor. The nurse practioner noted that the resident suffered a hematoma (a collection of blood under the skin) and bleeding on his head. At the time, the nurse practioner also noted that the resident was dazed and was having difficulty breathing. The resident was monitored by staff but refused to be transported to a hospital for further evaluation. At 11:30 a.m., the resident stopped breathing and staff was unable to revive him. According to the facility investigation into the fall, the nurse aide who provided the assistance was aware of the need for two staff members and assisted the resident off the toilet alone despite the need for two people. In an interview on [DATE], at 1:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing stated that at the time of the fall, two staff should have assisted the resident instead of one. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services. 395477 Page 2 of 3 395477 08/16/2024 Laureldale Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent 2125 Elizabeth Avenue Laureldale, PA 19605
F 0689 Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and interventions to prevent accidents related to falls for one of three sampled residents which resulted in actual harm of a head injury. (Resident 1) Findings include. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included muscle wasting, hypertension (high blood pressure), history of transient ischemic attacks (temporary interruptions of blood supply to the brain), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (a condition of increased plaque in the arteries of the heart, potentially causing heart attacks), and chronic respiratory failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a periodic evaluation of resident care needs) dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had a history of falls and required maximum assistance to use the toilet. The care plan identified that Resident 1 was at risk for falls and required assistance with activities of daily living (basic self-care tasks such as personal hygiene and using the toilet), and that staff was to use two people to assist the resident to walk and transfer from one surface to another. On [DATE], a nurse noted that the resident fell in the bathroom while a nurse aide was attempting to assist him onto the toilet. On [DATE], the resident was evaluated by a physical therapist. The therapist noted that the resident was having more difficulty with transferring from one surface to another (such as getting on and off the toilet) and that staff was to use two or more helpers. On [DATE], a nurse noted that the resident was having difficulty standing and needed additional help. On [DATE], a nurse noted that the resident fell at 10:28 a.m., while being assisted with toileting. According to the facility incident investigation, only one nurse aide was assisting the resident at the time. While transferring off the toilet, the resident's knees buckled and he fell, striking his head on the floor. The nurse practioner noted that the resident suffered a hematoma (a collection of blood under the skin) and bleeding on his head. At the time, the nurse practioner also noted that the resident was dazed and was having difficulty breathing. The resident was monitored by staff but refused to be transported to a hospital for further evaluation. At 11:30 a.m., the resident stopped breathing and staff was unable to revive him. In an interview on [DATE], at 1:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing stated that at the time of the fall, two staff should have assisted the resident instead of one. CFR: 483.25(d) Accidents Previously cited [DATE] 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services. 395477 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

3 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0580GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F580 - Notification of Changes

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • 0600SeriousS&S Gactual harm

    F600 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • 0689SeriousS&S Gactual harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 16, 2024 survey of LAURELDALE SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENT?

This was a inspection survey of LAURELDALE SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENT on August 16, 2024. The surveyor cited 3 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at LAURELDALE SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENT on August 16, 2024?

Yes, 3 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) tha..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.