Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

PENNSBURG MANORCMS #3955553 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 3 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

395555 05/06/2025 Pennsburg Manor 530 MacOby Street Pennsburg, PA 18073
F 0550 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner respectful of each resident's dignity to promote the quality of life for one of 26 sampled residents. (Resident 257) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Patient Security Bracelet, last reviewed July 1, 2024, revealed that residents were evaluated for the need of a wandering security bracelet to serve as a safety measure to prevent elopement (unauthorized departure from the facility) and wandering in unsafe areas of the center. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 257 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pyogenic arthritis of the right knee joint (inflammation in one or more of the joints caused by an infection) and spinal stenosis (narrowing of the space in the spine). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was not cognitively impaired, required supervision with ambulation and transfers, and did not exhibit wandering behavior. Review of Resident 257's Elopement Evaluation dated April 20, 2025, revealed that the resident was not ask risk for elopement. Further review revealed another Elopement Evaluation dated April 30, 2025, stating that the resident had expressed a desire to go home and that the resident wandered. However, there was no evidence in the clinical record to support that Resident 257 had wandered or attempted to elope from the facility. Observation on May 4, 2025, at 12:19 p.m., revealed Resident 257 sitting up in bed with a wandering security bracelet on the left ankle. In an interview at that time, Resident 257 stated, This band is an insult to my intelligence; where am I going to go? I am here for antibiotics and physical therapy. I just want to go outside when it's nice and they won't allow it. There was no evidence in the clinical record to support that the wandering security bracelet was discussed with the resident or that the resident was agreeable to its use. In an interview on May 6, 2025, at 9:35 a.m., the Administrator stated that the resident should not have had the wandering security bracelet. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services. Page 1 of 3 395555 395555 05/06/2025 Pennsburg Manor 530 MacOby Street Pennsburg, PA 18073
F 0690 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess bladder incontinence and provide treatment and services to restore bladder function as much as possible for one of four sampled residents with urinary incontinence. (Resident 97) Findings include: Review of the policy entitled, Continence Management, last reviewed January 2025, revealed that residents were to be assessed for the need for a continence management program as part of the nursing assessment process. A urinary incontinence assessment was to be completed upon admission. The purpose was to provide appropriate treatment and services for residents with urinary incontinence to minimize urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible. The facility was to develop individualized interventions and a plan of care based on information from assessments and voiding records/documentation. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 97 was admitted [DATE], and had diagnoses of encephalopathy, disturbance of the brain, and weakness. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was only slightly cognitively impaired, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was not on a toileting program. The assessment also indicated that the problem of urinary incontinence was to be addressed in the care plan. On March 6, 2025, a nurse documented that the resident was incontinent of urine and used adult briefs. There was no documented evidence that a urinary incontinence assessment was completed upon admission in order to assess and provide treatment and services to the resident for urinary incontinence in order to restore bladder continence to the extent possible. In addition, there was no care plan developed with specific interventions to address/restore urinary incontinence. In an interview on May 6, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., the Administrator stated that the staff had not completed a urinary incontinence assessment nor developed and implemented specific care planned interventions to address and attempt to restore bladder function as per facility policy. 28 Pa.Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services. 395555 Page 2 of 3 395555 05/06/2025 Pennsburg Manor 530 MacOby Street Pennsburg, PA 18073
F 0812 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards. Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the dietary department. Residents Affected - Many Findings include: An environmental tour of the food service department on May 4, 2025, at 9:06 a.m., revealed the following: There were five stained ceiling tiles above a table that contained a large coffee maker. There were areas on the back splash of the stove and around the burners that were stained with a blackish/brown substance. The bottom of the convection oven was dirty with burnt crumbs. The doors on the inside of the convection oven were covered with grease and burnt substances. 28 Pa.Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management. 395555 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

3 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0690GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F690 - Incontinence

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

  • 0812GeneralS&S Fpotential for harm

    F812 - Food safety requirements

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • 0550GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F550 - Resident Rights

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 6, 2025 survey of PENNSBURG MANOR?

This was a inspection survey of PENNSBURG MANOR on May 6, 2025. The surveyor cited 3 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at PENNSBURG MANOR on May 6, 2025?

Yes, 3 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, an..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.