F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
Based on review of facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide
adequate supervision to ensure a safe environment with unrestricted access to the outdoor courtyard area
for thirteen of one 168 residents.Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights dated 7/7/25,
indicated this includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical
layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. During an
observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/7/25 at approximately 9:20 a.m. the facility [NAME]
Garden exit door was propped open. This door is located down a corridor next to the family room, out of the
view of the nursing units. A resident was observed in the courtyard unattended, an additional resident was
attempting to egress out to the courtyard, and visitors processed out the during this observation period. The
door has two signs one reads Keep Door Closed the second reads Not an Exit . The DON confirmed the
door should not be propped open at the time of the observation. During an interview on 10/7/25, at
approximately 2:30 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), DON, and Assistant Director of Nursing
(ADON) they confirmed the courtyard is the new smoking location as of 10/6/25, the door is not part of the
wander guard or alarm system, any mobile resident could egress through this location with the door
propped open as the door locks when properly closed. During an observation on 10/8/25, at approximately
9:30 a.m. The exit door to the courtyard was observed as closed. During an interview on 10/8/25, at
approximately 10:00 a.m. the NHA and the DON confirmed that the facility failed to provide adequate
supervision to ensure a safe environment with unrestricted access to the outdoor courtyard area for mobile
residents, by propping open a secure door. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code
201.18(b)(e)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c)(d) Resident care policies.28 Pa Code
211.12(d)(1)(2)(5) Nursing services.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
395596
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
395596
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/03/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care Center
3590 Washington Pike
Bridgeville, PA 15017
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to
make certain that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of eighteen residents (Resident
R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Errors dated 7/7/25, indicated Significant
Medication Error means one which causes the patient discomfort or jeopardizes their health and safety. To
prevent medication errors and ensure safe medication administration, nurses should very the following
information: Right medication, dose, route, and time of administration; Right patient and right
documentation. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE].Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/2/25,
included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), end stage renal disease (kidney failure
requiring dialysis), and high blood pressure. Review of the physician orders September 2025, indicated to
give Resident R1 insulin Lantus (glargine - long-acting insulin) 4 units inject subcutaneously two times a
day, timed at 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m .Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for
September 2025 indicated Resident R1 was given Lantus insulin as per provider order. Review of the
physician orders September 2025, indicated to give Resident R1 insulin Lispro (fast-acting insulin) 4 units
inject subcutaneously every four hours daily, timed at 7:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m., 4:30 p.m. and 9:30 p.m. and
additional units, according to a blood glucose reading following the sliding scale:200-299 =1 unit300-399 =2
units400-499 =3 units400-499 = 4 units500-599 = 5 unitsCall provider if blood sugar is greater than 500.
Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2025 indicated Resident R1 was
given Lispro insulin as per provider order. During a phone interview with LPN Employee E1 on 10/7/25 at
approximately 2:20 p.m., Employee E1 stated on she was preparing insulin for the insulin for Resident R2,
30 units of NovoLog and prior to administration was interrupted by a resident. Employee E1 returned to the
room and confirmed that she inadvertently administered Resident R2 insulin to Resident R1. Review of the
approximate event timeline of 9/22/25 reveals:5:50 p.m., the incorrect resident was administered insulin.
5:52 p.m., the supervisor was notified. 6:00 p.m., the resident notified her family.6:15 p.m., the provider
notified, and orders received to monitor blood sugars. Blood sugar was 354.6:30 p.m., the supervisor
notified residents family. 7:45 p.m., the family requested resident be sent to the emergency department.
8:10 p.m., the resident was transported to the emergency department where she received D10w (an
intravenous solution) at 250cc/hr. Resident R1 returned from the emergency department 9/23/25
approximately 10:00 a.m. During an interview on 10/8/25, at approximately 10:30 a.m., the Director of
Nursing confirmed the facility failed to make certain that residents are free of significant medication errors
for one of eighteen residents.28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility.28 Pa. Code: 211.10(c)(d)
Resident care policies.28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
395596
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2