Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ROLLING HILLS HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTERCMS #3956142 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0583 Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident privacy for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 3 revealed a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], that assessed Resident 3 as having a memory problem and that he had severe cognitive impairment (never or rarely made decisions). Review of an incident investigation dated September 5, 2025, revealed that Employee 3 (nurse aide) reported to the Director of Nursing that Employee 5 (nurse aide) sent an electronic private message with a picture attachment of Resident 3. Resident 3's face was obscured by a filtering program; however, Employee 3 was able to identify that it was a facility resident. Statements obtained by the facility during the investigation determined that Employee 5 sent the same photo to Employee 4 (nurse aide). The facility substantiated that Employee 5 took and disseminated a photo of Resident 3 who was incapable of giving consent to be photographed. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on September 16, 2025, at 3:15 PM confirmed the above findings. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(2)(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights Residents Affected - Few Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 395614 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 395614 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 09/16/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Rolling Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 17350 Old Turnpike Road Millmont, PA 17845 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections. Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services for an indwelling urinary catheter as ordered by the physician for one of one resident reviewed for urinary catheter concerns (Resident 1).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed physician orders to maintain a coude foley catheter (flexible tubing inserted into the bladder to drain urine; a coude catheter is equipped with a bent tip to allow passage beyond obstructions such as the prostate gland) for obstructive uropathy (blockage in the urinary system that hinders urine flow; commonly an enlarged prostate) as follows: 24 French (scale where one French unit corresponds to approximately 0.33 millimeters in diameter) coude foley with 10 cc (cubic centimeters, one cc equals one milliliter) balloon changed monthly every 30 days and as needed for blockage or obstruction. This may only be changed by the registered nurse (dated May 31, 2025, to August 29, 2025). 24 French coude foley with 30 cc balloon changed monthly every 30 days and as needed for blockage or obstruction. This may only be changed by the registered nurse (dated August 29, 2025). Review of Resident 1's treatment administration record dated July 2025 revealed that Employee 1 (licensed practical nurse) documented that he changed Resident 1's coude catheter on July 30, 2025 (although Resident 1's physician order stipulated that the registered nurse complete the treatment). Review of Resident 1's treatment administration record dated August 2025 revealed that Employee 6 (registered nurse) changed Resident 1's coude catheter on August 8, 2025. Nursing documentation by Employee 6 dated August 8, 2025, at 10:02 PM indicated that changing Resident 1's coude catheter was effective for blockage/obstruction. Nursing documentation dated August 29, 2025, at 9:59 AM revealed that the Director of Nursing changed Resident 1's catheter for monthly change. Resident 1's clinical record did not contain evidence of a complication (e.g., blockage or obstruction) that warranted changing the indwelling catheter sooner than 30 days from the previous change (that occurred on August 8, 2025). Nursing documentation by Employee 2 (licensed practical nurse) dated April 30, 2025, at 2:03 PM reiterated that a registered nurse changed Resident 1's coude catheter on August 29, 2025. The facility failed to ensure that Resident 1's physician ordered treatment for his indwelling urinary catheter was completed by the appropriate licensed staff at the appropriate schedule. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on September 16, 2025, at 3:15 PM confirmed the above findings. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services Event ID: Facility ID: 395614 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0583GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F583 - Privacy and Confidentiality

    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

  • 0690GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F690 - Incontinence

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 16, 2025 survey of ROLLING HILLS HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of ROLLING HILLS HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER on September 16, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ROLLING HILLS HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER on September 16, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.