Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ROSE MEADOWS HEALTH & REHAB CENTERCMS #3957452 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0557 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility records, resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to respect resident rights in the handling and protection of personal property an packages being delivered upon receipt and unopened for one of three residents reviewed Resident R1. Findings include: Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has a readmission date of 10/31/18, Resident R1 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of14 which indicated he is alert and oriented. Resident R1 has a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as fuel) , COPD ( a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty/discomfort breathing), and spinal stenosis (space in the spine narrow and create pressure on the spinal cord and nerve roots). Which remain current as of the MDS (minimum data set - a brief periodic review of resident needs), dated 11/13/23. Review of facility documentation concern form, dated 12/11/23, indicated Missing package delivered by FedEx on 11/21, for all personal items ordered through his insurance. The actions section of the form indicated items in UM (Unit Manager) of. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 9:50 a.m. Resident R1 indicated that they had ordered a package online and received a text telling him his package was delivered by mail carrier to the facility. Resident R1 indicated that the package was not delivered to him for several days after receipt of the text. Resident R1 also indicated that when he got the package it was open with no explanation as to why it had been opened. During a review of Resident R1 clinical record there was no mention of the missing package. Review of the concern form failed to indicate why Resident R1 did not receive the package timely and why it was opened. During an interview on 12/12/23, at 3:50 p.m. Registered Nurse Unit Manager Employee E3 confirmed that the package was opened prior to Resident R12 receiving it, and that it sat in the office (unit managers) for days prior to Resident R1 receiving the package. During an interview on 12/12/23, at 3:55 p.m. Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 4 Event ID: 395745 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 395745 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/13/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Rose Meadows Health & Rehab Center 1717 Skyline Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15227 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0557 further documentation about the package and why there was a delay in the resident receiving the package. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm During an interview on 12/12/23, at 3:56 p.m. DON confirmed that the facility failed to respect resident rights in the handling and protection of personal property for Resident R1 package being deliver opened and not upon receipt in the facility. Residents Affected - Few 28 Pa. Code 201.18 Euro(1)(h)Management. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a)c(i)(k)Resident rights. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 395745 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 4 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 395745 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/13/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Rose Meadows Health & Rehab Center 1717 Skyline Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15227 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0677 Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy, facility submitted reports, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that assistance for activities of daily living were consistently provided for 16 of 93 residents (R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16 and R17). Residents Affected - Some Review of the facility policy Routine Resident Care, last reviewed 8/21/23, indicated that routine care by a nursing assistant includes assisting or providing for personal care including timely incontinence care. Review of three facility provided documents indicated Residents R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15 and R16 had not been provided assistance with incontinence care timely and Resident R17 had been left on a bedpan but had refused care when staff attempted to provide care. All residents had complete assessments completed with no identified skin issues. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia and agitation. An MDS (Minimum Data Set- a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 12/7/23, indicated the diagnoses remained current and that Resident R2 requires assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living). Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. An MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R3 required assistance with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of dementia. An MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R4 required assistance with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of dementia. A MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R5 required assistance with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. A MDS dated [DATE] indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R6 required assistance with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. A MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R7 required assistance with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. A MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and the Resident R8 required assistance with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. A MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R9 required assistance with ADL's. (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 395745 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 4 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 395745 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/13/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Rose Meadows Health & Rehab Center 1717 Skyline Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15227 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0677 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of dementia. A MDS dated [DATE]. indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R10 required assistnace with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. A MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R11 required assistance with ADLs. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. A MDS dated [DATE], inidcated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R12 required assistance with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. A MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R13 required assistance with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of a fracture thoracic spine. A MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R14 required assistance with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of pneumonia and lung disease. A MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R15 required assistance with ADL's. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of a fracture left leg. A MDS dated [DATE], indicated that the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R16 required assistance with ADL's. Resident R16 has been discharged . Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and inability to use both lower extremities. A MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis remained current and that Resident R17 required assistance with ADL's. During an interview on 12/12/23, at 2:50 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the reports indicated staff had not provided timely assistance with ADL's and that the staff had been removed from care and/or terminated due to the lack of providing timely care to the residents identified. 28 Pa. Code: 211.10(a)(c)(d) Resident care policies. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing services. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 395745 If continuation sheet Page 4 of 4

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0677GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F677 - A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • 0557GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F557 - Respect and Dignity

    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 13, 2023 survey of ROSE MEADOWS HEALTH & REHAB CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of ROSE MEADOWS HEALTH & REHAB CENTER on December 13, 2023. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ROSE MEADOWS HEALTH & REHAB CENTER on December 13, 2023?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.