F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
review of facility policy, clinical record review, incident reports, facility documents, employee statements,
and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate
supervision who was an elopement risk which resulted in an elopement for one of seven residents
(Resident R1). This was identified for past non-compliance for Resident R1. Findings include: Review of
facility policy Elopement indicated: It is the policy of this facility to protect residents from wandering away
from the facility and to begin an immediate search if a resident is found missing. Review of Resident R1's
admission record indicated they were admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment
(MDS - Minimum Data Set - a periodic review of resident needs) dated 5/27/25, indicated diagnosis of
unspecified dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) and mood
disturbance (disconnect between actual life circumstances and the persons' state of mind or feeling).
Review of Resident R1 clinical record BIMS (brief interview for mental status) dated 5/27/25, revealed the
resident had a BIMS of 9, meaning moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident R1 elopement
assessment, indicated Resident R1 total score was a 9 which indicates resident is a wander risk. Review of
facility submitted documentation indicated the following: At 10:47PM, Resident R1, BIMS 9, exited the
center, without notification, while wearing their wander alarm, via the Grand Heritage doorway (delivery
door - equipped with magnetic locks and alarm) to the lower parking lot. Resident was last assessed for
elopement risk on 05/22/2025, with wander alarm was indicated, ordered and placed same day. The
resident was gone from the facility 14 minutes which included the time that an employee brought back to
the center. The resident was appropriately dressed for the weather, fully clothed, to include footwear and
the temperature was 76 degrees and the climate was clear and dry. Resident R1 assessed for injury and/or
emotional trauma without noted concern. Upon return to the center the resident was reassessed for
elopement and transferred to the secure unit. Physician and family notified. Emotional support provided to
resident. A full investigation into the matter was launched. Review of facility documentation witness
statements indicated the following: LPN Employee E2 stated they were leaving the facility and saw
Resident R1 walking across the street, LPN Employee E2 got in her car and escorted Resident R1 back to
the facility . LPN Employee E3 after they received a call from the person who dropped them off indicating
that they thought a resident was across the street from the facility describing a person wearing pink pants
and a yellow shirt walking back and forth. They identified the person as Resident R1 - went to get the
resident from across the street and as they were in the parking lot they saw an LPN Employee E2 bringing
them back. Maintenance Assistant Employee E4 indicated that on 7/3/25, they exited out of the building
through the delivery door (door which was identified that Resident R1 eloped from). During an interview on
7/16/25, at 9:30 a.m. NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) confirmed that the facility failed to ensure that a
resident received adequate supervision who was an elopement risk which
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
395826
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
395826
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/16/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Highland Hills Post Acute
1105 Perry Highway
Pittsburgh, PA 15237
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
resulted in an elopement for one of seven residents (Resident R1). This was identified for past
non-compliance for Resident R1. The facility implemented a plan of correction that included the following:
Resident R1 was assessed and no injury was identified. Resident R1 was appropriately dressed and did
not appear to suffer any emotional trauma after incident. Resident R1 was transferred to facility secure unit
with family approval. At the time of the event the delivery door was determined to be open and the system
was re-engaged.A whole house audit was completed. All residents accounted for. All doors were checked to
ensure they were secure. Facility had in place a system checking all door locks to make sure they were
properly functioning During a review of facility documentation of Door Mag Lock check list, indicated that
the door locks were function appropriately on the following
days:5/23/255/29/256/04/256/13/256/20/256/24/257/03/25 Facility elopement plan was updated to include
use of designated exit doors only by employees and placement of transponders on residents identified at
risk for elopement. To prevent a risk of recurrence of elopement plan will be updated to include transponder
placement on residents at risk for elopement and designated employee entrances. A sign will be placed on
the delivery door that it is only for deliveries and emergency use. All employees will receive education and
return competency on safety and elopement risk reduction strategies, and all new hires will receive the
same education/competency moving forward. The center will have all the doors checked by the alarm
company. Maintenance Director will increase door transmitter frequency to 4ft distance. Maintenance
Director/designee will complete door checks daily for 1 week, weekly for 3 weeks and monthly thereafter for
operation of door monitors and patient wandering system, monitored by the Administrator/designee and
reported to QAPI for review and or recommendation. Review of facility documentation included the
following:Education for all employees on safety and elopement risk reduction strategies.Alarm company
check of overall patient wandering system.Daily door checks by maintenance director/designee.Ad-hoc
meeting of QAPI.Observation of sign on delivery door only to use for deliveries and emergency use. During
interviews 12 staff to include nurses, nurse aides, maintenance, receptionist, and RNAC's were trained on
safety and elopement risk reduction strategies. During an interview on 7/16/25, Nursing Home
Administrator confirmed that Resident R1 exited the building through the delivery door, which was not
alarmed, the last employee through the door was identified (Maintenance Assistant Employee E4) and
there at the time of the incident only three staff with the two codes for the door - one code allows for a
bypass of the system. Facility has determined that the bypass code was entered accidently by the
employee upon exit from the building which was why the alarm did not trigger when Resident R1 exited.
The facility has demonstrated compliance with the above since 7/16/25. Information was reviewed via Plan
of Correction documentation. Durin an interview on 7/16/25, at 3:15 p.m. NHA and DON and review of the
facility's immediate actions, education and review of the QAPI monitoring process, it was verified that the
facility had implemented a plan of correction and achieved compliance ensuring residents are provided
adequate safety interventions during transfers. 28 Pa. Code: 201.20 (a)(1) Staff development28 Pa. Code:
211.10 (d) Resident care policies28 Pa. Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee
Event ID:
Facility ID:
395826
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2