Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

SCHUYLKILL CENTERCMS #3958312 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0550 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights. Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a reasonable accommodation of needs for one of seven sampled residents. (Resident 3)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included hemiparesis and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident required assistance from two staff and a mechanical lift for transfers, assistance from two staff for toileting (staff were to provide assistance with toileting as needed), and that the resident had been educated to call staff for assistance. On August 5, 2025, at 11:09 a.m., the resident's call bell was observed to be lit outside the room. At 11:15 a.m., the call bell remained activated. At that time, Resident 3 stated that she rang the call bell to notify staff that she required assistance to the bathroom; a staff member told her they would return with another staff member to provide assistance, but no one had returned. The resident's call bell continued to remain lit at 11:40 a.m., and at that time, Resident 3 stated that no staff member had returned to offer assistance. Staff did not return to Resident 3's room to provide assistance until 11:48 a.m., 39 minutes after the resident's call bell was initially observed to have been activated. In an interview on August 5, 2025, at 1:52 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that staff were to provide a timelier response to the call bell. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services. Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 395831 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 395831 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/05/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Schuylkill Center 1000 Schuylkill Manor Rd Pottsville, PA 17901 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician's orders for two of seven sampled residents. (Residents 1 and 2) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus. Review of the care plan revealed that staff were to obtain glucometer (device used to measure blood glucose levels) readings and report abnormalities as ordered. A physician's order dated July 11, 2025, directed staff to inject insulin lispro per sliding scale orders and notify the physician for a blood glucose reading of 400 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) or higher. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed that on July 11, 2025, staff noted a blood glucose level of 438 mg/dL at 5:01 p.m. There was no evidence that the resident's physician was notified of the blood glucose reading that was above 400 mg/dL, per the physician's order. In an interview on August 5, 2025, at 3:10 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no evidence that staff notified the resident's physician of the blood glucose level of 438 mg/dL, per the physician's order. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure). Physician's orders dated April 6, 2025, and May 1, 2025, directed staff to check the resident's blood pressure twice per day and administer clonidine (a medication to treat high blood pressure) as needed, every eight hours if Resident 2's systolic blood pressure was greater than 160 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg), or diastolic blood pressure was greater than 100 mm Hg. Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed that on July 10, 2025, at 6:14 p.m., staff noted the resident's blood pressure to have been 165/89 mm Hg. On July 26, 2025, at 8:04 a.m., staff noted the resident's blood pressure as 187/107 mm Hg. There was no evidence that staff administered the clonidine at those times on July 10 and 26, 2025, when the resident's systolic blood pressure was greater than 160 mm Hg, and diastolic blood pressure was greater than 100 mm Hg, per the physician's order. In interviews on August 5, 2025, at 3:28 p.m. and 3:38 p.m., the DON confirmed that there was no evidence that staff administered the medication when the resident's systolic blood pressure was greater than 160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure was greater than 100 mm Hg, per the physician's order.28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services. Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 395831 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0550GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F550 - Resident Rights

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 5, 2025 survey of SCHUYLKILL CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of SCHUYLKILL CENTER on August 5, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at SCHUYLKILL CENTER on August 5, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her right..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.