F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to
make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care by failing to have physician
orders, resident specific care plans, and correct complete assessments for wander guards (a bracelet that
alarms when close to an exit door) for four of four residents (Resident R4, R5, R6, and R7), and failed to
accurately transcribe a medication upon admission for one of three residents (Resident R8). Findings
include: Review of the facility Wandering and Elopements dated 6/1/25, indicated the facility will identify
residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least
restrictive environment for residents. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues,
the residents care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. Review of
the facility Reconciliation of Medications on Admission dated 6/1/25, indicated the purpose of this
procedure is to ensure medication safety by accurately accounting for the resident's medications, routes,
and dosages upon admission or readmission to the facility.Review of Resident R4's clinical record indicated
the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's
MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes, and dementia (a group of
symptoms that affect memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Resident R4's MDS assessment
section C0200 BIMS score was a 12 indicating Resident R4 was moderately impaired. Review of Resident
R4's Elopement Evaluation Form dated 3/4/25, 5/6/25, 6/25/25, and 8/10/25, indicated resident scored a 0,
indicating resident was not at risk for elopement. Review of Resident R4's physician orders on 9/24/25,
failed to list any wander guard orders. During an interview on 9/24/25, at 4:45 p.m. the Director of Nursing
confirmed that Resident R4's physician orders failed to include any wander guard orders and confirmed the
dates and scores of the Elopement Evaluations. Review of Resident R5's clinical record indicated the
resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R5's MDS dated [DATE], indicated
diagnoses of high blood pressure, cerebral infarction, and epilepsy (disorder of the brain characterized by
repeated seizures). Resident R5's MDS assessment section C0200 BIMS score was a 14 indicating
Resident R5 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident R5's Elopement Evaluation Form dated 2/15/25 and
5/7/25, indicated resident scored a 3, indicating resident was at risk for elopement. Review of Resident R5's
Elopement Evaluation Form dated 8/7/25, indicated resident scored a 0, indicating resident was not at risk
for elopement. Review of Resident R5's physician orders dated 1/7/25, indicated resident is ordered a
security guard. Check placement every shift. Resident R5 failed to have orders to check wander guard
battery weekly. Review of Resident R5's care plan dated 1/7/25, indicated Risk for wandering/elopement
identified. Interventions - failed to include check wander guard battery weekly. During an interview on
9/24/25, at 4:50 p.m. the DON confirmed that Resident R5's care plan failed to check wander guard battery
weekly, physician orders failed to include check wander guard
Residents Affected - Some
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 5
Event ID:
395845
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
395845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Cranberry Place
5 Saint Francis Way
Cranberry Township, PA 16066
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
battery weekly, and confirmed the dates and scores of the Elopement Evaluations. Review of Resident R6's
clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R6's MDS
dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of cerebral infarction, diabetes, and aphasia (language disorder that
affects communication). Resident R6's MDS assessment section C0100 BIMS indicated a 0, indicating
resident is rarely/never understood. Review of Resident R6's Elopement Evaluation Form dated 4/29/25,
indicated resident scored a 1, indicating resident was at risk for elopement. Review of Resident R6's
Elopement Evaluation Form dated 8/1/25, indicated resident scored a 0, indicating resident was not at risk
for elopement. Review of Resident R6's physician orders dated 12/18/24, indicated resident is ordered a
security bracelet. Check placement every shift. Check the function of security bracelet every night shift.
During an interview on 9/24/25, at 4:55 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the dates and scores of
Elopement Evaluations. Review of Resident R7's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the
facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R7's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure,
diabetes, and anxiety. Resident R7's MDS assessment section C0200 BIMS score was a 9 indicating
Resident R5 was moderately impaired. Review of Resident R7's Elopement Evaluation Form dated 6/4/25,
indicated resident scored a 0, indicating resident was not at risk for elopement. Review of Resident R7's
Elopement Evaluation Form dated 7/9/25, indicated resident scored a 4, indicating resident was at risk for
elopement. Review of Resident R7's Elopement Evaluation Form dated 8/26/25, indicated resident scored a
0, indicating resident was not at risk for elopement. Review of Resident R7's physician orders dated
7/10/25, indicated resident is ordered a security bracelet every shift. Resident R7 failed to have orders to
check wander guard battery weekly. Review of Resident R7's care plan dated 1/7/25, indicated Risk for
wandering/elopement identified. Interventions - failed to include check wander guard battery weekly. During
an interview on 9/24/25, at 5:00 p.m. the DON confirmed that Resident R7's care plan failed to check
wander guard battery weekly, physician orders failed to include check wander guard battery weekly, and
confirmed the dates and scores of the Elopement Evaluations. During an interview on 9/24/25, at 5:03 p.m.
the DON stated she wasn't sure why Resident R4, R5, R6, and R7's Elopement Evaluation for August were
scored a 0, and once a resident is an elopement risk, they will always be an elopement risk unless they are
discharged or bedbound. During an interview on 9/24/25, at 5:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator
confirmed that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and
care by failing to have physician orders, resident specific care plans, and correct complete assessments for
wander guards (a bracelet that alarms when close to an exit door) for four of four residents (Resident R4,
R5, R6, and R7). Review of Resident R8's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility
on [DATE]. Review of Resident R8's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive
heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), diabetes, and end stage renal disease
(ESRD, an inability of the kidneys to filter the blood). Review of Resident R8's physician orders dated
8/27/25, indicated resident was ordered Calcium Acetate (a medication used with people with kidney
disease) 667 mg (milligrams), one tablet by mouth with meals. Review of Resident R8's discharge
medications from acute care setting on 9/24/25, indicated resident was discharged and was to continue
taking Calcium Acetate 1334 mg, one tablet by mouth with meals. During an interview on 9/24/25, 4:30 p.m.
Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP) Employee E2 stated that if that's what he was ordered from
the acute care hospital, then that's what he should be getting at the facility. CRNP Employee E2 stated that
she reviewed medications upon admission, did not change the dose of the medication, and feels that it was
a transcription error. Resident R8 has been getting half of the dose since admission of Calcium Acetate.
CRNP Employee E2
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
395845
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
395845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Cranberry Place
5 Saint Francis Way
Cranberry Township, PA 16066
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
stated she would correct the dosage error. During an interview on 9/24/25, at 4:45 p.m. the Director of
Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to accurately transcribe a medication upon admission for one of
three residents (Resident R8). 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1) Management28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident
Rights28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c)(d) Resident Care policies28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(2)(3)(5) Nursing
services.
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
395845
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
395845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Cranberry Place
5 Saint Francis Way
Cranberry Township, PA 16066
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
review of facility policy, clinical record reviews, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to
provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings
include: Review of the facility Wandering and Elopements dated 6/1/25, indicated the facility will identify
residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least
restrictive environment for residents. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues,
the residents care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. During an
interview on 9/24/25, at 10:30 a.m. the Director of Nursing stated that residents should have orders for a
wander guard, check placement of wander guard every shift, and check wander guard battery weekly if
they are deemed at risk for elopement. Elopement assessments should be completed at least quarterly.
Review of Resident R1's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review
of Resident R1's MDS (minimum data set a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 8/31/25,
indicated diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart
muscles), diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of
time), and cerebral infarction (necrotic tissue in the brain resulting loss of blood and oxygen to the brain).
Resident R1's MDS assessment section C0200 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening test
that aids in detecting cognitive impairment). The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions:
13-15: cognitively intact, 8-12: moderately impaired, 0-7: severe impairment. Resident R1's BIMS score was
a 9 indicating Resident R1 was moderately impaired. Review of Resident R1's Elopement Evaluation Form
dated 8/30/25, indicated resident scored a 0, indicating resident was not at risk for elopement. During a
review of Resident R1's progress note dated 9/14/25, indicated the following: - Resident was outside in the
parking lot sitting under the roof by a bench per front desk. She was in her wheelchair with her bag packed.
The husband called the facility due to resident texting him. Resident came back in via wheelchair. Nurse
Assistant (NA) was present with resident upon returning to unit. During a phone interview on 9/24/25,
Receptionist Employee E1 stated that she received a phone call from Resident R1's husband stating she is
out front waiting for him to pick her up and resident stated she was too weak to get back into building. I
looked up and observed Resident R1 sitting out front with her bag packed and went out and brought her
back into the building and notified nursing staff. During a review of facility provided documentation dated
9/14/25, indicated resident was assessed upon returning to the nursing unit. A new elopement assessment
was completed. Resident R1 scored a 4, indicating resident was at risk for elopement. The physician was
notified and a new order for a wander guard (a bracelet worn by residents that will alarm close to an exit
door) was received. Wander guard placed on resident. Review of Resident R1's physician orders dated
9/15/25, indicated check wander guard placement every shift, and check wander guard battery weekly.
Review of Resident R1's care plan dated 9/14/25, indicated Risk for wandering/elopement identified. GoalThe resident will not leave the facility unattended. Interventions-Clearly identify residents' room and
bathroom, Engage in purposeful activity, and wander guard in place. During an interview on 9/24/25, at
4:30 p.m. the DON confirmed that Resident R1's care plan failed to have resident specific interventions to
decrease the risk of elopement, failed to have a check wander guard placement daily, and failed to check
wander guard battery weekly. During an interview on 9/24/25, at 4:35 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator
confirmed that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of five
residents (Resident R1). 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee28 Pa. Code
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
395845
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
395845
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Cranberry Place
5 Saint Francis Way
Cranberry Township, PA 16066
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
201.18 (b)(1) Management28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
395845
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 5