Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

AVENTURA AT CREEKSIDECMS #3959842 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

395984 05/15/2025 Aventura at Creekside 45 North Scott Street Carbondale, PA 18407
F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the discharge process honored the resident's preferences and goals and failed to demonstrate that the discharge was appropriate and necessary, for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include, Wernicke's Encephalopathy (an acute inflammatory hemorrhagic encephalopathy caused by thiamine deficiency, often associated with chronic alcoholism or malnutrition, characterized by loss of muscle coordination, visual disturbances such as diplopia, and confusion), alcohol-induced psychotic disorder, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver without ascites, and nicotine dependence. Documentation indicated the resident was cognitively intact. While it was noted that the resident had a legal guardian, the facility was unable to produce documentation confirming guardianship status during the survey. A review of a social services note dated May 6, 2025, at 5:49 P.M. revealed, I allowed time for Resident 1 to vent his feelings related to his admission. The resident voiced his desire to move to a different facility located in a neighboring city. The social worker documented that she would contact the guardian the following day to discuss the resident's wishes. A review of a social services note dated May 8, 2025, at 11:14 A.M. revealed, Social Services received a visit from Resident 1's Guardian today. This worker informed the Guardian that the resident would like to move to a facility in a local city. The guardian gave permission for the resident's records to be sent to two local skilled nursing facilities. However, a social services note dated May 15, 2025, at 8:14 A.M., indicated the resident was being transferred to a facility located several hours away from the current facility, contradicting the resident's stated desire to remain in a local setting. A nurses note dated May 15, 2025, at 9:39 A.M. revealed the resident was discharged from the facility to facility identified as located several hours distance away. During an interview conducted on May 15, 2025, at 2:00 P.M., the facility social services worker stated that Resident 1 had clearly expressed his desire to be transferred to a local skilled nursing facility that permitted smoking. The social worker could not explain why the discharge did not align with the resident's expressed preferences, nor was there documentation justifying why an appropriate Page 1 of 5 395984 395984 05/15/2025 Aventura at Creekside 45 North Scott Street Carbondale, PA 18407
F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few local discharge option could not be pursued or why the facility was no longer able to meet the resident's needs. The facility failed to demonstrate that the discharge was based on the resident's goals or that it was necessary and appropriate. Furthermore, there was no evidence the resident was involved in the discharge decision-making process in a meaningful way that honored his preferences, nor was there documentation to show that alternative local placement options had been exhausted or deemed unsuitable. Cross refer F 926 28 Pa. Code 201.29(h) Resident rights 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee 395984 Page 2 of 5 395984 05/15/2025 Aventura at Creekside 45 North Scott Street Carbondale, PA 18407
F 0926 Have policies on smoking. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement its established smoking policy to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance. Specifically, the facility failed to post smoking policies in a conspicuous and legible manner, ensure required smoking safety equipment was available in the designated smoking area for 12 residents who smoke, and assess one cognitively intact resident (Resident 1) who requested to smoke for safe smoking practices out of 6 residents sampled. These failures created a potential for fire hazards and compromised resident safety. Residents Affected - Some Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident smoking policy and procedure, no review date available revealed, to ensure compliance with regulatory guidelines and safety protocols, the facility prohibits smoking except for in specifically designed areas. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Resident Smoking Policy and Procedure revealed that smoking is prohibited except in specifically designated areas and outlined the following requirements: The smoking policy must be posted in a conspicuous and legible format for residents, so that they may be easily read by residents, visitors and staff. Each resident must be individually assessed to determine if they can safely smoke with or without supervision. The assessment must include whether a smoking apron is needed, and findings should be documented in both the resident's care plan. Reassessments should occur as necessary. The smoking determination should be noted in the resident's care plan and in a smoking log to be kept on each residential floor. Residents who have been determined to require supervision must be actively supervised by a staff member while in the designed smoking area. Designated areas must be public spaces and may not include bedrooms. Designated smoking areas must include: Signage indicating that smoking is allowed, Easy access to fire extinguishers, Design features that limit secondhand smoke exposure, Noncombustible ashtrays in sufficient number, Outside ventilation, 395984 Page 3 of 5 395984 05/15/2025 Aventura at Creekside 45 North Scott Street Carbondale, PA 18407
F 0926 Metal containers with self-closing covers for ash disposal Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm During the entrance conference on May 15, 2025, at approximately 1:00 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility permits smoking in designated areas. Residents Affected - Some An observation conducted on May 15, 2025, at approximately 1:00 PM revealed nine residents smoking on the patio outside the activity/dining room. Although all were wearing smoking aprons and were being supervised by a staff member, no fire extinguisher or fire blanket was present in the smoking area. No signage indicating this was a designated smoking area or posting of the facility's smoking policy was observed. A locked cabinet inside the facility contained a small fire extinguisher, as reported by the activity director. An observation conducted on May 15, 2025, at approximately 1:00 PM revealed nine residents smoking on the patio outside the activity/dining room. Although all were wearing smoking aprons and were being supervised by a staff member, no fire extinguisher or fire blanket was present in the smoking area. No signage indicating this was a designated smoking area or posting of the facility's smoking policy was observed. A locked cabinet inside the facility contained a small fire extinguisher, as reported by the activity director. Further facility-wide observations, including resident areas and lobby spaces, also failed to identify any postings of the smoking policy. An interview with the Activity Director on May 15, 2025, at 1:15 PM, confirmed that the smoking policy was not posted in the designated patio area, and that no fire safety equipment (e.g., fire extinguisher or fire blanket) was located outside where residents smoked. She stated that there was a small fire extinguisher located in the locked activity cabinet in the dining room She confirmed that 12 residents regularly participate in smoking multiple times of day, and the patio is used frequently. Clinical record review for Resident 1, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including Wernicke's encephalopathy (a neurological disorder characterized by confusion, lack of coordination, and memory loss caused by thiamine deficiency), and nicotine dependence, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact. A Social Services note dated May 8, 2025, at 2:03 PM, documented that Resident 1 was observed on the smoking patio with peers and grabbed a cigarette butt from the ashtray and a lighter from a staff member's hand to light the cigarette. Social Services intervened and explained the smoking policy. The resident complied and extinguished the cigarette. Subsequent documentation from the Activity Department (May 8, 2025, 4:32 PM) and Social Services (May 8, 2025, 4:45 PM) recorded that Resident 1 became agitated when denied access to the smoking patio and was told he could not participate until assessed by nursing. A nursing progress note dated May 10, 2025, at 3:31 PM, documented Resident 1 became verbally aggressive, banged on the door, and had to be redirected after being denied access to smoke. Another staff member was able to calm the resident and escort him back to his room. An interview with the DON and NHA on May 15, 2025, at approximately 1:30 PM, confirmed the facility failed to implement its smoking policy as written. Specifically, the DON acknowledged that Resident 1 had not been assessed for safe smoking and confirmed that required safety postings and equipment 395984 Page 4 of 5 395984 05/15/2025 Aventura at Creekside 45 North Scott Street Carbondale, PA 18407
F 0926 were not in place in the designated smoking area. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm The facility failed to assess residents for safe smoking, ensure required fire safety equipment was present in the smoking area, and post smoking policies in accordance with its established procedures. Residents Affected - Some Cross refer F 627 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 209.3 (a) Smoking. 395984 Page 5 of 5

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0627GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F627 - Transfer and discharge-

    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

  • 0926GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F926 - Establish policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and

    Have policies on smoking.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 15, 2025 survey of AVENTURA AT CREEKSIDE?

This was a inspection survey of AVENTURA AT CREEKSIDE on May 15, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at AVENTURA AT CREEKSIDE on May 15, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transf..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.