Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

GARDEN SPOT VILLAGECMS #3960791 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency, 1 of them serious (actual harm or immediate jeopardy). The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

396079 11/13/2025 Garden Spot Village 433 S Kinzer Avenue New Holland, PA 17557
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical records review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement an intervention to prevent a wound on the foot of a resident identified as high risk for skin impairment. The facility also failed to initiate a wound treatment, which resulted in actual harm of the wound worsening and getting infected for one of the two residents reviewed (Resident CL1).Findings include: Review of Resident CL1's demographic sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], post amputation of the right foot toe. The resident had diagnoses of Diabetes (group of metabolic disorders characterized by high blood sugar level over a prolonged period of time) and Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD -circulatory condition that affects blood vessels outside the heart and brain, particularly in the legs and arms).Review of Resident CL1's care plan revealed interventions were developed on September 15, 2025, indicating resident was at risk for skin issues due to decreased mobility, edema (swelling), and circulatory issues.Review of Resident CL1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents), dated September 21, 2025, revealed the resident's cognition was intact. The same MDS assessment revealed resident was independent while rolling in bed, left to right.Review of Resident CL1's nursing progress notes revealed an entry dated September 27, 2025, at 11:07 p.m., indicating a small amount of blood was noted by Resident CL1's daughter on the resident's left foot sock after assisting the resident to bed and removing the shoes. A small skin tear was noted on (the resident's) left foot pinky toe. Area measured 1.0 x 0.5 cm (centimeters). The area was cleansed with NSS (sterile salt water) and covered with a band aid. Fax placed in CRNP (Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner) binder to note. TX (treatment) placed in TAR (Treatment Administration Record).Review of the nursing progress, weekly skin check note dated September 28, 2025, at 10:18 p.m., revealed treatment to the left foot. The same note revealed New interventions: Heel Boots.Review of Resident CL1's clinical records failed to reveal the new intervention, heel boots, was added to the resident's care plan. Further review of the clinical records failed to reveal the new intervention, heel boots, was implemented by the facility until October 4, 2025, as evidenced by a Weekly Skin Check Note dated October 4, 2025, at 9:26 p.m. indicating New Intervention: Heel Boots.Additional review of Resident CL1's progress notes revealed a Health Status note dated October 6, 2025, at 9:35 p.m., indicating LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) called RN (Registered Nurse) to room to report a new opened area on resident's lateral (side) left foot. Area with opened area measuring 4.2x1.8x0.1cm with 25% granulation (new tissue), 25% epithelial (skin), and 50% thin layer of yellow slough (dead) tissue. Edges are intact with some peeling skin along edges. Periwound (tissue surrounding the wound) skin intact, edematous (swollen), and with ecchymosis (bruising) along dorsal (upper) edge. Resident reporting that area is due to abrasion (superficial injury caused by rubbing or scraping) from when lying in bed. Resident with air mattress with hanger over footboard of bed and reporting hitting it.Review of Resident CL1's October MAR revealed the left Residents Affected - Few Page 1 of 2 396079 396079 11/13/2025 Garden Spot Village 433 S Kinzer Avenue New Holland, PA 17557
F 0684 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few lateral foot was not treated from October 6, 2025, till October 8, 2025. The wound was treated with Medihoney (dressing that aids and supports debridement and a moist wound healing environment in acute and chronic wounds and burns) on October 8, 2025, two days after it was initially identified on October 6, 2025.Further review of the Progress Notes revealed a Secure Conversation dated October 9, 2025, at 2:26 p.m., indicating the resident with worsening abrasion on the left lateral foot with increasing redness and warmth to the dorsal foot. The wound base is now with 50% yellow/tan slough tissue with hypergranulation (excessive growth of red granulation tissue that sits above the wound's skin level, usually caused by excessive moisture, infection, or irritation) on the dorsal edge of the wound. The resident reports less tenderness to the area, but the area appears more inflamed (reddened, warm, and swollen), and drainage has also increased to moderate to heavy serous (clear). The wound treatment was changed to Silver Alginate (dressing used for moderate to heavy exuding wounds to help control infection and promote a wound environment for healing).Review of the Nurse Practitioner (NP) notes revealed an entry dated October 10, 2025, indicating the resident had an abrasion on the left foot that occurred when the foot rubbed on the footboard of the bed, as stated by the resident. Staff noted that the area was extremely erythematous (abnormal redness of the skin due to accumulation of blood in the area) yesterday, with concerns over possible infection. Today, the erythema of the foot has improved, but still very tender to touch. The resident was diagnosed with left foot cellulitis (skin infection that causes a red, painful, and swollen area of skin, which is commonly caused by Staphylococcus bacteria that enter the body through a cut or break in the skin). The wound care treatment was changed, and Doxycycline (an antibiotic) by mouth was ordered by the NP.Interview with licensed nurse Employee E2 on November 13, 2025, at 12:40 p.m., revealed the facility utilizes a kind of heel boot that covers the entire foot of the resident. Employee E2 was unable to provide documented evidence the facility consistently implemented the heel boot intervention to protect Resident CL1's feet from developing further skin impairment.An interview with the NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) on November 13, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., was conducted. The NHA confirmed there was no documented evidence the heel boot intervention to protect Resident CL1's feet from further skin impairment were implemented. The NHA also confirmed a wound treatment on Resident CL1's left lateral foot was not completed on October 6, 2025, and October 7, 2025.The facility failed to implement Resident CL1's heel boot intervention to prevent further skin impairment and failed to provide wound care to a wound abrasion, which resulted in actual harm when the wound deteriorated and became infected. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing servicesPreviously cited 1/5/24 28 Pa Code 211.5(f) Clinical RecordsPreviously cited 1/5/24 396079 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684SeriousS&S Gactual harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 13, 2025 survey of GARDEN SPOT VILLAGE?

This was a inspection survey of GARDEN SPOT VILLAGE on November 13, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at GARDEN SPOT VILLAGE on November 13, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.