Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Castle Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterCMS #4555101 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

455510 11/25/2025 Castle Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center 8020 Blanco Rd San Antonio, TX 78216
F 0726 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all licensed staff possessed the appropriate competencies, and skill sets necessary to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 2 of 13 nursing staff (RN A and LPN B) reviewed for competencies. The facility failed to ensure that RN A and LPN B obtained current basic life support (CPR and AED) program certifications upon hire. This failure could affect and diminish the resident's quality of life by potentially placing the residents at risk of not receiving competent and skilled care to assure resident safety and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident.The findings included: Record review of an untitled and undated facility document, provided by the DON on [DATE], revealed a list with facility employees, their department, position, hire date, primary phone number, and designated if the employee was PRN. Thirteen (13) licensed nursing staff was listed, including RN A with a hire date of [DATE] and LPN B with a hire date of [DATE]. Neither RN A nor LPN B was noted as PRN. ? Record review of RN A's and LPN B's Basic Life Support (CPR and AED) Program certifications, provided by the DON on [DATE], revealed RN A's certification expired 03/2025 and LPN B's certification expired 04/2024. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:23 a.m., the DON stated the facility did not have a competencies policy. The DON stated the facility procedure was to review competencies upon hire and annually. During an interview on [DATE] at 03:15 p.m., the HR stated she completed the CPR certification checks during the onboarding (integration of a new employee) of new hires. She stated she would send staff without current certifications a text reminder at least monthly, and after her third or fourth reminder, she included the DON in the texts. She stated she made the DON aware of both RN A's and LPN B's expired certifications. The HR stated she had initially known about RN A's expired certification when RN A was hired, around [DATE] (documented hire date [DATE]) and LPN B's expired certification on [DATE] (documented hire date [DATE]). The HR stated she was unsure of the impact of a nurse not having a current certification. She would just ensure the DON was aware the current certifications had not been received. The HR stated she did not believe either RN A or LPN B was scheduled on shifts without another licensed nurse present. Attempted interview on [DATE] at 03:43 p.m. with LPN B, but they did not answer or return the call. During an interview on [DATE] at 04:11 p.m., the DON stated her expectation was for the licensed staff to be CPR certified. She stated that the HR was responsible for auditing the licensed staff documents to verify current certification but was unsure how often the HR completed this task. She stated she was made aware of RN A's expired certification back in September of 2025 and had just found out about LPN B. She stated she did not believe both nurses' expired certification would have impacted resident care because both nurses would have still gone into action and performed CPR, and she felt both nurses were competent in performing the duties that would have been needed to be done. She stated neither Page 1 of 2 455510 455510 11/25/2025 Castle Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center 8020 Blanco Rd San Antonio, TX 78216
F 0726 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few nurse worked the same shift as the other, resulting in both nurses working with other licensed and CPR certified nurses. During an interview on [DATE] at 04:40 p.m., RN A stated she was notified a few weeks ago that her CPR certification had expired. She stated she felt competent in responding to a code and did not believe her expired certification would have impacted her resident care. During an interview on [DATE] at 05:07 p.m., the DON stated she did not have a competencies checklist. She stated that the process to verify CPR and AED competency was to obtain a certification document. Record review of policy titled, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), date revised [DATE], revealed: Policy:It is the policy of this facility to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will implement guidelines regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .3. CPR certified staff will be available at all times.4. CPR certified staff will maintain current CPR certification for healthcare providers through a CPR provider whose training includes a hands-on session either in a physical or virtual instructor-led setting in accordance with accepted national standards. 455510 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0726GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F726 - Nursing Services

    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 25, 2025 survey of Castle Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center?

This was a inspection survey of Castle Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center on November 25, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Castle Hills Rehabilitation and Care Center on November 25, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes ..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.