Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterCMS #4555281 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0609 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources, were reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to HHSC for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #4) reviewed for abuse. The facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to the administrator and HHSC within 2 hours after the allegation was made per facility policy. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could contribute to further neglect. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 05/29/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 02/18/19. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's, fainting, Unspecified injury of the head, stomach ulcer with perforation, Dementia with behavioral disturbance, anemia (low blood count), anxiety, Diabetes, High blood pressure, malnutrition, abnormal gait and balance, curvature of the spine, repeated falls, reduced mobility, unsteadiness of feet, and assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She was exit-seeking, utilized a wheelchair which she could self-propel slowly. She was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, dressing, including footwear, showering, toileting, transferring, and oral hygiene. She required set-up assistance with eating. She required substantial assistance with upper-body dressing and moderate assistance with positioning. She was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Her active diagnosis was Non-traumatic Brain Dysfunction. Record review of Resident #4's care plan dated 04/27/20: Date Initiated: 02/01/23. The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions included: Date Initiated: 04/21/23 The resident requires extensive assistance by (2) staff to turn and reposition in bed, and the resident requires extensive assistance by (2) staff to move between surfaces (transfers). Date Initiated: 08/13/24. Needs a structured environment in a secure unit related to cognitive deficit. Interventions included Date Initiated: 08/13/24, Try to keep a routine such as bathing, dressing, and eating. Date Initiated: 02/01/2023. The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes r/t Alzheimer's. Interventions included cue, reorient, and supervise as needed. Keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent caregivers as much as possible in order to decrease confusion. She required extensive and frequent redirection. Record review of Resident #4's active physician orders revealed Cilostazol Oral Tablet 100 MG (Cilostazol), Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for PVD (Peripheral Vascular Disease), Pharmacy, Active, 10/24/2024. Record review of Resident #4's fall risks dated from 06/16/20 to present had all been scored as high. During a phone interview with HSK C on 10/07/25 at 1:20 pm, she said she saw LVN A help Resident #4 in her seat. She said she told the resident to sit down, and LVN A put his hand on Resident #4's shoulders and lowered her back down and she got up again and LVN A put his fingers on Resident #4's chest to sit her back down. She said LVN A was not forceful with Resident #4. She said Resident #4 did not cry out or grimace. She said she did not (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 455528 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 455528 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/05/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 1200 Lane Laredo, TX 78043 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0609 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few think LVN A was trying to hurt her. She said she did not say anything to anyone. She said she told her supervisor the following afternoon because she had personal issues going on. She said she reported things to everyone all the time. She said the Abuse coordinator was the ADM. She said she was not reporting to the Abuse Coordinator because she had personal issues going on, and she just went home on [DATE], the day of the incident. She said the ADM told her she should have called him, no matter what. She said she forgot they were supposed to report things right away. Observation of Resident #4 on 10/07/25 at 9:15 am revealed she was self-propelling slowly in her wheelchair. She was smiling at nothing or no one in particular. She touched the furniture, other residents', and/or their wheelchairs as she rolled down the hallway and in the dining area. Resident #4 was easily redirected by staff. In an interview with RN E on 10/07/25 at 9:16 am, she said Resident #4 tried to get up a lot, unassisted, and often fell. She said Resident #4 could be aggressive with other staff and residents. She said sometimes, Resident #4 did not answer, but seemed to understand because she could be redirected. She said she knew LVN A and worked with him several times. She said she never saw LVN A being aggressive, but rather, had seen him being nothing but kind and patient with the residents. In an interview with LVN A on 10/07/25 at 10:50 am, he said he was the only nurse in the unit on 10/02/25 with 2 CNAs. He said CNA B was bathing residents; CNA D was in another room assisting another resident. He said he was documenting at the desk, saw the resident trying to stand from her wheelchair, and he was able to verbally redirect her. He said the resident propelled herself in her wheelchair. He said she got up again and started walking around the dining table. He said he followed her closely behind with her wheelchair in case she fell. He said the resident did this several times, and he followed her with her wheelchair each time. He said the next time she got up; he quickly had to lock the chair and position himself in front of the wheelchair and the resident because the resident was getting a little wobbly. He said he told the resident to sit down, but she became rigid and would not sit down. He said she walked some more, he followed with her wheelchair, and this time he was able to guide her back into her chair by placing his hands in her axillary and lowering her to the wheelchair seat because she was about to fall and he barely caught her to get her back in the chair. He said it was better to get her in the chair than to let her fall. He said there was not anyone else in the unit other than himself, the residents, and the 2 CNAs. He said the resident did not vocalize or act in any different way than her norm. He said he received Alzheimer's training upon hire in August and has had dementia/Alzheimer's training throughout his career since 2020. Interview with CNA B on 10/07/25 at 1:07 pm, she said Resident #4 required a lot of redirecting. She said she did not see LVN A walking behind her with a wheelchair, but remembered the resident being very agitated on 10/02/20. She said she was performing showers, and the incident happened during rounds at shift change, around 6:30 pm. She said she helped the resident back to her chair a couple of times as well. She said HSK C was not in the unit at the time of the incident on 10/02/25, but saw her come out of the unit around 8:00 pm. She said she heard 2 days later, LVN A was rough with the resident. She said she never saw LVN A be rough with anyone. She said he was a nice guy- he was quiet. She said abuse should be reported immediately to the nurse or the ADM, who was the abuse coordinator.In an interview with CNA D, on 10/07/25 at 1:40 pm, she said she was working 10/02/25, the day of the incident, in the locked unit and denied ever seeing LVN A being rough with anyone. She said abuse should be reported immediately to the nurse or the ADM, who was the abuse coordinator.In an interview with the DON on 10/07/25 at 1:45 pm, she said Resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall several days before the incident on 10/02/25, and they could not determine if the spot on Resident #4's chest was from the unwitnessed fall or the incident. Record review of safe surveys dated 10/02/25 and 10/03/25 revealed no (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 455528 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 455528 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/05/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 1200 Lane Laredo, TX 78043 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0609 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete identified concerns. All residents said they felt safe. Record review of LVN A's Personnel file revealed a hire date of 08/08/25. No counseling reports other than the suspension on 10/02/25 for this intake.Record review of the facility policy dated 07/11/25 titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation under VII. Reporting/Response: A. 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g. law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: 1a. A. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. Event ID: Facility ID: 455528 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0609GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F609 - The facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that:

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 5, 2025 survey of Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?

This was a inspection survey of Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation Center on December 5, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Laredo West Nursing and Rehabilitation Center on December 5, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.