Inspection·January 30, 2026

F 0602 Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation and exploitation of property for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident #2) The facility failed to protect Resident #2 from misappropriation/exploitation by allowing housekeeping to take money from Resident #2 for housekeeping's own well-being and personal expenses, exact date unknown. This failure could place residents who resided in this facility at risk of misappropriation of property. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 1/30/26 reflected Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vascular dementia (a decline in thinking, memory, and reasoning skills caused by reduced blood flow to the brain, which damages or kills brain cells), and muscle wasting and atrophy (when muscles waste away). Record review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 4 which indicated Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment reflected Resident #2 required supervision or touching assistance with eating and needed substantial/maximal assistance with staff for toileting, and bathing. Record review of the care plan dated 11/6/19 indicated Resident #2 had impaired cognitive function and impaired thought processes related to dementia. During an interview on 01/29/2026 at 3:00 PM, Resident #2 stated he stated the staff here were all alright and they treated him well. He stated no staff had ever stolen anything from him, but he had given one guy $40.00 recently and he had paid him back only $10.00. He stated it was the housekeeping guy that he gave the money to. He stated he gave the money from his safe. He stated he felt safe in the facility, and he had no concerns. He stated he did get his money back and that the administrator paid him back. Attempts to interview housekeeping person were unsuccessful, two attempts were made to reach him by telephone on 01/30/26 at 10:47 AM and 2:16 PM. No return call was received. In an interview on 01/30/2026 at 7:00 PM, the DON stated that she was not working in the facility when the incident happened. During an interview on 01/30/26 at 7:50 PM, the ADM stated in the case of the self-report for misappropriation of property, on 09/6/25, Resident #2 had informed him that he lent $40 dollars to the housekeeping person, and he had paid him only $10.00 dollars back. He stated he immediately began the investigation and upon interviewing. He stated when he asked the housekeeping person about the money, he admitted to receiving the money. He stated the housekeeping person was suspended immediately and would be terminated. He stated that the facility paid back the $30.00 dollars to Resident #2. He stated they performed safe surveys for other residents. He stated he in-serviced staff on abuse and reporting. He stated that law enforcement was called. Review of the Facility Policy on Abuse Prevention Program with revised date December 2016 revealed: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Residents Affected - Few Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 455621 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 455621 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 01/30/2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Valley Grande Manor 1212 S Bridge Weslaco, TX 78596 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)