F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for
services as needed.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the
PASARR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care
planning, and transitions of care for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR services. The
facility failed to submit an NFSS request within 20 business days of Resident #1's IDT meeting held on
04/23/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the required care and services to attain
and maintain their highest, practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include:
Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 08/27/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year old female who
was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had medical
diagnoses that included osteitis deformans of multiple sites (a chronic metabolic disorder where bone
turnover is accelerated and disordered), epilepsy (a brain disorder causing recurring, unprovoked seizures),
paraplegia (the inability to voluntarily move the lower body parts), vascular dementia (brain damage),
cognitive communication deficit, and spina bifida (the spinal cord and backbones do not close
completely).Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 07/02/25, reflected she had
no BIMS indicated and she was considered by PASARR level II to have a serious mental illness, intellectual
disability, or a related condition. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan, revised on 08/05/25, reflected Resident
#1 was PASARR positive. Nursing and Social Services were responsible for ordering specialized services
for Resident #1 as determined by the IDT care plan review meeting. Nursing and Therapy were responsible
for ordering therapy services for Resident #1. Review of Resident #1's IDT Care Plan Review, dated
04/23/25, reflected, Therapy Services Plan of Care: .Therapy services were recommended by DOR and
specialized wheelchair. Review of Resident #1's PCSP, dated 04/23/25, reflected the IDT met on 04/23/25
and confirmed Resident #1's need for a CMWC. IDD also visited the facility, reviewed, confirmed and
signed on 04/28/25 that Resident #1's need for specialized services were agreed by the IDT and reflected,
Resident #1 will receive PASARR Services of.CMWC . Review of Resident #1's Order Summary Report,
dated 08/27/25, reflected no orders related to her CMWC. Review of Resident #1's Progress Notes,
April-August 2025, reflected no notes related to her CMWC. Review of the facility's Email Thread, from
05/02/25 through 08/27/25, reflected the wheelchair vender notified the DOR on 05/02/25 that the facility
had 28 days from Resident #1's IDT care plan review meeting to input Resident #1's PASARR into the SA's
online portal and how to process Resident #1's PASARR. The DOR notified the wheelchair vender on
05/14/25 that he was working/waiting on processing Resident #1's PASARR due to Resident #1 needing a
new IDT care plan review meeting. There were no email threads from 05/14/25 through 08/04/25. The ADM
followed-up on Resident #1's CMWC status with the wheelchair vender on 08/05/25. The wheelchair vender
notified the ADM and DOR on 08/05/25 to input Resident #1's PASARR into the SA's online portal and to
send Resident #1's approval to them to have Resident #1's CMWC ordered. An observation of the
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
455637
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455637
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Wellington Rehabilitation and Healthcare
1802 S 31st
Temple, TX 76504
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
facility's front entrance area on 08/27/25 at 11:10 a.m. reflected Resident #1 was sitting in a wheelchair. An
attempt to interview Resident #1 was made on 08/27/25 at 11:10 a.m., but Resident #1 was unable to
maintain focus during the interview. During an interview on 08/27/25 at 11:19 a.m., the SW stated she was
unsure who was responsible for identifying PASARR positive residents prior to and after admission to the
facility, who was responsible for making the referral to the appropriate state-designated authority when a
PASARR positive resident was identified, what the facility's process was for referring PASARR positive
residents to the appropriate state-designated authority, and why a referral to the appropriate
state-designated authority would not be made for a PASARR positive resident. The SW stated the MDS
Coordinator oversaw the PASARR process. The SW stated facility had a resource who was responsible for
the PASARR process because the former MDS Coordinator left the faciity on [DATE]. The SW stated she
knew the importance of referring identified PASARR positive residents to the appropriate state-designated
authority and said, Referrals should be made to the appropriate state-designated authority. Residents
should be able to get specialized services in order to help their well-being. Residents would not get the
services that they should have if they were not referred to the appropriate state-designated authority. During
an interview on 08/27/25 at 11:30 a.m., LVN A stated nurses were responsible for identifying PASARR
positive residents prior to and after admission to the facility. LVN A stated the SW was responsible for
making the referral to the appropriate state-designated authority when a PASARR positive resident was
identified. LVN A stated the nurses identified PASARR positive residents prior to and after admission to the
facility, nurses notified the DON, SW and physician, and the SW made the referral to the appropriate
state-designated authority. LVN A stated she did not know why a referral to the appropriate
state-designated authority would not be made for a PASARR positive resident. LVN A stated the ADON
oversaw the PASARR process. LVN A stated she knew the importance of referring identified PASARR
positive residents to the appropriate state-designated authority and said, Residents must receive
appropriate care for their needs. We must ensure residents were not dismissed for those services they
require. Residents could decline or not receive appropriate care from the staff. During an interview on
08/27/25 at 11:40 a.m., LVN B stated the DON was responsible for identifying PASARR positive residents
prior to admission to the facility. LVN B stated the nurses were responsible for identifying PASARR positive
residents after admission to the facility. LVN B stated the Physician was responsible for making the referral
to the appropriate state-designated authority when a PASARR positive resident was identified. LVN B
stated the DON identified PASARR positive residents prior to admission to the facility, the nurses identified
PASARR positive residents after admission to the facility, the nurses notified the DON, the DON or the
nurses notified the physician, and the physician made the referral to the appropriate state-designated
authority. LVN B stated a referral to the appropriate state-designated authority would not be made for a
PASARR positive resident if the resident had a change in condition that resulted in them no longer meeting
PASARR positive criteria. LVN B stated the ADON and DON oversaw the PASARR process. LVN B stated
she knew the importance of referring identified PASARR positive residents to the appropriate
state-designated authority and said, Residents could get treated according to their diagnoses and to ensure
residents get the services they need. Resident could develop mental psychosis, become suicidal, and
worsen psychosis condition if they did not receive the appropriate care.During an interview on 08/27/25 at
11:51 a.m., the ADON stated the BOM was responsible for identifying PASARR positive residents prior to
admission to the facility. The ADON stated the nursing, therapy, and social services departments were
responsible for identifying PASARR positive residents after admission to the facility. The ADON stated the
SW was responsible for making the referral to the appropriate
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455637
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455637
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Wellington Rehabilitation and Healthcare
1802 S 31st
Temple, TX 76504
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
state-designated authority when a PASARR positive resident was identified . The ADON stated she did not
know what the facility's process was for referring PASARR positive residents to the appropriate
state-designated authority and why a referral to the appropriate state-designated authority would not be
made for a PASARR positive resident. The ADON stated the SW and DOR oversaw the PASARR process.
The ADON stated she knew the importance of referring identified PASARR positive residents to the
appropriate state-designated authority and said, Residents need to receive the best care they could
tolerate and get the best quality of life in which they are able to function. We do not want anyone to be able
to do something and not have special service, equipment or assistance for the condition. Residents could
potentially decline if they do not get what they need.During an interview on 08/27/25 at 12:11 p.m., the
DON stated the MDS Coordinator was responsible for identifying PASARR positive residents prior to and
after admission to the facility and making the referral to the appropriate state-designated authority when a
PASARR positive resident was identified. The DON stated she did not know why a referral to the
appropriate state-designated authority would not be made for a PASARR positive resident and said, There
shouldn't be a reason a referral is not sent out. The DON stated the MDS Coordinator oversaw the
PASARR process. The DON stated the MDS Coordinator sent Resident #1's PASARR referral to the
wheelchair vender and did not follow-up on the status. The DON stated the SA notified the facility that
Resident #1 did not receive her CMWC for her PASARR positive condition. The DON stated Resident #1's
CMWC was ordered and the facility was waiting for it to arrive at the time of the interview. The DON stated
the MDS Coordinator left the facility at unknown date. The DON stated she knew the importance of referring
identified PASARR positive residents to the appropriate state-designated authority and said, Residents
quality of life is better when they receive specialized services. Resident could develop a decrease in quality
of care and not have needs met if they did not receive specialized services. During an interview on
08/27/25 12:28 p.m., Resident #1's POA stated Resident #1 had PASARR positive conditions before her
admission to the facility. Resident #1's POA stated Resident #1 requested specialized equipment for her
PASARR positive condition. Resident #1's POA stated Resident #1 told her that the facility told her that they
were getting her CMWC. Resident #1's POA stated the nursing department helped transfer Resident #1
using a mechanical lift and therapy department helped Resident #1 strengthen her ADLs to address her
PASARR positive condition as the CMWC order was pending. Resident #1's POA stated she was
concerned with Resident #1 having not received the CMWC. During an interview on 08/27/25 at 12:50 p.m.,
the ADM stated the facility's resource was responsible for identifying PASARR positive residents prior to
and after admission to the facility. The ADM stated the DOR was responsible for making the referral to the
appropriate state-designated authority when a PASARR positive resident was identified. The ADM stated
he did not know why a referral to the appropriate state-designated authority would not be made for a
PASARR positive resident and said, I can't imagine that there would be any reason for a referral not being
sent out. The ADM stated the MDS Coordinator oversaw the PASARR process. The ADM stated the MDS
Coordinator left the faciity on [DATE]. The ADM stated the DOR left the faciity on [DATE]. The ADM stated
Resident #1's IDT care plan review meeting was on 04/23/25, the DOR sent Resident #1's PASARR referral
to the wheelchair vender on 05/02/25, the wheelchair vender told him on 05/14/25 that the IDT care plan
review meeting was too far from when the DOR sent Resident #1's PASARR referral and requested a new
IDT care plan review meeting, Resident #1's new IDT care plan review meeting was on 07/23/25, he did not
know when Resident #1's PASARR referral was sent out again, he followed up with the wheelchair vender
on 08/05/25 and the vender confirmed the request Resident #1's referral request was completed on
08/15/25. The ADM stated the DOR did not meet the timeframe for submitting and following up on
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455637
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455637
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/27/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Wellington Rehabilitation and Healthcare
1802 S 31st
Temple, TX 76504
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Resident #1's PASARR referral for a CMWC. The ADM stated he was told the timeframe to submit the
referral was within 30 business days. The ADM stated he knew the importance of referring identified
PASARR positive residents to the appropriate state-designated authority and said, Residents have a right
to receive specialized services. The ADM said, It depends on the resident and their condition for what could
happen to a resident if they did not receive specialized services. During an interview on 08/27/25 at 1:42
p.m., the surveyor requested the ADM and DON provide the facility's PASSAR policy. During an interview
on 08/27/25 at 1:43 p.m., the ADM stated the facility's PASARR Resident Assessment policy was the
facility's PASARR policy. During an interview on 08/27/25 at 2:43 p.m., the DON stated the facility's
PASARR Resident Assessment policy was the facility's PASARR policy. Review of the facility's In-Services,
April-August 2025, reflected staff were not given any reeducation related to PASSAR. Review of the
facility's PASARR Resident Assessment policy, reviewed 05/2021, reflected, Policy: It is the policy of this
facility to ensure that each resident is properly screened using the PASARR specified by the State.
Procedures: The facility will refer to the state's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review policy.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455637
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4