F 0626
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds
bed-hold policy.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and follow written policy on permitting residents to
return to the facility after they were hospitalized for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for
transfer/discharge.
The facility failed to admit Resident #1 back to facility after he was sent to the hospital on [DATE].
This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to meet their needs and
could affect their mental and emotional well-being.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 02/22/24 indicated resident was a [AGE] year-old
male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Quadriplegia (paralysis from the
neck down, including the trunk, legs, and arms), muscle weakness, and urinary tract infection.
Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was able
to be understood by others, able to understand others, had a BIMS of 15 which indicated Resident #1 was
cognitively intact, and required extensive assistance from two persons for his ADLs.
Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the type of assessment was a code
10: Discharge Assessment - return not anticipated. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital and facility did nto
anticpate his return.
Record review of Resident#1's Care Plan dated 07/26/23 revealed the potential for injury r/t Resident with
Poly Microbial Infection (acute and chronic disease caused by various combinations of viruses, bacteria,
fungi, and parasites) to wounds and refuses hospital care/transfer to hospital. The facility explained the
risks to Resident regarding not going to the hospital for TX, and the need for IV antibiotics. Reisdent was
also given an explanation about Assisted Living and Healthcare. Resident was provided with an explanation
about the informed refusal form.
Record review of Resident #1's Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was transferred to
the hospital for a sacral wound and signed by Resident #1's physician.
Interview with the local Ombudsman on 02/20/24 at 1:50 PM revealed Resident #1 was transferred to
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
455672
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455672
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/23/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Palms Rehabilitation and Retirement
2101 Treasure Hills Blvd
Harlingen, TX 78550
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0626
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
the hospital and was not provided with a copy of the Bed Hold Policy. Resident #1 went to the hospital and
was told that he had three days in which he could come back and still be accepted to the facility. Resident
#1 went to the hospital on a Friday, and he returned on a Monday but was told he no longer had a bed
available. Ombudsman said she assisted Resident #1 to appeal the discharge and the judge made the
decision that the discharge should be reversed, and Resident #1 could then return to the facility. The
Ombudsman said the judge signed the order on December 15th and Resident #1 still has not been
returned to the facility.
Interview with the facility SW on 02/21/24 at 2:57 PM revealed the SW said Resident #1 had a
life-threatening infection and the doctor gave orders to send to the hospital. The SW said Resident #1
refused to go to the hospital and they were finally able to convince him to go. The SW said they explained
about the bed hold and Resident #1 said he could not pay for the bed hold. The SW said Resident #1 was
told if the hospital released him within three days, he would be able to return to his room. The SW said
Resident #1 came back a day early, but he did not have any doctor's orders because he left the hospital
AMA. Resident #1 was insisting the facility accept him back, but they told Resident #1 they could not admit
him until they had doctor's orders. The doctor would not give orders because he left the hospital against
medical advice. The Resident finally agreed to go back to the hospital but then he was transferred to a
Long-Term Care Acute Hospital. Resident #1 was discharged from the facility. Resident #1 appealed the
discharge and the judge decided that the discharge be reversed.
In an interview on 02/21/24 at 3:38 PM Resident #1 said he was sent to the hospital and was told that he
had three days before his bed would be taken. Resident #1 said he did not sign a bed hold or discharge
paperwork. The facility did not tell him about the bed hold. Resident #1 said after discharged from the
hospital he was transferred to a Long-Term Care Acute Hospital for two weeks. Resident #1 said he went to
the hospital due to osteomyelitis and was in isolation. Resident #1 said he is not contagious and would only
be able to infect someone if they touched his wound without gloves and the only ones that would touch him
would be the nurses and they wore gloves. Resident #1 said he appealed the discharge, and the decision
was that he could return to the facility. The facility kept saying they were full and did not have any beds
available. Resident #1 said he still wanted to return because he was hoping to go upstairs to the ALF.
Resident #1 said he had friends at the facility and would visit with them. Resident #1 said he hated being at
the current facility and did not want to be there. Resident #1 said he spoke with the Administrator yesterday
and he would be returning to the facility.
In a telephone interview on 02/21/24 at 3:53 PM the former DON said he did remember Resident #1 but did
not recall the incident when he went to the hospital. The former DON said he did not recall if Resident #1
was provided with discharge information or if he went to a Long-Term Care Acute Hospital. The former DON
said he did recall that Resident #1 did not want to go to the hospital and that everyone was trying to
convince Resident #1 that he needed to go. The DON said he could not provide any further information.
In an interview on 02/21/24 at 4:12 PM the Administrator said the facility had not accepted Resident #1
because they did not have a long-term bed available, and they finally have one available. The Administrator
said they have a Pending admission List and Resident #1 was on it. The Administrator said they also had
not accepted Resident #1 because he was on isolation, and he would not stay in his room. The
Administrator said they were afraid that Resident #1 would not stay in his room and would infect other
residents. The Administrator said they could provide a copy of the Pending admission List.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455672
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455672
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/23/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Palms Rehabilitation and Retirement
2101 Treasure Hills Blvd
Harlingen, TX 78550
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0626
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Record review of the Copy of the Pending admission List dated 01/15/24 indicated Resident #1 was
approved for admission.
In an interview on 02/21/24 at 4:15 PM RN/Clinical Resource said Resident #1 was sent to the hospital due
to a life-threatening infection. Resident #1 refused to do a bed hold. Resident went to the hospital and then
went to a Specialty Acute Hospital. RN/Clinical Resource said the facility did not have an available bed for
Resident #1 when he was ready to return.
Record review of Fair Hearing - Medicaid Nursing Facility Residents - Discharge Order dated 12/15/2023,
ordered by the Lead Hearing Officer Health and Human Services Commission revealed:
In accordance with the decision, Facility is instructed to allow Appellant to remain in, or immediately be
re-admitted back to into its facility, if the Appellant and his representative so desire, and not transfer or
discharge the Appellant from the facility. The Facility must report compliance with this order within 10 days
from the date of this decision by completing and faxing the attached Health and Human Services
Commission (HHSC) form H4807 (Action Taken on Hearing Decision) to the Hearings Officer.
Facility is not precluded from issuing a new 30-day notice of discharge meeting program guidelines in the
future.
Record review of facility's Policy for Criteria for Transfer and discharge date d November 2016 and
revised/reviewed in December 2023 indicated:
It is the policy of this Facility that each resident will remain in the Facility, and not be transferred or
discharged unless the discharge or transfer is appropriate as per the existing criteria. When the Facility
transfers or discharges a resident, the Facility shall ensure the transfer or discharge is documented in the
resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care
institution or provider.
Procedure:
1.
The facility shall permit each resident to remain in the Facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident
from the Facility unless:
i.
The transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in
the Facility.
ii.
The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident's health has improved sufficiently so the
resident no longer needs the services provided by the Facility.
iii.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455672
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455672
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/23/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Palms Rehabilitation and Retirement
2101 Treasure Hills Blvd
Harlingen, TX 78550
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0626
The safety of individuals in the Facility is endangered to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
2.
Residents Affected - Few
If the resident and/or their representative) exercises their right to appeal the transfer or discharge notice,
the Facility shall not transfer or discharge resident while the appeal is pending, unless the failure to
discharge or transfer would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other individuals in the Facility.
The Facility will document the danger that failure to transfer, or discharge would pose.
Record review of Admissions from 12/15/23 to 02/20/24 revealed there were 82 residents admitted from
Acute care hospital, five residents admitted from home, three admitted from Long Term Care Acute
Hospital, and two residents were transferred from another skilled nursing facility.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455672
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4