F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the
resident status for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy.
Residents Affected - Few
Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was coded incorrectly for wandering reflecting that
she did not wander when she had a consistent presence of the behavior (wandering).
Resident #1's quarterly Significant Change assessment dated [DATE] was coded incorrectly for wandering
reflecting that she did not wander when she had a consistent presence of the behavior (wandering).
Resident #1's quarterly and comprehensive assessment did not reflect the behavior for wandering even
though staff (ADM, DON, LVN A, LVN B, The Activity Director, CNA C, CNA D, the MDS Coordinator and
CNA E) had witnessed her wandering since her admission [DATE]) into other resident room and specifically
Resident #2's room.
This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's face sheet (undated) indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted
to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of dementia with agitation
(loss of cognitive functioning), generalized anxiety disorder (feelings of worry, tension and fear), and
intermittent explosive disorder (repeated, sudden bouts of impulsive of physical or verbal outburst).
Resident #1 resided on Hall 100.
Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 99 which
indicated Resident #1 was unable to complete the interview. The MDS Assessment for Resident #1
revealed in section E0900 that the Resident #1 had not exhibited the behavior of wandering.
Review of Resident #1's Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of
03 which indicated Resident #1's cognition was severely impaired. The MDS Assessment for Resident #1
revealed in section E0900 that the Resident #1 had not exhibited the behavior of wandering. Section E100
did not contain any data regarding the impact of Resident #1 wandering on others. Section E1100 did not
capture if Resident #1's wandering had remained the same, worsened or improved.
Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 2/15/24 did not reveal a care plan for the behavior of wandering.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 13
Event ID:
455871
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Review of Resident #1's progress notes did not reveal any ongoing prevention or intervention about
Resident #1 wandering.
Review of Resident #2's face sheet (undated) indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to
the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral
infarction (paralysis of partial or total body function and aphasia (language disorder making it difficult to
communicate). Resident #2 resided on Hall 500.
Review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 06 which indicated
Resident #2 cognition was severely impaired.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 10:32 AM with the ADM revealed an incident between Resident #1 and
Resident #2 in the hall of 400. She said she was unsure what provoked Resident #2 but that it resulted in
Resident #2 hitting Resident #1. She said that Resident #1 would reach out and try to hug and or stick out
her hands to others. She said she was curious to know if Resident #1 did either of these things to provoke
Resident #2. She said she could not interview Resident #2 because he was upset the day the incident
happened. She stated the physical incident between Resident #1 and Resident #2 had not happened
before.
An Interview on 03/06/24 at 10:33 AM with the DON revealed that there was a physical incident that
occurred between Resident #1 and Resident #2 but this had not happened before.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 11:18 AM with LVN A revealed that she did not have much information about
the physical altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2, but that Resident #1 wanders the halls. She
said Resident #1 would sometimes bump into other people and enter their rooms.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 11:31 AM with LVN B revealed that an incident occurred in the hallway between
Resident #1 and Resident #2. She was unsure of the date and time. She said they must have been
crossing paths, she observed Resident #2 with Resident #1 wrist in his hand, and Resident #2 was
screaming. She said she broke them apart and could not get what happened from Resident #1 because he
was upset. She said Resident #1 was confused all the time and wanders over the facility.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 11:48 AM with the Activity Director revealed that she had not been present for
the physical incident with Resident #1 and #2. She said she does know there have been at least two
incidents. She said one occurred by his room door, and he kicked her. The second incident she witnessed
was when they were near the nurse's station, and she observed Resident #2 hand go up in the air and
Resident #1 was near him. She said she yelled for LVN B to look and ran to get Resident #1 away from
Resident #2. She said she could not remember the exact date of the incident, but it was about two months
ago.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 12:01 PM with CNA C revealed that she was not present when the physical
altercation occurred between Resident #1 and Resident #2, but that report was given to her that Resident
#1 was attempting to wander into Resident #2 room and Resident #1 kicked her. She said Resident #1 had
a history of wandering all over the facility.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 12:06 PM with the CNA D revealed that Resident #1 does try to go in other
resident's room. She said she tried to go in Resident #2 room Resident #2 did not like it.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 12:28 PM with CNA E revealed that she did not have any information
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
regarding the physical altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2 but that she had worked with both
residents. She said Resident #1 has a history of wandering around the facility. She said she repeatedly tried
to keep Resident #1 off 500 Hall.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 1:26 PM with Resident #2 revealed that Resident #1 tried to come into his
room multiple times. He said she had tried to come into his room at least five times. He said that he did not
know the exact date and time. He said he had not reported these attempts to staff but that there was always
staff around when Resident #1 tried to come into his room. He said that he does not like it when residents
come into his room. He said Resident #1 entered his room because she wanted to steal from him.
An observation was made on 03/06/24 at 1:55 of Resident #1 self-propelled slowly near the nurse's station.
An observation was made on 03/06/24 at 2:03 PM, Resident #1 self-propelled slowly down the hall. She
entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. Another resident (unknown) propelled behind her, telling her not to go
into the room. Resident #1 enter room [ROOM NUMBER] in her wheelchair. She went to the nightstand in
the room and began to rummage. The Investigator notified the DON, and she and another staff (unknown)
intervened. They redirected her physically out of the resident's room.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 2:38 PM with the MDS Coordinator revealed that Resident #1 likes to wander
around the facility. She said sometimes Resident #1 would go into the wrong room. She said Resident #1
had wandered since being admitted to the facility. She said usually, staff intervene. She said when Resident
#1 gets into the room across from hers, the resident in that room will yell at her, and then staff will get her.
She said that she was responsible for completing the MDS assessments for all the residents in the facility.
She said the DON was responsible for the resident care plans. She said she believed that Resident #1
behavior for wandering was in the care plan but was not sure. She said the behavior should be captured in
the care plan. She said she did not believe there was a potential negative outcome for Resident #1's
wandering behavior not being reflected in the care plan. She said the only potential negative outcome that
she could think of for the wandering not being reflected in the MDS assessment was there could be a
monetary penalty. She said the staff that provide direct care do not look at the MDS assessment to provide
care, but they do look at the care plan. She said Resident #1's wandering was not reflected in the MDS
assessments because she did not consider her wandering up and down the halls without a purpose
significant enough to put in the MDS. She said Resident #1 was not trying to leave the facility or bother
other residents. She said she does obtain information from staff for her assessments. She said she knew
that a male resident became upset about Resident #1 going into his room, but she did not know when. She
said she had been trained on how to complete MDS assessments. She said she taught herself. She said
another reason the wandering may not have been in the MDS assessments was that there was a time
when Resident #1 did not wander.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 2:54 PM with the DON revealed the potential negative outcome for the
inaccurate MDS that could affect the care plan. She said it could cause the care plan to not be appropriate
for the resident. Regarding Resident #1, all the staff knew her very well. She said she was unaware that the
quarterly or the latest comprehensive MDS assessment did not capture Resident #1's wandering behavior.
She said she had been trained regarding the accuracy of MDS assessments. She said her training was 3-4
years ago. She said Resident #1 does wander and had exhibited the behavior since she had been
employed at the facility. She said Resident #1 was intentional when she wanders. She said Resident #1
would go to the same people daily to see staff she knew. She said she expected that the MDS be
completed accurately and reflect current information. She said the MDS Coordinator was
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
responsible for completing the MDS assessments.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
An interview on 03/06/24 at 3:24 PM with CNA E revealed Resident #1 had always had a history of
wandering around the facility and into other residents' rooms since she had been employed at the facility.
She said she had been employed at the facility for six months. She said that when she stated in her earlier
interview that she tried to keep Resident #1 from Hall 500, it was because of Resident #2. She said she
had observed him kick Resident #1 out of his room. She said she did not know what a care plan was and
had not looked to see if wandering was on it. She said she had not been specifically trained on what to do
about Resident #1's wandering behavior. She said she knew about Resident #1 behavior from working with
her.
Residents Affected - Few
An interview on 03/06/24 at 3:32 PM with the LVN A revealed Resident #1 had always exhibited wandering
behavior. She said the only time Resident #1 does not wander was if she does not feel well or was in bed.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 3:37 PM with the ADM revealed the potential negative outcome for the MDS
not being accurate was billing could be off or skewed. She said she was unaware that Resident #1's
wandering behavior was not reflected in her most recent quarterly and Significant Change MDS
assessment. She said there was no specific system in place to monitor MDS assessments. She said they
do not look at the assessment's individual sections but look at if there was an overall decline. She said she
had not been trained in completing accurate MDS Assessments. She said she expected MDS assessments
to be accurate and reflect current information regarding residents. She said she had observed Resident #1
wandering around the facility. She said the MDS Coordinator was responsible for accurately completing the
MDS assessments. She said she had no reason the MDS was not completed accurately. She said the
potential negative outcome of not reflecting Resident #1's behavior of wandering or current behaviors in the
care plan was that she or other residents may not receive the care they need. She said Resident #1 had
exhibited wandering behavior the entire time she had known her. She said she was unaware that Resident
#1 had been in Resident #2's room multiple times.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 03:51 PM with CNA D revealed that Resident #1 had always wandered around
the facility and in other residents' rooms. She stated she had seen Resident #1 enter Resident #2 room
more than once.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 03:52 PM with CNA C revealed that Resident #1 had always wandered around
the facility and in other residents' rooms. She stated she had seen Resident #1 enter Resident #2 room
more than once. She said she observed Resident #2 blocking Resident #1 and attempting to wave her out
of his room because he could not speak.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 04:20 PM with the ADM revealed that there was no specific policy for the MDS
assessments but that they use the Long-Term Care RAI manual.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 04:19 PM with the DON revealed she stated she was unaware if Resident #1's
wandering was tracked.
An interview on 03/11/24 at 05:08 PM with the social worker revealed that on 01/29/24, there was a
physical altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2. She said she could not interview Resident #1
because of her cognitive status. She said she was able to interview Resident #2 through the use of his
communication board. She said Resident #2 told her he grabbed Resident #1's arm because she grabbed
his leg as she rolled by. She said he motioned that the incident happened in the hallway. She
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
said she did not, and he did not clarify if the incident specifically happened in Hall 500 or where it
happened. She assumed it was outside his room because of how he motioned. She said Resident #1 goes
up and down the hallways and wanders throughout the facility. She said sometimes she would go into other
residents' rooms, but some residents were familiar with her. She said she could not answer the potential
negative outcome if Resident #1 went into a room where she was unwanted. She said she could not say
what risks Resident #1 would be at if she went into a resident's room that she was unwanted in because it
would all depend on the other resident. She said she hoped they would tell Resident #1 to leave, and she
would listen and leave.
Review of the Intake Investigation Worksheet 480251, dated 01/29, revealed the following:
The incident occurred on 01/29/24 at 10:00 AM. LVN B witnessed Resident #2 grabbing Resident #1's arm
and twisting it. The Social Worker was told by Resident #2 that Resident #1 touched his leg when she rolled
by.
Review of the Intake Investigation Worksheet 480251, dated 01/29, revealed the following:
The incident occurred on 01/29/24 at 10:00 AM. LVN B witnessed Resident #2 grabbing Resident #1's arm
and twisting it. The Social Worker was told by Resident #2 that Resident #1 touched his leg when she rolled
by.
Review of the facility policy, Behavioral, Intervention and Monitoring, Revised December 2021, revealed the
following: Policy Statement:
The center will provide, and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or
maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the
comprehensive assessment and plan of care.
Behavioral symptoms will be identified using center-approved behavioral screening tools and the
comprehensive assessment.
The center will comply with regulatory requirements related to the use of medications to manage behavioral
changes.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation
General Guidelines
1. Behavior is the response of an individual to a wide variety of factors. These factors may include medical,
physical, functional, psychosocial, emotional, psychiatric, or environmental causes.
a. Behavior is regulated by the brain and is influenced by past experiences, personality traits, environment,
and interactions with other people.
b. Behavior can be a way for an individual in distress to communicate unmet needs, indicate discomfort, or
express thoughts that cannot be articulated.
As part of the comprehensive assessment, staff will evaluate, based on input from the resident, family and
caregivers, review of medical record and general observations:
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
a. The resident's usual patterns of cognition, mood and behavior;
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
4. New onset or changes in behavior will be documented regardless of the degree of risk to the resident or
others.
Residents Affected - Few
Cause Identification
1. The interdisciplinary team will evaluate new or changing behavioral symptoms in order to identify
underlying causes and address any modifiable factors that may have contributed to the resident's change in
condition, including:
Management
1. The interdisciplinary team will evaluate behavioral symptoms in residents to determine the degree of
severity, distress and potential safety risk to the resident, and develop a plan of care accordingly. Safety
strategies will be implemented immediately if necessary to protect the resident and others from harm.
a. Atypical behavior will be differentiated from behavior that is dangerous or problematic for the resident(s)
or staff, or behavior that signals underlying distress.
b. If the behavior is atypical but not problematic or dangerous and the resident does not appear to be in
distress, then the IDT will monitor for changes but not necessarily intervene to normalize the behavior.
2. The care plan will incorporate findings from the comprehensive assessment and PASRR Level II
determinations (as appropriate), and be consistent with current standards of practice.
3. The resident and family or representative will be involved in the development and implementation of the
care plan. Resident and family involvement, or attempts to include the resident and family in care planning
and treatment, will be documented.
4. The resident and family/representatives will be informed of the resident's condition as well as the
potential risks and benefits or proposed interventions.
5. The resident and/or resident surrogate will have the right to refuse treatment.
6. Interventions will be individualized and part of an overall care environment that supports physical,
functional and psychosocial needs, and strives to understand, prevent or relieve the resident's distress or
loss of abilities.
7. Interventions and approaches will be based on a detailed assessment of physical, psychological and
behavioral symptoms and their underlying causes, as well as the potential situational and environmental
reasons for the behavior. The care plan will include, as a minimum:
a. A description of the behavioral symptoms, including:
(1) Frequency;
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
(2) Intensity;
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
(3) Duration;
(4) Outcomes;
Residents Affected - Few
(5) Location;
(6) Environment; and
(7) Precipitating factors or situations.
b. Targeted and individualized interventions for the behavioral and/or psychosocial symptoms;
c. The rationale for the interventions and approaches;
d. Specific and measurable goals for targeted behaviors; and
e. How the staff will monitor for effectiveness of the interventions.
Monitoring
1. If the resident is being treated for altered behavior or mood, the IDT will seek and document any
improvements or worsening in the individual's behavior, mood, and function.
2. The IDT will monitor the progress of individuals with impaired cognition and behavior until stable. New or
emergent symptoms will be documented and reported.
3. Interventions will be adjusted based on the impact on behavior and other symptoms, including any
adverse consequences related to treatment.
Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version
1.18.11, October 2023, revealed the following: an accurate assessment requires collecting information from
multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. Those sources must include the resident and
direct care staff on all shifts, and should also include the resident's medical record, physician, and family,
guardian and/or other legally authorized representative, or significant other as appropriate or acceptable. It
is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified
by the MDS items on the assessment and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual
status was during that observation period) by the IDT completing the assessment. As such, nursing homes
are responsible for ensuring that all participants in the assessment process have the requisite knowledge to
complete an accurate assessment.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet
the highest practicable physical, mental, psychosocial well-being for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed
for care plans as follows:
1. Resident #1 did not have a care plan for her ongoing behavior for wandering that had occurred since her
admission on [DATE].
These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their Individualized
needs.
Findings include:
Review of Resident #1's face sheet (undated) indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted
to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnoses of dementia with agitation
(loss of cognitive functioning), generalized anxiety disorder (feelings of worry, tension and fear), and
intermittent explosive disorder (repeated , sudden bouts of impulsive of physical or verbal outburst).
Resident #1 resided on Hall 100.
Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 99 which
indicated Resident #1 was unable to complete the interview. The MDS Assessment for Resident #1
revealed in section E0900 that the Resident #1 had not exhibited the behavior of wandering.
Review of Resident #1's Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of
03 which indicated Resident #1's cognition was severely impaired. The MDS Assessment for Resident #1
revealed in section E0900 that the Resident #1 had not exhibited the behavior of wandering. Section E100
did not contain any data regarding the impact of Resident #1 wandering on others. Section E1100 did not
capture if Resident #1's wandering had remain the same, worsened or improved.
Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 2/15/24 did not reveal a care plan for the behavior of wandering.
Review of Resident #1's progress notes did not reveal any ongoing prevention or intervention about
Resident #1 wandering.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 11:18 AM with LVN A revealed Resident #1 wanders the halls. She said
Resident #1 would sometimes bump into other people and enter their rooms.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 11:31 AM with LVN B revealed Resident #1 was confused all the time and
wanders over the facility.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 12:01 PM with CNA C Resident #1 had a history of wandering all over the
facility.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 12:06 PM with the CNA D revealed that Resident #1 does try to go in other
resident's room.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
An interview on 03/06/24 at 12:28 PM with CNA E revealed Resident #1 had a history of wandering around
the facility. She said she repeatedly tried to keep Resident #1 off 500 Hall.
An observation was made on 03/06/24 at 1:55 of Resident #1 self-propelled slowly near the nurse's station.
An observation was made on 03/06/24 at 2:03 PM, Resident #1 self-propelled slowly down the hall. She
entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. Another resident (unknown) propelled behind her, telling her not to go
into the room. Resident #1 entered room [ROOM NUMBER] in her wheelchair. She went to the nightstand
in the room and began to rummage. The Investigator notified the DON, and she and another staff
(unknown) intervened. They redirected her physically out of the resident's room.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 2:38 PM with the MDS Coordinator revealed that Resident #1 likes to wander
around the facility. She said sometimes Resident #1 would go into the wrong room. She said Resident #1
had wandered since being admitted to the facility. She said usually, staff intervene. She said when Resident
#1 gets into the room across from hers, the resident in that room will yell at her, and then staff will get her.
She said the DON was responsible for the resident care plans. She said she believed that Resident #1
behavior for wandering was in the care plan but was not sure. She said the behavior should be captured in
the care plan. She said she did not believe there was a potential negative outcome for Resident #1's
wandering behavior not being reflected in the care plan. She said the staff that provide direct care do not
look at the MDS assessment to provide care, but they do look at the care plan. She said she knew that a
male resident became upset about Resident #1 coming into his room, but she did not know when.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 2:54 PM with the DON revealed the potential negative outcome for behaviors
not being reflected in the residents' plan was that they may need the care and not receive it. She said she
was unaware that Resident #1 care plan did not reflect the wandering behavior. She said the system they
use to monitor care plans was the level of care meetings. She said that during these meetings, they talk
about resident transfer and how many people it takes to complete the transfer. She said she had been
trained regarding the completion of care plans, and this was a part of being a registered nurse. She said
the MDS Coordinator was responsible for long-term care plans, and the DON was responsible for acute
care plans. She said anything that triggered on the CAAs should be care planned. She said specific things
that were risk areas should also be care planned. She said she does not know why Resident #1 wandering
was not care planned but that the MDS Coordinator would have been responsible. She said the MDS
Coordinator had been trained to complete care plans.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 3:24 PM with CNA E revealed Resident #1 had always had a history of
wandering around the facility and into other residents' rooms since she had been employed at the facility.
She said she had been employed at the facility for six months. She said that when she stated in her earlier
interview that she tried to keep Resident #1 from Hall 500, it was because of Resident #2. She said she
had observed him kick Resident #1 out of his room. She said she did not know what a care plan was and
had not looked to see if wandering was on it. She said she had not been specifically trained on what to do
about Resident #1's wandering behavior. She said she knew about Resident #1 behavior from working with
her.
An Interview on 03/06/24 at 3:32 PM with the LVN A revealed Resident #1 had always exhibited wandering
behavior. She said the only time Resident #1 does not wander was if she does not feel well or was in bed.
She said she was unsure how to access the care plan and if wandering was on the care plan.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
An interview on 03/06/24 at 3:37 PM with the ADM revealed the potential negative outcome of not reflecting
Resident #1's behavior of wandering or current behaviors in the care plan was that she or other residents
may not receive the care they need. She said the information in the kiosk that the CNAs use comes from
the care plan. She said she was unaware that Resident #1 behavior of wandering had not been care
planned. She said regarding a system to monitor care plans, they review care plans quarterly, and the
absence of the behavior should have been caught. She said she was unaware of why Resident #1's
wandering behavior was not care planned. She said multiple disciplines are responsible for different areas
of the care plan. She said the DON was overall responsible as she ultimately signs off. She said Resident
#1 had exhibited wandering behavior the entire time she had known her. She said she was unaware that
Resident #1 had been in Resident #2's room multiple times.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 03:51 PM with CNA D revealed that Resident #1 had always wandered around
the facility and in other residents' rooms. She stated she had seen Resident #1 enter other residents room
more than once. She said she used the care plan and had never received specific training for Resident #1's
wandering but that she naturally redirected her because she knew her. She confirmed that she did not see
a care plan on the kiosk they use for Resident #1's wandering.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 03:52 PM with CNA C revealed that Resident #1 had always wandered around
the facility and in other residents' rooms. She stated she had seen Resident #1 enter other residents' room
more than once. She stated she used the care plan and had never received specific training for Resident
#1's wandering but that she naturally redirected her because she knew her. She confirmed that she did not
see a care plan on the kiosk they use for Resident #1's wandering.
An interview on 03/06/24 at 04:19 PM with the DON revealed that all staff use the care plan. She stated she
was unaware if Resident #1's wandering was tracked.
An interview on 03/11/24 at 04:19 PM with the DON revealed that all staff use the care plan. She stated she
was unaware if Resident #1's wandering was tracked.
An interview on 03/11/24 at 05:08 PM with the social worker revealed that on 01/29/24, there was a
physical altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2. She said she could not interview Resident #1
because of her cognitive status. She said she could not answer the potential negative outcome if Resident
#1 went into a room where she was unwanted. She said she could not say what risks Resident #1 would be
at if she went into a resident's room that she was unwanted in because it would all depend on the other
resident. She said she hoped they would tell Resident #1 to leave, and she would listen and leave.
Review of the facility policy, Behavioral, Intervention and Monitoring, Revised December 2021, revealed the
following:
Policy Statement
The center will provide and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain
the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive
assessment and plan of care.
Behavioral symptoms will be identified using center-approved behavioral screening tools and the
comprehensive assessment.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
The center will comply with regulatory requirements related to the use of medications to manage behavioral
changes.
Cause Identification
1. The interdisciplinary team will evaluate new or changing behavioral symptoms in order to identify
underlying causes and address any modifiable factors that may have contributed to the resident's change in
condition, including:
Management
1. The interdisciplinary team will evaluate behavioral symptoms in residents to determine the degree of
severity, distress and potential safety risk to the resident, and develop a plan of care accordingly. Safety
strategies will be implemented immediately if necessary to protect the resident and others from harm.
a. Atypical behavior will be differentiated from behavior that is dangerous or problematic for the resident(s)
or staff, or behavior that signals underlying distress.
b. If the behavior is atypical but not problematic or dangerous and the resident does not appear to be in
distress, then the IDT will monitor for changes but not necessarily intervene to normalize the behavior.
2. The care plan will incorporate findings from the comprehensive assessment and PASRR Level II
determinations (as appropriate), and be consistent with current standards of practice.
3. The resident and family or representative will be involved in the development and implementation of the
care plan. Resident and family involvement, or attempts to include the resident and family in care planning
and treatment, will be documented.
4. The resident and family/representatives will be informed of the resident's condition as well as the
potential risks and benefits or proposed interventions.
5. The resident and/or resident surrogate will have the right to refuse treatment.
6. Interventions will be individualized and part of an overall care environment that supports physical,
functional and psychosocial needs, and strives to understand, prevent or relieve the resident's distress or
loss of abilities.
7. Interventions and approaches will be based on a detailed assessment of physical, psychological and
behavioral symptoms and their underlying causes, as well as the potential situational and environmental
reasons for the behavior. The care plan will include, as a minimum:
a. A description of the behavioral symptoms, including:
(1) Frequency;
(2) Intensity;
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 11 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
(3) Duration;
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
(4) Outcomes;
(5) Location;
Residents Affected - Few
(6) Environment; and
(7) Precipitating factors or situations.
b. Targeted and individualized interventions for the behavioral and/or psychosocial symptoms;
c. The rationale for the interventions and approaches;
d. Specific and measurable goals for targeted behaviors; and
e. How the staff will monitor for effectiveness of the interventions.
Monitoring
1. If the resident is being treated for altered behavior or mood, the IDT will seek and document any
improvements or worsening in the individual's behavior, mood, and function.
2. The IDT will monitor the progress of individuals with impaired cognition and behavior until stable. New or
emergent symptoms will be documented and reported.
3. Interventions will be adjusted based on the impact on behavior and other symptoms, including any
adverse consequences related to treatment.
Review of the facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 1/27/24, revealed the following:
Policy
It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement A comprehensive person-centered care plan for
each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to
meet a residence medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the residents
comprehensive assessment.
The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum of the following:
The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical mental
and psychosocial well-being.
Any services that would otherwise be furnished but are not provided due to the residents exercise of his or
her right to refuse treatment.
Resident specific interventions that reflect the residents needs and preferences and align with the residents
cultural identity, as indicated.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 12 of 13
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455871
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Lynwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
803 S Alamo
Levelland, TX 79336
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Individualized interventions for trauma survivors that recognize the interrelation between trauma and
symptoms of trauma as directed. Trigger specific interventions will be used to identify ways to decrease the
residents exposure to triggers which read traumatize the resident, as well as identify ways to mitigate or
decrease the effect of trigger on the resident.
The comprehensive care plan will be prepared by the interdisciplinary team, that includes, but is not limited
to:
a registered nurse with the responsibility for the resident
a nurse aide with responsibility for the resident
The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each
comprehensive and quarterly and BS assessment.
The comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and time frames to meet the residents
needs as identified in the residence comprehensive assessment. The objectives will be utilized to monitor
the residents progress. Alternative interventions will be documented as needed.
Qualified staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the care plan will be notified of their
roles and responsibilities for carrying out the interventions, initially and when changes are made.
The services provided were arranged by the facility, as outlined in the comprehensive care plan will meet
professional standards of quality, and will be provided by qualified persons and recordings with each
resident's written plan of care.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455871
If continuation sheet
Page 13 of 13