F 0553
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of
care.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to participate in the development
and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #47) reviewed
for care plans.The facility failed to invite and include the input of Resident #47 and/or the resident's
representative as members of the interdisciplinary team in Care Plan Conference meetings.This failure
could place residents at risk of not receiving the interventions, treatments, and care necessary for the
resident to reach their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being by not involving the
resident and/or the resident's representative in Care Plan Conference meetings. The findings
included:Record review of Resident #47's face sheet, dated 10/12/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female
admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (occurs when a blood clot blocks an artery in
the brain, cutting off oxygen and nutrients leading to brain tissue death) with Right sided weakness,
hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (difficulty speaking), and
visuospatial deficits (difficulties with processing and interpreting visual information).Record review of
Resident #47's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate
cognitive impairment. Further review of Resident #47's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] revealed
Resident #47 presented with upper and lower extremity range of motion impairment, required a wheelchair
for mobility, set-up assistance in self-feeding, was dependent in toilet hygiene, bathing and transfers,
required moderate assistance in upper body dressing and maximum assistance in lower body dressing,
and bed mobility. A record review of Resident #47's care plan revealed the care plan was initiated on
11/05/2025 and completed on 11/24/2025. The record did not include an invitation for Resident #47 and/or
the Responsible Party to the care plan meeting or a signature sheet of attendees.During an interview on
12/08/2025 at 1:03 p.m., Resident #47 stated she talks a lot with the therapy staff but has not attended or
been informed of a Care Plan Conference meeting with the Social Worker, Activity Director or nursing staff.
Resident #47 stated she signed her own paperwork when she was admitted to the facility. During an
interview on 12/11/25 at 9:09 a.m., Resident #47's family member stated that she was not invited to or
informed of a Care Plan Meeting since Resident #47 was admitted . Resident #47's family member stated
she was visiting Resident #47 on 12/10/25 when she was approached by the Social Worker to go to a
meeting to discuss concerns the family member had addressed to the nurses over the previous
weekend.During an interview on 12/10/25 at 5:20 PM, the MDS Nurse stated that a Care Plan review was
completed 11/24/25. The MDS Nurse stated neither the resident nor the family members were present at
the review. The MDS Nurse stated that she believes the Social Worker is responsible for inviting the
resident or the family to the meetings. The MDS Nurse stated that failure to include residents in their plan of
care could result in them not being fully aware of their medications, treatments and rights.During an
interview on 12/10/2025 at 5:23 p.m., the Social Worker stated that a Care Plan meeting was held this
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 28
Event ID:
455985
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0553
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
morning with Resident #47's family members. The Social Worker stated that this was an impromptu meeting
when she was notified that the family had some concerns and that they were present in the facility. The
Social Worker stated that she is responsible for informing and inviting residents and/or responsible parties
to the Care Plan conference meeting which should be completed within three weeks of admission. The
Social Worker stated a Care Plan review was already completed for Resident #47 and she failed to invite
the resident or responsible party to the review meeting. The Social Worker stated that she should have
notified Resident #47 of the care plan review meeting, that it is important to involve the Resident in the
meetings to ensure he/she is aware of all aspects of his/her care and failure to include them could result in
missing some important concerns about care.During an interview on 12/10/25 at 6:54 p.m., the DON stated
that a baseline care plan should be completed within 72hours of admission and a full care plan should be
completed by day 21 of the resident's stay. The DON stated she expects the Interdisciplinary Team
Members to include the Social Worker and MDS Nurse to ensure the resident and/or their Responsible
Party participate in the care plan conference meeting either in person or by phone if necessary to ensure
they are informed of the care plan findings and involved in the plan of care. The DON stated adverse effect
of residents or their representative not attending and participating in review meetings would be that
decisions could be made that the resident and/or representative were not aware of or were not congruent
with their wishes.An interview was attempted on 12/10/25 at 7:31 p.m. with the Administrator, however she
was not available for interview.Review of facility policy titled Care Plan Guidelines, Revised 05/06/2016,
revealed, 1. Meetings will be conducted within 21 days of admission, 2. The meetings will be scheduled by
the Social Worker, and 3. The Social Worker will send out invitation letters to the resident, family member,
responsible party.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0582
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of
admission, and periodically during the resident's stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for
those services, which included charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the
facility's per diem rate for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #15 and #19) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid
coverage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 was given a NOMNC (is a notice that indicates when
your care is set to end from a skilled nursing facility when discharged from skilled services prior to his
covered days being exhausted. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 was given a SNF ABN when
discharged from skilled services at the facility prior to covered days being exhausted. These failures could
place residents at risk of not being aware of changes to services provided. Findings include: 1. Record
review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated 12/10/25, reflected Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old male,
originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included transient cerebral ischemic
attack (stroke). Record review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/26/25, reflected
Resident #15 made himself understood and understood others. Resident #15's BIMS score was 15, which
indicated his cognition was intact. Record review of Resident #15's SNF Beneficiary Notification Review
reflected Resident #15 received Medicare Part A skilled services on 07/20/25, and the last covered day of
Part A services was 08/15/25. The facility/provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A services
when benefits were not exhausted. It was reflected that a NOMNC was not completed which would have
informed Resident #15 about the termination, including the reason and his right to appeal the decision. 2.
Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 12/10/25, reflected Resident #19 was an [AGE] year-old
female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Alzheimer's (progressive disease
that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Record review of Resident #19's quarterly
MDS assessment, dated 10/13/25, reflected Resident #19 usually made herself understood and usually
understood others. Resident #19's BIMS score was 8, which indicated her cognition was moderately
impaired. Record review of Resident #19's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review indicated
Resident #19 was receiving Medicare Part A services starting on 10/07/25, and the last day covered of Part
A services was 10/13/25. It was reflected that a SNF ABN was not completed, which would have informed
Resident #19 of the option to continue services at the risk of out-of-pocket. During an interview on 12/10/25
at 8:59 a.m., the MDS Coordinator stated she was responsible for ensuring Resident #19 was issued a
SNF ABN. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #19 had 93 skilled benefit days remaining. The MDS
Coordinator stated she was unaware a SNF ABN and NOMNC should be issued. The MDS Coordinator
stated the previous MDS Coordinator would have been responsible for ensuring Resident #15 was issued a
NOMNC. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #15 had 73 skilled benefit days remaining. The MDS
Coordinator stated the form should have been issued if the resident had skilled benefit days remaining and
was being discharged from Part A services and continued in the facility. The MDS Coordinator stated the
Regional Operations Director was responsible for monitoring and overseeing. The MDS Coordinator stated
it was important for the residents to receive the form so they would know how many days they had left and
what they were responsible for. An attempted telephone interview on 12/10/25 at 5:00 p.m., with the
Regional Operations Director was unsuccessful. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 6:54 p.m., the DON
stated she expected the SNF ABN and NOMNC to be given when the resident had skilled benefit days
remaining and was being discharged from Part A services and continued in the facility. The DON stated it
was important for the residents to receive the forms to inform them about their care.
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0582
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
An attempted telephone interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30 p.m., with the Administrator was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Beneficiary Notices of Non-Coverage revised 05/30/2018
indicated. it is the intent of named company to abide by the Federal regulations that pertain to issuance of
Advanced Notification of Non Coverage when it is believed that Medicare will not pay for services or items
not meeting the criteria for skilled care that is no longer reasonable or necessary, or is considered custodial
care. the purpose of this guide is to ensure that the correct form(s) for each situation are delivered in timely
manner. SNFABN (1) Beneficiary drops to a non-skilled of care and benefits have not exhausted and
remains in the facility. Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (1) Beneficiary drops to a non-skilled of care and
benefits have not exhausted and remains in the facility.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive
person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable
objectives and time frames to meet a resident's mental, nursing, and psychosocial needs that were
identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans.The
facility failed to fully develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that was specific for Resident #1
to address the resident's communication deficit.This failure could place residents at risk for not getting their
medical, physical, and psychosocial needs met and not being provided with the necessary care or services
and having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs.The findings were:Record review
of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/10/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted [DATE]
and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia (difficult speaking), slurred speech, legal
blindness, cerebral infarction (occurs when a blood clot blocks an artery in the brain, cutting off oxygen and
nutrients leading to brain tissue death) with right sided weakness, and hypertension (high blood
pressure).Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS Score of 9
indicating moderate cognitive impairment, had unclear speech, was sometimes understood and
understands others. Further review of Resident #1's comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE]
revealed Resident #1 presented with upper and lower extremity range of motion impairment, was bedfast
(did not get out of bed during assessment period), and was totally dependent in all activities of daily living
to include eating, dressing, toileting, bathing, transfers and mobility.Record review of Resident #1's
comprehensive care plan with target completion date 11/07/2025 revealed there was not a care plan
addressing the resident's communication deficit.During an interview and observation of Resident #1 on
12/08/2025 at 2:05 p.m. and on 12/09/2025 at 12:01 p.m., Resident #1 responded to surveyor questions
with head nods and facial expressions only, with no attempt at verbal communication.During an interview
on 12/09/2025 at 9:58 a.m., CNA A stated that Resident #1 does not speak and will use head nods to
communicate her needs.During an interview on 12/10/2025 the Social Worker stated that she does feel
Resident #1 has a communication problem and will use head nods, hand gestures and facial expressions to
communicate. The Social Worker stated that she is responsible for completing the communication section of
the MDS, but that the MDS Nurse is responsible for completing the care plan focus problems based off the
Care Area Assessment Summary. The Social Worker stated that the risks for not identifying communication
deficits on the care plan could mean the resident's needs are not being met.During an interview on
12/10/2025 at 3:00 p.m., the MDS Nurse stated that Resident #1's last care plan review was completed
11/12/2025 and the Interdisciplinary Team members did not catch that communication was not identified in
the plan of care. The MDS Nurse stated that failure to identify communication deficits in the plan of care
could result in the resident's needs not being met if the staff do not know how to communicate properly with
her.During an interview on 12/10/2025 at 6:54 p.m., the DON stated that the care plan for Resident #1
should have included a communication focus problem with appropriate interventions specific to this
resident. The DON stated she expects the Interdisciplinary Team members to accurately complete a plan of
care reflecting the resident needs. The DON stated that she is ultimately responsible for the accuracy and
completeness of the care plans.An interview was attempted on 12/10/25 at 7:31 p.m. with the Administrator,
however she was not available for interview.Record review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care
Plans, Revised 09/04/2024, revealed it is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a
comprehensive person-centered care plan for each
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
resident.that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and
mental needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0676
Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to
ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish based on the comprehensive
assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #48)
reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to provide communication assistance to effectively
communicate with staff for Resident #48. This failure could place residents at risk for decline and
diminished quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #48's face sheet dated 12/10/25
indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses Down
syndrome (genetic condition leading to developmental delays), epilepsy (neurological condition marked by
recurrent seizures), and cognitive communication deficit (struggle in communication due to cognitive
problems). Record review of Resident #48's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated he usually understood
others and could usually make himself understood. The MDS also indicated he had a BIMS score of 99
because he was unable to complete the assessment and he had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS
also indicated Resident #48 required set up assistance with eating, maximal assistance with bathing,
supervision with toileting and transfers, and was independent with bed mobility. Record review of Resident
#48's care plan dated 10/28/25 indicated Resident has a communication deficit: nonverbal status related to
severe intellectual disabilities with interventions to Ensure availability and functioning of adaptive
communication equipment: Communication/Message Board. Record review of the facility's undated
document titled Communication with non-oral communication devices or sign language indicated Resident
#48 required a communication board for communication. During an observation and interview on 12/08/25
at 3:05 PM Resident #48 was lying in bed and slightly smiled when asked questions but did not respond to
surveyor. There was no communication tools noted, and roommate was unaware of any ever being used.
During an observation and interview on 12/09/25 at 10:22 AM Resident #48 had no communication board
in the room. Surveyor attempted to ask questions to Resident #48 but could not get Resident #48 to nod
yes or no for any questions. During an observation and interview on 12/10/25 at 4:03 PM CNA N said
Resident #48 was more hands on than verbal. CNA N said Resident #48 understood what the staff said,
but he did not communicate back except for scrunching his nose. CNA N said Resident #48 had never had
a communication board that she was aware of. CNA N said if Resident #48 had a communication board, it
would have been in his bedside drawer. CNA N and surveyor looked in the bedside dresser drawers as well
as bedside nightstand and no communication board was noted. CNA N said it would have been nice to
have a communication board to tell if Resident #48 was hurting and where he was hurting or to know what
type of food he really likes. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 4:14pm LVN D said she had never seen a
communication board in Resident #48's room. If he had one, it would be located by the bed. LVN D said
Resident #48 should have an order or a care plan if he was supposed to have one. LVN D showed the
surveyor the care plan, and it was noted in the care plan that Resident #48 should have had a
communication board as adaptive communication device. LVN D said no one had mentioned anything
about a communication board to her. LVN D said she would speak with the DON and let her know right
away so the facility could get a communication board in place. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 5:43 PM
Resident #48's family member said she visits Resident #48 once a week and she felt like the staff did a
good job taking care of him. She said she had never seen a communication board in Resident #48's room
but she wished Resident #48 had a communication board. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 7:11 PM the
DON said the facility ordered a communication board and it was in the facility especially for him prior to his
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0676
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
admission on [DATE]. The DON said she was responsible as well as CNAs should have been responsible
for ensuring the communication board was always available but no one ever notified her of the
communication board being missing. The DON said the failure placed a risk for the resident not being able
to communicate his needs. Record review of the facility undated policy Communication and Interpersonal
Skills indicated:Communication- exchanging information with others. The process could be sent or received
through verbal or by non-verbal means.Non-verbal communication is communicating without using words.
Non-verbal can use behavior, body language, facial expressions, and attitudes or emotions. Example,
resident pointing to a cup of water. The policy did not indicate use of a communication board.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable
parameters of nutritional status and is offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health
for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #13 and Resident #19) reviewed for nutrition. 1.The facility failed to ensure
Resident #13 had water in his cup to drink on 12/08/25 and 12/09/25. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident
#19 was given a shake as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased
nutritional status, decline in health, serious illness, or hospitalization.Findings included:
Residents Affected - Few
1.Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 12/10/25 indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male who
admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses diabetes mellitus (condition that causes the blood
sugar to be elevated), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it
difficult to breathe), obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage of urine flow, causing backup and kidney
damage, pain, and infection), and muscle weakness.
Record review of Resident #13's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated he understood others
and was able to make himself understood. The MDS also indicated he had a BIMS score of 11 which meant
he had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated he was dependent on staff for toileting and
bathing, he required moderate assistance with bed mobility and required set-up assistance with eating. The
MDS also indicated he was on a mechanically altered diet that required change in texture of food or liquids.
Record review of Resident #13's care plan revised on 12/05/25 indicated Resident #13 was on a no
restrictions, mechanical soft, and with nectar thickened liquids diet with a goal to maintain adequate
hydration and interventions to provide nectar thickened liquids as ordered.
Record review of Resident #13's order summary report dated 12/10/25 indicated he had orders for:
1)Restrictions diet Mechanical Soft texture, Mildly Thick-Nectar consistency with a start date of 12/03/25
and no end date.
2) This resident is at risk for malnutrition due to sepsis (medical emergency related to the body response to
a severe infection) with a start date of 11/25/25 and no end date.
During an observation and interview on 12/08/25 at 11:35 AM Resident #13 was sitting up in his wheelchair
visiting with a family member and had no water in his room. He said the facility made axle grease (which
was what he called thickened liquids) but they did not leave any in the room for him to drink. Resident #13
said he never had water except on his food trays and he was worried because he had a urinary tract
infection while in the hospital. Resident #13 said he was not offered fluids any other times.
During an observation on 12/09/25 at 10:38 AM the physical therapist was in Resident #13's room working
with him, but he continued to have no water in his room to drink.
During an observation on 12/10/25 at 8:38 AM Resident #13 was out of his room but he did not have any
water at his bedside.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
During an interview on 12/10/2025 at 11:33 AM CNA H said the dining room sends out fluids with their
meals, and the nurse gives them fluids with their medications. She said she was told that they cannot leave
thickening fluids in their room. She said if Resident #13 asked for fluids in between those times, she would
have to go to the nurse and ask her to give her some thickened fluids. She said she would ask him if he
wanted a drink, and he would drink it. She said she felt they could stay hydrated on their own if fluids were
left in the room. CNA H said the failure placed residents at risk for dehydration.
During an interview on 12/10/2025 at 2:10 PM, LVN M said the dietary staff does not deliver the thickened
liquids to them at snack times. She said today (12/10/25) was the first time she had seen them being
delivered.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 7:14 PM the DON said it was not their policy to have the water at the
bedside all the time because it could change consistency. The DON said the facility staff used to leave the
thickened water at the bedside and the company changed it to where the staff were not supposed to leave
it. The DON said the CNAs were supposed to bring out water for residents daily at 10:00 AM, 2:00 PM, and
8:00 PM for hydration. The DON said the failure placed Resident #13 at risk of not having water when he
wants it, but he has not had an issue with dehydration.
An attempted telephone interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30 p.m. with the Administrator was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility policy Hydration Fluid Maintenance dated October 2010 indicated:
Anticipated Outcome 1. The facility will have a comprehensive program to provide adequate opportunity for
fluid intake
to each resident. Risk factors for a resident becoming dehydrated are:
? Coma/decreased sensorium (sensory apparatus)
? Fluid loss and increased fluid needs (e.g., diarrhea, fever, uncontrolled diabetes)
? Fluid Restriction
? Functional impairment that makes it difficult to drink, reach fluid or communicate fluid needs.10. There will
be no water pitcher at bedside for residents who have ordered Fluid Restrictions,
Thickened liquids and NPO. For residents, on thickened liquids containers of pre-thickened liquids may be
kept at bedside in a resident's personal refrigerator or a small cooler.
2. Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 12/10/25, reflected Resident #19 was an [AGE]
year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Alzheimer's (progressive
disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions).
Record review of Resident #19's order summary report, dated 12/10/25, reflected ensure two times a day
for supplement with a start date 10/24/25.
Record review of Resident #19's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/13/25, reflected Resident #19
usually made herself understood and usually understood others. Resident #19's BIMS score was 8, which
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #19 was independent with eating. Resident #19
has not had 5% weight loss or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months.
Record review of Resident #19's comprehensive care plan, revised on 11/18/25, reflected Resident #19
was at risk for nutritional and hydration related to Alzheimer's, dementia (loss of memory, language,
problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life), BIMS score,
and recent acute illness. The care plan interventions included: provide, serve diet as ordered, and provide
ensure as ordered.
During an observation, interview and record review on 12/08/25 at 12:25 p.m., Resident #19 did not receive
a shake with her lunch meal. The meal ticket reflected 4 oz of a nutritious shake. Resident #19 stated she
was supposed to get a milk shake with her meals.
During an interview on 12/08/25 at 3:02 p.m., CNA E stated the nurse must check the trays prior to passing
them out to the residents to make sure the residents received the right diet. CNA E stated the DON had
stepped away and the dietary staff stated it was ok to take the tray to Resident #19. CNA E stated it was
important for residents to receive their milk shake to prevent weight loss.
During an interview on 12/09/25 at 12:51 p.m., Dietary Aide F stated she was responsible for ensuring the
milkshake was on the tray prior delivering to the residents. When asked why she did not ensure a milkshake
was placed on a tray,
Dietary Aide F stated, it was a mistake. Dietary Aide F stated it was important for residents to receive their
milk shake to prevent weight loss.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 6:08 p.m., the Dietary Manager stated the aide was responsible for
ensuring the residents receive the milkshake. The Dietary Manager stated she monitored meals by
watching meal service daily. The Dietary Manager stated there has not been any issues in the past 3
months regarding residents not receiving the correct diet. The Dietary Manager stated it is important to
ensure the residents were on the correct diet to prevent weight loss.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 6:54 p.m., the DON stated she expected the physician diet order to be
followed. The DON stated she did not check Resident #19's tray prior to CNA E giving it to her. The DON
stated the CNA E should have waited on her to come back before delivering the tray. The DON stated she
monitored by weekly and random dining room rounds to ensure diet orders were followed. The DON stated
there have been issues in the past, but staff were immediately in-serviced verbally. The DON stated it was
important to receive the correct diet to give extra nutrition.
An attempted telephone interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30 p.m., with the Administrator was unsuccessful.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Menu Planning Guidelines and Procedure revised 07/12/24
indicated. Menus will be followed and served as written.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 11 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0699
Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive
culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and
accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may
cause re-traumatization of the resident for 4 of 5 residents (Resident #2, Resident #7, Resident #8, and
Resident #11) reviewed for trauma-informed care.The facility did not ensure the care plans of Resident #2,
Resident #7, Resident #8, and Resident #11, who had histories of trauma, identified possible triggers and
interventions.This failure could place residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to
re-traumatization.1.Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 12/10/25, reflected Resident #2 was a
[AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included PTSD (a
disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event).
Residents Affected - Some
Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #2 made himself
understood and understood others. Resident #2's BIMS score was 9, which indicated his cognition was
moderately impaired. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of PTSD and depression.
Record review of Resident #2's comprehensive care plan, revised 07/31/25 reflected Resident #2 had a
history of trauma that may have a negative effect related to PTSD. The care plan interventions included:
monitor for signs and symptoms of depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances and substance abuse issues.
The care plan did not address triggers.
Record review of Resident#2's comprehensive trauma screening, dated 01/17/25, reflected it did not
address triggers.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #2 stated he had a diagnosis of PTSD. Resident
#2 stated he had not identified any triggers within the facility and there was nothing that bothers him.
Resident #2 stated however he did get spooked when he was woken up.
2. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 12/10/25, reflected Resident #7 was a [AGE] year-old
male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included PTSD (a disorder in which
a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), anxiety, depression,
and psychotic disorder (severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions) with
hallucinations (sensory experiences, like seeing hearing or feeling things that are not real).
Record review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #7 sometimes made
himself understood and usually understood others. Resident #7's BIMS score was 8, which indicated his
cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #7 had a diagnosis of PTSD anxiety, depression, and
psychotic disorder with hallucinations.
Record review of Resident #7's comprehensive care plan, revised 09/16/25 reflected Resident #7 used
psychotropic medications, mood stabilizer, antidepressants, antianxiety, antipsychotics related to PTSD,
major depression disorder, and psychotic disorder with hallucinations. The care plan intervention included:
administer medication as ordered, and monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. The care plan
did not address Resident #7's history of trauma to include potential triggers for re-traumatization.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 12 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0699
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Record review of Resident #7's comprehensive trauma screening, dated 11/08/24, reflected it did not
address triggers.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 10:07 a.m., the Social Worker stated the comprehensive trauma
screening was completed by her on admission. The Social Worker stated she did not ask about the triggers
when completing the comprehensive trauma screening. The Social Worker stated she had never been told
to ask about triggers unless the resident or family volunteered the information. The Social Worker stated the
care plan should indicate whether the resident had triggers or not. After reviewing Resident #2 and #7's
electronic medical records, the Social Worker stated neither resident had triggers noted and to her
knowledge Residents #2 and #7 did not have any triggers. The Social Worker stated it was important to
ensure triggers were identified to prevent re-traumatization.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 10:42 a.m., Resident #7's family member stated he had a diagnosis of
PTSD. Resident #7's family member stated he had no significant triggers; however, he does have dreams
about his PTSD. Resident #7's family member described it as lookbacks from being in the Vietnam war.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 11:07 a.m., CNA G stated she provided care to Resident #2. CNA G
stated to her knowledge Resident #2 did not have any trigger or a diagnosis of PTSD. CNA G stated it was
important to know resident's triggers to look out for the warning signs.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 11:32 a.m., CNA H stated she was Resident #7's aide for the 6a-6p
shift. CNA H stated to her knowledge Resident #7 did not have any triggers or a diagnosis of PTSD. CNA H
stated if the resident did or did not have triggers it should be documented in his chart. CNA H stated it was
important to know resident's triggers to prevent re-traumatization.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 5:48 p.m., the MDS Coordinator stated the care plan should indicate
whether the residents have triggers or not. After reviewing Resident #2 and #7's electronic medical records,
the Social Worker stated neither resident had triggers noted and to her knowledge Residents #2 and #7 did
not have any triggers. The MDS Coordinator stated it was important to know resident's triggers to prevent
traumatization.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 6:54 p.m., the DON stated she expected triggers to be identified on the
care plan. The DON stated the Social Worker and MDS Coordinator were responsible for ensuring the
triggers were identified and documented in the resident's chart. The DON stated the Administrator was
responsible for monitoring and overseeing PTSD/triggers. The DON stated it was important to know
resident's triggers to help better care for the resident.
An attempted telephone interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30 p.m., with the Administrator was unsuccessful.
Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 12/10/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally
admitted [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, cerebral
palsy (a neurological condition from brain damage affecting movement, posture and coordination),
schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness blending symptoms of psychosis like hallucinations & delusions
with mood disorders and mood swings), mild intellectual disabilities, and anxiety (a feeling of unease, worry
or fear).
Record review of Resident #8's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 13 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0699
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
indicating intact cognition and active diagnosis of PTSD. Further review of Resident #8's comprehensive
MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 utilized a wheelchair for mobility, was independent in eating,
required moderate assistance in bathing, maximum assistance in toileting, bed mobility, transfers and total
assistance in upper and lower body dressing. Record review of Trauma Assessment Screening form (date
not obtained) revealed no identified triggers or description of PTSD event.
Residents Affected - Some
Record review of Resident #8's care plan with target date of 02/02/2026 revealed Resident #8 was
identified as having a history of trauma that may have a negative effect. The care plan did not identify the
type of trauma experienced and provided no interventions to ensure Resident #8's needs were being met.
During an interview on 12/09/2025 at 11:25 a.m., Resident #8 appeared hesitant to discuss her trauma
history with surveyor and was unable to provide further information regarding triggers for care.
During a phone interview on 12/11/2025 at 2:20 p.m., Resident #8's family member stated that the trauma
stemmed from her former marriage where she experienced an abusive family member. Resident #8's family
member stated that Resident #8 appears content in the facility and that a possible trigger could be an
aggressive male or a male that resembled her family member.
During an interview on 12/10/2025 at 10:11 a.m., the Social Worker stated that she completes the trauma
assessment on admission on ly for residents and stated that the trauma assessment does not ask for
triggers. The Social Worker stated that identification of triggers specific to each resident would be important
to know to help avoid exacerbation of trauma / PTSD. The Social Worker stated she does not ask each
resident specifically what the triggers are, but she does explore the PTSD, document concerns and refer to
psychological care services for on-going management.
During an interview on 12/09/2025 at 9:58 a.m., CNA A stated that she is aware Resident #8 has some
outbursts at times but has not been informed of any trauma triggers to be mindful of.
During an interview on 12/09/2025 at 3:09 p.m., LVN B stated that she is aware Resident #8 receives
medication for mood and behavior management, but is not aware of specific areas of concern related to
trauma.
During an interview on 12/09/2025 at 3:20 p.m., CNA C stated she works well with Resident #8 and knows
that she becomes upset at times but she can easily calm her down. CNA C stated she has not been
advised of specific concerns for Resident #8 related to PTSD and that she could not recall if she has
received training for PTSD in the past year.
During an interview on 12/10/2025 at 1:55 p.m., LVN D stated that she knows Resident #8 receives
psychological services and behavior medications but she was not aware of what Resident #8's trauma is
related to or what triggers to watch for.
During an interview on 12/10/2025 at 6:54 p.m., the DON stated she expects triggers to be identified on the
care plan however she feels her staff know the residents well enough that no harm has come from not
having this information available for all staff. The DON stated that the Social Worker and the MDS Nurse are
responsible for completing the Trauma Informed Care Assessment and stated it is important that triggers
are identified to ensure quality of care for the residents affected by PTSD. The DON stated she and the
Administrator are ultimately responsible for ensuring assessments are completed.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 14 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0699
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 12/10/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who
re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses PTSD, Dementia (cognitive decline that affects daily
life caused by brain cell damage), major depressive disorder (persistent sadness, loss of interest, fatigue,
and change in sleep/appetite), diabetes mellitus (chronic metabolism condition marked by high blood
sugars), and presbyopia (natural age-related loss of eye's ability to focus on nearby objects).
Residents Affected - Some
Record review of Resident #11's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated he could make himself understood
and was able to understand others. The MDS also indicated he had a BIMS score of 15 which meant his
cognition was intact. The MDS also indicated he was independent with all ADLs.
Record review of Resident #11's care plan dated 02/22/22 indicated he had a history of trauma that may
have a negative effect related to his diagnosis of PTSD due to military history with a goal of staff assist
Resident #11 in avoiding his triggers. The care plan did not indicate what Resident #11's triggers were.
Record review of Resident #11's comprehensive trauma screening assessment dated [DATE] completed by
the Social Worker indicated he had a documented diagnosis of trauma but the assessment did not indicate
if Resident #11 had triggers nor what the triggers were.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 10:25 AM the Social Worker said Resident #11 had triggers that
consisted of him not liking loud noises. The Social Worker said yesterday (12/09/25) the facility had fire
drills and she felt like she should have gone to Resident #11 and let them know there was going to be loud
noises [KS1] and that she maybe should have stayed with Resident #11 to comfort him. The Social Worker
said the staff would know what Resident #11's triggers were because he was very vocal and would let them
know. The Social Worker said there were no triggers on Resident #11's care plans but there should have
been triggers included in his care plan to prevent more trauma.
During an interview on 12/10/25 at 11:34 AM CNA H said she did not know about Resident #11 having
PTSD, but he provided his ADLs for himself. CNA H said she was not aware of him having PTSD, but he
would talk with her if he needed anything. CNA H said all staff should be aware if residents had a diagnosis
of PTSD to prevent problems.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care dated 10/24/22 indicated. it is the policy of
this facility to provide care and services which, in addition to meeting professional standards, are delivered
using approaches which are culturally-competent, account for experience and preferences, and address the
needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. 4. The facility will collaborate with
resident trauma survivors, and as appropriate, the resident's family, friends, the primary care physician, and
any other health care professionals (such as psychologists and mental health professionals) to develop and
implement individualized care plan interventions. 6. The facility will identify triggers which may re-traumatize
residents with a history of trauma. Trigger-specific interventions will identify ways to decrease the resident's
exposure to triggers which re-traumatize the resident, as well as identify ways to mitigate or decrease the
effect of the trigger on the resident and will be added to the resident care plan.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 15 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0759
Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free from a medication error
rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 8.82 %, based on 3 errors out of 34
opportunities, which involved 3 of 5 residents (Residents #15, #26, and #27) reviewed for medication
administration. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN K administered insulin correctly for Resident #15. 2. The
facility failed to ensure RN B administered Aspirin 325 mg (a common strength of the nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used for pain/fever relief (headaches, colds, arthritis) and, at the doctor's
direction, for heart/stroke prevention by reducing blood clots) as ordered by the physician for Resident #26
on 12/08/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure RN B administered Cyanocobalamin 2500 mcg (medication
used to maintain the health of your metabolism, blood cells, and nerves) as ordered by the physician for
Resident #27 on 12/08/25. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended
therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed by the physician's orders. Findings
included: 1. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated 12/10/25, reflected Resident #15 was a
[AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which
included Type 2 diabetes mellitus (lifelong condition where the pancreas makes little or no insulin, which
leads to high blood sugar levels), stroke, and high blood pressure Record review of Resident #15's
quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/26/25, indicated Resident #15 made himself understood and
understood others. Resident #15's BIMS score was 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. The MDS
indicated he received insulin over the 7-day look-back period. Record review of Resident #15's
comprehensive care plan dated 08/16/23 indicated Resident #15 had diabetes mellitus. The care plan
interventions were for staff to check his blood sugars, give diabetes medication as ordered, observe for
adverse side effects and/or complications such as hypoglycemia. Record review of the physician order
summary report, dated 10/23/25, reflected Resident #15 had an order for: -NovoLog Flex Pen
Subcutaneous Solution Pen injector 100 units per milliliter (Insulin Aspart) Inject 20 units subcutaneously
before meals for diabetes. -NovoLog Flex Pen Subcutaneous Solution Pen injector 100 units per milliliter
(Insulin Aspart) Inject as per sliding scale: if 200 - 250 = 2 units; 251 - 300 = 4 units; 301 - 350 = 6 units;
351 - 400 = 8 units; 401 -450 = 10 units if over 400, contact primary physicians. Subcutaneously before
meals and at bedtime, related to diabetes. During an observation and interview on 12/08/25 at 10:53 a.m.,
LVN K took Resident #15's blood sugar with a reading of 292. LVN K prepared Resident #15's Novolog by
removing the pen cap, placing a needle onto the pen, and turning the dose knob to 24 units. LVN K
administered the medication to Resident #15's right arm. LVN K did not prime (removing the air from the
needle and cartridge) the insulin pen by turning the dose knob to 2 units before turning the dose knob to 24
units. LVN K said she was unaware she needed to prime the insulin before administering Resident #15's
insulin. LVN K said after being questioned that she could see the importance of priming the insulin pen to
ensure the resident received the correct dosage of insulin, which could have led to uncontrolled diabetes. 2.
Record review of Resident #26's face sheet dated 1210/25, indicated a [AGE] year old female who admitted
to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when
the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), high blood pressure, kidney failure ( a
condition in which one or both of your kidneys no longer work on their own), and diabetes mellitus type 2
(also known as diabetes, a chronic disease that occurs when the body has high blood sugar levels. Record
review of Resident #26's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #26 understood and
was understood by others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #26 had a BIMS score of 11,
Residents Affected - Some
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 16 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0759
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #26 had
received an antiplatelet medication within the last 7 days of the look-back period. Record review of Resident
#26's comprehensive care plan revised on 09/03/25, indicated Resident #26 was taking an anticoagulant
related to her disease process of high blood pressure, heart issues, and kidney disease. The care plan
interventions were for staff to give diabetes medication as ordered by the doctor. Record review of Resident
#26's order summary report dated 06/01/25, indicated Resident #26 had an order for the following: Aspirin
Oral Tablet 325 MG (Aspirin). Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for the heart. During an observation on
12/09/25 at 9:59 a.m., RN B checked the MAR for Resident #26 and then gave 1 tablet of Aspirin 81mg.
During an interview on 12/09/10 at 12:58 p.m., RN B said she gave Resident #26, 1 tablet of Aspirin 81 mg.
She said that since the order read to give 1 tablet of Aspirin 325mg, but she gave 1 tablet of Aspirin 81mg,
she gave the wrong dose. She said she pulled the wrong bottle, and the risk could affect her clotting factor.
3.Record review of Resident #27's face sheet dated 12/10/25, indicated an [AGE] year-old male who
admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vitamin B deficiency (occurs when your
body lacks sufficient B vitamins, leading to symptoms like extreme fatigue, weakness, pale skin, mood
changes (depression, irritability), numbness/tingling, mouth sores, and cognitive issues (memory problems,
confusion), and dementia (a loss of mental functions that is severe enough to affect your daily life and
activities). Record review of Resident #27's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident
#27 understood and was understood by others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #27 had a BIMS
score of 05, indicating his cognition was severely impaired. The MDS assessment did not indicate Resident
#27 had received Cyanocobalamin. Record review of Resident #27's comprehensive care plan revised on
08/25/25, indicated Resident #27 had impaired cognition and was at risk for a further decline in cognitive
and functional abilities related to dementia. The care plan interventions were for staff to give medication as
ordered by the doctor. Record review of Resident #27's order summary report dated 05/30/25, indicated
Resident #27 had an order for the following: Cyanocobalamin Tablet 1000 MCG. Give 2.5 tablets by mouth
in the morning for the supplement; take 2.5 tabs to equal a 2500 mcg dose. During an observation on
12/09/25 at 10:07 a.m., RN B checked the MAR for Resident #27 and then gave 2.5 tablets of
Cyanocobalamin 500 Mcg. During an interview on 12/10/10 at 12:47 p.m., RN B said she gave Resident
#27, 2.5 tablets of Cyanocobalamin 500 Mcg. She said that since the order read to give 2.5 tablets of
Cyanocobalamin 1000 Mcg, she gave 2.5 tablets of Cyanocobalamin 500 Mcg, she gave the wrong dose.
She said the failure was she gave the wrong ordered dosage, and he did not receive the therapeutic dose
he needed. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 7:00 p.m., the DON said she expected nurses to give insulin
and other medication correctly. The DON said she expected the nurses to read the MAR and give
medication as ordered. The DON said she was not sure of what the policy said on insulin pen
administration, but after reading the manufacturer's insert on insulin pens, she said she would do an
in-service about priming the insulin pens before each use. She said if the pen was malfunctioning, then a
resident might not receive the correct dose of insulin, which could make their blood sugar level rise, and if
they did not receive the ordered dose, they may not be receiving the therapeutic dose. During an attempted
phone interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30 p.m., the Administrator was unsuccessful. Record review of the
undated facility's Licensed Nurse Skills Review indicated #1 Perform hand hygiene, #2 Check the
physician's order for insulin, #5 Prepare injection: attach the needle, remove the needle cap, check the flow
of delivery (air shot) with a 2 unit prime every time and then select the dosage. Record review of the
facility's policy titled, Medication-Treatment Administration and Documentation Guidelines, revised
04/06/23, indicated To provide a process for accurate, timely
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 17 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0759
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
administration and documentation of medication and treatment. Fundamental information: medications are
administered according to the manufacturer's guidelines unless otherwise indicated by physician orders.
Process: #1 Verify labels accurately reflect the physician's orders on the electronic medical administration
record before administering residents' medications and treatment, #2 verify administration accuracy by
checking the medication with the MAR three times, #4 administer the medication according to the
physician's order. Record review of the manufacturer's policy titled Insulin Aspart Recombinant Novolog,
indicated, Insulin was a fast-acting type of insulin. Insulin is one of many hormones that help the body turn
the food we eat into energy. To use the flex pen or flex touch pen: #1 wash your hands, #2 primed the pen
by removing the air from the needle and cartridge, Select 2 units when turning the dose knob, #3 hold the
pen with the needle pointing up then gently tap the cartridge holder to collect the air bubbles at the top, #4
press the push button until it stops you should see a zero in the dose window, #5 you should see insulin at
the needle tip if you do not see anything repeat the priming steps but not more than six times if there is still
no answer do not use the pen.#6 turn the dose selector, be careful not to press the button #7 insert the
needle into your skin and press the push button all the way in for at least 6 seconds. Keep pressing until the
needle has pulled out from the skin. This will make sure that you have received the full dose.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 18 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant
medication errors for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #15) reviewed for insulin administration. The facility did not
ensure LVN K administered Resident #15's Novolog (insulin medication) according to the manufacturer's
instructions on 12/08/25. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and prevent
them from receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings included: Record review of
Resident #15's face sheet, dated 12/10/25, reflected Resident #15 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to
the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes mellitus
(lifelong condition where the pancreas makes little or no insulin, which leads to high blood sugar levels),
stroke, and high blood pressure Record review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS assessment, dated
11/26/25, indicated Resident #15 made himself understood and understood others. Resident #15's BIMS
score was 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. The MDS indicated he received insulin over the
7-day look-back period. Record review of Resident #15's comprehensive care plan dated 08/16/23
indicated Resident #15 had diabetes mellitus. The care plan interventions were for staff to check his blood
sugars, give diabetes medication as ordered, observe for adverse side effects and/or complications such as
hypoglycemia. Record review of the physician order summary report, dated 10/23/25, reflected Resident
#15 had an order for -NovoLog Flex Pen Subcutaneous Solution Pen injector 100 units per milliliter (Insulin
Aspart) Inject 20 units subcutaneously before meals for diabetes. -NovoLog Flex Pen Subcutaneous
Solution Pen injector 100 units per milliliter (Insulin Aspart) Inject as per sliding scale: if 200 - 250 = 2 units;
251 - 300 = 4 units; 301 - 350 = 6 units; 351 - 400 = 8 units; 401 -450 = 10 units if over 400, contact primary
physicians. Subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime, related to diabetes. During an observation and
interview on 12/08/25 at 10:53 a.m., LVN K took Resident #15's blood sugar with a reading of 292. LVN K
prepared Resident #15's Novolog by removing the pen cap, placing a needle onto the pen, and turning the
dose knob to 24 units. LVN K administered the medication to Resident #15's right arm. LVN K did not prime
(removing the air from the needle and cartridge) the insulin pen by turning the dose knob to 2 units before
turning the dose knob to 24 units. LVN K said she was unaware she needed to prime the insulin before
administering Resident #15's insulin. LVN K said after being questioned that she could see the importance
of priming the insulin pen to ensure the resident received the correct dosage of insulin, which could have
led to uncontrolled diabetes. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 7:00 p.m., the DON said she expected the
nurse to take the resident's blood sugar and give the ordered dose of insulin. The DON said she did not
know right off hand what the policy said on the administration of the insulin pen. The DON said she was
unaware that the insulin pen needed to be primed before administering the insulin dose. She said she did a
random medication pass, which included insulin administration, and she did not notice any issues. After
reviewing the manufacturer's package insert, the DON said it was important to properly prime the insulin
pen to prevent blood sugar issues. She said she would do an in-service on the proper way to prime the
insulin pens. During an attempted phone interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30 p.m. with the Administrator was
unsuccessful. Record review of the undated facility's Licensed Nurse Skills Review indicated #1 Perform
hand hygiene, #2 Check the physician's order for insulin, #5 Prepare injection: attach the needle, remove
the needle cap, check the flow of delivery (air shot) with a 2 unit prime every time and then select the
dosage. Record review of the manufacturer's insert titled Insulin Aspart Recombinant Novolog, indicated
that insulin is a fast-acting type of insulin. Insulin is one of many hormones that help the body turn the food
we eat into energy. To use the flex pen or
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 19 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
flex touch pen: #1 wash your hands, #2 primed the pen by removing the air from the needle and cartridge,
Select 2 units when turning the dose knob, #3 hold the pen with the needle pointing up then gently tap the
cartridge holder to collect the air bubbles at the top, #4 press the push button until it stops you should see a
zero in the dose window, #5 you should see insulin at the needle tip if you do not see anything repeat the
priming steps but not more than six times if there is still no answer do not use the pen.#6 turn the dose
selector, be careful not to press the button #7 insert the needle into your skin and press the push button all
the way in for at least 6 seconds. Keep pressing until the needle has pulled out from the skin. This will make
sure that you have received the full dose.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 20 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0761
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted
professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately
locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation and interview the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only
accessible by authorized personnel, and labeled and dated correctly for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #11)
observed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 did not have hydrocortisone
cream and Neosporin on his bedside table and dresser. These failures could place residents at risk for not
receiving drugs and biologicals as needed, or overmedicating, .Findings include: Record review of Resident
#11's face sheet dated 12/10/25 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male who re-admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with the diagnoses PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), Dementia (cognitive decline that effects
daily life caused by brain cell damage), major depressive disorder (persistent sadness, loss of interest,
fatigue, and change in sleep/appetite), diabetes mellitus (chronic metabolism condition marked by high
blood sugars), and presbyopia (natural age-related loss of eye's ability to focus on nearby objects). Record
review of Resident #11's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated he could make himself understood and was
able to understand others. The MDS also indicated he had a BIMS score of 15 which meant his cognition
was intact. The MDS also indicated he was independent with all ADLs. Record review of Resident #11's
care plan dated 09/20/25 indicated he had impaired cognition and was at risk for a further decline in
cognitive and functional abilities related to Parkinsons with interventions to administer medications per
physician orders and monitor. Record review of Resident #11's order summary report dated 12/10/25
indicated:Hydrocortisone External Cream 1 % (Hydrocortisone (Topical)) Apply to affected area topically
every 12 hours as needed for itching apply thin layer to affected area with a start date of 10/30/2024 and no
end date. The order summary report did not indicate an order for Neosporin. During an observation and
interview on 12/09/2025 at 10:26 AM, Resident #11 had hydrocortisone cream 1% on his bedside table.
Resident #11 said he used the hydrocortisone cream for places on his arm when he scratches, he said one
of the nurses gave it to him. During an observation on 12/10/2025 at 8:42 AM, Resident #11 was out of the
room and had hydrocortisone 1% cream in his room on his nightstand. During an interview on 12/10/2025
at 3:58 PM, LVN M said the facility did not have an order for anyone who kept medications at bedside. LVN
M said Resident #11 should not have the hydrocortisone medication at his bedside. LVN M said the failure
placed a risk for Resident #11 or any other resident getting the medication, eating it, using too much of the
medication, getting the medication in their eyes, or putting the medication in the wrong place. LVN M said
all the staff was responsible for ensuring there was no medications in the residents' room. During an
interview on 12/10/2025 at 7:08 PM, the DON said she found the hydrocortisone 1% cream and a tube of
Neosporin cream in Resident #11's room when she went to clean it out. The DON said Resident #11 had
been told over and over that he could not have medications in his room. She said she expected the
medications to be stored in the medication cart or the medication rooms. The DON said the staff make
rounds daily and all staff was responsible for ensuring the medications was not in Resident #11's room. The
DON said the failure placed a risk to having other residents coming in Resident #11's room and ingest it or
Resident #11 could have taken or used too much. An attempted telephone interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30
p.m., with the Administrator was unsuccessful. Record review of the facility policy Medication Storage dated
1/20/21 indicated: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will
be stored, dated and labeled according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure
proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 21 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0761
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
security.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines 1. General Guidelines: a. All drugs and biologicals
will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication
rooms) under proper temperature controls.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 22 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0804
Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable,
attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 9 of 9 confidential residents reviewed for food and
nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff provided food that was palatable and had an
appetizing temperature on 12/09/25. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake,
hunger, and unwanted weight loss.Findings included: During a confidential resident group meeting 9
residents stated the food was lousy and cold. During an observation and interview on 12/09/25 at 12:16
p.m., lunch tray was sampled by the Dietary Manager and six surveyors. The sample tray consisted of chili
bake which was lukewarm, carrots which were lukewarm, and salad was brown, soggy and withered. The
Dietary Manager stated the chili bake and carrots was good to her, and salad was alright. During an
interview on 12/10/25 at 4:37 p.m., CNA L stated residents had stated the food was not that great. CNA L
stated she was unable to recall the resident's name. CNA L stated when they complained she would try to
season the food with the salt and pepper that was given on the tray or offer the resident an alternative. CNA
L stated she did not report the complaints to anyone. CNA L stated residents not eating their food could
potentially cause weight loss. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 4:51 p.m., the ADON stated no residents
complained to her about food being cold or bland but if so, she would offer the resident an alternative. The
ADON stated all food complaints would be reported to the DON and Dietary Manager. The ADON stated it
was important to ensure food was palatable and had an appetizing temperature to ensure the residents get
the nutrition they need. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 6:08 p.m., the Dietary Manager stated she has
not had any complaints regarding food being cold or food tasting bland in the last several months. The
Dietary Manager stated food complaints were usually brought to her verbally and an alternative would be
offered. The Dietary Manager stated she monitored meal service daily including random tray sampling. The
Dietary Manager stated it was important to ensure food was palatable and had an appetizing temperature
to prevent weight loss. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 6:54 p.m., the DON stated she expected food to
be the appropriate temperature and seasoned for palatability. The DON stated the Administrator was
responsible for monitoring and overseeing. The DON stated it was important to ensure food was palatable
and had an appetizing temperature to keep up their nutrition and quality of life. An attempted telephone
interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30 p.m., with the Administrator was unsuccessful. Record review of the facility's
policy titled Dietary Services Manager's Responsibility revised 01/2013 indicated. The Dietary Service
Manager or designee is responsible for ensuring proper preparation of food by methods that conserve
nutritive value, flavor and appearance. 2. The dietary service manager or designee should taste all foods
prior to serving. 3. The dietary service manager or designee should see that all meals are presented in a
manner that enhances plate appearance.
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 23 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0810
Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide special eating equipment and
utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident can use the
assistive devices when consuming meals for 1 of 5 (Resident #19) residents reviewed for special eating
equipment and assistance when consuming meals. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 had a
physician's ordered cup with lid for drinking fluids. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by
weight loss, diminished independence, and self-esteem.Findings included:Record review of Resident #19's
face sheet, dated 12/10/25, reflected Resident #19 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with a diagnosis which included Alzheimer's (progressive disease that destroys memory and other
important mental functions). Record review of Resident #19's order summary report, dated 12/10/25,
reflected regular texture, thin consistency, fortified foods, and cup with lid and straws with every meal with a
start date 10/07/25. Record review of Resident #19's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/13/25, reflected
Resident #19's usually made herself understood and usually understood others. Resident #19's BIMS
score was 8, which indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #19 was independent with
eating. Resident #19 has not had 5% weight loss or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in last 6
months. Record review of Resident #19's comprehensive care plan, revised on 11/18/25, reflected Resident
#19 was at risk for nutritional and hydration related to Alzheimer's, dementia (loss of memory, language,
problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life), BIMS score,
and recent acute illness. The care plan interventions included: provide, serve diet as ordered, and provide
ensure as ordered. During an observation and interview on 12/08/25 at 12:25 p.m., Resident #19 did not
receive a lid with her cup. Resident #19 stated she did not know if she needed a lid or not. During an
interview on 12/08/25 at 3:02 p.m., CNA E stated the nurse must check the trays prior to passing them out
to the residents to make sure the residents received the right diet. CNA E stated the DON had stepped
away and the dietary staff stated it was ok to take the tray to Resident #19. CNA E stated it was important
for Resident #19 to receive a lid on her cup to prevent spillage. During an interview on 12/09/25 at 12:51
p.m., Dietary Aide F stated she was responsible for ensuring a lid was on the cup prior to delivering to
Resident #19. When asked why she did not ensure a lid was on the cup, Dietary Aide F stated, it was a
mistake. Dietary Aide F stated it was important for Resident #19 to receive a lid on her cup to prevent
spillage. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 6:08 p.m., the Dietary Manager stated the aide was responsible
for ensuring the residents receive a lip on their cup. The Dietary Manager stated she monitored meals by
watching meal service daily. The Dietary Manager stated there has not been any issues in the past 3
months regarding residents not receiving the correct diet. The Dietary Manager stated it is important to
ensure the residents receive a lid on the cup to prevent spillage which could cause a dignity issue. During
an interview on 12/10/25 at 6:54 p.m., the DON stated she expected the physician diet order to be followed.
The DON stated she did not check Resident #19's tray prior to CNA E giving it to her. The DON stated the
CNA E should have waited on her to come back before delivering the tray. The DON stated she monitored
by weekly and random dining room rounds to ensure diet orders were followed. The DON stated there have
been issues in the past, but staff were immediately in-service verbally. The DON stated it was important to
receive the correct diet to prevent spillage. An attempted telephone interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30 p.m., with
the Administrator was unsuccessful. Record review of the facility's policy titled Menu Planning Guidelines
and Procedure revised 07/12/24 indicated. Menus will be followed and served as written.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 24 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0812
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve
food in accordance with professional standards.
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and
serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility
did not ensure:1. Food items were labeled and dated.2. Hair restraints were worn. 3. The kitchen staff had a
Soap dispenser located in a place that did not prevent the staff contaminating the clean dish rack. These
failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness.Findings included: During the initial tour
observation and interview with the Dietary Manager on 12/08/25 beginning at 11:02 a.m., the following was
revealed: 1. Two cans of cut sweet potatoes undated. During an observation on 12/08/25 at 11:05 a.m., the
soap dispenser was located over the clean dish rack next to the three-compartment sink. During an
observation on 12/08/25 at 11:10 a.m. [NAME] O, [NAME] P and Dietary Manager hairnet were not
covering her entire head while she prepared the lunch meal. There was loose hair sticking out. During an
interview on 12/10/25 at 5:09 p.m., Dietary Aide F stated all staff were responsible for labeling and dating.
Dietary Aide F stated hair nets should always be worn while in the kitchen and cover the entire head
without loose hair sticking out. Dietary Aide F stated these failures could potentially put residents at risk for
food borne illness and cross contamination. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 5:18 p.m., [NAME] Q stated
all staff were responsible for labeling and dating. [NAME] Q stated hair nets should always be worn while in
the kitchen and hairnets were supposed to cover the entire head without loose hair sticking out. [NAME] Q
stated these failures could potentially put residents at risk for foodborne illness and cross contamination. An
attempted telephone interview on 12/10/25 at 5:21 p.m., with [NAME] O was unsuccessful. An attempted
telephone interview on 12/10/25 at 5:25 p.m., with [NAME] P was unsuccessful. During an interview on
12/10/25 at 6:08 p.m., the Dietary Manager stated cleanliness was important in the kitchen, so staff were
not spreading germs or contaminating anything. The Dietary Manager stated she was responsible for
making sure the kitchen was cleaned appropriately. The Dietary Manager stated all food should be dated by
the date received. The Dietary Manager stated hair nets should be worn while in the kitchen and covering
the entire head without loose hair sticking out. The Dietary Manager stated the soap dispenser should not
be over the clean dishes. The Dietary Manager stated she had reported to the department head about
moving the soap dispenser. The Dietary Manager stated she was unable to recall names. The Dietary
Manager stated she was responsible for monitoring and overseeing daily walk throughs and when there
was an isolated issue that staff were verbally in service. The Dietary Manager stated these failures could
potentially put residents at risk for cross contamination and foodborne illness. An attempted telephone
interview on 12/10/25 at 6:22 p.m., with the Dietitian was unsuccessful. During an interview on 12/10/25 at
6:54 p.m., the DON stated food items should be dated. The DON stated hair nets should be worn while in
the kitchen and covering the entire head without loose hair sticking out. The DON stated the soap dispenser
should not be over the clean dish rack. The DON stated the Administrator was responsible for monitoring
and overseeing. The DON stated these failures could potentially put residents at risk for cross
contamination and foodborne illness. An attempted telephone interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30 p.m., with the
Administrator was unsuccessful. Record review of the facility's policy titled Dietary Services Manager's
Responsibility revised 01/2013 indicated. The Dietary Service Manager or designee is responsible for
ensuring proper preparation of food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance.6. The
dietary service manager or designee must ensure that dietary staff practice hygienic food handling
techniques at all times. Record review of the facility's policy titled Dry Food and Supplies Storage revised
11/15/17 did not address dating food that was in its
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 25 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0812
original container.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 26 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and
control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the
development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #13)
room reviewed for infection control practices and enhanced barrier precautions. 1) The facility failed to
ensure the Treatment nurse used the proper handwashing technique while providing wound care for
Resident #13. 2) The facility failed to ensure the Treatment Nurse disinfected her scissors during wound
care when she cut the dirty dressing and then cut the clean dressing with the contaminated scissors. These
failures could place residents at increased risk for serious complications from a communicable disease that
could diminish the residents' quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet
dated 12/10/25 indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the
diagnoses diabetes mellitus (condition that causes the blood sugar to be elevated), chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe), obstructive and reflux
uropathy (a blockage of urine flow, causing backup and kidney damage, pain, and infection), and muscle
weakness. Record review of Resident #13's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated he
understood others and was able to make himself understood. The MDS also indicated he had a BIMS score
of 11 which meant he had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated he was dependent on
staff for toileting and bathing, he required moderate assistance with bed mobility and required set-up
assistance with eating. Record review of Resident #13's care plan dated 11/26/25 indicated he had a
pressure ulcer and was at risk for infection, pain, and a decline in functional abilities with a goal to be free
from infection and interventions to provide wound care per physician's order and keep dressing clean, dry,
and intact. During an observation on 12/10/2025 at 3:15 PM the Treatment Nurse provided wound care to
Resident #13's right heel. The Treatment nurse performed the wound care using aseptic technique. Prior to
initiating wound care the Treatment Nurse performed hand hygiene using the sink in Resident #13's
bathroom. When the Treatment Nurse turned off the water faucet, she used her bare hand/wrist. The
Treatment Nurse was also observed between glove changes turning the faucet off with her bare hand/wrist
and again at the completion of wound care prior to exiting the room the Treatment Nurse turned the water
faucet off using her bare hand/wrist. During the wound care procedure the Treatment Nurse cleaned her
scissors prior to the start of the procedure, but removed the soiled dressing from the patient's right heel
using scissors, placed the dirty scissors back on the clean surface, and failed to clean or disinfect the
scissors prior to being used to cut clean dressings before the clean dressings were applied to the open
wound. During an interview on 12/10/25 at 3:52 PM the treatment Nurse said she felt as though she
washed her hands excessively and she usually used the hand sanitizer in between glove changes. The
Treatment Nurse said she should have turned the water off with her paper towel instead of her hand
because she was re-contaminating her hands. The Treatment Nurse said she also failed to clean the
scissors after she cut the dirty dressing off and before cutting the clean dressing. The Treatment Nurse said
the failure placed a risk for recontamination or infection. During an interview on 12/10/2025 at 7:17 PM
DON said her expectation was for the treatment nurse to use a paper towel to turn the water off and clean
scissors between clean and dirty surfaces. The failure placed a risk for infection. An attempted telephone
interview on 12/10/25 at 7:30 p.m. with the Administrator was unsuccessful. Record review of the facility
policy Hand Hygiene dated 2/20/22 indicated: Policy: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures
to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 27 of 28
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
455985
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clarksville Nursing Home
300 E Baker St
Clarksville, TX 75426
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility.5. Hand hygiene technique when using soap and
water:a. Wet hands with water. Avoid using hot water to prevent drying of skin.e. Dry thoroughly with a
single-use towel f. Use clean towel to tum off the faucet. Record review of the facility policy Cleaning and
Disinfecting Portable Equipment dated 5/4/21 indicated: Anticipated Outcome: It is the policy of this facility
to follow infection control principles to prevent spread of infection through contact with portable equipment
in the resident's care environment.2. Staff shall follow environmental infection control principles for cleaning
and disinfecting the equipment.a. Each user is responsible for routine cleaning and disinfection. b. Cleaning
shall be performed daily and between residents. c. Hard surfaces shall be cleaned with a cloth dampened
with an approved cleaner/disinfectant (spray the cloth not the device) or a disposable pre-moistened cloth.
Allow surfaces to air dry before reuse. (Follow manufacturer's instructions when selecting
cleaning/disinfection products.).
Event ID:
Facility ID:
455985
If continuation sheet
Page 28 of 28