Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

VINELAND POST ACUTECMS #5550111 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to readmit one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). On 12/17/2025, Resident 1 was discharged to the GACH and was for readmission back to the facility on [DATE]. The facility only readmitted back Resident 1 on 12/23/2025. This deficient practice resulted to a violation of Resident 1's right to be readmitted back to the facility. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 9/17/2025 with diagnoses including epilepsy (a brain disorder causing seizures [abnormal electrical activity in your brain that temporarily affects your consciousness, muscle control, and behavior], and muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 9/27/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was severely impaired with thought process and required maximal assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADLs activities such as bathing, dressing, and toileting a person performs daily).During an interview on 12/19/2025 at 3:14 p.m. with the Social Service Worker (SSW), the SSW stated that she (SSW) spoke to the case manager of the GACH, the physician from GACH and ombudsman informing them that the facility will not take Resident 1 back in the facility when Resident 1 was already ready to be discharged in the GACH yesterday (11/18/2025). The SSW stated that the facility Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) decided not to readmit Resident 1 back in the facility.During an interview on 1/19/2025 at 3:48 p.m. with the DON, the DON stated that the facility was not accepting Resident 1 back from the facility.During an interview on 12/22/2025 at 9:00 a.m. with the Administrator, the Administrator stated that the facility was not taking Resident 1 back in the facility.During a concurrent interview and review on 12/22/2025 at 2:43 p.m. with the DON, the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Transfer and Discharge (including AMA) dated 12/19/2022, readmission to Facility dated 12/19/2022, Discharge Planning process dated 12/29/2022, and admission of a Resident dated 12/19/2022 were reviewed. The DON stated P&P indicated, It is the policy of this facility to protect the resident's right to readmission by initiating a bed-hold and permitting each resident to return to the facility after they are hospitalized or placed on therapeutic leave, regardless of payment source. The DON stated that the facility P&P did not indicate that Resident 1 was qualified not to be readmitted back to the facility. The DON stated that the facility can be able to take care of Resident 1 and the facility was equipped to take care Resident 1. The DON stated that it was possible that Resident 1 family members will have a hard time visiting Resident 1 due to the change of location if Resident 1 was transferred to another facility.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility readmitted Resident 1 on 12/23/2025. During a review of the facility policy and procedure titled, readmission to Facility, last review date 12/19/2022, the policy and procedure indicated, It is the policy of this facility to protect the resident's right to readmission by initiating a bed-hold (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555011 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555011 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/22/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Vineland Post Acute 10830 Oxnard Street North Hollywood, CA 91606 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0627 and permitting each resident to return to the facility after they are hospitalized of placed on therapeutic leave, regardless of payment source. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555011 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0627GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F627 - Transfer and discharge-

    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 22, 2025 survey of VINELAND POST ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of VINELAND POST ACUTE on December 22, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at VINELAND POST ACUTE on December 22, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transf..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.