Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

WHITE BLOSSOM CARE CENTERCMS #5550681 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0658 Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when license nurses did not accurately complete Resident 1's elopement and wandering risk assessment. This failure had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to provide resident-centered interventions based on assessment data. Residents Affected - Few Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture due to abnormal brain development), chromosomal abnormality (a genetic condition that occurs when there are missing, extra, or irregular portions of chromosomal DNA [a molecule that carried genetic instructions for the development and functioning of all living organisms]), other lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood (known as developmental delay, means a child or adult is not achieving the expected developmental milestones at the typical age). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 1/21/25, indicated she had a brief interview of mental status (BIMS, a structured cognitive test) scoring 3 (severe cognitive impairment). Review of Resident 1's health status note, dated 1/28/25 at 00:23 a.m., indicated the resident eloped from the facility during shift change, and the resident attempted to leave the facility to go home. Review of Resident 1's elopement and wandering risk observation/assessment, dated 11/9/24, indicated: 0. None present was marked for C. Disease diagnosis: does the resident have a diagnosis that may impact cognition? (i.e., Alzheimer's disease, Anxiety disorder, Bipolar disorder, Delusions, Dementia, Depression, ID/DD, OBS, Schizophrenia, or other not listed); H. Other relevant information was blank; I. Interventions: 1. Has the care plan been initiated/updated to reflect interventions aimed at reducing the risk of unsafe wandering or an elopement? was blank. Review of Resident 1's care plans indicated there was no care plan developed for elopement or wandering. During an interview and record review with assistant director of nursing (ADON) A on 4/7/25 at 9:10 a.m., she confirmed the record review. ADON A stated Resident 1's elopement and wandering risk observation/assessment, dated 11/9/24 was not accurate for the resident's diagnoses. ADON A acknowledged that 4. Two or more are present should have been marked for question C, and all sections should (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555068 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555068 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 05/15/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE White Blossom Care Center 1990 Fruitdale Avenue San Jose, CA 95128 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0658 have been completed. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm During an interview and record review with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) B on 4/7/25 at 3:45 p.m., she confirmed she completed Resident 1's elopement assessment dated [DATE]. LVN B stated Resident 1's elopement and wandering risk observation/assessment, dated 11/9/24 was not accurate for the resident's diagnoses. LVN B acknowledged that 4. Two or more are present should have been marked for question C, and all sections should have been completed. Residents Affected - Few Review of the facility's undated policy and procedure titled Wandering and Elopements indicated, The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm .If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 2001, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555068 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0658GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F658 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 15, 2025 survey of WHITE BLOSSOM CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of WHITE BLOSSOM CARE CENTER on May 15, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at WHITE BLOSSOM CARE CENTER on May 15, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.