Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

MANZANITA HEALTHCARE CENTERCMS #5550832 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0658 Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care according to accepted standards of quality for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 had no documented behavior monitoring for the use of an antipsychotic medication (medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior). Residents Affected - Few This failure had the potential to result in an ineffective management of Resident 3's psychological health needs. Findings: A review of an admission Record for Resident 3 indicated she was admitted in 6/2024 with diagnoses including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (mental illness that cause extreme mood swings that include emotional highs and lows). A review of Resident 3's Physician Orders, dated 6/25/24, indicated an order for Invega 156 milligrams (mg., a unit of measurement) per milliliter (ml., a unit of measure) given once a month for schizophrenia. A review of Resident 3's Progress Notes, dated 6/28/24 at 4:47 p.m., indicated that a nurse from a psychiatric clinic came to the facility and administered/injected Invega to Resident 3 as ordered. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/1/24 at 1:40 p.m. with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Progress Notes were reviewed. MDSC confirmed that the antipsychotic medication was administered to Resident 3 but there was no behavior monitoring documented by staff. In an interview on 7/1/24 at 3 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated Resident 3's order for an antipsychotic medication should have been properly written and monitored for the targeted behavior and side effects to ensure proper care for the resident. A review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 7/2022 the P&P stipulated Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition .Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications are subject to prescribing, monitoring : Anti-psychotics . Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555083 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555083 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 07/01/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Manzanita Healthcare Center 5318 Manzanita Avenue Carmichael, CA 95608 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) at a high risk for elopement. Residents Affected - Few This failure placed Resident 1 at an increased risk for elopement. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used for care), dated 5/23/24, indicated that Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool) score of 4 out of 15, with memory problems. The MDS further indicated Resident 1 could independently transfer and ambulate using a walker. During observations on 7/1/24 at 11:40 a.m., 12:25 p.m., and 1:32 p.m., Resident 1 was observed ambulating alone without a walker by the hallways unable to go back to her own room without assistance. A review of Resident 3's Progress Notes, dated 6/24/24 at 6:43 p.m. and at 11:36 p.m., indicated Resident 3 exhibited verbal and physical aggression towards staff with severe confusion wanting to go outside to park her car. During an interview on 7/1/24 at 1:40 p.m. with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) the MDSC confirmed that Resident 1 had behaviors of wandering and was at risk for elopement. During an interview 7/1/24 at 2:30 p.m. with the Social Services Director (SSD) the SSD stated that Resident 1 is considered at high risk for elopement but there was no record that an elopement assessment had been completed for her. During an interview on 7/1/24 at 3 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) the DON confirmed that Resident 1 wanders and was at risk for elopement and should have been assessed properly to be able to plan appropriate interventions for the resident's safety. A review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Wandering and Elopements revised 3/2019 the P&P stipulated The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm .If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain resident's safety. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555083 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0658GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F658 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 1, 2024 survey of MANZANITA HEALTHCARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of MANZANITA HEALTHCARE CENTER on July 1, 2024. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at MANZANITA HEALTHCARE CENTER on July 1, 2024?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.