Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Citrus Post-AcuteCMS #5550932 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0656 Level of Harm - Potential for minimal harm Residents Affected - Some Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented to reflect the individual care needs for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's risk for fall interventions for bilateral floor mats were implemented. This failure posed the risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, or individualized care to the resident.Findings: Review of the P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised 3/2022 showed the comprehensive, person-centered care plan describes the services that are to be furnished to attain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 2/11/26. Resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's SBAR for falls dated 1/28/26, showed Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall and was found lying face down on the side of the bed. Review of Resident 1's care plan for risk for falls dated 1/28/26, showed interventions including bilateral floor mats to minimize injury in case of falls. Review of Resident 1's Morse Fall assessment dated [DATE], showed a score of 65. Further review showed a score of 45 and above indicated a high fall risk. On 2/17/26 at 0849 hours, during an observation of Resident 1, Resident 1 was noted with a round hematoma (a localized collection of clotted or partially clotted blood outside blood vessels, often causing a painful, raised, and bruised lump) on her forehead, dark purple bruising on both cheeks, chin, and the front of her neck. There were no floor mats seen in the room or on the floor next to the resident's bed. On 2/17/26 at 1113 hours, during an interview with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the bump on her forehead was from the fall she had at the facility. On 2/17/26 at 1242 hours, an observation of Resident 1 and concurrent interview was conducted with LVN 2. LVN 2 verified Resident 1 did not have floor mats in place and stated there should be floor mats due to her being a fall risk. On 2/17/26 at 1539 hours, the Administrator and the DON acknowledged the above findings. Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555093 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555093 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/17/2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Citrus Post-Acute 1929 N. Fairview Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686 Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing. Level of Harm - Potential for minimal harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcer for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5). * The facility failed to update the physician's order for Resident 5's low air-loss mattress setting to the resident's current weight. This failure had the potential for the resident to develop pressure ulcers or worsening of existing pressure ulcer(s).Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Support Surface Guidelines revised 9/2013 showed redistributing support surfaces are to promote comfort for all bed or chairbound residents, prevent skin breakdown, promote circulation, and provide pressure relief or reduction. Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 2/13/26. Resident 5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 5's Order Summary Report dated 9/19/25, showed a physician's order to implement a low air-loss mattress for wound care and management. The setting was set for 99 lbs. every shift. Review of Resident 5's Weights and Vitals Summary dated 2/1/26, showed the resident weighed 115 lbs. Review of Resident 5's Skin assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 5 had surgical wound on her left buttock. Further review showed the resident was on a low air-loss mattress that was functioning properly. On 2/13/26 at 0958 hours, during an observation in Resident 5's room, Resident 5's low air-loss mattress setting was set at 120 lbs. On 2/17/26 at 1440 hours, an observation and concurrent medical record review for Resident 5 was conducted with the ADON. The ADON verified Resident 5's low air-loss mattress was set at 120 lbs. The ADON verified the physician's order and low air-loss mattress setting were not updated to reflect Resident 5's current weight of 115 lbs. On 2/17/26 at 1539 hours, the Administrator and the DON acknowledged the above findings. Residents Affected - Some FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555093 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0656GeneralS&S Bno actual harm

    F656 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • 0686GeneralS&S Bno actual harm

    F686 - Skin Integrity

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 17, 2026 survey of Citrus Post-Acute?

This was a inspection survey of Citrus Post-Acute on February 17, 2026. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Citrus Post-Acute on February 17, 2026?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be ..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.