F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) had an
updated Care Plan. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for preventable falls and
potential injury.
Findings:
During a review of the facility Occupational Therapy (OT) Evaluation Note, dated 2/12/24, the Occupational
Therapist 1 (OT 1) documented for a visit occurring on 2/5/24. The assessment indicated, Patient (Pt) will
benefit from Stand By Assist (SBA)-(CGA) Contact Guard Assist for out of bed mobility and
activity/transfers/functional ambulation for safety .Pt will benefit from line-of-sight supervision from nursing.
Pt with impaired safety, ADL's, functional mobility, fall risk, impaired cognition.
During an interview on 3/15/24 at 11:45 AM with OT 1, OT 1 stated that a home evaluation was ordered for
weakness. OT 1 stated her assessment found the resident would benefit from stand by assistance (SBA) to
contact guard assistance (CGA) while ambulating for safety. OT 1 stated her recommendations included
line-of-sight supervision from nursing staff. OT 1 stated, I do not write orders but make recommendations
for the health care team. It's up to the rest of the medical team to decide what to do with my
recommendations.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/19/24 at 9:36 AM with Supervising Registered Nurse
(SRN 1) and Resident 1's Care Plan with a run date of 1/13/24 was reviewed. The Care Plan indicated the
interventions for Problem #4 Activities of Daily Living function, alteration in, was last updated on 7/29/23
except the section for a Neurology department consult on 12/12/23. SRN 1 stated she did not see the
2/5/24 OT consultation recommendations for Resident 1 to be SBA to CGA assistance or to be in
line-of-site added to the Care Plan. I do not see it reflected under problem #4. It's not in writing, It is not in
the Care Plan.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
555095
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555095
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/07/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Veterans Home of California - Yountville - Snf
100 California Drive
Yountville, CA 94599
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident
1) was
Residents Affected - Few
1.) Provided a timely occupational therapy (OT) evaluation.
2.) Followed occupation therapy recommendations for care.
This failure led to several potentially preventable falls for Resident 1 and had the potential for additional falls
and injury.
Findings:
1.) During a review of OT Communication Note dated 1/30/24, the note indicated an OT evaluation order
was placed on 1/8/24 for diagnosis of weakness. It indicated on 1/30/24 OT 1 attempted to evaluate Patient
1. The note indicated, Nurse reports patient feels his Parkinson's (a brain disorder that causes unintended
or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination) is
progressing. Patient in computer room per RN will f/u (follow up) when patient is available.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Physical and Occupational Therapy
Services, dated 7/31/23, the P&P indicated, Physical/Occupational Therapy Evaluation referrals for acute
conditions or events will be evaluated within 5 business days .Acute conditions/events may include but are
not limited to: .new and recent multiple falls (2 or more falls within 30 days with or without injury.
During an interview on 3/22/24 at 1:31 PM with Speech Pathologist (SP 1), Chief of Restorative Care
Services, SP 1 stated the policy indicated Resident 1 should have been seen within 5 days of the referral.
SP 1 stated the referral was from the MD (Medical Doctor) for weakness, an Home Assessment
(assessment of the home environment for adaptive equipment and assistance requirements with Activities
of Daily Living (ADLS)). SP 1 stated OT attempted several times, on 1/26/24, 1/30/24 and 2/2/24. SP 1
stated, (Resident 1) was evaluated on 2/5/24.
2.) During a record review of Occupational Therapy (OT) Evaluation Note on 2/12/24, Occupational
Therapist 1 (OT 1) documented for a visit occurring on 2/5/24. The assessment indicated, Patient (Pt) will
benefit from Stand By Assist (SBA)-(CGA) Contact Guard Assist for out of bed mobility and
activity/transfers/functional ambulation for safety .Pt will benefit from line-of-sight supervision from nursing.
Pt with impaired safety, ADL's, functional mobility, fall risk, impaired cognition.
During an interview on 3/15/24 at 11:45 AM with OT 1, OT 1 stated that a home evaluation was ordered for
weakness. OT 1 stated the assessment found the resident would benefit from stand by assistance (SBA) to
contact guard assistance (CGA) while ambulating for safety. OT 1 stated the recommendations included
line-of-sight supervision from nursing staff. OT 1 stated, I do not write orders but make recommendations
for the health care team. It's up to the rest of the medical team to decide what to do with my
recommendations.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/19/24 at 9:36 AM with Supervising Registered
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555095
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555095
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/07/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Veterans Home of California - Yountville - Snf
100 California Drive
Yountville, CA 94599
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Nurse (SRN 1) and Resident 1's Care Plan with a run date of 1/13/24 was reviewed. The Care Plan
indicated the interventions for Problem #4 Activities of Daily Living function, alteration in, was last updated
on 7/29/23 except the section for a Neurology department consult on 12/12/23. SRN 1 stated she did not
see the 2/5/24 OT consultation recommendations for Resident 1 to be SBA to CGA assistance or to be in
line-of-site added to the Care Plan. I do not see it reflected under problem #4. It's not in writing, .It is not in
the Care Plan.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Accident Prevention, Fall, dated 6/21/23,
the P&P indicated the Post Fall Interdisciplinary Team meeting (IDT) is scheduled by the licensed nurse
within one week of the fall. The IDT is responsible to address each Resident's risk for accidents and safety
needs .after each fall . The IDT records their recommendations on the ' IDT Conference Record' and the
Resident Care Plan.
During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Interdisciplinary Team Conference, dated
8/16/23, the P&P indicated the IDT members include appropriate clinical staff in disciplines as determined
by the Resident's needs. IDT responsibilities are to review the active residents care plan problems . and
re-evaluate and revise . as the resident's status changes.
During a review of Resident 1's Interdisciplinary Residential Fall Investigation and Intervention, dated
2/20/24, regarding a fall on 2/18/24, the IDT notes indicated the Care Plan was updated. There were no
interventions included to the care plan from Resident 1's Home Safety Assessment completed by OT 1 on
2/5/24.
During a review of the Resident 1's Interdisciplinary Residential Fall Investigation and Intervention, dated
2/27/24, regarding the fall on 2/24/24, the IDT notes indicated the Care Plan was updated. There were no
interventions included to the care plan from Resident 1's safety assessment completed by OT on 2/5/24.
During a review of the Resident 1's Interdisciplinary Residential Fall Investigation and Intervention, dated
2/27/24, regarding the fall on 2/25/24 the IDT notes indicated the Care Plan was updated. There were no
interventions included to the care plan from Resident 1's safety assessment completed by OT on 2/5/24.
During an interview on 3/22/24 at 1:31 PM with Speech Pathologist (SP 1), Chief of Restorative Care
Services,SP 1 stated after an evaluation the therapist would discuss the recommendations with the RN on
duty who would then update the care plan. The assessment is printed and put in the chart. Nurses have
access to the assessment. SP 1 stated that following a fall, the PT/OT staff would be included in the IDT
meeting to represent their discipline from restorative services and review their recommendations and
interventions. SP 1 stated, They always do take rehab's (rehabilitation's) recommendations. We go around
the room and each discipline will summarize progress or changes SP 1 stated, Rehab has not been
updating the problem areas. It was not our process to change the care plan in the problem section, we have
an interventions section where we document .I do not see OT is in that section.
During an interview on 4/2/24 at 1:37 PM with OT 2, OT 2 stated, We don't review the care plan from start
to finish in the IDT meeting. Just things regarding the fall. We would not have looked at the ADL's, but we
would look at problem #2 Injury. OT 2 stated the interventions for ADL's were not reflective of his care
needs. OT 2 stated they were not accurate.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555095
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3