F 0655
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being
admitted
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan
was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission for one of three sampled residents (Resident
1). * The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that addressed pressure injuries and
wounds for Resident 1, who was admitted with pressure ulcers and other wounds. * The facility incorrectly
created a baseline nutritional care plan that included interventions to feed Resident 1 who was not able to
take in nutrition or liquids by mouth and was dependent on enteral tube feedings for his nutritional and
hydration needs. These failures posed the risk for Resident 1 not to receive the necessary treatment and
services to meet Resident 1's individualized care needs and for Resident 1 to potentially suffer harm due to
incorrectly rendered care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Baseline Care Plan revised 12/29/22,
showed the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's
admission and will include the minimum health care information necessary to properly care for a resident
and meets professional standards of practice. The P&P also showed interventions shall be initiated to
address the resident's special needs such as wound care and dietary orders. Closed medical record review
for Resident 1 was initiated on 2/12/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged
from the facility on 2/2/26. Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident had
severe cognitive impairment. a. Review of Resident 1's initial skin assessment dated [DATE], showed
Resident 1 had the following 10 pressure injuries and wounds present upon admission: - pressure injury to
the sacrococcygeal area;- unstageable pressure injury to the Right hip;- unstageable pressure injury to the
Left hip;- pressure injury to the left gluteal fold;- pressure injury to the left heel;- unstageable pressure injury
to the side of the right foot;- surgical incision on the right upper with separated wound edges;- skin tear on
the antecubital space of the right arm;- open wound on the front of the right knee; and- open wound on the
front of the left ear. Review of Resident 1's baseline care plan initiated on 1/29/26, did not show a care plan
regarding pressure injuries or wounds was developed or initiated. On 2/12/26 at 1330 hours, an interview
and concurrent medical record review for Resident 1 was conducted with the IP. The IP stated the purpose
of a care plan was for communication. The IP stated the purpose of a baseline care plan was to catch every
wound. The IP stated if the care plan was missing for a wound, the wound could get overlooked. The IP
stated each specific wound should have its own care plan with the specific interventions being provided. On
2/12/26 at 1400 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident 1 was conducted
with LVN 2. LVN 2 confirmed there was no care plan regarding wounds for Resident 1. LVN 2 stated
Resident 1 should have had a wound care plan. LVN 2 stated the purpose of the wound care plan was to
assess how the wound was progressing and to change the intervention if the treatment was not working.
LVN 2 stated the purpose of the care plan was also to make goals. LVN 2 stated a care plan was a form of
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
555103
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555103
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/12/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
French Park Care Center
600 E Washington Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92701
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0655
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
communication. On 2/12/26 at 1430 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident
1 was conducted with the DON. The DON reviewed each of the wounds listed on the skin assessment. The
DON stated it is the expectation that each wound has a specific care plan. The DON stated the treatment
nurses usually create the wound care plan because they conduct the assessment and implement the
treatment orders. The DON stated the purpose of the care plan was to communicate to the staff what
interventions are being done for a resident. The DON confirmed there was no care plan for any of the
wounds. The DON stated the plan of care for a resident could be compromised or jeopardized if a plan
wasn't done. The DON stated for example a treatment modality could have been missed such as the
resident needing a low air loss mattress. b. Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report showed the
following physician's orders: - dated 1/29/26, NPO diet; and - dated 1/29/26, enteral feed order. Review of
Resident 1's swallowing evaluation dated 1/30/26, showed loss of liquids/solids from the mouth when eating
or drinking, residual food left in his mouth after meals, and coughing or choking during meals or when
swallowing medications. Review of Resident 1's Physician Progress Note dated 1/31/26, showed the
resident was nonverbal, NPO, and fed via GT. Review of Resident 1's nutritional care plan dated 2/2/26,
showed the following interventions: - honor the resident's food preferences and offer a substitute if the
resident ate less than 50% of the meal; and- allow the resident ample time to eat and drink. On 2/12/26 at
1430 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident 1 was conducted with the
DON. The DON stated Resident 1 was NPO and on an enteral feeding. The DON stated she expected the
nutritional care plan to address Resident 1's NPO status and enteral feeding. The DON stated the current
nutritional care plan did not reflect the physician orders. The DON stated the nutritional care plan was
incorrect and could have caused staff to think Resident 1was able to take in food or water by mouth. The
DON stated if Resident 1 had been given food or water by mouth he could have aspirated it into is lungs
accidentally.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555103
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555103
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/12/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
French Park Care Center
600 E Washington Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92701
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure documentation for one
of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was accurate and maintained within accepted professional
standards and practices. * Multiple entries in Resident 1's nursing progress notes incorrectly indicated he
was able to verbalize, communicate his needs, and was oriented, despite Resident 1 being nonverbal and
having severe cognitive impairment. * Nursing care was documented as being provided to Resident 1 after
he had been discharged from the facility. This failure posed the risk for changes in Resident 1's condition to
be missed, miscommunication between care providers, and for Resident 1 to receive incorrect
treatment.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Documentation in Medical Record revised 12/19/22,
showed documentation should be factual, accurate, and reflect objective information based on first-hand
knowledge of the assessment. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 2/12/26.
Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 2/2/26. Review of
Resident 1's Physician Progress Note dated 1/31/26, showed the resident was nonverbal. Review of
Resident 1's Nursing Progress Note dated 1/31/26, showed the resident denied pain or discomfort at that
time. Review of Resident 1's Skilled Nursing Evaluations dated 1/31 to 2/2/26, showed the following
documentation: - under the neurological assessment section, the resident followed commands and denied
weakness, tremors, numbness, or tingling; - under the mental status assessment section, the resident was
alert and oriented x 3, communicated verbally, speech was clear, and was able to understand and be
understood when speaking; and- under the mental status assessment section, Resident 1 had mild
cognitive impairment with some confusion. Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed
the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress Note dated 2/2/26,
showed the resident denied pain or discomfort at that time. b. Review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress
Note dated 2/2/26, showed Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital for a low hemoglobin level. Review of
Resident 1's Nursing Progress Note dated 2/4/26, showed the resident was on a GT feeding, a wound vac
was in place and functioning as ordered, IV antibiotics were continued, and no signs of active infection
noted. On 2/12/26 at 1430 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident 1 was
conducted with the DON. The DON stated there was a lot of confusion and inaccuracies in the nursing
record. The DON stated the documentation made it appear Resident 1 was nonverbal one shift, and then
the next shift was alert and talking. The DON stated the documentation made it unclear whether the
resident improved or declined in function. The DON stated it was a serious concern because the delivery of
care and the care plan were jeopardized. The DON stated if a family member called, it could have caused
panic to the family member. The DON stated the resident left on 2/2/26, the nurse could not have assessed
the resident on 2/4/26. The DON stated it was unclear if the nurses were really doing their assessments as
required or just copying and pasting documentation. The DON stated she expected the documentation to
be accurate.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555103
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3