Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

MERCY RETIREMENT & CARE CENTERCMS #5551891 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0626 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to follow a written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility when Resident 1, who was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and continued to require services provided by the facility, was not allowed to return on [DATE]. This failure resulted in an unnecessary hospital stay for nine days from [DATE] to [DATE].Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Detailed Summary, the Detailed Summary indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated [DATE], the Progress Notes indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar levels), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, refers to a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and right foot osteomyelitis (bone infection). During a review of Resident 1's Interdisciplinary Notes, dated [DATE], the Interdisciplinary Notes indicated Resident 1 was noted with altered mental status and did not recall place and event (way of measuring one's awareness, did not know where they are and why they are there). The Notes indicated Resident 1 was taken to the hospital for further evaluation. During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 3:03 p.m. with Case Manager (CM), CM stated Resident 1 was ready to be discharged from the hospital on [DATE]. CM stated he called Admissions Director (AD) on [DATE] but was told Resident 1 would not be allowed to return to the facility. CM also stated AD had indicated Resident 1 was already discharged from the facility. CM stated he was told by AD that Resident 1 did not have enough Medicare (federal health insurance that covers up to 100 days of care in a facility) days left and would require long-term stay. During an interview and concurrent review on [DATE] at 10:50 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the facility's daily census from [DATE] to [DATE] was reviewed. DON stated when Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], Resident 1 was offered a seven-day bed hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization). DON stated the seven-day bed hold expired on [DATE] so Resident 1 was discharged from the system. DON stated Resident 1 was clinically ready to return from the hospital on [DATE] and did not require special care different than what was provided before Resident 1's transfer to the hospital. DON stated the facility did not accept Resident 1 back because there was no available long-term bed at the time. DON was not able to explain further what long-term bed and short-term bed meant, but (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555189 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555189 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 10/03/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Mercy Retirement & Care Center 3431 Foothill Blvd. Oakland, CA 94601 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0626 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some explained that Resident 1, after staying in the hospital for 24 days, required long-term care services the facility could not provide. DON stated there were five available beds for potential residents on [DATE], which DON stated, were non-long term beds. DON stated there was no facility policy identifying a long-term bed from a short-term bed. During a follow-up interview on [DATE] at 11:21 a.m., with DON, DON stated, on [DATE], another resident, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility. DON stated as of [DATE], there were 35 residents currently receiving long term care services. During a review of the Hospitalist Discharge summary dated [DATE], the Hospitalist Discharge Summary indicated Resident 1 will likely need a prolonged course of rehabilitation. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:26 a.m. with AD, AD stated receiving a telephone call from CM on [DATE] about Resident 1's return to the facility. AD stated Resident 1 had 11 Medicare days available and had Medical (state program that pays for health care services) eligibility. AD stated, the facility's policy indicated that if a resident was admitted to the facility for short-term stay, transferred to the hospital unexpectedly, and returns to the facility for long-term stay, the resident would not be accepted back because there are no long-term beds available. AD stated she was not aware of a facility policy on permitting residents to return after hospitalization. During a concurrent interview and review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Bed holds and Returns, last revised [DATE], on [DATE] at 11:47 a.m. with Regional Operations Specialist (ROS), the P&P indicated Residents who seek to return to the facility after a state bed-hold period has expired . are allowed to return to their previous room if available or immediately to the first available bed in a semi-private room provided that the resident: still requires the services provided by the facility; and is eligible for Medicare skilled nursing facility or Medicaid nursing facility services. ROS stated the facility's P&P was clear and well-written, Resident 1 should be allowed to return to the facility. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555189 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0626GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F626 - Transfer and discharge-

    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 3, 2023 survey of MERCY RETIREMENT & CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of MERCY RETIREMENT & CARE CENTER on October 3, 2023. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at MERCY RETIREMENT & CARE CENTER on October 3, 2023?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.