F 0835
Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy, truthfulness, and
completeness of information for the facility census of 51, including two of two sampled residents (Resident
1 and Resident 2) when the facility provided false and misleading information regarding Resident 2's room
placement, which prevented the timely readmission of Resident 1 from the hospital.This failure resulted in
lack of transparency and inconsistencies between the facility's census record and actual resident
placement and reported information to surveyors. These discrepancies had the potential to compromise
Resident 2's safety, delay the provision of necessary care and service, and cause a delay in Resident 1's
prompt return to the facility.During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), printed on
8/22/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnosis of acute and
chronic respiratory failure (occurs when there is not enough oxygen in the blood). During a record review of
Resident 1's record, titled, Leaving Facility Against Medical Advice (AMA), dated 8/21/25, the AMA form
indicated, Resident 1 refused to sign the AMA form and Resident 1 was insisting to be transferred to the
hospital. During a record review of the facility's census, dated 8/22/25, two different versions of the facility's
census were reviewed: 8/22/25 - Received upon entrance at 11:25 a.m., the census listed room [ROOM
NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] as empty and no assigned residents, while Resident 2 was listed
in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 8/22/25 - Received via email at 4:13 p.m., the census indicated Resident 2 was
moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER], while room [ROOM NUMBER] remained
unassigned. During a phone interview on 8/22/25 at 3:28 p.m. with the hospital's Case Manager (CM), CM
stated the facility was refusing to readmit Resident 1 due to no available isolation rooms. During a phone
interview on 8/22/25 at 3:54 p.m. with the Administrator, the ADM stated they were not able to
accommodate Resident 1 back to the facility because there were no empty rooms available that can be
used as an isolation room. The ADM further stated room [ROOM NUMBER] was already assigned to a new
admission, making it unavailable for Resident 1's readmission. During a follow-up concurrent record review
and phone interview on 8/22/25 at 4:13 p.m. with the ADM, two different copies of facility's census dated
8/22/25 were compared and reviewed. The ADM stated Resident 2 was moved from room [ROOM
NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER] because Resident 2's roommate was agitated, and the room change
was made to prevent further issues or altercations. Contrary to the ADM's earlier statement that a new
admission was placed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The ADM further stated there were still no available
rooms to readmit Resident 1 from the hospital. During a record review of the facility's census, dated 8/23/25
through 8/26/25, the facility's census indicated the following:8/23/25 - Resident 2 was incorrectly listed in
room [ROOM NUMBER]; room [ROOM NUMBER] was unassigned.8/24/25 - Resident 2 was incorrectly
listed in room [ROOM NUMBER]; room [ROOM NUMBER] was unassigned.8/25/25 and 8/26/25 - Resident
2 was incorrectly listed in room [ROOM NUMBER]; room [ROOM NUMBER] was assigned to another
resident who had not been admitted to the facility.During a
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
555189
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555189
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/26/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Mercy Retirement & Care Center
3431 Foothill Blvd.
Oakland, CA 94601
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0835
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
record review of Resident 2's AR, printed on 8/26/25, the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the
facility in July 2025 with diagnoses of right femur fracture (broken thigh bone), chronic pain, and
osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease).During an interview on 8/26/25 at 12:54 p.m. with Certified Nurse
Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated Resident 2 was very alert and oriented. CNA 1 stated Resident 2 had
been in the same room since she was admitted and had not been moved to a different room. During an
observation and interview on 8/26/25 at 12:56 p.m. with Resident 2 in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 2
was sitting in her bed, awake and alert. Resident 2 stated she had been admitted to the facility since July
2025. Resident 2 stated she had not been transferred to any other rooms. Resident 2 stated she had no
issues with the current room and the roommate. Resident 2 further stated she and roommate get along well
just fine. Resident 2 further stated there had been no incident of any sort of altercations between her
roommate or any other residents. During a concurrent record review and interview on 8/26/25 at 1:30 p.m.
with Medical Records Director (MDR), the facility's census dated 8/23/25 through 8/26/25 were reviewed.
The MDR stated the Admissions Director (AD) was primarily responsible for updating and maintaining the
facility's daily census records. During a concurrent record review and interview on 8/26/25 at 1:32 p.m. with
AD, the facility's census dated 8/25/25 and 8/26/25 were reviewed. The AD stated she was not responsible
for updating the facility's daily census records. AD stated she only updated the census when there were
pending admissions. During a follow-up interview on 8/26/25 at 2:47 p.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 confirmed
Resident 2 did not have any altercations with Resident 2's roommate or any other residents. During an
interview on 8/26/25 at 4:11 p.m. with the ADM, the ADM stated Resident 2 had asked the Social Worker
for a room change. The ADM stated CNA 1 was instructed to move Resident 2 to room [ROOM NUMBER];
however, CNA 1 did not do the room change as directed. The ADM further stated she was not sure why
Resident 2 wanted to change rooms. The ADM stated when room changes happen, the facility typically just
moved the residents around without any supporting paperwork to document the transfer. The ADM stated
the census records from 8/22/25 through 8/26/25 were not updated because neither the MRD nor AD knew
that the room change for Resident 2 did not happen. The ADM stated it was an error, and the census
should have been updated to reflect correct information.During a record review of the facility's document,
titled, Facility Assessment, dated July 2025, the Facility Assessment indicated, The purpose of the Facility
Assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for the residents completely during both
day-to-day operations and emergencies.The Facility Assessment is organized in three parts: 1.Resident
profile including numbers, diseases/conditions.factors that impact care.2. Services and care offered based
on resident needs.3. Facility resources needed to provide competent care for residents.Sources of this
assessment include, but are not limited to.Resident Census and Condition of Residents.and/or
Roster/Sample Matrix form.and in-house designed reports.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555189
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2