F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services as ordered by the
physician for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 6).
Residents Affected - Few
* The facility failed to ensure the psychiatric evaluation and treatment were provided to Resident 6 as
ordered. This failure had the potential for the resident not to receive the necessary care and services.
Findings:
Medical record review for Resident 6 was initiated on 7/5/24. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE].
Review of Resident 6's H&P Examination dated 5/13/24, showed Resident 6 did not have a capacity to
understand and make decisions. Resident 6's diagnosis included senile dementia with psychosis. The H&P
examination further showed Resident 6 needed a psychiatry follow up.
Review of Resident 6's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 6's cognition was moderately impaired.
Review of Resident 6's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 5/10/24, for psychiatric
evaluation and treatment with Physician 1.
Further review of Resident 6's medical record failed to show documented evidence Resident 6's was
scheduled and/or seen for psychiatric evaluation and treatment.
On 7/29/24 at 0918 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 6. Resident 6 was asked if he had
seen the psychiatrist, Resident 6 stated, no.
On 7/31/24 at 1507 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with LVN 2.
When asked if Resident 6 had a follow up with psychiatry, LVN 2 stated no. LVN 2 verified Resident 6 did
not follow up with the psychiatrist and further stated the psychiatry consult should have been done.
On 8/6/24 at 1037 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the DON.
The DONacknowledged the physician's order for Resident 6 to have a psychiatric evaluation and treatment
with Physician 1 was not done. The DON further stated Resident 6 should have followed-up with the
psychiatrist.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
555211
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555211
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Extended Care Hospital of Westminster
206 Hospital Circle
Westminster, CA 92683
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the post fall
assessments were completed for two of two residents (Residents 4 and 5) reviewed for falls.
* Resident 4's post fall neuro check assessment was not done.
* Resident 5's post fall neuro check assessment was incomplete.
These failures had the potential to delay the identification and response to post fall neurological changes.
Findings:
Review of the facility's P&P titled Assessing Falls and Their Causes revised March 2018 showed the After a
Fall section includes the following:
- If a resident had just fallen, or is found on the floor without a witness to the event, evaluate for possible
injuries to the head, neck, spine, and extremities;
- Obtain record of vital signs as soon as it is safe to do so;
- Observe for delayed complications of a fall for approximately 48 hours after an observed or suspected fall,
and would document findings in the medical record; and
- Document any observed signs or symptoms of pain, swelling, bruising, deformity, and/or decreased
mobility, and any changes in level of responsiveness/consciousness and overall function. Note the
presence and absence of significant findings.
1. On 7/26/24 at 1320 hours, a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 4.
Resident 4 was observed being awake and lying on his bed. Bilateral floor mattresses were observed on
the floor at the right and left sides of the bed. Resident 4 did not speak English.
Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 7/26/24. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE].
Review of Resident 4's H&P examination dated 4/24/24, showed Resident 4 had no capacity to understand
and make decisions.
Review of Resident 4's MDS dated [DATE], showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS
also showed the resident needed partial/moderate assistance with mobility.
Review of Resident 4's SBAR Communication Form dated 6/10/24, showed at 2130 hours, the CNA found
Resident 4 with his knees and legs on the floor, but the rest of body was on the bed.
On 8/1/24 at 1112 hours, an interview was conducted with LVN 2. LVN 2 stated Resident 4 had
unwitnessed falls several times. LVN 2 stated a fall was considered a change of condition. LVN 2 further
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555211
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555211
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/06/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Extended Care Hospital of Westminster
206 Hospital Circle
Westminster, CA 92683
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
stated after a resident's fall, they had to perform the neuro check assessment which included to obtain the
vital signs for 24 hours. The assessment had to be done every 15 minutes for one hour, then every 30
minutes for the next two hours, and every two hours for the next 24 hours. LVN 2 stated the neuro check
assessment was filed in the resident's medical record.
Further review of Resident 4's medical record review showed no documented evidence of the neuro check
assessments for the fall on 6/10/24.
On 8/2/24 at 1200 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review were conducted with LVN 1.
LVN 1 stated Resident 4's fall incident on 6/10/24, was considered unwitnessed fall. LVN 1 stated for
unwitnessed fall, they had to do the neuro check assessment because it was unwitnessed and no one
knew if the resident's head hit the floor. LVN 1 stated after an unwitnessed fall, they monitored the vital
signs and neuro assessment every 15 minutes for one hour, then every 30 minutes for two hours, and every
two hours for 24 hours as showed on the Neuro Check Sheet. LVN 1 verified there was no neuro check
sheet completed for Resident 4's fall incident on 6/10/24.
2. On 7/30/24 at 0730 hours, an observation was conducted with Resident 5. Resident 5 was observed
sleeping and lying on his bed. Bilateral floor mattresses were observed on the floor at the right and left
sidesof the bed.
On 7/30/24 at 0745 hours, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated Resident 5 was a high
risk for fall and had several unwitnessed falls in the past.
Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 7/30/24. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE].
Review of Resident 5's H&P examination dated 3/10/24, showed Resident 5 did not have the capacity to
understand and make decisions.
Review of Resident 5's SBAR Communication Form dated 7/5/24, showed at 2140 hours, Resident 5 rolled
out of bed onto the floor.
Review of Resident 5's Neuro Check Sheet assessment initiated on 7/5/24, showed the neuro checks to be
completed every 15 minutes for one hour, then every 30 minutes for two hours, and then every two hours
for 24 hours. However, the neuro check assessments for 0930, 1130, and 1330 hours, on 7/6/24, were
blank.
On 8/2/24 at 1200 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review wasconducted with LVN 1.
LVN 1 reviewed the post fall neurological assessment and verified the missing the assessments for 0930,
1130, and 1330 hours, on 7/6/24.
On 8/2/24 at 1600 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review wasconducted with the DON.
The DON stated the neurological assessment including vital signs should be done post fall incident for 24
hours, and the neuro check sheet form should be filed in the resident's medical record since it was not
done electronically. The DON was informed of the findings for Residents 4 and 5. The DON acknowledged
the above findings.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555211
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3