Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

THE SPRINGS HEALTHCARE CENTER AT THE CARLOTTACMS #5552261 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), when the resident left the facility unnoticed by facility staff. Later, an unknown visitor notified a staff member that Resident 1 left the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA). This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving information regarding the risks of leaving AMA which put Resident 1 at risk of possible worsening of her health condition while being outside of the facility setting, and resulted in the staff not knowing Resident 1 had left the facility.Findings:On August 18, 2025, an unannounced visit was made to the facility for a quality-of-care issue.On August 18, 2025, at 10:17 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1's Representative (RR)1, who stated he and RR 2 had Power of Attorney (POA - legally designated person to act on behalf of another person should the person become incapacitated) for Resident 1, and on August 9th, 2025, Resident 1 left the facility with another family member (FM) without their knowledge. A review of Resident 1's, Patient Information, dated, August 19, 2025, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of a fractured right femur (upper leg bone). RR 1 and RR 2 were listed as the emergency contacts. Further review indicated that Resident 1 was discharged from the facility on August 9, 2025, at 6:42 p.m., AMA. A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - A cognitive assessment), indicated a score of 14 (cognitively intact). A review of Resident 1's, History & Physical, dated, July 8, 2025, untimed, indicated, . (Resident 1) has the capacity to understand and make decisions . On August 18, 2025, at 3:39 p.m., an interview was conducted with the facility Administrator (Admin). The Admin stated prior to Resident 1 discharging from the facility, RR 2 approached her and expressed concerns that another FM would attempt to convince Resident 1 to leave the facility AMA. The Admin stated Resident 1 had the mental capacity to make her own decisions and there was not much the facility could do to keep Resident 1 from leaving AMA, as staff can't force a resident with decision making mental capacity to stay in the facility. The Admin verified Resident 1 discharged from the facility AMA on August 9, 2025, with another FM. The Admin stated Resident 1 wrote a letter stating she wanted to leave the facility AMA and delivered the letter to the nursing station. The Admin stated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 observed the FM arrive to visit Resident 1, and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was given the AMA note. On August 18, 2025, at 4:07 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA 1. The CNA stated on August 9, 2025, at approximately 4:45 p.m., she observed a man walk into Resident 1's room and greet the resident. Resident 1 stated, I've been waiting for you. At approximately 5:30 p.m., dinner time, Resident 1 was gone, she could not be found in her room or on the unit. CNA 1 stated, I didn't see (Resident 1) leave, and I thought it was just a visit. A review of Resident 1's, Progress Notes dated, August 9, 2025, at 3:41 p.m., by LVN 1, indicated, . LATE ENTRY.on Saturday evening (August 9, 2025), I (LVN 1) was at nurse (sic) station when a female came to me to tell me that the patient (Resident 1) wanted to leave (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 555226 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555226 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/19/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE The Springs Healthcare Center at the Carlotta 41505 Carlotta Drive Palm Desert, CA 92211 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few AMA and that this was a letter stating her wishes of leaving and that patient was fully aware that she was leaving against medical advice. I proceeded to ask her if her (Resident 1's) nurse was aware and that there was a facility form that we needed patient to sign, she then informed me patient was already gone, the lady walked away . On August 18, 2025, at 4:26 p.m., an interview was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 stated that the process for a resident to leave AMA from the facility includes trying to encourage the resident to stay, notifying the physician, receiving orders, and having the resident sign an AMA form prior to the discharge. LVN 1 stated on August 9, 2025, at approximately 5:30 p.m., she was working in the nurse's station, when a woman she had never seen before, approached her and handed her a note stating Resident 1 is leaving AMA. LVN 1 stated she told the woman there is a form Resident 1 needed to sign, and the woman stated Resident 1 had already left the facility, and the woman turned and walked away. LVN 1 stated she immediately notified Resident 1's assigned nurse. LVN 1 stated she was not aware of RR 2's concerns of Resident 1 possibly leaving AMA during visits with Resident 1's FM. LVN 1 stated she did not follow the unknown women out of the facility to search for Resident 1, stating I guess I could have, but I was taken aback (surprised) at the moment. A review of the note given to LVN 1, dated, August 9, 2025, untimed, indicated, I (Resident 1) on this 9th day of August 2025 called (FM) to come pick me up because I want to go home . I'm aware that I am leaving against medical advice. The note had Resident 1's name as a signature and another unknown person as the witness. On August 18, 2025, at 4:43 p.m., an interview was conducted with LVN 2, who stated, on August 9, 2025, at approximately 5:30 p.m., LVN 1 notified her that an unknown woman gave LVN 1 a note stating Resident 1 wanted to leave AMA. LVN 2 stated when the resident's letter was given to LVN 1, the resident had already left the building. LVN 2 stated LVN 1 did not get any other information from the unknown woman. LVN 2 stated she looked for Resident 1 in her room and inside the facility and asked CNA 2 if he saw a resident leave the facility. CNA 2 stated he did not witness the resident leave the facility, and the last time CNA 2 saw the resident was at approximately 3:30 p.m. LVN 2 verified she did not ask CNA 2 to look outside the facility for Resident 1, stating, That's something we could have done. On August 18, 2025, at 5:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), who stated, RR 2's concerns about Resident 1 discharging from the facility AMA with her FM was an ongoing discussion during the morning huddles (a daily meeting with the department managers and day shift charge nurses). The DON stated clinical managers were expected to pass the information from the huddles on to all nursing staff. On August 18, 2025, at 5:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 stated she was unaware of RR 2's concerns that Resident 1's FM might try to get the Resident to leave AMA. On August 19, 2025, at 2:47 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated he was Resident 1's assigned CNA on August 9, 2025, the evening Resident 1 left the facility. CNA 2 stated, on that day, he took Resident 1's vital signs (Blood Pressure, pulse, temperature & respirations) at approximately 3:30 p.m., and the resident was in her room alone. CNA 2 stated when he returned to the resident's room at approximately 4:30 p.m., Resident 1 was no longer in her room. CNA 2 stated he searched the unit for Resident 1, but did not search the outside grounds. On August 19, 2025, at 3:24 p.m., an interview was conducted with the DON, who stated it is her expectation of nursing staff to monitor the residents' whereabouts every hour. The DON stated she was not sure how Resident 1 left the facility unwitnessed by staff. On August 19, 2025, at 4:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Admin, who stated, she did not talk to Resident 1 regarding her representative's concerns that she may leave AMA with another FM. The Admin stated she could have explained to Resident 1 that she has the right to leave the facility AMA, but notify staff first. The Admin stated Resident 1 may have been able to leave the unit without staff's (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555226 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555226 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/19/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE The Springs Healthcare Center at the Carlotta 41505 Carlotta Drive Palm Desert, CA 92211 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm knowledge, by strolling around, without a lot of belongings, and that Resident 1 probably did not look like she was leaving the facility. A facility Policy & Procedure, titled, Safety and Supervision of Resident, revised, July 2017, indicated, . Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. The care team shall target interventions to reduce individual risks . including adequate supervision . Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555226 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 19, 2025 survey of THE SPRINGS HEALTHCARE CENTER AT THE CARLOTTA?

This was a inspection survey of THE SPRINGS HEALTHCARE CENTER AT THE CARLOTTA on August 19, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at THE SPRINGS HEALTHCARE CENTER AT THE CARLOTTA on August 19, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.