Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

VISTA VIEW POST ACUTECMS #5552461 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555246 09/03/2024 Vista View Post Acute 304 N. Melrose Dr Vista, CA 92083
F 0726 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurses (LN) had specific competencies and training related to Central Venous Catheter site (CVC- a soft plastic tube inserted into a vein to provide vascular access for hemodialysis [a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood of people whose kidneys were not functioning properly] for 5 of 7 licensed nurses (LN). This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate assessment and delayed care and treatment of a resident with a CVC line. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD- kidney failure) per the admission Record. On 8/22/24 at 4:30 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 3. LN 3 stated that to assess the CVC site, LNs had to examine the site and document the signs and symptoms of infection and the condition of the dressing. LN 3 further stated there would be no bruit [a whooshing sound] that happens when the blood flows to the body and trill [vibration over the blood vessel]. LN 3 stated the bruit and trill would be heard and felt for residents with AVF (arteriovascular fistula- a surgical connection between an artery and a vein). A review of Resident 1's Dialysis Communication Form was conducted. Under the Dialysis Center Information section, dated 7/24/24 through 8/7/24, Resident 1 had a CVC line in the left chest that the dialysis center used during dialysis treatment. On 7/24/24, 7/29/24, and 8/3/24, under the post-dialysis information [assessment performed by the facility], LN 1 documented the presence of bruit and trill. On 7/26/24, under the post-dialysis information section, LN 6 documented the catheter was patent (no obstruction), and bruit and trill were present. LN 6 was a licensed vocational nurse (LVN). On 7/31/24, under the post-dialysis information section, LN 4 documented the presence of bruit and trill. On 8/5/24, under the post-dialysis information section, LN 6 documented the presence of bruit and trill. Page 1 of 2 555246 555246 09/03/2024 Vista View Post Acute 304 N. Melrose Dr Vista, CA 92083
F 0726 On 8/7/24, under the post-dialysis information section, LN 5 documented the presence of bruit and trill. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm On 8/22/24 at 3:16 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 1. LN 1 stated she had cared for Resident 1 and did not have proper training for CVC for hemodialysis. Residents Affected - Few On 8/22/24 at 4 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 stated there was no formal training about the CVC for hemodialysis. Per LN 2, It was verbal instructions during endorsement (report). On 8/28/24 at 4:30 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 4. LN 4 stated he did not have formal training for CVC for hemodialysis. On 8/29/24 at 12:30 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 5. LN 5 stated he had formal training in CVC assessment. However, on 8/7/24, many things were happening, and human error occurred. LN 5 further stated he documented check marks on the bruit and trill (dialysis communication form) without assessing the site, and should not have. On 8/29/24 at 1:15 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 6. LN 6 stated she watched many videos upon hire and could not recall if one was about CVC assessment and care. LN 6 stated she should not have documented that the catheter was patent because it was beyond her scope (as a LVN) to check the CVC line's patency, and she was not allowed to touch the CVC. LN 6 further stated she assumed the line was patent because Resident 1 returned from hemodialysis. On 9/3/24 at 4:40 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON acknowledged the LNs should have competencies and training (for CVC), and stated assessment for the CVC site should have been monitored for bleeding, signs and symptoms of infection, and if the dressing was intact. The facility could not provide a policy and procedure for CVC care, training, and skills checks for the CVC line. 555246 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0726GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F726 - Nursing Services

    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 3, 2024 survey of VISTA VIEW POST ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of VISTA VIEW POST ACUTE on September 3, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at VISTA VIEW POST ACUTE on September 3, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes ..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.