Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

HEMET HILLS POST ACUTECMS #5552971 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0658 Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure blood glucose meters (glucometer - a blood sugar meter measures the amount of sugar in a small sample of blood) were calibrated and documented according to the facility protocol and current professional standards of practice on multiple days on November 2025. This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate blood glucose readings for residents requiring routine monitoring.Findings:A review of Station Three, Cart C November 2025 Quality Assurance Log indicated missing documentation for the following dates, with blank entries for time, staff performing, machine lot number, test strip lot number, low control, high control, and actions taken: -November 14, 2025;-November 15, 2025; and -November 19, 2025. On December 1, 2025, at 10:52 a.m., an interview and review of Station Three Quality Assurance Log were conducted with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1). LVN 1 stated, glucometer calibration was the responsibility of the night shift nurse and was documented on the assurance logs located on the medication carts. LVN 1 stated there were two medication carts per station and stated we are good about doing the checks. LVN 1 further acknowledged the November 2025 log had missing documentation on November 14, 15, and 19, 2025, and there should not be any gaps on the logs. A review of the November 2025 Station One's Cart B Quality Assurance Logs indicated missing documentation on the following dates, with blank entries for time, staff performing, machine lot number, test strip lot number, low control, high control, and actions taken:-November 15, 2025;-November 16, 2025;-November 20, 2025;-November 21, 2025; andNovember 25, 2025 (low and high control and actions taken - blank). On December 1, 2025, at 11:18 a.m., a concurrent interview and record review were conducted with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) at Station one. The RNS stated, LVNs on the night shift was responsible for completing glucometer calibration logs including lot numbers, control ranges and results. The RNS stated the logs were necessary to ensure accurate blood glucose readings. The RNS stated if there is nothing written you would not know if the glucometer was checked and then you would not know if your readings were accurate. The RNS stated the licensed nurses for the day shift should double check the logs during reports and make the corrections. RNS stated she was not previously aware of the gaps. On December 1, 2025, at 12:32 p.m., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD stated the night shift was responsible for completing the calibration logs and that oncoming shifts should review and complete the logs if missing to ensure accuracy. A review of the November 2025 Quality Assurance Log for Station Two Carts B and C indicated missing documentation as follows, with blank entries for time, staff performing, machine lot number, test strip lot number, low control, high control, and actions taken: -Station Two Cart B - November 19, and 25, 2025-Station Two Cart C - November 29, 2025 On December 1, 2025, at 12:53 p.m. an interview and record review were conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the LVN's conducting the medication administration for the night shift should be doing the glucometer checks and when the checks are done that were to fill out the assurance log fully including the lot number and range and Residents Affected - Some (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555297 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555297 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/16/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Hemet Hills Post Acute 1717 West Stetson Avenue Hemet, CA 92545 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0658 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete results. The DON stated the logs were necessary to ensure accurate readings of the blood sugars levels for the residents who need to have their levels checked. The DON confirmed there were four missing gaps for the month of November for Cart B and Cart C. The DON stated she did have a concern that if there is a blank portion of the assurance forms there should be a follow up by the day shift nurse and that day shift nurse should fill out the form as well to confirm that the glucometer check was done. The DON stated that if the forms were not filled out completely there was no way to know if it was done correctly or accurately. The DON stated if the forms are left blank there would be a risk for the residents' blood sugar readings to not accurately reflect the glucose levels. A review of the facility policy titled, Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level dated October 2011, indicated, the purpose of this procedure is to obtain a blood sample to determine the resident's blood glucose level.equipment and supplies.Reagent strip with color chart (e.g., Chemstrip) or blood glucose monitoring system (meter with test strips and calibration supplies).follow the instructions provided by the manufacturer of the glucose monitoring system to obtain a blood glucose reading, including the quality control monitoring of the glucometer.documentation.the person performing this procedure should record the following information in the resident's medical record.date and time the procedure was performed.name and title of individual who performed the procedure.all assessment data obtained during the procedure.results.follow facility policies and procedures.A review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Care of the Older Adult with Diabetes Mellitus dated November 2020, indicated, .to provide an overview of diabetes in the older adult.and the principles of glucose monitoring.Glycemic targets.use a glucometer for capillary blood sampling to measure current blood glucose levels.manage hypoglycemia according to protocols and provider orders.blood glucose monitoring.for resident on oral medication .who is well controlled and poorly controlled.resident receiving insulin. Event ID: Facility ID: 555297 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0658GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F658 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 16, 2025 survey of HEMET HILLS POST ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of HEMET HILLS POST ACUTE on December 16, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at HEMET HILLS POST ACUTE on December 16, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.