F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or
bed-hold policies.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a discharge notice (also known as a 30-day notice)
for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when, Resident 2, Resident 2's representative (FM; family
member), and the Office of the Long-Term Ombudsman (OMB, a person who assists residents with
resolving conflicts or concerns at the facility) did not receive written notification of Resident 2's impending
discharge within 30 days or as soon as practicable when an impending discharge date had been
determined by the facility.
This failure violated Resident 2's right to be informed in writing of a pending discharge and how to appeal
the decision of a facility-initiated discharge. This failure also resulted in Resident 2's representative and the
State Long-Term Care Ombudsman from being uninformed of the discharge decision in writing and
removed the opportunity for Resident 2's representative and/or the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman to
advocate on Resident 2's behalf in a timely manner.
Findings:
A review of Resident 2's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with
diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke, damage to tissues in the brain due to
a loss of oxygen to the area), muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility (when a person is
unable to walk in the usual way), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids), major depressive
disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in
activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and anxiety disorder (intense, excessive, and
persistent worry and fear about everyday situations).
A review of Resident 2's Physician Order Summary, dated 4/29/25, the record indicated .discharge to home
with support on 5/1/25 following cessation [stopping] of skilled services [medical and therapeutic services
that can only be safely and effectively performed by or under the supervision of licensed professionals,
such as nurses or therapists] .
A review of Resident 2's Social Services Progress Notes, dated 4/30/25, the record indicated, .Discharge
disposition was discussed with daughter .Daughter was advised to continue to coordinate .even if resident
return home .Referral was also made for meals .to see if she will qualify for services .referral for
supplemental caregiver support also emailed .
A review of Resident 2's Social Services Progress Notes, dated 5/1/25, the record indicated, .Per daughter
.resident will be moved to .as disposition. Discharge will be coordinated once the process is approved .
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
555307
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555307
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clearwater Healthcare Center
1517 East Knickerbocker Drive
Stockton, CA 95210
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
During an interview by phone on 5/29/25 at 4:13 p.m., with the Long-Term Ombudsman Representative
(OMB) 1, OMB 1 stated that he had not heard anything about Resident 2's impending discharge from the
facility.
During an interview on 5/30/25 at 10:05 a.m., with the facility Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD
stated that residents received discharge notices from Social Services. The SSD stated that the notice might
be given to the resident one day or one week ahead of time. The SSD stated that a discharge notice was
given to a resident with a copy placed in their electronic medical record (EMR) and a copy was sent to the
OMB afterwards. The SSD confirmed that Resident 2 did not receive a notice of discharge. The SSD stated
that it was because the discharge was still pending, so she was not able to give a notice of transfer or
discharge to Resident 2.
During an interview on 5/30/25 at 11 a.m., Resident 2 stated that the facility staff came to her room one
week before the discharge date and told her that she would be discharged on 5/1/25. Resident 2 stated that
her FM (daughter) appealed the discharge.
During an interview by phone with Resident 2's FM on 5/30/25 at 11:08 a.m., the FM stated that the facility
notified her that Resident 2 was to be discharged one week before the discharge date of 5/1/25. The FM
stated that she filed an appeal of the discharge. The FM confirmed that neither she nor Resident 2 received
a formal discharge notice from the facility. The FM stated that the SSD told her that Resident 2 was to be
discharged , and that she could appeal the discharge. The FM stated that she felt that the discharge was
not safe. The FM stated that the facility staff told Resident 2 that she would be discharged [DATE]. The FM
stated that she called the OMB's office on 4/30/25, and OMB 2 helped her file to appeal the discharge from
the facility. The FM stated that OMB 2 came to the facility and spoke with the SSD and told the SSD that the
FM filed an appeal, and that Resident 2 was not to be discharged from the facility pending the appeal. The
FM stated that a licensed nurse (LN) came to Resident 2's room while OMB 2 was there and began to pack
her things for discharge on [DATE], so she told the LN that the discharge appeal was pending. The FM
stated that after OMB 2 left the facility, another LN came to Resident 2's room with her medications and
discharge papers a short time later, and she refused to sign them and told the LN that the discharge appeal
was pending. The FM stated that Resident 2 was anxious and thought that the facility was going to put her
out on the street. The FM stated that she notified OMB 2, and OMB 2 made calls to the facility, and the
discharge was put on hold. The FM stated that the appeal of the discharge was later granted.
During an interview by phone with OMB 2 on 5/30/25 at 2:36 p.m., OMB 2 confirmed that the OMB's office
did not receive a notice of discharge for Resident 2. OMB 2 stated that Resident 2 was anxious because
the staff approached her about the discharge, but her FM was making the discharge arrangements, and the
staff did not include the FM in the discharge conversations. OMB 2 stated that she came to the facility on
5/1/25 and talked with the SSD. OMB 2 stated that the SSD stated that Resident 2 could make her own
decisions. OMB 2 stated that the SSD stated that Resident 2 had a safe place to be discharged to. OMB 2
stated to the SSD that Resident 2's FM stated that the place that the facility attempted to discharge
Resident 2 to was not safe. OMB 2 stated that the SSD stated that the facility was not attempting to
discharge Resident 2 since the discharge appeal was pending. OMB 2 stated that after she left the facility,
she received a call from Resident 2's FM stating that the facility staff was attempting to discharge Resident
2. OMB 2 stated that she called the SSD, and the discharge attempt was stopped.
A review of a facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Transfer or Discharge Documentation, revised 12/16,
the P&P indicated, .Policy Statement .When a resident is transferred or discharged ,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555307
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555307
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
06/02/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Clearwater Healthcare Center
1517 East Knickerbocker Drive
Stockton, CA 95210
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
details of the transfer or discharge will be documented in the medical record and appropriate information
will be communicated to the receiving health care facility or provider .2. If a resident exercises his or her
right to appeal a transfer or discharge notice he or she will not be transferred or discharged while the
appeal is pending .
A review of a facility P&P titled, Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for, revised 12/16, the P&P
indicated, .Residents will be prepared in advance for discharge .2. A post-discharge plan is developed for
each resident prior to his or her transfer or discharge. This plan will be reviewed with the resident, and/or
his or her family .
Review of an online article published by the California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR) titled
TRANSFER AND DISCHARGE RIGHTS, updated 9/4/24, the article indicated, .Written Notice Before
transferring or discharging a resident, the facility must provide written notice to the resident and the
resident's representative in a language and manner they understand . The facility must send a copy of the
notice to the long-term care ombudsman program. Except when specified below, the notice must be given
at least 30 days before the resident is transferred or discharged . Exceptions to 30-Day Notice .there are a
few exceptions to the 30-day notice requirement. Federal regulations permit notice to be made as soon as
practicable before transfer or discharge when: the health or safety of individuals in the facility would be
endangered; the resident's urgent medical needs require a more immediate transfer; the resident's health
has improved sufficiently to allow a more immediate transfer or discharge; or the resident has resided in the
facility less than 30 days . Even if an exception to the 30-day notice requirement is satisfied, the facility
must nevertheless provide written notice in advance of a proposed transfer or discharge and an opportunity
to appeal. A nursing home cannot transfer or discharge a resident while an appeal is pending, unless delay
would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other individuals in the facility . California law
requires nursing homes to give reasonable advance notice in writing in all cases of transfer or discharge .
(https://canhr.org/transfer-and-discharge-rights/)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555307
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3