Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

FOUNTAIN VALLEY POST ACUTECMS #5553281 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555328 11/25/2025 Fountain Valley Post Acute 11680 Warner Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708
F 0695 Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed. Level of Harm - Potential for minimal harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided appropriate respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's oxygen orders were administered by a license nurse and carried out as ordered by the physician. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's MDS was accurately coded when the resident was on oxygen. These failures had the potential to affect the respiratory health and well-being of the resident in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration (undated) showed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. The P&P further showed to verify there was a physician's order for this procedure and review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 11/25/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's H&P examination dated 10/18/25, showed the resident's decision-making capabilities as need assistance. Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report dated 10/27/25, showed an order for oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 LPM every shift, notify the MD if the oxygen saturation drops below 88%. Review of Resident 1's Significant Change/Medicare-5 Day MDS dated [DATE], showed under Section O, Resident 1 was not on oxygen. Review of Resident 1's Oxygen Saturation Summary showed the resident's oxygen saturation was obtained via room air on the following dates and times:- 11/21/15 at 1616 hours, O2 saturation of 97%- 11/21/25 at 2331 hours, O2 saturation of 97%- 11/22/25 at 1836 hours, O2 saturation of 96%- 11/23/25 at 0054 hours, O2 saturation of 96%- 11/23/25 at 0055 hours, O2 saturation of 96%- 11/23/25 at 1827 hours, O2 saturation of 95%; and- 11/24/25 at 0815 hours, O2 saturation of 96% On 11/25/25 at 1407 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with CNA 1 in Resident 1's room. Resident 1's oxygen concentrator was on with the nasal cannula hanging on the oxygen concentrator. The nasal cannula was not stored in an oxygen storage bag. The oxygen concentrator showed the setting at 2.5 LPM. CNA 1 took the nasal cannula and placed it on Resident 1. CNA 1 verified the nasal cannula was not stored in the oxygen storage bag prior to use. CNA 1 further verified they should not have put the nasal cannula on the resident. CNA 1 stated the license nurses were supposed to put the nasal cannulas on the residents to ensure the oxygen was on the right setting. On 11/25/25 at 1430 hours, an observation, interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with LVN 1 in Resident 1's room. LVN 1 verified Resident 1's oxygen concentrator was set at 2.5 LPM and the orders were for 2 LPM. LVN 1 verified the oxygen administered should match the physician's order. LVN 1 also verified the CNAs were not to apply the nasal cannula on the residents to ensure the oxygen therapy was applied correctly and stated the oxygen should be applied by the licensed nurses. On 11/25/25 at 1620 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident 1 was conducted with the DON. The DON stated the nasal cannulas should be stored properly in the oxygen storage bags to maintain infection control and should be applied on the resident by the charge nurses and not by the Residents Affected - Some Page 1 of 2 555328 555328 11/25/2025 Fountain Valley Post Acute 11680 Warner Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708
F 0695 Level of Harm - Potential for minimal harm CNAs. The DON further stated Resident 1's MDS should have coded Resident 1 on oxygen since the resident was on a continuous oxygen administration. The DON also verified the multiple dates the O2 saturation were noted as room air. The DON verified Resident 1 should be on continuous oxygen as ordered. The DON verified the above findings. Residents Affected - Some 555328 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0695GeneralS&S Bno actual harm

    F695 - Respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 25, 2025 survey of FOUNTAIN VALLEY POST ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of FOUNTAIN VALLEY POST ACUTE on November 25, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at FOUNTAIN VALLEY POST ACUTE on November 25, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.