Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

VINTAGE FAIRE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTERCMS #5553551 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three of three (3) current sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 4, and Resident 5), had person-centered care plans (a personalized document outlining a resident's health, support, and personal needs) when:1. Resident 1 did not have a care plan developed and implemented for diagnoses of hypertension (HTN, High blood pressure-the force of blood against your artery walls is consistently too high, making your heart work harder), medication for depression (feelings of sadness), and medication for prevention of blood clots (pooling of blood).2. Resident 4 did not have a care plan developed and implemented for diagnoses of HTN, chest pain, and a stroke (blood flow to the brain is suddenly interrupted, causing brain cells to die due to lack of oxygen). 3. Resident 5 did not have a care plan developed and implemented for diagnoses of diabetes (the body can't properly use sugar for energy, leading to high blood sugar levels because the body does not make enough insulin). These failures had the potential for Resident 1, Resident 4, and Resident 5's health care needs to go unrecognized, negatively affecting all three residents; Resident 1 (increased risk for stroke and depression), Resident 4 (increased risk for stroke), and Resident 5 (increased risk for uncontrolled blood sugar which could lead to fatigue, blurred vision, and in severe cases, seizures [a sudden surge of abnormal electrical activity in the brain]). Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included high blood pressure.A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, (contains the physician's orders) dated 11/19/25, indicated the following physician orders:-Amlodipine (medication used to treat [HTN] high blood pressure) one time a day for HTN-Lisinopril (medication used to treat HTN) one time a day for HTN-Metoprolol (medication used to treat HTN) three times a day for HTN-Sertraline (medication used to treat depression) one time a day for depression-Clopidogrel (antiplatelet medication to prevent blood clots) give 1 time a day for CVA (cerebral [brain] vascular accident - a stroke caused by a blood clot)A review of Resident 1's care plans did not contain care plans for Resident 1's HTN, depression, and anticoagulant therapy (medication to prevent blood clots).During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/19/25 at 1:35 PM with licensed nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 confirmed Resident 1 did not have care plans in place for HTN, depression, and anticoagulant therapy. LN 1 stated the care plans should have been in place. LN 1 explained the importance of the care plans was to guide the care of Resident 1 and to have given interventions for health conditions. LN 1 explained that without care plans in place for HTN, depression, and anticoagulant therapy, Resident 1's basic needs may not be met.2. A review of Resident 4's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included HTN, and a stroke.A review of Resident 4's care plans did not contain care plans related to Resident 4's diagnosis of HTN, stroke, and chest pain.A review of Resident 4's Order Summary Report, dated 11/19/25, indicated the following physician orders:-Aspirin one time a day for stroke prevention-Clopidogrel one time a (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555355 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555355 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 11/19/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Vintage Faire Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 3620-B Dale Rd Modesto, CA 95356 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete day for stroke prevention-Hydralazine (medication for HTN) one tablet every six hours as needed for HTN-Losartan (medication for HTN) one time a day for HTN-Nitroglycerin 1 tablet every 5 minutes as needed for chest painDuring a concurrent interview and record review on 11/19/25 at 3:34 PM with the Minimum Data Set Assistant (the MDSA works with the MDS nurse who handles clinical assessments known as the Minimum Data Set), Resident 4's care plans were reviewed. The MDSA confirmed Resident 4 did not have care plans for stroke prevention, HTN, and chest pain. The MDSA explained there should have been care plans in place, but due to a transition in ownership of the facility on 8/1/25, more than three months prior, the facility had not caught up on all their care plans, stating it was a work in progress.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/19/25 at 4:18 PM, the DON stated resident's care plans should have reflected their current health status. The DON stated it was important to have care plans in place that directed the care the resident received by having focus goals and interventions for that specific health condition. The DON further explained if the care plans were not in place there could be a delay care.During a follow-up interview with the DON on 12/24/25 at 12:19 PM, the DON confirmed Resident 4 did not have care plans in place for stoke prevention, HTN, and chest pain. The DON explained it was important to have active care plans in Resident 4's electronic health record (EHR) so the staff would have a visualization of Resident 4's ongoing plan of care.3. A review of Resident 5's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes.A review of Resident 5's Order Summary Report, dated 11/19/25, indicated Resident 5 was on the following medications for diabetes:-Metformin (medication used to control blood sugar) twice a day for diabetes, active since May 2025-Sitagliptin (medication used to control blood sugar) one time a day for diabetes, active since June 2025A review of Resident 5's care plans indicated there was not a care plan in place for Resident 5's diabetes until 11/17/25 when the prior month, Resident 5's blood sugar started tending up (high blood sugar) due to illness.During a concurrent interview and record review with the DON on 12/24/25 at 12:21 PM, Resident 5's care plans were reviewed. The DON confirmed Resident 5 did not have a care plan in place for diabetes and that the specific care plan should have been in place. The DON explained it was important to have active care plans in Resident 5' EHR (Electronic Health Record) for visualization of Resident 5's ongoing plan of care and the care plan should have reflected the specific interventions for Resident 5 health concerns.A review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan Policy, revised 5/17, indicated, . It is the policy of this facility to ensure resident needs are met and documented in a written care plan . A written care plan for each resident will be completed at the time of admission and shall include, at a minimum . A comprehensive assessment of resident's physical health, behavioral, and social needs and preferences, and capacity for self care . a description of the services which the facility will provide to meet the needs identified in the comprehensive assessment . The resident will be reassessed yearly or more frequently, if necessary, to address significant changes in the resident's physical behavioral, cognitive and functional condition and identify the services that the facility shall provide address the resident's changing needs. The care plan shall be updated to reflect the results of the reassessment . Event ID: Facility ID: 555355 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0656GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F656 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 19, 2025 survey of VINTAGE FAIRE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of VINTAGE FAIRE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER on November 19, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at VINTAGE FAIRE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER on November 19, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be ..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.