Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

SHIELDS NURSING CENTERCMS #5553642 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555364 11/20/2025 Shields Nursing Center 3230 Carlson Boulevard El Cerrito, CA 94530
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and care services were provided for one (Resident1) of three sampled residents in accordance with professional standards of practice and care plan when: 1.Facility did not reevaluate Resident 1's routine administered of Acetaminophen (Tylenol) medication twice a day for pain management when Resident 1's pain symptoms had resolved. (Tylenol - medication used to relieve mild to moderate pain and reduce fever). 2. Facility did not carry out diagnostic laboratory tests dated 8/30/24 for Resident 1 as ordered by the physician. 3. Facility did not monitor Resident 1's fluid intake and output record as indicated on care plan. 4. LVN 1 did not notify physician and document failed attempts to obtain STAT UA specimen via straight catheterization for Resident 1. STAT lab order means immediately. It is a medical instruction that indicates that a laboratory test should be performed, and the results should be provided as soon as possible.Straight catheterization is a medical procedure that uses a straight, hollow tube to drain urine from the bladder These failures had the potential to cause delay to receive the necessary care and services, suffer from unnecessary medication and dehydration for Resident 1.1.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 11/30/24, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.) score was 01 and indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 1 was not able to recall the correct year, month, and day of the week, had clear speech, and had difficulty communicating some words or finish her thoughts but able if prompted or given time. The MDS indicated Resident 1 needed supervision with eating food and/or liquid to mouth and swallow. The MDS indicated Resident 1 received a scheduled pain medication regimen. The MDS indicated Resident 1 had had no complaint of pain when interviewed. The MDS indicated Resident 1 had diagnoses to include non-Alzheimer's dementia (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body). During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 8/13/22, the Progress Notes indicated the physician ordered Resident 1 to receive acetaminophen tablets 325 mg give two tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain and give two tablets by mouth two times a day for pain management for complain of generalized pain. Further review of the Progress notes indicated Resident 1 had no complaint of pain and discomfort at the time and no change in level of consciousness. During a review of Resident 1's Medication Review Report (MRR), dated 12/3/24, the MRR indicated on 8/13/22 the physician verbally prescribed Resident 1 to receive Acetaminophen tablet 325 mg give two tablets by mouth two times a day for pain management. During a review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated July, August, September, October, November, December 2024 and January 2025, the MARs indicated Resident 1 was administered acetaminophen tablet 325 Residents Affected - Some Page 1 of 4 555364 555364 11/20/2025 Shields Nursing Center 3230 Carlson Boulevard El Cerrito, CA 94530
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some mg two tablets by mouth two times a day for pain management. Further review of Resident 1's MARs dated July, August, September, October, November, December 2024, and January 2025, the MARs indicated Resident 1 was assessed for pain every shift. MARs indicated Resident 1 had no pain. During an interview on 9/29/25 at 2:10 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN1), RN 1 stated Resident 1 had generalized chronic pain. RN 1 stated reevaluation may not apply to Resident 1's administration of routine Tylenol medication because Resident 1 had chronic pain. RN 1 stated Resident 1 was assessed every shift for pain and had no pain. During a review of Resident 1's Pain/discomfort Care Plan, initiated 5/24/22, the Pain/discomfort Care Plan indicated Resident 1 had risk for pain/discomfort, interventions included medicate for pain and assess for effectiveness. During an interview on 9/29/25 at 3:05 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated licensed nurses are expected to reevaluate Resident 1's need for pain medication and assess for effectiveness. 2. During a review of Resident 1's Physician's Orders (PO), dated 8/30/24, the PO indicated, Resident 1's physician ordered laboratory testing to include CBC, A1C, TSH/T4, Lipid profile and CMP (blood work) During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/29/25 at 3:05 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's PO, dated 8/30/24, was reviewed. The PO indicated on 8/30/24, Resident 1's physician ordered laboratory tests for blood work for Resident 1. DON stated the lab test ordered by the physician for Resident 1 was not carried out. 3. During a review of Resident 1's Nutritional Assessment, dated 12/09/24, the Nutritional Assessment indicated Resident 1's nutritional goal was for oral intake to meet adequate hydration and estimated fluid need =1500ml minimum in a day. During a review of Resident 1's Nutritional Fluid Intake documentation, dated 12/1/24 through 12/31/24 and 1/1/25 through 1/16/25, the document indicated Resident 1's fluid intake ranges from 540 mls to 1,050 ml a day, less than estimated fluid needs of 1500ml in a day. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/29/25 at 3:05 p.m. with DON, Resident 1's Potential for Fluid Deficit Care Plan related to chronic UTI, initiated on 5/27/22, and facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Intake, Measuring and Recording, dated October 2010 were reviewed. The care plan indicated Resident 1 had the potential for fluid deficit related to chronic urinary tract infection (UTI). Care plan interventions included encouraging Resident 1 to drink fluids of choice and monitor and document intake and output as per facility's policy. Resident 1 needs assistance with fluid intake to meet daily requirement, monitor document, and report any signs and symptoms of dehydration; decreased or no urine output. DON stated Resident 1 did not meet the criteria for keeping fluid intake and output record. DON stated fluid intake and output record was not kept for Resident 1. DON could not provide documentation that Resident 1's fluid intake record was tallied every day, and output record was kept as indicated on care plan to ensure Resident 1 had adequate fluid intake. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 1/16/25 at 00:20, the Progress Notes indicated Resident 1 complained of stomach pain and was given two tablets of acetaminophen, but Resident was still complaining of pain and vital signs were stable. Resident 1's daughter arrived and asked staff to get a UA done. An order was received at 7:17 p.m. from Nurse Practitioner for STAT CBC and UA culture. Staff tried to collect the urine but were unsuccessful and endorsed to the next shift nurse. Further review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 1/16/25, indicated Resident 1 had a change of condition reported abdominal pain, shortness of breath, and unresponsive. An order was received to call 911 and send Resident 1 to hospital emergency room. 4.During an interview on 9/29/25 at 3:25 p.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated an order for a STAT lab test for UA and straight catheter to obtain UA specimen was received for Resident 1 a day before Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital. LVN 1 stated she attempted to obtain urine specimen by straight catheterizing Resident 1 twice but there was no urine. LVN1 stated she endorsed the STAT order for UA to the night shift nurse. 555364 Page 2 of 4 555364 11/20/2025 Shields Nursing Center 3230 Carlson Boulevard El Cerrito, CA 94530
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some LVN 1 stated her mistake was that she did not notify physician of failed attempts to obtain UA specimen. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 complained of pain after receiving routine Tylenol. LVN 1 stated she did not informed physician that Resident 1 continued to complain of pain. LVN 1 said she did not document order for straight catheter in Resident 1's records. LVN 1 stated when she returned the next day, Resident 1 had low grade fever and low oxygen saturation. LVN 1 stated she called the doctor and received an order to transfer Resident 1 to the hospital. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/29/25 at 4:20 p.m. with DON, LVN 1 and Administrator (Admin), Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 1/10/25 through 1/17/25, and laboratory reports were reviewed. Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 1/16/25, indicated LVN 1 received an order from the physician the previous day. DON stated she was not aware that Resident 1's STAT lab order for UA was endorsed from shift to shift. DON stated she did not know that Resident 1's STAT lab orders was received a day before Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital. DON stated the progress notes did not reflect the time upon which the physician order for STAT labs was received.During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Lab and Diagnostic Test Results-Clinical Protocol, dated November 2018, the P&P indicated, The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests. A nurse will identify the urgency of communicating with the Attending Physician based on physician request, the seriousness of any abnormality, and the individual's current condition. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Pain-Clinical Protocol, dated October 2022, the P&P indicated, If pain symptoms have resolved or there is no longer an indication for pain medication, the multidisciplinary team and physician shall try to discontinue or taper analgesic medications to the extent possible. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Intake, Measuring and Recording, dated October 2010, the P&P indicated, The purpose is to accurately determine the amount of liquid a resident consumes in a 24-hour period. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. At the end of your shift, total the amounts of all liquids the resident consumed. 555364 Page 3 of 4 555364 11/20/2025 Shields Nursing Center 3230 Carlson Boulevard El Cerrito, CA 94530
F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents' medical records was accurately documented and systematically organized when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN1) did not document in Resident 1's medical records, the physician order to obtain STAT laboratory test for urinalysis (UA) and straight catheterization to include the date and time the order was received in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices.This failure had the potential to cause inaccurate documentation and confusion of care and treatment provided for Resident 1. During an interview on 9/29/25 at 3:25 p.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated an order for a STAT lab test for UA, blood work and straight catheter to obtain UA specimen were received for Resident 1 a day before Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital. LVN 1 stated she attempted to obtain urine specimen by straight catheterizing Resident 1 twice but there was no urine. LVN 1 stated she endorsed the STAT order for UA to the night shift nurse. LVN 1 stated her mistake was that she did not notify the physician of failed attempts to obtain UA specimen. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 complained of pain after receiving routine Tylenol. LVN 1 stated she did not inform the physician that attempts to obtain urine specimen failed. LVN 1 stated she did not informed physician that Resident 1 continued to complain of pain. LVN 1 said she did not document order for straight catheter. LVN 1 stated when she returned the next day, Resident 1 had low grade fever and low oxygen saturation. LVN 1 stated she called the doctor and received an order to transfer Resident 1 to hospital. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/29/25 at 4:20 p.m. with DON, LVN 1 and Administrator (Admin), Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 1/10/25 through 1/17/25 and laboratory reports dated 1/16/25, were reviewed. Lab report for STAT UA specimen was received 1/16/25 at 10:15 a.m. Resident 1 Progress Notes, dated 1/16/25 at 00:20 indicated that LVN1 received orders from the physician the previous day. DON stated she was not aware that Resident 1's STAT lab order for UA was endorsed from shift to shift. DON stated she did not know that Resident 1's STAT lab orders was received a day before Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital. DON stated the progress notes did not reflect the time upon which physician order for STAT labs was received. 555364 Page 4 of 4

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • 0842GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F842 - Resident-identifiable information

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 20, 2025 survey of SHIELDS NURSING CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of SHIELDS NURSING CENTER on November 20, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at SHIELDS NURSING CENTER on November 20, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.