F 0610
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to conduct a
thorough investigation into Resident 1's allegation of abuse involving Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1)
before allowing the alleged perpetrator to return to work.
Residents Affected - Few
This failure had the potential to expose Resident 1 to further abuse and compromised the integrity of the
abuse investigation process.
Findings:
On March 28, 2025, at 10:50 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate an
allegation of abuse.
On March 28, 2025, at 11:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1, who stated, CNA 1 was
rough while changing her brief, pushing her against the bed railing and causing pain and a bump on her left
wrist on March 15, 2025. Resident 1 stated It upset me at the time.
A Review of Resident 1's medical record, title, Resident Information, dated, March 18, 2025, at 11:50 a.m.,
indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis
(One-sided {Left} paralysis or weakness) following a stroke.
A review of Resident 1's, Brief Interview for Mental Status (a cognitive assessment), indicated a score of 15
(cognitively intact).
A review of Resident 1's, Change of Condition, (A deviation from baseline condition) note, dated, March 15,
2025, at 8:00 p.m., by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, indicated, . (Resident 1 . accusing {CNA 1} being
rough while changing (resident), (Resident 1) complained of a bump (on) left wrist . (LVN 1 assessed
Resident 1's left wrist) bone, no noted (injuries) skin intact, no discolorations . (CNA 1) stated she was not
rough with (resident) and had . (CNA 2) with her, while changing Resident 1 . (LVN 1) . notified . Director of
Nursing (DON) and Administrator ({Admin}-Abuse Coordinator) . DON informed all staff to take a second
person at all times caring for (Resident 1) . Police officer arrived and spoke to (LVN 1) . (Resident 1) and
(Admin). (Admin) called (the facility) and tried to speak to (Resident 1) twice and (resident) said No I'm not
talking to (Admin) .
On March 28, 2025, at 1:18 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA 1, who stated, she worked double
shift on March 15, 2025, and cared for Resident 1 in the morning without incident. CNA 1 stated she was
informed on March 15, 2025, at 9:23 p.m. (one hour after the allegation was reported), that she could return
to work the next morning, March 16, 2025 at 6:30 a.m.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
555383
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555383
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/22/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Blythe Post Acute LLC
285 West Chanslor Way
Blythe, CA 92225
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0610
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
On March 28, 2025, at 1:37 p.m., an interview was conducted with the DON, who stated, she was informed
of the allegation and spoke with Resident 1 by phone, then reported the incident to the Administrator. The
DON stated, she did not participate further in the investigation, as she was off duty.
On March 28, 2025, at 2:23 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator (Abuse Coordinator),
who stated, he was responsible for abuse investigations. The Administrator stated, he received the report
from LVN 1, spoke with the police, and attempted to interview Resident 1, who declined. The Administrator
stated, he interviewed staff who assisted with Resident 1's care but did not interview Resident 1 or any
other residents assigned to CNA 1 prior to allowing the CNA to return to work. The Administrator stated, he
believed he had enough information and permitted CNA 1 to return to her shift on March 16, 2025, even
though the investigation was not complete.
On April 1, 2025, at 10:29 a.m., an interview was conducted with LVN 1, who stated, Resident 1 reported
the incident around 7:50 p.m. on March 15, 2025. LVN 1 stated she assessed the resident, notified the DON
and Administrator. LVN 1 stated, the police arrived shortly afterward to interview Resident 1. LVN 1 stated
CNA 1 was sent home around 8:45 p.m. that evening.
On April 1, 2025, at 4:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator, who stated, on March
17, 2025 (a day after the reported allegation of abuse), he presented to the facility to interview other
residents who had received care from CNA 1 and conducted a follow-up with Resident 1, who decline to
discuss the incident further. The Administrator stated, he allowed CNA 1 to return to work on March 16,
2025.
A review of the facility Policy and Procedure, titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised, July 2017,
indicated, . Policy Statement: All reports of resident abuse . shall be promptly . and thoroughly investigated
by facility management. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Role of the Administrator . 4. The
administrator will suspend immediately any employee who has been accused of resident abuse, pending
the outcome of the investigation. 5. The administrator will ensure that any further potential abuse, neglect
exploitation or mistreatment is prevented . Role of the investigator: 1. The individual conducting the
investigation will, as a minimum: c. Interview the person(s) reporting the incident; g. Interview staff members
(on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident; i. Interview
other residents to whom the accused employee provides care or services; and j. Review all events leading
up to the alleged incident . 2. The following guidelines will be used when conducting interviews: a. Each
interview will be conducted separately and in a private location . d. Witness reports will be obtained in
writing. Either the witness will write his/her statement and sign and date it, or the investigator may obtain a
statement, read it back to the member and have him/her sign and date it .
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555383
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2