Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

BEACH CREEK POST-ACUTECMS #5553881 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0610 Respond appropriately to all alleged violations. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the abuse investigation protocol was followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 1 was suspended immediately when Resident 1 reported to the facility staff of allegation of abuse against CNA 1. Resident 1 reported CNA 1 being rough during the provision of care. * The facility failed to report the result of the investigation to the CDPH, L&C Program, Orange District Office within five working days. These failures had the potential to put vulnerable residents at increased risk for abuse and/or delay in providing the necessary care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting dated 10/2022 showed all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported. Under the section role of the administrator showed the administrator will suspend immediately any employee who has been accused of resident abuse, pending the outcome of the investigation. Further review of the P&P showed the administrator (or designee) will provide the appropriate agencies or individuals listed above with a written report of the findings of the investigation within five working days of the occurrence of the incident. Review of SOC 341 dated 11/28/25, showed on 11/28/25 at 1020 hours, the DON received a report from staff and Resident 1 of rough handling by assigned CNA on 11/27/25 in the evening shift. The SOC 341 further showed Resident 1 was alert oriented and had no injury. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 12/9/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's H&P examination dated 11/14/25, showed Resident 1 was able to make his own decisions. Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] , showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance from staff for his activities of daily living. On 12/9/25 at 1506 hours, an interview was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 stated on 11/27/25 at around 2100 hours, CNA 1 asked for assistance while providing care to the Resident 1. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 had a long-term skin issue on his back and she observed CNA 1 was being rough while cleaning Resident 1. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 asked CNA 1 to stop and CNA 1 then stopped. However, LVN 1 further stated Resident 1 reported to her that he asked CNA 1 to stop providing care multiple times and CNA 1 did not stop before LVN 1 came to the room. LVN1 stated she then reported the incident to RN 1. On 12/9/25 at 1527 hours, an interview was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 stated on 11/27/25 at around 2100 hours, LVN 1 reported to her that CNA 1 was being rough to Resident 1 while providing care, and Resident 1 also reported to LVN 1 that he asked CNA 1 to stop providing care multiple times and CNA 1 did not stop before LVN 1 came to the room. RN 1 stated she then changed the assignment for CNA 1 and did not assign Resident 1 to CNA 1. When asked if CNA 1 continued to work for the facility with other residents after the incident, RN 1 stated CNA 1 continued to work that shift with other residents until her Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555388 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555388 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/10/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Beach Creek Post-Acute 645 South Beach Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92804 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0610 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete shift ended on 11/27/25 at 2300 hours. RN 1 stated the above incident was an allegation of abuse against CNA 1 and the process was to report the incident to the Administrator and suspend the accused staff pending investigation. RN 1 stated she should have reported the incident to the Administrator right away and suspended CNA 1 pending investigation. RN 1 acknowledged by not suspending CNA 1 pending investigation put the other residents at risk for further abuse. 2. On 12/9/25, at 1555 hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator . The Administrator stated the facility had completed the investigation and determined the above allegation LVN 1 reported was unsubstantiated; however, the Administrator stated the facility did not submit the result of the investigation to CDPH L&C Program Orange District Office within five working days. The Administrator stated it was missed. On 12/20/25 at 0944 hours, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON was informed and acknowledged the above findings. Event ID: Facility ID: 555388 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0610GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F610 - In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 10, 2025 survey of BEACH CREEK POST-ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of BEACH CREEK POST-ACUTE on December 10, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at BEACH CREEK POST-ACUTE on December 10, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.