F 0578
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to
participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to verify if one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 39) had an
advance directive. In addition, the facility did not provide written information to Resident 39 related to
formulating an advance directive.As a result, this had the potential to affect Resident 39's care and
treatment in the event the resident could not make decisions for himself.Findings:A review of Resident 39's
Resident Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].On 7/24/25 at 11:40
A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the social services designee (SSD). The SSD
stated it was her job to check if residents had an advance directive upon admission. This would then be
discussed during the resident's first care conference. The SSD reviewed Resident 39's clinical record and
stated there was no documentation the resident had an advance directive. The SSD stated she did not
verify if Resident 39 had an advance directive. The SSD stated prior to being at the skilled nursing facility,
Resident 39 lived in the independent living facility (ILF) and may have had an advance directive at the ILF.
The SSD stated she would check.On 7/24/25 at 12:10 P.M., an interview was conducted with the SSD. The
SSD stated Resident 39 did not have an advance directive on file at the ILF. The SSD stated she should
have discussed having an advance directive with Resident 39.On 7/24/25 at 12:25 P.M., another interview
was conducted with the SSD. The SSD stated Resident 39 should have been provided written information
about formulating an advance directive and should have been informed of the facility's policies and
procedures for advance directives.On 7/24/25 at 3:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with the director of
nursing (DON). The DON stated it was her expectation for the SSD to check if residents had an advance
directive upon admission and to provide them with written information related to formulating an advance
directive.A review of the facility's policy titled Advance Directives revised December 2016, indicated, .1.
Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to.formulate an
advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. 2. Written information will include a description of the
facility's policies to implement advance directives.6. Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the Social
Services Director or designee will inquire of the resident, his/her family members and/or his or her legal
representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. 8. If the resident indicates that he or
she has not established advance directives, the facility will offer assistance in establishing advance
directives.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 29
Event ID:
555424
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or
bed-hold policies.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer and written notice of
bed-hold policy to one of four residents (Resident 7) reviewed for transfer and discharge.As a result, there
was the potential for residents to be uninformed about their transfer and bed-hold rights when sent to the
hospital.Findings:A review of Resident 7's Resident Face Sheet indicated the resident was readmitted on
[DATE].A review of Resident 7's Resident Progress Notes dated 4/27/25, indicated the resident was
transferred to the hospital for evaluation of a fever. Resident 7 was not sent via 911 services.A review of
Resident 7's Resident Progress Notes dated 7/1/25, indicated the resident was transferred to the hospital
for evaluation of a suspected urinary tract infection. Resident 7 was not sent via 911 services.On 7/23/25 at
12 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the director of staff development (DSD). The
DSD reviewed Resident 7's clinical record and stated the resident was transferred to the hospital on
4/27/25 and 7/1/25. The DSD stated no written notice of bed-hold policy was provided to Resident 7 when
transferred to the hospital. The DSD stated the facility did not provide written notices of bed-hold upon
transfer to long-term residents. The DSD further stated there was no documentation of written notices of
transfer provided to Resident 7. The DSD stated, We don't notify in writing when they're alert and it's a
transfer.On 7/24/25 at 3:51 P.M., an interview was conducted with the DSD. The DSD stated the facility did
not have a policy related to written notice of transfer.On 7/24/25 at 5:06 P.M., an interview was conducted
with the director of nursing (DON). The DON acknowledged written notices of bed-hold policy and written
notices of transfer were not provided to Resident 7 when transferred to the hospital on 4/27/25 and 7/1/25.A
review of the facility's policy titled Bed-Holds and Return revised March 2017, indicated, Prior to transfers
and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and
return policy.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set
assessment (MDS, a comprehensive assessment) for two of 18 residents (Resident 39, and Resident 51).
This deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents by delaying resident care needs and
provided inaccurate information to the Federal database.1. A review of Resident 39's Resident Face Sheet
indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].
Residents Affected - Few
On 7/21/25 at 3:45 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 39. Resident 39 stated
he was continent of urine but that nursing staff put a urinary catheter on him at night. Resident 39 stated he
did not know why and that it was the nursing staff who decided to put a urinary catheter on him.
On 7/22/25 at 8:12 A.M., an observation of Resident 39 was conducted. Resident 39 was lying in bed and
he was utilizing a urinary catheter. The catheter was draining clear, yellow urine into a drainage bag.
A review of Resident 39's MDS Assessment Section H- Bladder and Bowel dated 6/9/25, indicated .Z. None
of the above. for any appliances used (internal or external urinary catheters).
On 7/24/25 at 11:30 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the MDS coordinator
(MDSC). The MDSC reviewed Resident 39's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE]. The MDSC stated
her look-behind period for conducting Resident 39's bladder and bowel assessment was from 6/3/25
through 6/9/25. The MDSC stated Resident 39 did not use a urinary catheter at that time which was why
the MDS assessment was coded as Z. None of the above. The MDSC then reviewed Resident 39's
Resident Progress Notes dated 6/5/25 which indicated the resident was wearing a condom (external)
urinary catheter. The MDSC stated there was no order for the external urinary catheter until 7/11/25. The
MDSC stated if there had been an order during her look-back period, she would have captured and coded
the MDS assessment for the use of the external catheter. The MDSC stated, It got missed. The MDSC
stated Resident 39's MDS assessment Section H dated 6/9/25 was inaccurately coded. The MDSC stated
Resident 39's MDS assessment should have been accurate.
On 7/24/25 at 3:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with the director of nursing (DON). The DON stated it
was her expectation for MDS assessments to be accurate as they were a reflection of care and treatment
provided to residents. The DON stated Resident 39's external catheter should have been captured and
coded correctly on the MDS assessment.
A review of the facility's CMS's [Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services] RAI [Resident Assessment
Instrument- an instruction manual to guide completion of the MDS] 3.0 Manual dated October 2024,
indicated, .Definitions External Catheter Device attached to the shaft of the penis like a condom.that routes
urine to a drainage bag.Steps for Assessment 1. Examine the resident to note the presence of any urinary
or bowel appliances. 2. Review the medical record, including bladder and bowel records, for documentation
of current or past use of urinary or bowel appliances. Coding Instructions Check next to each appliance that
was used at any time in the past 7 days. Select none of the above if none of the appliances were used in
the past 7 days.
2. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's Resident Face Sheet.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
On 7/23/25, a record review of Resident 51's MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 51 was discharged to
general acute care hospital (GACH) on 4/22/25.
On 7/23/25, a record review of a Licensed Nurse (LN) Progress notes, dated 4/22/25, indicated Resident
51 was discharged to another skilled nursing facility (SNF).
Residents Affected - Few
On 7/23/25 at 8:31 A.M., a joint record review of Resident 51's clinical record and an interview was
conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 22. LN 22 stated Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]
and was discharged to another SNF on 4/22/25. LN 22 stated the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) was
responsible for encoding the resident's discharge from the facility on the MDS assessment.
On 7/23/25 at 8:51 A.M., a joint record review of Resident 51's clinical record and an interview was
conducted with MDSC. The MDSC stated she was responsible for coding the MDS assessment of the
residents when they were admitted and when they were discharged . The MDSC stated Resident 51's MDS
should have been coded correctly to reflect the correct information provided to Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal agency). MDSN stated, It was just a data entry error.
On 7/24/25 at 3:36 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated
the expectation was for the MDSC to provide the correct coding of the MDS to ensure accurate information
was relayed to CMS.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0655
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being
admitted
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 15
sampled residents (Resident 49) that addressed the resident's communication needs.This failure had the
potential to impact the resident's quality of care and treatment. Cross reference F676.Findings: Resident 49
was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. A record review of Resident
49's Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a comprehensive assessment) Section A Identification
Information, A1110 Language dated 7/13/25, indicated Resident 49's preferred language was a foreign
language. Documentation on Section A Identification Information included .b. Do you need or want an
interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff . Answer - yes A record review of Resident
49's written care plans indicated there was no baseline care plan for language/communication preferences.
On 7/21/2025 at 8:30 A.M., an interview and observation was conducted with Resident 49. Resident 49
spoke a foreign language only. The Infection Preventionist (IP) came into the room and stated if he wanted
to communicate with Resident 49 he gets a foreign language speaking certified nursing assistant (CNA),
housekeeper or charge nurse to translate. Resident 49 said some words in a foreign language and pointed
to her left ear. The IP went to find someone to translate what Resident 49 was saying. There was a white
board on the wall of Resident 49's room that had goals written in English on it. There was also a menu
written in English posted on the white board. On 7/21/25 at 8:40 A.M., an interview was conducted with
Licensed Nurse (LN) 36 in Resident 49's room. LN 36 stated she could translate because she speaks a
little of Resident 49's foreign language. LN 36 stated there were no communication tools available to speak
to Resident 49, such as a communication board (a tool that uses pictures, symbols, or text to help people
express themselves) or a language translation line (a phone service that facilitates communication between
individuals speaking different languages) to help staff communicate with a resident. LN 36 stated we would
look for someone who spoke the same foreign language or call the family member (FM) when we need to
communicate with Resident 49. On 7/21/2025 at 9:12 A.M., an interview with Resident 49's FM was
conducted. The FM stated she translated English to the foreign language for Resident 49. The FM
translated for Resident 49 who stated that she would like different items for breakfast as she had been
getting cereal, fruit and milk every day for the past week despite her choices, which frustrated her. Resident
49's FM translated that Resident 49 stated that sometimes she did not understand what the staff were
telling her. Resident 49 stated there were times when the facility did not provided a translator. Resident 49
stated to her FM that most of the time she was alone and she could not get her needs met. On 7/23/25 at
8:42 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 stated Resident 49 spoke a foreign language and
did not speak English. LN 2 stated she did not speak the resident's foreign language but could ask simple
questions. LN2 stated if medical terminology was required, she would get someone to speak to Resident 49
in her language, such as unit clerk or contact her supervisor to get a translator. LN 2 stated there was no
language phone line for translation or communication board for use. LN 2 stated Resident 49's FM was
usually here to translate, or she was called for assistance. LN 2 stated there was no care plan in place for
language preference, but it was important especially if the FM or staff were not available for translation. On
7/23/25 at 9:20 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 3. LN 3 stated there was no language line
translation service or communication board for Resident 49 because the staff would go and find a translator
if available. LN 3 stated there was no baseline care plan done related to language preference for Resident
49. On 7/24/25 at 3:40 P.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The DON
stated the care plan was expected
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0655
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
to be developed within 24 hours of admission and language preference would be expected to be care
planned if the resident did not speak English. The DON stated Resident 49's baseline care plan should
have included what communication tools were preferred by the resident. The DON stated a communication
board or language line translation service should have been utilized so the resident's needs were met. A
review of the facility's Baseline Care Plan template, undated, indicated, .Baseline Care Plan: will identify my
care needs, risks, strengths and goals for the first 48 hours
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 15 sampled residents (Resident
15 and 39) had resident-specific written care plans developed for:1.The use of an external urinary catheter
(condom catheter) for Resident 39.2. Resident 15's medication administration preferences.As a result, there
was the potential residents' needs would not be met.Findings:
1. A review of Resident 39's Resident Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with diagnoses to include urinary tract infection (UTI).
On 7/21/25 at 3:45 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 39. Resident 39 stated
he was continent of urine but that nursing staff put a urinary catheter on him at night. Resident 39 stated he
did not know why and that it was the nursing staff who decided to put a urinary catheter on him.
On 7/22/25 at 8:12 A.M., an observation of Resident 39 was conducted. Resident 39 was lying in bed and
he was utilizing a urinary catheter. The catheter was draining clear, yellow urine into a drainage bag.
On 7/23/25 at 4:10 P.M., an interview was conducted with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 34. CNA 34
stated he often provided care to Resident 39 and knew him well. CNA 34 stated Resident 39 was continent
of bowel and bladder. CNA 34 stated Resident 39 could hold his urine and would let him know when it was
time to take him to the bathroom. CNA 34 stated he was not sure why Resident 39 used an external
catheter when he was continent, and that it may be the resident's preference to use one.
On 7/24/25 at 8:30 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with license nurse (LN) 35. LN 35
stated she was unsure if Resident 39 was continent or incontinent. LN 35 stated Resident 39 used an
external catheter at night, and she was unsure why he did so. LN 35 reviewed Resident 39's written care
plans and stated there should have been a written care plan that addressed the resident's use of an
external catheter. LN 35 stated the care plan should include why Resident 35 used an external catheter,
how long it was to be used, and monitoring of its use.
On 7/24/25 at 8:40 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with LN 36. LN 36 reviewed
Resident 39's clinical record and stated the resident's use of an external catheter did not have a clear
indication. LN 36 reviewed Resident 39's written care plans and stated the resident's use of an external
catheter was not included in the care plan.
On 7/24/25 at 10:30 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the director of staff
development (DSD). The DSD reviewed Resident 39's clinical record and stated there was no order for the
resident's external catheter until 7/11/25. The DSD stated Resident 39's progress note indicated the
external catheter was in use on 6/5/25 and there was no order. The DSD further stated there was no plan of
care related to Resident 39's use of the external catheter. The DSD stated there should have been a written
care plan for the use of the external catheter, So we know how to use it and can monitor and evaluate it as
an intervention.
On 7/24/25 at 3:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with the director of nursing (DON). The DON stated
there should have been a care plan developed to include Resident 39's use of an external urinary
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
catheter.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
2. A review of Resident 15's Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a
diagnosis of essential hypertension (high blood pressure) and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left
femur (a break in the bone of the left leg).
Residents Affected - Few
A review of Resident 15's physician orders, dated 3/31/25, indicated medication orders for Labetalol (a
medication for high blood pressure) 50 milligrams (mg), Metamucil 3 in 1 Daily Fiber 2 capsules, Daily
Multivitamin 1 tablet, Valsartan (a medication for high blood pressure) 80 mg, Vitamin B-12 1,000
micrograms (mcg), and Vitamin D3 125 mcg to be administered at 8:00 A.M.
On 7/23/25 at 9:49 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN 11) during
Resident 15's medication administration. LN 11 administered Labetalol and Valsartan to Resident 15. LN 11
stated Resident 15 preferred to take her blood pressure medication separate from her other morning
medications. LN 11 stated she would give the rest of Resident 15's morning medications around 10:45 A.M.
On 7/23/25 at 11:02 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 11 during Resident 15's
medication administration. LN 11 administered daily multivitamin, Vitamin B-12, and Vitamin D3 to Resident
15. Resident 15 stated she did not want to take the Metamucil capsules yet and requested LN 11 to come
back in 15 minutes to give it to her.
On 7/23/25 at 11:25 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 11 during Resident 15's
medication administration. LN 11 administered Metamucil capsules to Resident 15. LN 11 stated Resident
15's medication administration for morning medications was scheduled for 8 A.M. and medications were
considered late if given after 9 A.M. LN 11 stated there should have been a written care plan for medication
administration preferences for Resident 15.
On 7/24/25 at 8:25 A.M., an interview and joint record review was conducted with LN 36. LN 36 reviewed
Resident 15's care plans and stated there was no care plan found for the resident's medication
administration preferences. LN 36 stated Resident 15 should have had a specific person-centered care plan
related to her medication administration preferences.
On 7/24/25 at 4:15 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated
Resident 15's morning medication should not have been given past 9 A.M. The DON stated Resident 15
should have had a person-centered care plan developed for a later medication administration time if the
resident did not want to take her medications by 9 A.M.
A review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, revised December 2012, indicated, .3.
Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. 4.
Medications must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified.
A review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised December 2016,
indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables
to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each
resident.10. Identify problem areas and their causes, and developing interventions that are targeted and
meaningful to the resident.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0676
Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary language services for one
of 15 sampled residents (Resident 49).As a result, there was the potential for miscommunication to impact
the resident's care and quality of life. Cross reference F655.Findings:Resident 49 was admitted to the
facility on [DATE] per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. A record review of Resident 49's Minimum Data Set
assessment (MDS - a comprehensive assessment) Section A Identification Information, A1110 Language
dated 7/13/25 indicated Resident 49's preferred language was a foreign language. Documentation on
Section A Identification Information included .b. Do you need or want an interpreter to communicate with a
doctor or health care staff? Answer - yes On 7/21/2025 at 8:30 A.M., an interview and observation was
conducted with Resident 49. Resident 49 only spoke a foreign language. The Infection Preventionist (IP)
came into the room and stated if he wanted to communicate with Resident 49 he got a foreign language
speaking CNA (certified nursing assistant), housekeeper or charge nurse to translate. Resident 49 said
some words in a foreign language and pointed to her left ear. The IP went to find someone to translate what
Resident 49 was saying. There was a white board on the wall of Resident 49's room that had goals written
in English on it. There was also a menu written in English posted on the white board. On 7/21/25 at 8:40
A.M., an interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 36 in Resident 49's room. LN 36 stated there
were no communication tools available to speak to Resident 49, such as a communication board (a tool
that uses pictures, symbols, or text to help people express themselves) or a language translation line (a
phone service that facilitates communication between individuals speaking different languages) to help staff
communicate with a resident. LN 36 stated we look for someone who spoke the same foreign language or
call the family member (FM) when we need to communicate with Resident 49 .On 7/21/2025 at 9:12 A.M.,
an interview with Resident 49's FM was conducted. The FM stated she translated English to the foreign
language for Resident 49. The FM translated for Resident 49 who stated that she would like different items
for breakfast as she had been getting cereal, fruit and milk every day for the past week despite her choices,
which frustrated her. Resident 49's FM translated that Resident 49 stated that she did not understand what
the staff were telling her. Resident 49 stated there were times when the facility did not provide a translator.
Resident 49 stated to her FM that most of the time she was alone, and she could not get her needs met.
On 7/23/25 at 8:42 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 stated Resident 49 spoke a foreign
language and did not speak English. LN 2 stated she did not speak the resident's foreign language but
could ask simple questions. LN2 stated if medical terminology was required, she would have to get
someone to speak to Resident 49 in her language, such as unit clerk or contact her supervisor to get a
translator. LN 2 stated there was no language phone line for translation or communication board for use. LN
2 stated she would call the FM to translate for Resident 49.On 7/23/25 at 9:20 A.M., an interview was
conducted with LN 3. LN 3 stated if available, she would get staff to translate to Resident 49 so she could
communicate with Resident 49. LN 3 stated there was no language line translation service or
communication board because the staff would go and find a translator if available. On 7/23/25 at 9:38 A.M.,
an interview was conducted with CNA 4. CNA 4 stated Resident 49 was a foreign language speaker. CNA 4
stated he could speak a little of Resident's 49 foreign language and stated he was able to kind of
communicate with the resident. CNA 4 stated flash cards would be a helpful way for Resident 49 to
communicate. CNA 4 also stated a phone translation line or ipad would be helpful for translation if the
facility had that. On 7/24/25 at 3:40 P.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted.
The DON stated they should have used
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 9 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0676
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
communication tools that that Resident 49 preferred. The DON stated staff should utilized a communication
board or language line translation service when communicating with the resident to ensure the resident's
needs were met. The DON stated there was a language translation line service available and was surprised
that her staff were not aware of the language service tool. The DON stated it was her expectation that the
staff use the language line translation service when speaking to a non-English speaking resident. A review
of the facility's policy titled Translation and/or Interpretation of Facility Services, revised May 2017,
indicated, .11. Competent oral translation of vital information that is not available in written translation . shall
be provided in a timely manner . c. Contracted interpreter service; e. Telephone interpretation service .13.
Family members and friends shall not be relied upon to provide interpretation services for the resident
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 10 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0688
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM
and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide restorative nursing
assistant (RNA , a staff who focuses on maintaining and improving resident's functional abilities) services
for one of one sampled resident (Resident 32) reviewed for decreased range of motion (ROM, refers to how
far one can move a joint or a body part, like an arm or leg, in different directions). This failure had the
potential to cause contractures (stiffening of muscles), decreased ROM, and decreased mobility.Findings:
Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included stroke and quadriplegia
(paralysis below the neck that affects all of a person's limbs), as per the facility's Resident Face Sheet.
Resident 32's History and Physical (H&P,) dated 4/24/25, indicated Resident 32 did not have the capacity to
make decisions. Per the H&P, Resident 32 was dependent on the facility staff on her activities of daily living
(ADLs, basic tasks a person does to take care of oneself, like eating). A review of Resident 32's minimum
data set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 6/6/25 indicated Resident 32 had
functional limitations in ROM on her upper and lower extremities and that Resident 32 was dependent on
staff. A review of Resident 32's physician orders dated 3/1/24 and 8/30/24 indicated the following:- RNA
Training program for PROM to prevent bilateral knee contractures three times a week.- RNA to provide
Passive ROM (PROM, a staff does the ROM to the resident) to the right upper arm extremities three times
a week as tolerated. On 7/21/25 at 9:43 A.M., an observation of Resident 32 was conducted in her room.
Resident 32's upper extremities were exposed. Resident 32 did not respond when her name was called.
Resident 32's right hand was observed to be in a closed fist with her right thumb extended. On 7/22/25 at
3:40 P.M., an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 22. CNA 22 stated he was
familiar with Resident 32. CNA 22 stated Resident 32 had right side body weakness and was on RNA. CNA
22 stated Resident 32 was dependent on staff for her ADLs. CNA 22 stated he did not see RNA treatment
in the afternoon shifts. On 7/23/25 at 9:47 A.M., a concurrent review of Resident 32' clinical record and an
interview was conducted with RNA 22. RNA 22 stated Resident 32 had right side body weakness and was
scheduled to receive PROM of her upper and lower extremities three times a week. RNA 22 stated
Resident 32's RNA treatment was scheduled in the morning shift on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays.
RNA 22 stated the RNAs documented the amount of time and the resident's response to treatment when
Resident 32 received her RNA treatment. On 7/23/25, a review of Resident 32's RNA treatment program
from 6/1/25 to 7/24/25 was conducted. The treatment record indicated Resident 32 missed seven
treatments in June 2025 (6/5, 6/12, 6/14, 6/17, 6/19, 6/26 and 6/28) and five treatments in July 2025 (7/3,
7/5, 7/8, 7/14, and 7/19). On 7/24/25 at 10:20 A.M., a follow- up interview was conducted with RNA 22.
RNA 22 stated Resident 32 refused RNA services on some days. RNA 22 stated when the residents
missed their RNA services, the RNAs responsibility was to document in the resident's clinical record as
refused. RNA 22 stated she did not know why Resident 32 missed some days of RNA services. On 7/24/25
at 10:27 A.M., a joint review of Resident 32's clinical record and an interview was conducted with Licensed
Nurse (LN) 36. LN 36 stated there was missing documentation of RNA services to Resident 32 from June
2025 to July 2025. LN 36 stated there was no documentation as to whether Resident 32 received or
refused the RNA services on those service dates. LN 36 stated the RNAs should have documented RNA
services provided to Resident 32 to ensure the physician's orders were carried out as prescribed, to
prevent Resident 32 from developing contractures and keeping her mobility as possible. On 7/24/25 at 3:36
P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing. The DON stated the expectation was for the
staff to follow the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 11 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0688
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
physician's RNA order to Resident 32 to prevent the resident from developing contractures, maintaining her
functions and her joints' ROM. A review of the facility's policy titled Restorative Nursing Services, revised
7/17, indicated, Residents will receive restorative nursing care.to help promote optimal safety and
independence.5. Restorative goals may include, but are not limited to supporting and assisting the resident
in.b. Developing, maintaining and strengthening his/ her physiological.resources.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 12 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate
catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 15 residents (Resident 39)
reviewed for urinary incontinence, was:1. Evaluated and reassessed to determine if bladder continence or
incontinence was present through an incontinence/bladder management program.2. Provided scheduled
two-hour toileting based on the initial bladder assessment.3. Had a clear indication for the use of an
external catheter (condom catheter) at night.These failures had the potential for Resident 39 to miss the
opportunity to regain urinary continence through bladder retraining. In addition, this had the potential for the
resident to develop urinary tract infections (UTI).Findings:A review of Resident 39's Resident Face Sheet
indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include UTI.On 7/21/25 at
3:45 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 39. Resident 39 stated he was
continent of urine but that nursing staff put a urinary catheter on him at night. Resident 39 stated he did not
know why and that it was the nursing staff who decided to put a urinary catheter on him.On 7/22/25 at 8:12
A.M., an observation of Resident 39 was conducted. Resident 39 was lying in bed and he was utilizing a
urinary catheter. The catheter was draining clear, yellow urine into a drainage bag.On 7/23/25 at 4:10 P.M.,
an interview was conducted with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 34. CNA 34 stated he often provided
care to Resident 39 and knew him well. CNA 34 stated Resident 39 was continent of bowel and bladder.
CNA 34 stated Resident 39 could hold his urine and would let him know when it was time to take him to the
bathroom. CNA 34 stated he was not sure why Resident 39 used an external catheter when he was
continent, and that it may be the resident's preference to use one.On 7/24/25 at 8:30 A.M., an interview
was conducted with license nurse (LN) 35. LN 35 stated she was unsure if Resident 39 was continent or
incontinent. LN 35 stated Resident 39 used an external catheter at night, and she was unsure why he did
so.On 7/24/25 at 8:40 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with LN 36. LN 36 reviewed
Resident 39's admission assessment dated [DATE] and stated the resident was identified as incontinent
based on hospital documentation. LN 36 stated Resident 39 was documented by CNAs as continent in the
daytime and incontinent at night when using the external catheter. LN 36 stated there was no
documentation the facility followed up on Resident 39's bladder assessment and implemented a bladder
program to determine if the resident was truly continent or incontinent.A review of Resident 39's Minimum
Data Set Assessment (MDS, a comprehensive assessment) Section H- Bladder and Bowel dated 6/9/25,
indicated, the resident was occasionally incontinent. The MDS also indicated, Has a trial of toileting
program (e.g., scheduled toileting, prompted voiding, or bladder training) been attempted on
admission/entry or reentry since urinary incontinence was noted in this facility? The MDS was coded as
Yes. The MDS further indicated, Response- What was the resident's response to the trial program? The
MDS was coded, Unable to determine or trial in progress.On 7/24/25 at 10:15 A.M., an interview was
conducted with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC). The MDSC reviewed Resident 39's clinical record and stated
everyone admitted to the facility received a toileting program for 14 days to determine incontinence or
continence. The MDSC stated there was no documentation the toileting program was implemented for
Resident 39 or what the results of it were.On 7/24/25 at 10:30 A.M., an interview and record review was
conducted with the director of staff development (DSD). The DSD reviewed Resident 39's clinical record
and stated the resident was on a 14-day bowel and bladder assessment upon admission that required the
resident to be toileted every two hours. The DSD stated there was no documentation in the electronic
medical record that the bladder program had been done. The DSD stated CNAs were to record the
two-hour toileting on a paper Intake and
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 13 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Output form that was located in Resident 39's bathroom.At 10:40 A.M., the DSD went to Resident 39's
bathroom. There was no paper documentation/ Intake and Output form present.At 10:42 A.M., The DSD
went to the medical records director and asked for Resident 39's paper Intake and Output documentation of
two-hour toileting during his 14-day bladder training. The medical records director told the DSD, [she's]
never seen anything like that.The DSD stated the bowel and bladder management program should assess
the resident over 14 days with every two-hours offering of toileting. The DSD stated this program should
then be reassessed and reviewed to determine if the resident was incontinent or not and then develop an
appropriate plan of care. The DSD stated nursing should have gone back and evaluated the bladder
program for Resident 39. The DSD stated there was no follow through on Resident 39's initial bladder
assessment. The DSD stated there was no documentation related to the bladder training that had been
done for Resident 39 and that we should know if the resident was continent or incontinent.The DSD
reviewed Resident 39's clinical record and stated there was no physician order for the external catheter
until 7/11/25. The DSD stated Resident 39's progress note indicated the external catheter was in use on
6/5/25 and there was no order. The DSD further stated there was no plan of care related to Resident 39's
use of the external catheter.On 7/24/25 at 3:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with the director of
nursing (DON). The DON stated there should have been documentation of Resident 39's bladder program
being done during the first 14 days of admission. The DON stated there should have been documentation
of two hour toileting being offered to the resident. The DON stated the data obtained from the bladder
program should have been reviewed to determine if the resident was continent or not.A review of the
facility's policy titled Urinary Incontinence-Clinical Protocol revised April 2018, indicated, .4. As appropriate
based on assessment of the category and causes of incontinence, the staff will provide scheduled toileting,
prompted voiding, or other interventions to try to improve the individual's continence status. Monitoring 1.
The staff and physician will review the progress of individuals with impaired continence until continence is
restored or improved as much as possible, or it is identified that further improvement is unlikely. a. This
should include documentation of a resident's responses to attempted interventions such as scheduled
toileting, prompted voiding, or medications used to treat incontinence.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 14 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a
licensed pharmacist.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were
provided for two residents (Resident 7 and 34) according to acceptable standards of practice
when:1.Licensed nurse (LN) 11 did not follow the prescription label and gave Resident 34's levofloxacin
(antibiotic) with calcium which was contraindicated.2.Resident 7's controlled drug record (CDR) for
oxycodone (controlled pain medication) did not reconcile with the medication administration record
(MAR).As a result there was the potential for Resident 34 to experience the adverse effect of not receiving
the intended antibiotic dosage. In addition, there was the potential for Resident 7's controlled drug to be
diverted (when a medication is taken for use by someone other than whom it is prescribed). Findings:1. A
review of Resident 34's Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a
diagnosis of Vitamin deficiency, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous (under the skin) tissue, and
urinary tract infection.A review of Resident 34's physician orders, dated 7/21/25, indicated Levofloxacin
tablet 500 milligrams (mg) was to be given once a day at 8 A.M. Resident 34's physician orders, dated
3/19/25, indicated Oyster Shell Calcium (calcium carbonate) 500 mg 2 tablets was to be given once a day
at 8 A.M.On 7/23/25 at 8:22 A.M., an observation was conducted during Resident 34's medication
administration. Licensed Nurse (LN) 11 was observed preparing Resident 34's morning medications.
Resident 34's Levofloxacin medication label was observed to have a warning that indicated, give 2 hrs
before antiacids (medication containing calcium carbonate), multivitamins, minerals, and iron. At 8:37 A.M.,
LN 11 administered Levofloxacin and Oyster shell calcium together to Resident 34.On 7/23/25 at 11:30
A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with LN 11. LN 11 reviewed the warning label on
Resident 34's Levofloxacin and stated she should not have given Resident 34's calcium with it because it
could have interfered with the effectiveness of the Levofloxacin.On 7/24/25 at 2:49 P.M., a telephone
interview was conducted with the facility's pharmacist consultant (PC). The PC stated the warning label on
Resident 34's levofloxacin package should have been followed. The PC stated the levofloxacin should not
have been given at the same time as calcium. The PC stated, It affects the absorption of the antibiotic, and
it was considered a medication error. A review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications,
revised December 2012, indicated, .7. The individual administering the medication must check the label
THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method
(route) of administration before giving the medication.2. A review of Resident 7's Face Sheet indicated the
resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (a disease that
causes painful inflammation of the digestive tract) and chronic pain syndrome.A review of Resident 7's
physician orders, dated 5/1/25, indicated Oxycodone 15 mg one tablet for severe pain as needed every
eight hours.A review of Resident 7's CDR for Oxycodone 15mg tab, indicated the resident received the
medication on 5/24/25 at 12 A.M. and 6/1/25 at 9 A.M.A review of Resident 7's May through July 2025 MAR
for Oxycodone 15mg tab indicated the resident received the medication on 5/24/25 at 7:37 A.M. On 6/1/25
there was no documentation that Resident 7 received Oxycodone. On 7/18/25 at 7:18 A.M. documentation
was created for Resident 7's oxycodone administration on 5/24/25 and indicated, .Late Administration:
Charted Late, Comment: done on time - Given @ 12A [A.M.].On 7/24/25 at 4:15 P.M., an interview was
conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated LN 11 should have read the warning label
for Resident 34's Levofloxacin and should not have given it with the calcium. The DON reviewed Resident
7's CDR and MAR for Oxycodone and stated the MAR and CDR do not match and documentation was
missing for 6/1/25 on the MAR. The DON stated the nurse should not have
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 15 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
documented on 7/18/25 for the 5/24/25 administration of Resident 7's Oxycodone and the nurse would not
have known what they did two months ago.A review of the facility's policy titled Controlled Substances,
revised December 2012, indicated, .an individual resident controlled substance record must be made for
each resident who will be receiving a controlled substance.This record must contain:.i. Time of
administration.10. The Director of Nursing Services shall investigate any discrepancies in narcotics
reconciliation to determine the cause and identify any responsible parties, and shall give the Administrator
a written report of such findings.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 16 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0756
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart,
following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its pharmacist consultant (PC) identified medication
irregularities during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) for two sampled residents (Resident 33
and 39).As a result, there was the potential for residents to receive medications with inappropriate duration
and in excessive dosages. Cross reference F757. 1.A review of Resident 39's Resident Face Sheet
indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include urinary tract infection
(UTI).
A review of Resident 39's History and Physical dated 6/6/25, indicated the resident was in the hospital from
[DATE] through 6/3/25, and .For presumed urinary tract infection, the patient was treated with Rocephin
[antibiotic].The patient's Rocephin was completed after a 5-day course on 6/1/25 and the patient was
restarted on penicillin [antibiotic]. It was suspected that the patient had osteomyelitis [bone infection] of the
left second toe. The patient's urine culture on May 27, 2025 showed over 100,000 colony- forming units of
Klebsiella pneumoniae [type of bacteria] which was resistant to ampicillin, cefazolin, and cefuroxime [types
of antibiotics] but susceptible to Rocephin, ceftazidime, Augmentin, ciprofloxacin and Bactrim [types of
antibiotics]. The patient is currently asymptomatic.
A review of Resident 39's physician order dated 6/3/25, indicated the resident was to receive penicillin
tablet 500 milligrams twice a day, .No end date at this time.Dx [diagnosis] urinary tract infection, site not
specified.
A review of Resident 39's MAR for June and July 2025 indicated the resident received the penicillin as
ordered.
A review of Resident 39's Resident Census indicated the resident was discharged from the facility on
7/3/23 and was admitted on [DATE].
2.A review of Resident 33's Resident Face Sheet indicated the resident was re-admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with a diagnosis of Unspecified dementia (a disease affecting cognition and memory), severe, with
agitation.
A review of Resident 33's physician orders, dated 6/13/25, indicated an order for nitrofurantoin macrocrystal
(antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) one capsule once a day for UTI Prophylaxis with no stop date.
A review of Resident 33's medication administration record (MAR) from 6/14/25 through 7/23/25, indicated
the resident received nitrofurantoin daily.
A review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review document titled Consultant Pharmacist's Medication
Regimen Review Listing of Residents Reviewed with No Recommendations For Recommendations
Created Between 6/1/25 And 6/24/25, indicated that Resident 33 and Resident 39's medications were
reviewed by the facility's PC and did not require any recommendations.
On 7/24/25 at 2:38 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP).
The IP reviewed the facility's MRR for 6/1/25 through 6/24/25 and stated Resident 33 and
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 17 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0756
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Resident 39 did not have any medication recommendations. The IP stated Resident 33's nitrofurantoin did
not have a stop date and the indication for use was UTI prophylaxis. The IP stated Resident 33 and
Resident 39's antibiotics should have had a stop date because prolonged duration of antibiotics without a
proper indication can contribute to antibiotic resistance (when bacteria or other microorganisms evolve to
become resistant to the drugs designed to kill them).
Residents Affected - Few
On 7/24/25 at 2:24 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with the facility's PC. The PC stated for
residents to continue taking antibiotics without a stop date, there should be a valid reason from the MD
documented in the residents' clinical record. The PC stated antibiotics given without a stop date could be an
unnecessary medications and lead to antibiotic resistance. The PC reviewed Resident 33's nitrofurantoin
and stated she completed the resident's MRR on 6/23/25 and stated it should have had a stop date. The
PC stated it should have been identified as a medication irregularity and, It got missed.
The PC then reviewed Resident 39's penicillin and stated she completed the resident's MRR on 6/23/25.
The PC reviewed Resident 39's antibiotic without a stop date and it was not identified on the June MRR.
The PC stated she had identified Resident 39's penicillin with no stop date for April and May 2025 and she
wrote a letter to the physician recommending it to have a stop date. The PC was informed Resident 39 was
not a resident at the facility in April and May 2025 and was admitted on [DATE].
On 7/24/25 at 4:15 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated
Resident 33 and Residents 39's antibiotics should have had a stop date and prolonged duration of
antibiotics could cause resistance and other health effects. The DON acknowledged the residents'
antibiotics without stop dates should have been identified as irregularities during the June 2025 MRR.
A review of the facility's policy titled XVII Pharmacy Medication Regimen Review, revised 11/2017,
indicated, A. The consultant pharmacist performs the review of each resident's medication regimen monthly,
which shall include but are not limited to all psychotropic and antibiotic medication orders (active and
discontinued) used since previous review.Based on information gathered during medication monitoring, the
pharmacist evaluates (but not limited to): 1. The continued appropriateness of the medication and dosage.4.
Inappropriate doses ordered or administered.6. The need to discontinue any medication à
unnecessary meds.
A review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Staff and Clinician Training and Roles, revised
2016, indicated, .Consultant Pharmacist: 1. During the drug regimen review, the consultant pharmacist will
identify, and flag, orders for antibiotics that are not consistent with antibiotic stewardship practices.
A review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Policy for Antibiotic Stewardship
Program, reviewed 8/29/22, indicated, The World Health Organization has reported that antibiotic
resistance is one of the major threats to human health.5. Tracking.c. Pharmacy consultant will review and
report antibiotic usage data including numbers of antibiotics prescribed (e.g., days of therapy) .
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 18 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0757
Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 33 and 39)
were free from unnecessary medications when both residents were given antibiotics without verification of
a stop date. As a result, there was the potential for Resident 33 and 39 to experience antibiotic resistance
(when bacteria or other microorganisms evolve to become resistant to the drugs designed to kill them).
Findings:
Residents Affected - Few
1.A review of Resident 33's Resident Face Sheet indicated the resident was re-admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with a diagnosis of Unspecified dementia (a disease affecting cognition and memory), severe, with
agitation.
A review of Resident 33's physician orders, dated 6/13/25, indicated an order for nitrofurantoin macrocrystal
(antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) one capsule once a day for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) Prophylaxis with no
stop date.
A review of Resident 33's medication administration record (MAR) from 6/14/25 through 7/23/25, indicated
the resident received nitrofurantoin daily.
2. A review of Resident 39's Resident Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with diagnoses to include urinary tract infection (UTI).
A review of Resident 39's History and Physical dated 6/6/25, indicated the resident was in the hospital from
[DATE] through 6/3/25, and .For presumed urinary tract infection, the patient was treated with Rocephin
[antibiotic].The patient's Rocephin was completed after a 5-day course on 6/1/25 and the patient was
restarted on penicillin [antibiotic]. It was suspected that the patient had osteomyelitis [bone infection] of the
left second toe. The patient's urine culture on May 27, 2025 showed over 100,000 colony- forming units of
Klebsiella pneumoniae [type of bacteria] which was resistant to ampicillin, cefazolin, and cefuroxime [types
of antibiotics] but susceptible to Rocephin, ceftazidime, Augmentin, ciprofloxacin and Bactrim [types of
antibiotics]. The patient is currently asymptomatic.
A review of Resident 39's physician order dated 6/3/25, indicated the resident was to receive penicillin
tablet 500 milligrams twice a day, .No end date at this time.Dx [diagnosis] urinary tract infection, site not
specified.
A review of Resident 39's MAR for June and July 2025 indicated the resident received the penicillin as
ordered.
A review of Resident 39's written care plan for Infections dated 6/5/25, indicated, Resident has prophylactic
antibiotics related to chronic UTI * and osteomyelitis left second toe * Penicillin. Long term goal.Urinary
tract infection will resolve
On 7/24/25 at 8:30 A.M., an interview was conducted with license nurse (LN) 35. LN 35 stated Resident 39
was taking penicillin for a UTI, toe infection, and pneumonia. LN 35 reviewed Resident 39's physician order
for penicillin and stated it was to treat a UTI. LN 35 stated Resident 39 did not have any signs and
symptoms of a UTI while he resided at the facility. LN 35 stated there should have been a urinalysis done
since he was admitted to determine if the resident had an active UTI and needed
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 19 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0757
to continue taking the penicillin.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
On 7/24/25 at 8:40 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with LN 36. LN 36 reviewed
Resident 39's clinical record and stated there was no documentation the resident had a UTI or sign and
symptoms of a UTI while in the facility. LN 36 stated there were no labs done while the resident was in the
facility to determine if the resident had a UTI. LN 36 reviewed Resident 39's History and Physical dated
6/6/25 and stated it was unclear why the resident was taking penicillin. LN 36 stated Resident 39's order for
penicillin did not have a clear reason for there to be no stop date. LN 36 stated the penicillin order did not
indicate it was prophylaxis or to treat the resident's toe. LN 36 stated the order should have been clarified
with the physician to determine if a stop date for the penicillin was appropriate. LN 36 stated antibiotics
given indefinitely without a stop date could contribute to antibiotic resistance and could be considered
unnecessary medications.
Residents Affected - Few
On 7/24/25 at 2 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the infection preventionist (IP).
The IP reviewed Resident 39's physician order for penicillin and stated it needed a stop date. The IP stated,
I need to call the MD [medical doctor]. We need to take him off [the penicillin] since there's no signs and
symptoms of UTI. The IP stated penicillin was not appropriate for prophylaxis as it could lead to antibiotic
resistance.
The IP then reviewed Resident 33's clinical record and stated the resident's nitrofurantoin did not have a
stop date and the indication for use was UTI prophylaxis. The IP stated Resident 33's nitrofurantoin should
have had a stop date.
The IP further stated antibiotics without a stop date could be unnecessary medication and contribute to the
development of antibiotic-resistant organisms.
On 7/24/25 at 2:24 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with the facility's pharmacist consultant (PC).
The PC stated for residents to continue taking antibiotics without a stop date, there should be a valid
reason from the MD documented in the residents' clinical record. The PC stated antibiotics given without a
stop date could be unnecessary medications and lead to antibiotic resistance.
On 7/24/25 at 3:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with the director of nursing (DON). The DON stated
physician orders for antibiotics should be reviewed for a stop date and clarified with the MD with a valid
reason documented in the clinical record to continue taking them indefinitely. The DON stated Resident 33
and Resident 39's antibiotics without a stop date should have been identified. The DON stated antibiotics
given without a stop date may lead to antibiotic resistance.
According to the World Health Organization's online article titled Antimicrobial Resistance Hypervirulent
Klebsiella pneumoniae- Global Situation, dated 7/31/24, .Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is a
Gram-negative, bacteria.[it] is a leading cause of infections acquired in health-care institutions globally and
has been considered an opportunistic pathogen.Two main types of antibiotic resistance have been
commonly identified: one mechanism involves the expression of enzymes known as extended spectrum
β-lactamases (ESBL), which render bacteria resistant to the following antibiotic groups: penicillins.
A review of the facility's policy titled XVII Pharmacy Medication Regimen Review, revised 11/2017,
indicated, .Based on information gathered during medication monitoring . 1. The continued appropriateness
of the medication and dosage.4. Inappropriate doses ordered or administered.6. The need to discontinue
any medication à unnecessary meds.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 20 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0757
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
A review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and
Outcomes, revised December 2016, indicated, .2. The IP, or designee, will review antibiotic utilization as
part of the antibiotic stewardship program and identify specific situations that are not consistent with the
appropriate use of antibiotics .4. All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented on the facility-approved
antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The information gathered will include:.i. Stop date; j. Total days of
therapy.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 21 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0802
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition
service.
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and nutrition services
staff was able to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the department, when one Dietary Aide
(DA 22) incorrectly demonstrated how to calibrate a food thermometer. This failure in staff competence
could led to incorrect food temperature, which could increase the risk of foodborne illness in the resident
population of 47. Findings: On 7/23/25 at 11:22 A.M., an observation of DA 22 calibrating the food
thermometer, with the presence of the Registered Dietitian (RD) and an interview was conducted with DA
22. DA 22 put some ice into a glass then put some water into it. DA 22 immersed the food thermometer into
the glass with the probe touching the bottom and side of the glass. DA 22 stated he was unable to get the
right temperature to calibrate the food thermometer. DA 22 asked Do I have to put more ice in it? On
7/24/25, a review of DA 22's culinary competency assessment tool was conducted. The assessment tool
indicated DA 22 was signed off as competent on calibrating a food thermometer on 1/19/24. On 7/24/25 at
4:43 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Executive Officer (EO), the RD and the Director of Culinary
(DOC). The RD stated the competency of the dietary staff was a facility's project for the last six months and
the expectation was for the dietary staff to be receiving their competency and be followed annually. A review
of the facility's policy, titled Resource: Taking Accurate Temperature, dated 7/22, indicated, .Start with an
accurately calibrated thermometer.Ice Point Method.2. Place the thermometer probe into the ice water
mixture. It is important to wait about 30 seconds without having the probe touch the sides or bottom of the
container.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 22 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0812
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve
food in accordance with professional standards.
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary measures
were met in the kitchen during dietary operations according to standards of practice when: 1.Food item had
brown spots and was not able to be served to the residents. 2. Cool down process (hot food must be cooled
within 2 hours to 70 degree Fahrenheit, additional 4 hours to less than 41 degree Fahrenheit, total of 6
hours to cool down hot foods) was not properly followed per the facility's policy on handling potentially
hazardous food (PHF, means any food which consists in whole or in part of milk or milk products, eggs,
meat, poultry, rice ,fish, shellfish, edible crustacean, raw-seed sprouts, heat-treated vegetables and
vegetable products and other ingredients in a form capable of supporting rapid and progressive growth of
microorganism) item. These findings had the potential to expose the facility's residents to unsafe and
unsanitary food practices that could lead to widespread foodborne illnesses.Findings: 1. On 7/21/25 at 8:07
A.M., an observation of the produce walk-in refrigerator and an interview was conducted with the Dietary
Aide (DA) 23. There were three pieces of green bell pepper with white porous materials and a jalapeno
pepper with three brown dots in it. DA 23 stated, They will be discarded. On 7/23/25 at 11:15 A.M., an
interview was conducted with the Registered Dietitian. The RD stated she was informed of the green
peppers with molds in it. The RD stated the kitchen staff were supposed to inspect the food items/ produce.
The RD stated The cook will see it and they will not serve it. It is important for food safety and quality. A
review of the facility's policy titled, General Food Preparation and Handling, dated 7/22, indicated, Food
items will be prepared to conserve maximum nutritive value, develop, and enhance flavor and keep free of
harmful organisms and substances.2. Food Storage, a. Food will be received, checked and stored properly.
2. On 7/23/25 at 3:20 P.M., a review of the kitchen's cool down process log was reviewed with the
Registered Dietitian (RD) and the Director of Culinary (DoC). The cool down log indicated the cooked
chicken was placed in the chiller on 7/23/25 at 10 A.M. at 175-degree Fahrenheit. There was no
temperature checked of the cooked chicken after 2 hours (12 noon). The RD stated, There should be a
temperature check after 2 hours. It was important for the kitchen staff to check the food and ensure the cool
down process was followed to prevent food borne illness, the food might be in the danger zone. The RD
stated the DA who prepared the cool down process was gone for the day. A review of the facility's policy,
titled Use of Leftover, dated 7/22, indicated, .Leftovers will be properly handled and used or discarded as
appropriate.3. Leftovers must be cooled to 70 degrees Fahrenheit within 2 hours and then to 41-degree
Fahrenheit withing another 4 hours.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 23 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection control policies and
procedures when:1. Hand hygiene (washing hands or using hand sanitizer) was not offered to residents
prior to eating in the dining room.2. Hand hygiene was not consistently performed during wound treatment.
As a result there was a potential for cross contamination and transmission of infections to residents, staff,
and visitors. 1a. On 7/21/25 at 11:20 A.M., an observation was conducted in the dining room. Two female
residents in wheel chairs were being assisted by staff to table 10. Staff did not offer hand wipes or sanitizer
to both residents.
Residents Affected - Few
On 7/21/25 at 11:40 A.M., an observation of the female residents at table 10 was conducted. One of the
two female residents was wheeled out of the dining room; Resident 42 remained seated and ate her lunch.
Resident 42 held the bread roll with bare hands.
On 7/21/25 at 12:40 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 42 from table 10. Resident 42 stated
the staff did not offer hand wipes or hand sanitizers to clean their hands prior to meals.
On 7/21/25 at 12:48 P.M., an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5. CNA 5
stated she was not at the dining room when Resident 42 was seated in table 10. CNA 5 stated whoever
brought the resident to the dining room should offer hand wipes to the residents. CNA 5 stated the staff
should offer hand wipes before and after for their meals for hygiene and infection control.
On 7/24/25 at 2:29 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP), The IP stated the
staff should have provided the residents with wipes or offered to wash their hands. The IP stated the
residents should have clean hands before eating. The IP stated a lot of residents were dependent. The IP
stated it was important to maintain hand hygiene for the residents and keeping their fingers clean to prevent
an infection.
On 7/24/25 at 3:36 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated
the staff should offer hand sanitizer, encourage residents to perform hand hygiene for infection control.
1 b. On 7/21/25 at 11:50 A.M., a dining observation was conducted in the Garden Dining Room. There were
14 residents observed sitting at tables and eating lunch. Three staff members were present in the dining
room. Resident 30 was seated at the table eating lunch, and he stated he was not offered hand hygiene
and did not perform hand hygiene prior to his lunch tray being served. Resident 28 was wheeled to a table
by a certified nursing assistant (CNA) 5. Resident 28 was not offered hand hygiene by the staff and did not
perform hand hygiene prior to her lunch tray being served.
On 7/21/25 at 12:05 P.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 5. CNA 5 stated she did not offer hand
hygiene to Resident 28. CNA 5 stated it was important to perform hand hygiene prior to eating to clean
hands to prevent infection.
On 7/23/25 at 8:42 A.M., a dining observation was conducted in the Garden Dining Room. Two staff
members were present. Resident 30 was seated at a table eating breakfast and he stated he was not
offered hand hygiene and did not do hand hygiene prior to being served his breakfast tray. Resident 28 was
seated at table eating breakfast. Resident 28 stated she was not offered hand hygiene prior to being served
her breakfast tray. Resident 27 was seated at a table eating breakfast. Resident 27
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 24 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
stated she was not offered hand hygiene and did not perform hand hygiene prior to being served her
breakfast tray. Resident 27 stated she did not need to do hand hygiene because, I took a shower earlier this
morning.
On 7/24/25 at 2:30 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP stated that
residents should perform hand hygiene prior to eating in the dining room. The IP stated he put the hand
disposal wipes on each table so that staff would remember to do hand hygiene with the residents. The IP
stated his expectation was that hand hygiene should be provided by all staff to residents – either
soap and water or hand hygiene wipes prior to eating. The IP stated hand hygiene was important because
prior to eating because a resident could get sick and get other residents sick.
A review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/ Hand Hygiene, revised 10/23, indicated, The facility
considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections.5. Resident, family member
and or visitors will be encouraged to practice hand hygiene.
2. Resident 30 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included infection of left knee
prosthesis (an artificial body part that replaces a part that's missing or no longer functional) per the facility's
Resident Face Sheet.
On 7/21/25, a review of the facility's roster matrix (used to identify pertinent care categories) indicated
Resident 30 had a pressure ulcer/injury stage 2 (Partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow
open sore or wound).
On 7/22/25 at 3:47 P.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 22. CNA 22 stated Resident 30 had an
open wound in his left buttock and a rash between his legs.
On 7/24/25 at 7:57 A.M., a concurrent interview and an observation of the Wound Nurse (WN) performing
wound treatment to Resident 30 was conducted. The WN stated Resident 30 developed a pressure injury in
his left buttock. The WN put a gown onto himself and a pair of gloves and with a gloved hand, he closed the
door behind him touching the door knob, pulled the privacy curtain, took the remote control to put the
resident's bed up, went to the left side of the bed instructing Resident 30 to turn to the right side. Then WN
with the same gloves, folded Resident 30's incontinence brief, removed the old dressings from Resident
30's left buttock, put normal saline on the dry gauze, patted the gauze to Resident 30's wound then patted
the wound with dry gauze. Next, WN then applied the cream to Resident 30's wounds, cleaned the sides of
the wound and applied dressings. The WN performed all the tasks without changing gloves and did not
perform hand hygiene in between the tasks.
On 7/24/25 at 8:07 A.M., an interview was conducted with the WN. The WN stated he did not change his
gloves. The WN stated he should have changed his gloves because the old dressing was considered not
clean and could contaminate the wound which could cause Resident 30's wound to become infected.
On 7/24/25 at 3:36 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated
the expectation was for the wound nurse to take off the gloves, and perform hand hygiene after removing
the soiled dressing. The DON stated it was important to prevent contamination and prevent infection to
Resident 30.
A review of the facility's policy titled, Dressings, Dry/ Clean, revised 9/13, indicated, The purpose of this
procedure is to provide guidelines for the application of dry, clean dressings.Steps in
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 25 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Procedure.6. Put on clean gloves. Loosen tape and remove soiled dressing, 7. Pull glove over dressing and
discard into plastic or biohazard bag, 8. Wash and dry your hands thoroughly.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 26 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0881
Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its antibiotic stewardship program when two
sampled residents' (Resident 33 and 39) infections and antibiotic use was not monitored and reviewed June
and July 2025.As a result, Resident 33 and 39 were both on antibiotics without verification of a stop date.
This potentially excessive use of antibiotics had the potential to contribute to antibiotic resistance (when
bacteria or other microorganisms evolve to become resistant to the drugs designed to kill them) in the
facility. Findings:
Residents Affected - Few
1.A review of Resident 33's Resident Face Sheet indicated the resident was re-admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with a diagnosis of Unspecified dementia (a disease affecting cognition and memory), severe, with
agitation.
A review of Resident 33's physician orders, dated 6/13/25, indicated an order for nitrofurantoin macrocrystal
(antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) one capsule once a day for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) Prophylaxis with no
stop date.
2. A review of Resident 39's Resident Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on
[DATE] with diagnoses to include urinary tract infection (UTI).
A review of Resident 39's History and Physical dated 6/6/25, indicated the resident was in the hospital from
[DATE] through 6/3/25, and .For presumed urinary tract infection, the patient was treated with Rocephin
[antibiotic].The patient's Rocephin was completed after a 5-day course on 6/1/25 and the patient was
restarted on penicillin [antibiotic]. It was suspected that the patient had osteomyelitis [bone infection] of the
left second toe. The patient's urine culture on May 27, 2025 showed over 100,000 colony- forming units of
Klebsiella pneumoniae [type of bacteria] which was resistant to ampicillin, cefazolin, and cefuroxime [types
of antibiotics] but susceptible to Rocephin, ceftazidime, Augmentin, ciprofloxacin and Bactrim [types of
antibiotics]. The patient is currently asymptomatic.
A review of Resident 39's physician order dated 6/3/25, indicated the resident was to receive penicillin
tablet 500 milligrams twice a day, .No end date at this time.Dx [diagnosis] urinary tract infection, site not
specified.
A review of Resident 39's written care plan for Infections dated 6/5/25, indicated, Resident has prophylactic
antibiotics related to chronic UTI * and osteomyelitis left second toe * Penicillin. Long term goal.Urinary
tract infection will resolve
On 7/24/25 at 8:30 A.M., an interview was conducted with license nurse (LN) 35. LN 35 stated Resident 39
was taking penicillin for a UTI, toe infection, and pneumonia. LN 35 reviewed Resident 39's physician order
for penicillin and stated it was to treat a UTI. LN 35 stated Resident 39 did not have any signs and
symptoms of a UTI while he resided at the facility. LN 35 stated there should have been a urinalysis done
since he was admitted to determine if the resident had an active UTI and needed to continue taking the
penicillin.
On 7/24/25 at 8:40 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with LN 36. LN 36 reviewed
Resident 39's clinical record and stated there was no documentation the resident had a UTI or sign and
symptoms of a UTI while in the facility. LN 36 stated there were no labs done while the resident
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 27 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0881
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
was in the facility to determine if the resident had a UTI. LN 36 reviewed Resident 39's History and Physical
dated 6/6/25 and stated it was unclear why the resident was taking penicillin. LN 36 stated Resident 39's
order for penicillin did not have a clear reason for there to be no stop date. LN 36 stated the penicillin order
did not indicate it was prophylaxis or to treat the resident's toe. LN 36 stated the order should have been
clarified with the physician to determine if a stop date for the penicillin was appropriate. LN 36 stated
antibiotics given indefinitely without a stop date could contribute to antibiotic resistance.
On 7/24/25 at 2 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the infection preventionist (IP).
The IP reviewed Resident 39's physician order for penicillin and stated it needed a stop date. The IP stated,
I need to call the MD [medical doctor]. We need to take him off [the penicillin] since there's no signs and
symptoms of UTI. The IP stated penicillin was not appropriate for prophylaxis as it could lead to antibiotic
resistance.
The IP then reviewed Resident 33's clinical record and stated the resident's nitrofurantoin did not have a
stop date and the indication for use was UTI prophylaxis. The IP stated Resident 33's nitrofurantoin should
have had a stop date.
The IP further stated he was unable to perform the oversight of the antibiotic stewardship program in June
2025 to current (7/24/25) as he was dealing with an outbreak in another area of the building (not the skilled
nursing facility). The IP stated the antibiotic stewardship should have taken place and the resident's
antibiotic without a stop date should have been identified and clarified with the physician. The IP stated not
conducting the antibiotic stewardship program could lead to the development of antibiotic-resistant
organisms.
On 7/24/25 at 2:24 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with the facility's pharmacist consultant (PC).
The PC stated for residents to continue taking antibiotics without a stop date, there should be a valid
reason from the MD documented in the residents' clinical record. The PC stated antibiotics given without a
stop date could lead to antibiotic resistance.
On 7/24/25 at 3:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with the director of nursing (DON). The DON stated
physician orders for antibiotics should be reviewed for a stop date and clarified with the MD with a valid
reason documented in the clinical record to continue taking them indefinitely. The DON stated Resident 33
and Resident 39's antibiotics without a stop date should have been identified by the antibiotic stewardship
program. The DON stated the antibiotic stewardship program should have been ongoing no matter what
was going on in other parts of the building. The DON stated antibiotics given without a stop date may lead
to antibiotic resistance.
According to the World Health Organization's online article titled Antimicrobial Resistance Hypervirulent
Klebsiella pneumoniae- Global Situation, dated 7/31/24, .Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is a
Gram-negative, bacteria.[it] is a leading cause of infections acquired in health-care institutions globally and
has been considered an opportunistic pathogen.Two main types of antibiotic resistance have been
commonly identified: one mechanism involves the expression of enzymes known as extended spectrum
β-lactamases (ESBL), which render bacteria resistant to the following antibiotic groups: penicillins.
A review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Staff and Clinician Training and Roles, revised
December 2016, indicated, .Director of Nursing (DON) and Infection Preventionist (IP): 1. Administrative
and management personnel with clinical oversight responsibilities will receive
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 28 of 29
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555424
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center
211 Saxony Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0881
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
initial orientation and ongoing training on: a. The facility's antibiotic stewardship program; b. the rationale for
judicious use of antibiotics.2. The DON will monitor individual resident antibiotic regimens, including:.b.
compliance with start/stop dates and/or days of therapy.
A review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and
Outcomes, revised December 2016, indicated, .2. The IP, or designee, will review antibiotic utilization as
part of the antibiotic stewardship program and identify specific situations that are not consistent with the
appropriate use of antibiotics .4. All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented on the facility-approved
antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The information gathered will include:.i. Stop date; j. Total days of
therapy.
A review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Policy for Antibiotic Stewardship
Program, reviewed 8/29/22, indicated, The World Health Organization has reported that antibiotic
resistance is one of the major threats to human health.2. Accountability: a. An ASP team will be established
to be accountable for stewardship activities. The ASP team may consist of:.Director of Nursing, Infection
Preventionist (IP).As a team, they will: i. Review infections and monitor antibiotic usage patterns on a
regular basis.iv. Report on number of antibiotics prescribed (e.g., days of therapy).
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555424
If continuation sheet
Page 29 of 29