Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

OCEAN VIEW POST ACUTECMS #5554271 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555427 05/07/2024 Ocean View Post Acute 1980 Felicita Road Escondido, CA 92025
F 0660 Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately discharge on e of one resident (Resident 3) with elopement risk reviewed for discharge planning when; Residents Affected - Few 1. There was no documentation regarding Resident 3's elopement risk and the appropriateness of a discharge to an independent living facility and, 2. A discharge care plan was not developed. As a result, Resident 3 was readmitted to the hospital. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities) and repeated falls according to the facility's admission Record. During a review of the physician's history and physical (H&P) admission note dated 2/7/24, the H&P indicated .patient resides at Board and Care (place to live that provides food and personal care). Patient was wandering and went missing for several days. He was found by local police and brought in the hospital and placed on 5150 hold (when a person is a danger to self or others is detained for 72 hours in a psychiatric hospital) . A review of Nurses Progress Note (NPN), dated 3/9/24, at 4:30 P.M. indicated, The resident was observed by staff ambulating on the walkway near Felicita Road close to traffic. Staff feared he may inadvertently wander into traffic . Further review of NPN dated 3/21/24, 12:10 P.M. indicated Resident 3 was discharged to an independent living facility (ILF-place to live for people who do not need assistance with walking or personal care). During an interview on 4/17/24, at 10:15 A.M. with the facility administrator (ADMIN), the ADMIN stated the interdisciplinary team (IDT-team members with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of their residents) discussed residents' discharge plans with social services to assist with home health needs. An interview and concurrent record review on 4/17/24, at 11:44 A.M. with the assistant director of nurses (ADON) was conducted. The ADON stated the IDT included discharge planner, social services, Page 1 of 2 555427 555427 05/07/2024 Ocean View Post Acute 1980 Felicita Road Escondido, CA 92025
F 0660 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm case manager, minimum data set nurse (MDS- nurse who assessed and evaluated the quality of care being given to long-term care residents), ADON or director of nurses, administrator, and rehab staff. The ADON reviewed Resident 3's progress notes (PN). The ADON stated there was no IDT documentation regarding the decision for Resident 3 to be discharged to an ILF. The ADON further stated the case manager, social services or nursing staff should have documented if Resident 3 was appropriate for an ILF. Residents Affected - Few After the ADON's record review on 4/17/24, at 12:18 P.M., the ADON stated she did not attend the IDT meeting regarding Resident 3. The ADON stated if she attended, she would have questioned if the ILF was safe for the resident because Resident 3 had histories of elopements. An interview and concurrent record review was conducted on 4/17/24, at 12:31 P.M. with the social service director (SSD). The SSD reviewed Resident 3's records and stated he did not find IDT notes regarding decision for Resident 3 to be discharged to an ILF. The SSD further stated he should have documented the IDT's decision, family discussion and the income criteria for an ILF. During an interview and concurrent record review on 4/17/24, at 12:41 P.M. with the ADON, the ADON reviewed care plans for Resident 3. The ADON stated there was no care plan regarding Resident 3's discharge planning. The ADON further stated there should have been a care plan to know the plan for Resident 3's discharge. An interview on 5/7/24, at 1:08 P.M. with the ADON was conducted. The ADON stated it was important to document discharge plans for a resident to ensure everyone was aware of discharge and a care plan was expected to be completed for everyone to be aware of the details of discharge planning. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Discharge Planning Process, dated 12/19/22 was conducted. The P&P indicated, .5. If discharge to community is a goal, an active discharge care plan will be implemented and will involve the interdisciplinary team, including the resident and/or resident representative .An active individualized discharge care plan will address .discharge destination, with assurances the destination meets the resident's health/safety needs .caregiver/support person availability .The facility will document any referrals .The evaluation of the resident's discharge needs and discharge plan will be completely documented on a timely basis in the clinical record . 555427 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0660GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F660 - Quality of life

    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 7, 2024 survey of OCEAN VIEW POST ACUTE?

This was a inspection survey of OCEAN VIEW POST ACUTE on May 7, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at OCEAN VIEW POST ACUTE on May 7, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.