Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

MISSION DE LA CASACMS #5554871 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency, 1 of them serious (actual harm or immediate jeopardy). The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555487 04/18/2024 Mission DE LA Casa 2501 Alvin Avenue San Jose, CA 95121
F 0689 Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided to one of three residents (Resident 1) who was assessed to be high risk for falls, totally dependent on staff for transferring, and required close monitoring (staff made rounds and observed the residents at risk of falling) when Resident 1 was left sitting in her wheelchair in the hallway without staff watching and/or supervising her on [DATE], at 6:45 a.m., when staff went inside another resident's room. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling on the floor and sustaining a subdural hematoma (occurs when a blood vessel in the space between the skull and the brain is damaged; blood escapes from the blood vessel, leading to the formation of a blood clot that places pressure on the brain and damages it) on the right temporal region (a region at the side of the head behind the eyes). This blunt force injury of her head was the immediate cause of her death after 15 days in the general acute care hospital (GACH). Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), epilepsy (characterized by recurrent brief episodes of involuntary movement that may involve a part of the body or the entire body and are sometimes accompanied by loss of consciousness and control of bowel or bladder function), muscle weakness, abnormality of gait and mobility, and a history of falling. Review of Resident 1's Nursing Fall Risk Evaluation , dated [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE], indicated that Resident 1 was at high risk for falls. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a clinical assessment tool), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident 1's cognition was moderately impaired, and she needed extensive assistance (staff provide weight-bearing support) with one-person physical assist in transferring to moving between surfaces including to or from bed, a chair, her wheelchair, and in and out of a standing position. Review of Resident 1's Change of Condition , dated [DATE], at 3:50 p.m., indicated on [DATE] at around 3:50 p.m., Resident 1 was witnessed standing up from her wheelchair and holding on to the hallway rail. Resident 1 slightly lost her balance. A staff went to Resident 1 and assisted her slowly to the floor. Review of Resident 1's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of healthcare professionals who work together to provide the residents with the care they need) Notes, dated [DATE] at 3:41 p.m., indicated that the IDT recommended that Resident 1 should be on closely monitored by group resident monitor Page 1 of 3 555487 555487 04/18/2024 Mission DE LA Casa 2501 Alvin Avenue San Jose, CA 95121
F 0689 staff (a staff assigned to make rounds and observe the residents who are at risk for falling). Level of Harm - Actual harm Review of Resident 1's Change of Condition , dated [DATE], at 1:06 a.m., indicated on [DATE] at 1:06 a.m., Resident 1 was found on her room floor and wrapped in her blanket. Resident 1 sustained a 4 centimeter (cm, a metric unit of length) by 4 cm bump on the right side of her forehead. Residents Affected - Few Review of Resident 1's activities of daily living (ADLs, a person's daily self-care activities) care plan, dated [DATE], indicated that Resident 1 was totally dependent on one staff for transferring. Review of Resident 1's at risk for fall care plan, dated [DATE], indicated that the interventions included were that the facility would closely monitor Resident 1 by group resident monitor staff and frequently check Resident 1 for safety and needs to attain a goal that Resident 1 would not sustain a serious injury related to a fall. Review of Resident 1's Change of Condition , dated [DATE], at 6:45 a.m., indicated on [DATE] at 6:45 a.m., Resident 1 was up on her wheelchair in the hallway and that certified nursing assistant A (CNA A) went inside a room to collect the garbage. When CNA A walked out of the room, he noted Resident 1 was on the floor on her right side. Resident 1 apparently had fallen and had sustained a 3 cm by 3 cm bump on her right frontal area. This fall incident resulted in Resident 1 being transferred to the GACH on [DATE] for further evaluation and management. During an interview with CNA A on [DATE], at 2:20 a.m., he stated he could not recall the date but could recall the incident that happened (referring to the incident that happened on [DATE])as it was about the end of the night shift when Resident 1 was up in the wheelchair in the hallway. CNA A stated he was in Resident 1's room helping Resident 1's roommate. When he walked out of the room, he saw Resident 1 on the floor. During an interview with license vocational nurse B (LVN B) on [DATE], at 10:45 a.m., she stated she could not recall the date but could recall the incident that happened (referring to the incident that happened on [DATE]) as it was about the end of the night shift. Resident 1 was up in the wheelchair in the hallway. There were no staff there with Resident 1 at that time because everybody was busy because it was the end of the shift. Then a CNA notified her that Resident 1 had fallen. She came over and saw that Resident 1 was on the floor, and upon assessment Resident 1 had sustained a bump on her forehead. She called the physician and received an order to send Resident 1 to the GACH emergency room via 911 for further evaluation and treatment. Review of Resident 1's Emergency Provider Report, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was brought in by ambulance for a fall off her wheelchair at the facility that morning, and that Resident 1 had a right forehead hematoma (a localized swelling that is filled with blood caused by a break in the wall of a blood vessel). Resident 1 was admitted to the GACH for further monitoring and management and remained admitted in the hospital from [DATE], until the date of her death on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's head computed tomography scan (CT scan, an imaging test that uses a series of X-rays and a computer to create detailed images of the bones and soft tissues) Diagnostic Imaging Report, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 had sustained a 3.5 millimeter (mm, a metric unit of length) subdural hematoma right high temporal region. Review of Resident 1's Discharge Summary from the GACH, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was pronounced dead at around 9:35 p.m. on [DATE]. 555487 Page 2 of 3 555487 04/18/2024 Mission DE LA Casa 2501 Alvin Avenue San Jose, CA 95121
F 0689 Review of Resident 1's Certificate of Death, dated [DATE], indicated that blunt force injury of her head from her fall on [DATE] was the immediate cause of her death. Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on [DATE], at 2:35 p.m., she stated she was on vacation at the time Resident 1 fell on [DATE]. The DON further stated that Resident 1 was supposed to have someone watching her. During an interview with the MDS Assistant (MDSA) on [DATE], at 4:35 p.m., she reviewed Resident 1's clinical record and stated since Resident 1 needed extensive assistance with one-person physical assist in transferring, staff should have watched Resident 1 while she was in the wheelchair because Resident 1 would have fallen if she stood up by herself. During an interview with the DON on [DATE], at 11:20 a.m., the DON stated Resident 1 was placed in a wing in the facility with other residents who were at risk for fall. The DON also stated that in morning shift and evening shift, a group resident monitor staff would make rounds in the wing and observe the residents, but during night shift, there was no group resident monitor staff assigned but the CNA were supposed to observe the residents in the wing. However, during the time Resident 1 fell on [DATE], at 6:45 a.m., Resident 1 was left sitting in her wheelchair in the hallway by herself, completely unmonitored and unsupervised. Review of the facility's policy, Fall Management Program, dated 3/2023, indicated The facility strives to provide each resident with adequate supervision and assistance devices to minimize the risks associated with falls . Avoidable accident is an accident which occurred because the facility failed to: . Implement interventions, including adequate supervision and assistive devices, consistent with a resident's needs, goals, care plan, and current professional standards of practice in order to eliminate the risk, if possible, and, if not, reduce the risk of an accident. 555487 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689SeriousS&S Gactual harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 18, 2024 survey of MISSION DE LA CASA?

This was a inspection survey of MISSION DE LA CASA on April 18, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at MISSION DE LA CASA on April 18, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.