Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Meadowood Nursing CenterCMS #5554903 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 3 deficiencies, 2 of them serious (actual harm or immediate jeopardy). The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555490 10/07/2025 Meadowood Nursing Center 3805 Dexter Lane Clearlake, CA 95422
F 0557 Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions. Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) with nursing care in a manner that maintained his dignity and respect, when Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1):1. Did not cease performing a rectal (of, relating to, or situated near the rectum, which is the final section of the large intestine) treatment/procedure after Resident 1 complained of pain and asked RN 1 to stop.2. Did not ensure privacy during care/treatment which required Resident 1 to be partially unclothed from the waist down.3. Did not provide explanation of care/treatment to Resident 1 prior to performing an invasive (involving the introduction of instruments or other objects into the body or body cavities) rectal medication insertion. (See F552 for additional information).These failures caused Resident 1 to experience pain, anxiety, and to feel violated and embarrassed. These failures also caused Resident 1 to experience serious psychosocial trauma (distressing thoughts and symptoms that last for more than two weeks after a traumatic event). Record review of the facility Face Sheet (facility demographic) indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses which included post laminectomy syndrome (a condition, where part of the bone (lamina) covering the spinal cord is removed and causes persistent or recurring pain, tingling and numbness in the buttocks and legs) and constipation (a condition characterized by infrequent or difficult bowel movements).A review of Resident 1's Clinical Physician Orders, last reviewed on 8/27/25, indicated Resident 1 was prescribed, Dulcolax Rectal Suppository (a small, solid medication plug designed to be inserted into the rectum (the final section of the large intestine, connecting the colon to the anus, where stool is stored before it is expelled from the body). It melts and releases its medication into the bloodstream through the rectal wall to relieve constipation), 10 milligrams (a unit of measure), insert suppository rectally every 24 hours as needed for constipation.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set - C (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 9/12/25, the MDS indicated Resident1's cognitive (the ability to think and process information) skills for daily decision making were intact.During a review of Resident 1's MDS - D (a mood assessment), dated 9/14/25, it indicated Resident 1 was mildly depressed, based on a score of six (6) out of 27 possible points. Assessment questions indicated Resident 1 had no sleep, energy, or loss of interest problems. During a review of Resident 1's MDS - I (active diagnoses), dated 9/14/25, it indicated Resident 1 was not diagnosed with PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-a mental health condition that develops after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event, such as a natural disaster, war, violent crime, or personal assault), or any other psychiatric/mood disorder other than depression.Record review of a nursing note dated 9/15/25 at 10:31 p.m., indicated, RESIDENT FELT VIOLATED AFTER RN ADMINITERED (sic) RECTAL SUPPOSITORY.During an interview on 9/17/25 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 1 stated that on 9/15/25 at approximately 10:30 p.m., Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) inserted a suppository into his rectum at his request. According to Resident 1, Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) was assisting by helping turn Page 1 of 7 555490 555490 10/07/2025 Meadowood Nursing Center 3805 Dexter Lane Clearlake, CA 95422
F 0557 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few Resident 1 to his side to facilitate the insertion. Resident 1 stated RN 1 inserted the suppository into his rectum and swirled her finger around one way inside his rectum, then the other way, continuing for a total of about four (4) minutes. Resident 1 stated he complained of pain and requested that RN 1 stop about three (3) minutes into the procedure, however RN 1 did not stop. Resident 1 stated that RN 1 told him, I need to do this so it will dissolve. Resident 1 stated he was embarrassed by this, and felt he was raped. Resident 1 also stated that while this incident was occurring, staff did not pull the privacy curtain around his bed, and the door to the hallway was open.During a phone interview on 9/17/25 at 11:20 a.m., CNA 1 confirmed being present during the above incident with Resident 1 and RN 1. CNA 1 stated she assisted RN 1 by turning Resident 1 on his side, so RN 1 could insert the suppository. CNA 1 stated she estimated RN 1 took five (5) to ten (10) minutes to insert the suppository, and she felt this timing to be extensive since other nurses she witnessed giving suppositories could accomplish the procedure in less than a minute. RN 1 began by inserting the suppository into Resident 1's rectum, and, after about three (3) minutes, CNA 1 stated Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) came back into Resident 1's bedroom and gave CNA 1 a look which she perceived as, this isn't right. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 then complained it was taking too long and RN 1 replied, I have to move my finger around so it will activate. CNA 1 stated a few minutes later, RN 1 removed her finger from Resident 1's rectum and left the room. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 looked visibly upset after the procedure, so she stayed to comfort and talk to Resident 1, while Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) reported the incident to the Charge Nurse (LVN 1) on duty. During an interview on 9/17/25 at 12:15 p.m. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), she stated the process for inserting a suppository involved rolling the resident to his side, inserting the lubricated suppository with a gloved hand and pulling the hand back out immediately after administration. The ADON stated if resistance was met during the procedure due to a collection of stool in the bowel, the nurse should try to push it slightly but if the resident was to complain of pain, the nurse was required to stop right away. During a phone interview on 9/18/25 at 1:40 p.m., RN 1 stated when she inserted the suppository into Resident 1's rectum, she felt something hard that she believed to be stool. RN 1 stated she then moved her finger around inside Resident 1's rectum for about six (6) seconds, to break up the stool so she could insert the suppository, and it could dissolve. RN 1 stated she was pretty sure CNA 1 provided adequate privacy by closing Resident 1's curtain before this procedure, but was not certain stating, the CNAs are pretty good about doing that.During an interview on 10/6/25 at 4:00 p.m. with RN 1, RN 1 stated she told Resident 1 that he would be turned and didn't tell Resident 1 much else about the procedure since she was forewarned that Resident 1 could cause trouble for staff that engaged with him verbally.During an interview with on 10/06/25 at 4:32 p.m. with CNA 1, she stated RN 1 told Resident 1 that prior to administering the Dulcolax medication, she told Resident 1 she would be inserting a suppository. CNA 1 stated as RN 1 inserted the suppository into Resident 1's rectum, CNA 1 noticed Resident 1 displaying facial grimacing. Afterwards the administration was completed, CNA 1 noticed that Resident 1 appeared upset, with tears in his eyes. CNA 1 also stated CNA 2 told her she saw Resident 1's bedroom door and privacy curtain was open from the hallway, at the time RN 1 and CNA 1 were with Resident 1, and CNA 2 could see his (Resident 1's) butt.During a phone interview on 10/7/25 at 7:45 a.m. with CNA 2, she stated she went to Resident 1's room after Resident 1 had asked for a suppository on the night of the 9/15/25. CNA 2 stated she then returned to Resident 1's room briefly, but left after she became aware that Resident 1 was already being attended to by RN1 and CNA 1. CNA 2 stated she could not recall if Resident 1's privacy curtain was open or closed. CNA 2 stated she again went back to Resident 1's room after the incident, just prior to reporting 555490 Page 2 of 7 555490 10/07/2025 Meadowood Nursing Center 3805 Dexter Lane Clearlake, CA 95422
F 0557 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few the incident to the Charge Nurse (CN) on duty. CNA 2 stated Resident 1 was visibly upset with tears in his eyes. During a phone interview on 10/7/25 at 10:45 a.m. with Physician 1 (PHY 1), he stated digital dis-impaction required a physician's order (crucial for patient health, as it provides expertise and guidance to ensure proper treatment and avoid complications), and performing dis-impaction without a physician's order could cause resident harm because of physical pain and irritation, as well as unwanted dignity issues.During an interview on 10/07/25 at 11:00 a.m. with Resident 1, he stated he still experienced PTSD and psychological trauma from the suppository insertion on the evening of 9/15/25. Resident 1 stated he was still suffering from nightmares and did not want to eat, because he did not feel safe.During an email correspondence on 10/14/25 at 12:53 p.m. from Resident 1, he wrote that his nightmares began after 9/15/25, and continued to worsen over time. Resident 1 also wrote he still felt unsafe in the facility because of this incident and the investigation, and feared staff might try to tamper with his food. Record review of the facility policy (P & P) titled, Administering Rectal or Vaginal Medications, revised in 2010, indicated, Explain the procedure to the resident.Provide for privacy of the resident. and gently insert the suppository into the anus with the lubricated, gloved index finger. Insert approximately 10 centimeters (a unit of measure) (4 inches) deep along the wall of the rectum.instruct resident to remain in left lateral (side) or lying position for at least five (5) minutes.Record review of P & P titled, Requesting, Refusing and/or Discontinuing Care or Treatment, revised in February of 2021, indicated, Residents and resident representatives have the right to request, refuse and/or discontinue treatment. Treatment refers to medical care, nursing care, and interventions provided to maintain or restore health and well-being, improve functional level, or relieve symptoms, and Residents/representatives are informed (in advance) of: a. the care that will be furnished or made available to the resident based on his or her assessment and plan of care; b. the risks and benefits of the proposed care, treatment, treatment alternatives or treatment options.Record review of P & P titled Dignity, revised 2021, indicated, Staff promote, maintain and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. 555490 Page 3 of 7 555490 10/07/2025 Meadowood Nursing Center 3805 Dexter Lane Clearlake, CA 95422
F 0609 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within two hours to the DEPARTMENT for one of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 1).This finding had the potential to result in inability for the DEPARTMENT to investigate and advocate for Resident 1's rights, and possible continuous abuse to Resident 1 and other residents of the facility.Record review of the facility Face Sheet (facility demographic) indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses which included post laminectomy syndrome (a condition, where part of the bone (lamina) covering the spinal cord is removed and causes persistent or recurring pain, tingling and numbness in the buttocks and legs) and constipation (a condition characterized by infrequent or difficult bowel movements).Record review of a form titled, SOC-341 (a specific form used in California for Mandated Reporters to document and report suspected Dependent Adult or Elder Abuse), the facility sent and was received at DEPARTMENT on 9/16/25 at 10:06 a.m., indicated, Resident [Resident 1] requested a suppository and when RN [Registered Nurse 1] went to give it he states that, she swirled the suppository around inside his rectum and it took too long. When he questioned her she stated I have to activate it, so it works .He felt violated and almost had an erection of how long the nurse took.During an interview on 9/17/25 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 1 stated the incident occurred on 9/15/25 at approximately 10:30 p.m.Record review of a nursing note dated 9/15/25 at 10:31 p.m., indicated, RESIDENT [Resident 1] FELT VIOLATED AFTER RN (Registered Nurse 1) ADMINITERED (sic) RECTAL SUPPOSITORY. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/17/25 at 9:58 a.m. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), a fax confirmation log showing transmissions from the facility fax was requested. The log was reviewed and showed no faxes sent (or attempted) from the facility to the DEPARTMENT on 9/15/25. During a phone interview on 9/18/25 at 11:15 a.m., the Administrator (ADM) stated she was notified on the abuse allegation made by Resident 1 at 9/15/25 at 10:58 p.m. by Charge Nurse (LVN 1), who explained she sent a fax to the DEPARTMENT within two hours of the abuse allegation (on 9/15/25) for notification purposes. The ADM stated she was unable to find evidence of this fax, therefore, she called the DEPARTMENT on the morning of 9/16/25 to confirm the DEPARTMENT received Resident 1's abuse allegation dated 9/15/25. The ADM stated the DEPARTMENT told her they did not receive notification of the abuse incident on 9/15/25, so the ADM faxed the SOC-341 to the DEPARTMENT on 9/16/25 at approximately 9:00 a.m.Record review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, revised 2022, indicated, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) .Immediately is defined as: a. within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury; or b. within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. 555490 Page 4 of 7 555490 10/07/2025 Meadowood Nursing Center 3805 Dexter Lane Clearlake, CA 95422
F 0658 Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality. Level of Harm - Actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice when:1. Registered Nurse 1(RN 1) performed a digital stool dis-impaction (a procedure to remove hardened, impacted stool from the rectum using a lubricated, gloved finger, which is inserted into the rectum to break up and extract the stool) procedure for Resident 1 without a physician's order.2. Facility did not provide licensed nursing staff (RN 1, Registered Nurse 2, Registered Nurse 3) sufficient education and training regarding rectal suppository (a small, solid medication plug designed to be inserted into the rectum. It melts and releases its medication into the bloodstream through the rectal wall) insertion and digital rectal stool dis-impaction (see F726 for additional information).This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing discomfort, confusion and anxiety during and after the procedure, and the potential for all facility residents to receive substandard rectal medication administration and treatment. Record review of the facility Face Sheet (facility demographic) indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses which included post laminectomy syndrome (a condition, where part of the bone (lamina) covering the spinal cord is removed and causes persistent or recurring pain, tingling and numbness in the buttocks and legs) and constipation (a condition characterized by infrequent or difficult bowel movements).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 9/12/2025, the MDS indicated Resident1's cognitive (the ability to think and process information) skills for daily decision making were intact.A review of Resident 1's Clinical Physician Orders, last reviewed on 8/27/25, indicated Resident 1 was prescribed, Dulcolax Rectal Suppository (a small, solid medication plug designed to be inserted into the rectum (the final section of the large intestine, connecting the colon to the anus, where stool is stored before it is expelled from the body). It melts and releases its medication into the bloodstream through the rectal wall to relieve constipation), 10 milligrams (a unit of measure), insert suppository rectally every 24 hours as needed for constipation.Record review of a nursing note dated 9/15/25 at 10:31 p.m., indicated, RESIDENT FELT VIOLATED AFTER RN ADMINITERED (sic) RECTAL SUPPOSITORY.During an interview on 9/17/25 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 1 stated on 9/15/25 at approximately 10:30 p.m., Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) inserted a suppository into his rectum at his request. According to Resident 1, Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) was assisting by helping turn Resident 1 to his side to facilitate the insertion. Resident 1 stated RN 1 inserted the suppository into his rectum and swirled her finger around one way inside his rectum, then the other way, continuing for a total of about four (4) minutes. Resident 1 stated he complained of pain and requested that RN 1 stop about (3 ) three minutes into the procedure, however RN 1 did not stop. Resident 1 stated that RN 1 told him, I need to do this so it will dissolve. Resident 1 stated he was embarrassed by this, and felt he was raped. During a phone interview on 9/17/25 at 11:20 a.m., CNA 1 confirmed being present during the above incident with Resident 1 and RN 1. CNA 1 stated she assisted RN 1 by turning Resident 1 on his side, so RN 1 could insert the suppository. CNA 1 stated she estimated RN 1 took five (5) to ten (10) minutes to insert the suppository, and she felt this timing to be extensive since other nurses she witnessed giving suppositories could accomplish the procedure in less than a minute. CNA 1 stated a few minutes into the procedure, Resident 1 complained it was taking too long and RN 1 replied, I have to move my finger around so it will activate. According to CNA 1, a few minutes later, RN 1 removed her finger from Resident 1's rectum and left the room. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 looked visibly upset after the procedure and she stayed to comfort him and talk, while Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) Residents Affected - Few 555490 Page 5 of 7 555490 10/07/2025 Meadowood Nursing Center 3805 Dexter Lane Clearlake, CA 95422
F 0658 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few reported the incident to the charge nurse on duty. During an interview on 9/17/25 at 12:15 p.m. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), she stated the process for inserting a suppository involved rolling the resident to his side, inserting the lubricated suppository with a gloved hand and pulling the hand back out immediately after administration. The ADON stated if resistance was met during the procedure due to a collection of stool in the bowel, the nurse should try to push it slightly but if the resident was to complain of pain, the nurse was required to stop right away. During a phone interview on 9/18/25 at 1:40 p.m., RN 1 stated on the evening of 9/15/25, she inserted the suppository into Resident 1's rectum, she felt something hard that she believed to be stool. RN 1 stated she then moved her finger around inside Resident 1 for about (6) six seconds, to break up the stool so she could insert the suppository, and it could dissolve. RN 1 stated stool came out of Resident 1, along with a lot of gas. When asked to describe what dis-impaction was, RN 1 stated moving stool around so it can pass and be removed.During an interview on 10/6/25 at 4:00 p.m., RN 1 explained how she inserted Resident 1's suppository on 9/15/25, stating she inserted suppository using finger, took out some stool, so suppository would dissolve. When asked how the facility measured RN 1's competency to administer rectal suppositories upon hire, RN 1 stated she filled out a form. RN 1 stated she had performed digital (using a finger) dis-impactions in her past employment, and she didn't believe it required a physician's order. RN 1 stated if a resident had excessive stool in the rectum, she would remove it, rather than to let the resident suffer. During an concurrent interview and record review on 10/7/25 at 12:31 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), she stated in reviewing employee training files for RN 1, Registered Nurse 2 (RN 2) and Registered Nurse 3 (RN 3), there were no detailed competencies outlining the specific actions required/performed during a rectal medication administration, nor a facility policy on digital stool dis-impaction. The DSD stated that it had been a while, but she did recall a specific past occurrence at the facility when digital stool dis-impaction was performed. At 1:45 p.m., the DSD stated rectal suppository administration was a common skill that needed to be performed competently by nursing staff, and the facility should ensure a return-demonstration should be done and documented prior to nursing staff performing rectal procedures independently. During a phone interview on 10/7/25 at 7:45 a.m. with CNA 2, she stated she went to Resident 1's room after Resident 1 had asked for a suppository on the night of the 9/15/25. CNA 2 stated she became aware that Resident 1 was already being attended to by RN1 and CNA 1, so she left the room. CNA 2 stated she later went back to Resident 1's room after the incident, just prior to reporting the incident to Charge Nurse (CN) on duty. CNA 2 stated Resident 1 was visibly upset with tears in his eyes.During a phone interview on 10/7/25 at 10:45 a.m. with Physician 1 (PHY 1), he stated rectal procedures/dis-impaction could result in harm because of pain, irritation and dignity issues. PHY 1 also stated dis-impaction required a physician's order (crucial for patient health, providing expertise and guidance to ensure proper treatment and avoid complications) prior to the procedure.During an interview on 10/07/25 at 11:00 a.m. with Resident 1, he stated he still experienced PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-a mental health condition that develops after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event, such as a natural disaster, war, violent crime, or personal assault) and trauma from the suppository insertion on the evening of 9/15/25. Resident 1 stated he was suffering from nightmares and did not want to eat, because he did not feel safe.During an email correspondence on 10/14/25 at 12:53 p.m. from Resident 1, he wrote his nightmares began after 9/15/25, and continued to worsen over time. Resident 1 also wrote he still felt unsafe in the facility because of this incident and investigation, and he feared that staff might try to tamper with his food. A review of California Code of Regulations (16 CCR S 1472) Standardized Procedure Functions, current as of 555490 Page 6 of 7 555490 10/07/2025 Meadowood Nursing Center 3805 Dexter Lane Clearlake, CA 95422
F 0658 Level of Harm - Actual harm Residents Affected - Few 9/26/25, indicated, An organized health care system must develop standardized procedures before permitting registered nurses to perform standardized procedure functions. A registered nurse may perform standardized procedure functions only under the conditions specified in a health care system's standardized procedures; and must provide the system with satisfactory evidence that the nurse meets its experience, training, and/or education requirements to perform such functions.During a review of Meadowood Registered Nurse Job Description, dated 2023, it indicated, Provides direct care skills.in accordance with current policies and procedures, as assigned .Prepares and administers medications as per physicians' orders.Establishes a culture of compliance by adhering to all facility policies and procedures. Complies with standards of business conduct, and state/federal regulations and guidelines.Record review of the facility policy (P & P) titled, Administering Rectal or Vaginal Medications, revised in 2010, indicated, Explain the procedure to the resident.Provide for privacy of the resident. and gently insert the suppository into the anus with the lubricated, gloved index finger. Insert approximately 10 centimeters (a unit of measure) (4 inches) deep along the wall of the rectum.instruct resident to remain in left lateral or lying position for at least five (5) minutes. 555490 Page 7 of 7

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

3 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0557SeriousS&S Gactual harm

    F557 - Respect and Dignity

    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.

  • 0609GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F609 - The facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that:

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • 0658SeriousS&S Gactual harm

    F658 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 7, 2025 survey of Meadowood Nursing Center?

This was a inspection survey of Meadowood Nursing Center on October 7, 2025. The surveyor cited 3 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Meadowood Nursing Center on October 7, 2025?

Yes, 3 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.