F 0658
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were
conducted for two residents (Resident 3, and Resident 9) of eight sampled residents when insulin orders
did not include blood sugar parameters (levels that indicate when blood sugar is considered too high or too
low).This failure placed residents at risk for ineffective monitoring of insulin usage and worsening of their
Diabetes Mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound
healing).Findings:During a review of Resident 3's untitled facility document indicated, the resident was a
[AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a medical diagnosis that included DM.During
a review of Resident 3's physician order report dated 5/28/25 indicated, Insulin glargine (a long-acting type
of insulin used to manage blood sugar levels in people with diabetes) pen (a prefilled injection device
containing insulin) 100 units/milliliter (specifies the concentration of insulin in one milliliter). Inject 20 units
subcutaneously (a layer of fatty tissue just below the skin) at bedtime for DM. The order for insulin glargine
dated 5/28/25 did not indicate parameters for blood sugar levels and when to notify a physician when the
insulin was supposed to be held (not administered).During a review of Resident 9's History and Physical
(H&P) dated 5/8/25 indicated Resident 9 was a [AGE] year-old- female admitted to the facility on [DATE]
with a medical diagnosis that included DM.During a review of Resident 9's blood sugar flow sheets from
9/1/25 to 9/10/25 indicated, Resident 9 had episodes of fluctuating blood sugar levels between 236 mg/dl
and 91 mg/dl (mg/dL, milligrams per deciliter, a unit of measurement for the concentration of blood sugar
(glucose). The medication administration record (MAR) dated from 9/7/25 through 9/10/25 did not indicate
the frequency of monitoring blood glucose levels. During a review of Resident 9's Current Scheduled
Medication report indicated, Insulin glargine pen, inject 80 units subcutaneously nightly for DM was ordered
5/20/25. The order for Insulin glargine did not show documented evidence that Resident 9 had an order for
insulin parameters and when to notify a physician when the insulin was supposed to be held.During an
interview and concurrent record review on 9/10/25 at 1:30 p.m., Licensed Staff K (LS K) reviewed the
e-MARs (Electronic Medication Administration Record ) for Residents 3 and 9 and confirmed their insulin
orders did not have parameters. LS K stated the glucose checks and insulin parameters have not been
ordered consistently for residents.During an interview on 9/11/25 at 11:15 a.m., Pharmacist J (PharmD J)
stated parameters for insulin should always be ordered for insulin administration. PharmD J stated the
standard of practice is for insulin to have parameters, or a sliding scale in the orders. PharmD J stated
order-sets for insulin are used and sometimes discussed and reviewed with the physician. PharmD J stated
he had not reviewed insulin parameters for Residents' 3 and 9 with the physician. During an interview on
9/11/25 at 2:25 p.m., Physician D stated his standard of practice for writing insulin administration orders
included parameters for managing high and low blood glucose levels. Physician D confirmed the orders for
insulin parameters were inconsistent and he was
Residents Affected - Some
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 8
Event ID:
555516
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555516
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/12/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Jerold Phelps Comm Hosp Snf
733 Cedar Street
Garberville, CA 95542
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0658
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
working on improving the processes. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Insulin
Utilization not dated, indicated, .Insulin vials will be labeled with a patient specific label with insulin
formulation, dose, directions for use and frequency.Two licensed.Health Clinicians will verify the following
prior to administration: the LIP [Licensed Independent Practitioner] order, type of insulin, dosage, route,
time, and most recent blood glucose level.A review of The American Medical Directors Association's
publication titled Diabetes Management in the Long-Term Care Setting revised 2010 indicated, .A
systematic facility approach to diabetes management can streamline day-to-day care and reduce the
frequency of episodes of hypoglycemia [when blood sugar level is too low], hyperglycemia [when blood
sugar level is too high], and other.complications [of diabetes].Make use of standing orders for glucose
monitoring and practitioner notification.when the patient is admitted .the practitioner may write an order
stating that he or she is to be notified when a patient's blood glucose values are outside of a specific
range.When patients are extremely frail or cognitively impaired and their blood glucose levels are poorly
controlled, the practitioner may wish to note specific individual blood glucose or symptom parameters in the
orders.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555516
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555516
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/12/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Jerold Phelps Comm Hosp Snf
733 Cedar Street
Garberville, CA 95542
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility's two consulting Registered Dietitians (RD A and RD
B) did not provide nutritional assessments and reassessments, per policy and procedure, for one resident
(Resident 6) of eight sampled residents and the facility did not have documentation of an admission
nutrition Nursing Care Plan (a document that contains essential information about a patient's condition,
diagnosis, goals, interventions, and outcomes) for Resident 6. These deficiencies caused Resident 6 to
receive his first post-admission RD nutritional assessment almost two months later which potentially
delayed the timely implementation of nutritional interventions designed to assist Resident 6 in attaining his
highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 6's hospital
document titled, Initial Nutritional Assessment, dated 7/30/24 indicated the Registered Dietician A (RD A)
had documented, . Low appetite reported. Intake: (less than) 25% . Under subtitled, Objective, RD A
documented, Ht: (height) 5'9 (five feet, nine inches) Wt: (weight) 100 lbs. (pounds). Underweight status for
ht/wt (height/weight) . RD to f/u (follow up) (in) 2-3 months of per consultation request.During a review of
Resident 6's admission document titled History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/13/24indicated Resident 6's
diagnoses included Failure to thrive (substantial decline in overall health, including weight loss), Cachexia
(significant weight loss and muscle loss), and Iron Deficiency Anemia (low iron causing decreased
production of red blood cells.). The H&P also indicated Resident 6 was a candidate for admission to our
long-term care facility for support with activities of daily living (basic tasks necessary for self-care and daily
functioning like bathing, dressing, eating and toileting), physical therapy, and monitoring of nutrition.A
review of Resident 6's initial MDS (resident assessment tool), dated 8/28/24, indicated he was admitted to
the facility on [DATE], was 69 inches tall (approximately 5 feet, 7.5 inches in height), and weighed 105
pounds. The MDS assessment indicated Resident 6 triggered Nutrition, which indicated he should have a
Nursing Care Plan to address his nutritional needs).Review of Resident 6's medical record titled, Follow-up
Nutritional Assessment, dated 10/9/24 indicated RD A documented, .Ht: 5'9 Wt: 110 lbs. Underweight
status for ht/wt. Weight gain about 10 lbs. in 3 months. RD to f/u 2-3 months or per consultation request.
During a review of Resident 6's medical record, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM, who was not a
registered dietician) documented in a CDM progress note on 8/22/24 that Resident 6's meal intake,
.continues to be less than 25% . The CDM's next documentation in Resident 6's medical record was
10/9/24 (almost two months after his admission). A review of Resident 6's Nutritional care plan, dated
6/15/25, indicated interventions included, . Snacks between meals.Monitor weights and report significant
weight loss. Dietary evaluation. Encourage nutritional supplements.During a concurrent interview and
record review on 9/10/25 at 3:49 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON), Director of Staff Development (DSD)
and MDS nurse (a nurse who coordinates, assesses, and documents patient care in a long-term care or
nursing facility using a comprehensive federal tool called the Minimum Data Set (MDS)) reviewed Resident
6's medical record. The DSD stated the CDM documented in Resident 6's medical record on 8/22/24. The
DSD stated RD A's first documented assessment of Resident 6's nutritional status was on 10/9/24 and
acknowledged the RD B had not documented in Resident 6's medical record between his admission on
[DATE] and 10/9/24. The MDS nurse stated the facility did not have a nutritional care plan for Resident 6
prior to 6/15/25. During an interview on 9/10/25 at 5p.m., the CDM stated she had visited Resident 6,
encouraged him to have Ensure (R) (a nutritional supplement), but she missed the fact he had no timely
nutrition assessment. During a telephone interview on 9/12/25 at 9:39 a.m., RD A stated she worked as a
consulting RD at the facility; she provided resident nutritional assessments remotely (she did
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555516
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555516
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/12/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Jerold Phelps Comm Hosp Snf
733 Cedar Street
Garberville, CA 95542
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0692
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
not physically come to the facility). She stated she routinely did an initial nutritional assessment for new
residents and then quarterly assessments thereafter. She stated if a resident was at high risk for nutritional
issues she would reassess them every one to two months. RN A stated Resident 6 should have had an
initial assessment around 8/13/24. RN A stated she should have reassessed him after a month based on
his weight of 105 pounds and diagnosis of Failure to Thrive. When asked why she hadn't reassessed him
after a month, she stated she was not sure. During a telephone interview on 9/12/25 at 10:07 a.m., RN B
stated she worked at the facility monthly for approximately two to three hours per month and her tasks
included kitchen oversight and some resident education. She stated RN A addressed the majority of
resident nutritional concerns; she stated she would only do a resident nutritional assessment if requested
by RN A. RN B stated a resident who was 5 foot, nine inches tall, weighed 105 pounds and had a diagnosis
of Failure to Thrive was a potentially high-risk nutritional resident. Review of facility policy titled, Nutritional
Risk Screening and Assessment for . SNF (facility) Patients. undated, indicated, . Initial Assessment: . A
nutritional assessment will be completed by RD within one week from admission. Reassessment. The RD
will reassess patient within 1 week of consultation. Consultation could be triggered by and of the following:
.If the patient is consuming less than 50% of food offered for 5 or more days.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555516
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555516
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/12/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Jerold Phelps Comm Hosp Snf
733 Cedar Street
Garberville, CA 95542
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0727
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Many
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on
a full time basis.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked at least
8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for a census of 8 residents. This failure contributed to
staffing shortfalls: there were no RNs on duty for 7 days between January 2025 and March 2025, thereby
creating the potential that residents would not receive RN-specific care such as assessments and
intravenous medication administration. Cross reference F838.Findings: During a concurrent interview and
record review on 9/11/25 at 4:10 p.m., the DON (Director of Nursing) reviewed the facility nurse staffing
schedules dated, January 2025, February 2025, March 2025 and April 2025. The DON confirmed the
facility did not have an RN scheduled to work on the following dates: 1/25/25, 3/1/25, 3/9/25, 3/16/25,
3/23/25, 3/27/25, and 3/30/25. The DON stated an RN who was working at the hospital on those dates was
assigned to be a hospital float nurse (an RN who provides various duties including working different units
like the Emergency Department or general hospital, assisting other nurses with tasks, covering nurses
when they take a break, etc.). The DON confirmed the hospital float nurse was not specifically designated
to work as an RN at the facility on those dates; the hospital float nurse was available to assist at the facility
if needed.During an interview on 9/12/25 at 10 a.m., the DON stated the facility did not have a policy and
procedure addressing staffing.During an interview on 9/12/25 at 12:11 p.m. with Quality Officer H (QO H)
and Quality Staff I (QS I), QO H stated the facility was not aware staffing requirements were not met, as
outlined in the Facility Assessment (comprehensive evaluation process assessing the resident population
and the resources needed to provide competent care). The QO H stated they thought a float nurse was
adequate. Review of the Facility Assessment titled, Facility Assessment Tool, dated updated 10/5/2023,
indicated, . There is a Licensed Vocational nurse on each shift; 12 hour day shift and 12 hour night shift.
There is a Resource Registered Nurse (float nurse) available 24 hours a day 7 days a week on site.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555516
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555516
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/12/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Jerold Phelps Comm Hosp Snf
733 Cedar Street
Garberville, CA 95542
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0756
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart,
following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medication Review (MRR) policy and
procedures were developed and maintained for scheduled medication reviews and oversight of medication
administration.This failure put residents at risk for ineffective monitoring of medications and side effects that
could go undetected by licensed staff and delay for the physician to act upon irregularities.Findings:During
an interview on 9/11/25 at 11:15 a.m., the facility Pharmacist J (PharmD J) stated he had monthly MRR
reviews for each of the residents and reported to the physician and Director of Nursing (DON). PharmD J
stated during his MRR reviews he expected a response to any of his recommendations from a physician
right away or within 48 hours.Pharm D J stated standard of practice for insulin administration included
parameters and blood sugar checks in the orders. Pharm D J stated parameters should be ordered for
residents depending on the type of insulin administered. Pharm D J also verified he did not review the
residents that received insulin and if parameters were ordered.A review of the Policy and Procedures for
the MRR process was requested, the PharmD J stated he was in process of writing the policy and
procedures and currently did not have a policy and procedure for the MRR.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555516
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555516
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/12/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Jerold Phelps Comm Hosp Snf
733 Cedar Street
Garberville, CA 95542
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0761
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted
professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately
locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens stored in the medication
cart were dated with an opened date for three residents (Resident 3, Resident 4, and Resident 8) of a
sample of eight residents.This failure increased the facility's potential to administer expired medication and
decrease the resident's opportunity to benefit from the full effect of the medication.Findings:During an
observation of the Medication Cart and concurrent interview with Licensed Staff K (LSK) on [DATE], at
11:30 a.m., Insulin Pens (Insulin pens are convenient and discreet devices used to administer insulin for
managing type 2 diabetes) did not have open dates for three residents. Resident 1's Lantus insulin pen was
labeled with a beyond-use-date of [DATE]; Resident 2's Lantus insulin pen was labeled with a
beyond-use-date of [DATE]; and, Resident 3 Humalog Kwik pen was labeled with a beyond-use-date of
[DATE]. During a concurrent interview, (LS K) verified the insulin pens did not have an opened-date and
stated once opened, an insulin pen use is for 28 days.During an interview on [DATE] at 11:20 a.m., the
facility pharmacist (PharmD J) stated the insulin pens should be dated with an opened date.A review of the
Institute for Safe Medication Practices article titles Storage of Insulin published 2025 indicated, Write the
date you open the insulin on the product. On the day you open the insulin vial, pen, or cartridge, or start
keeping it outside the refrigerator, write the date on the label. This will help you remember when to stop
using it. Insulin expires 28 days after it is opened.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555516
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555516
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/12/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Jerold Phelps Comm Hosp Snf
733 Cedar Street
Garberville, CA 95542
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0838
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Many
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for
residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and
emergencies.
Based on administrative interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive
facility-wide assessment (evaluation process assessing the resident population and the resources needed
to provide competent care) was updated annually and included a staffing plan that ensured Registered
Nurse's (RN) worked 8 consecutive hours per day, seven days a week.This failure contributed to staffing
shortfalls: there were no RNs on duty for 7 days between January 2025 and March 2025, thereby creating
the potential that residents would not receive RN-specific care such as assessments and intravenous
medication administration. Cross reference F727.Findings:During an interview on 9/11/25 at 2:45 p.m., the
Director of Nursing (DON) stated she did not have an updated facility assessment and provided a facility
assessment tool dated, which was last updated 10/5/23. The DON stated the facility was currently working
on updating the facility assessment.During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/11/225 at 4:10
p.m., the DON reviewed the facility nurse staffing schedules dated, January 2025, February 2025, March
2025 and April 2025. The DON confirmed the facility did not have an RN scheduled to work on the following
dates: 1/25/25, 3/1/25, 3/9/25, 3/16/25, 3/23/25, 3/27/25, and 3/30/25. The DON stated an RN working in
the hospital (located down the hall from the facility) was available to assist at the facility if needed but was
not specifically designated to work at the facility.Review of the Facility Assessment titled, Facility
Assessment Tool, updated on 10/5/23, indicated, . There is a Licensed Vocational nurse on each shift;
12-hour day shift and 12-hour night shift. There is a Resource Registered Nurse (float nurse; an RN who
provides various duties including working different units like the Emergency Department or general hospital,
assisting other nurses with tasks, covering nurses when they take a break, etc.) available 24 hours a day 7
days a week on site.During an interview on 9/12/25 at 10a.m., the DON stated the facility did not have a
policy and procedure addressing staffing.During an interview on 9/12/25 at 12:11 p.m. with Quality Officer
H (QO H) and Quality Staff I (QS I), QO H stated the facility was not aware RN staffing requirements were
not being met, as outlined in the Facility Assessment (comprehensive evaluation process assessing the
resident population and the resources needed to provide competent care). QO H stated they thought a float
nurse (from the hospital) was adequate.QO H stated the facility did not have a policy and procedure for
their Facility Assessment.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555516
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 8