F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop and implement the
individualized resident-centered plans of care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2).
* Resident 2's care plan interventions were not implemented as recommended in PASRR Level II
evaluation.
* Resident 2's desire to be discharged to a lower level of care was not assessed by the IDT team and
reflected in the plan of care.
These failures posed the risk of not providing appropriate and individualized care to Resident 2 to maintain
her highest practicable physical well-being.
Findings:
Review of the facility's P&P titled Comprehensive Care Planning revised 3/2019 showed there should be
coordination of the assessment with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) to ensure
that residents with a mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition receive care and services
in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Coordination includes incorporating
recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into the
resident's assessment, care planning and transitions of care. When the resident has no family or
responsible party and is unable to make his/her own health care decisions, the IDT will act as surrogate
decision maker.
Review of the facility's P&P titled Discharge Planning Process revised 10/2017 showed to identify the
discharge needs of each resident and result in the development of a discharge plan. If a resident expresses
an interest in returning to the community, the facility should document any referrals to local contact
agencies or other appropriate entities for this purpose. If discharge to the community is determined to not
be feasible, the facility will document who made the determination and why this determination was made.
Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 10/24/23. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE], and readmitted on [DATE],with a diagnosis of psychosis.
Review of Resident 2's Individualized Determination Report following PASRR Level II dated 7/13/23, under
the Recommended Specialized Services section, showed the social workers could also arrange for the safe
and orderly transition to alternative levels of care when appropriate and facilitate the
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
555520
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555520
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/24/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Court Nursing Center
1135 Leisure Court
Anaheim, CA 92801
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
communication with other caregivers. The alternative placements and services included Residential Care
Facility for the Elderly, Adult Residential Facility and Program of All Inclusive Care for the Elderly.
Review of Resident 2's History and Physical Examination dated 7/15/22, showed Resident 2 could make
needs known but could not make medical decisions.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report for October 2023 showed the following physician's orders:
- dated 9/7/23, for Depakote (anticonvulsant) 500 mg 250 mg by mouth in the morning for mood stabilizer
for labile mood m/b striking out.
- dated 7/7/23, for Aripiprazole (antipsychotic) 5mg by mouth a day for psychosis m/b responding to internal
stimuli.
Review of Resident 2's Behavior and Psychotropic Summary/Dosage Reduction for Depakote and
Aripiprazole showed Resident 2 did not have behavioral episodes of striking out or responding to internal
stimuli from 2/21/23 to 9/30/23.
Review of Resident 2's Care Plan updated 10/12/23, showed the care plan problem addressing PASRR
evaluation Level II on 7/12/23. The DHCS reviewed the findings and made determination about the most
suitable setting for the resident's care and needs for specialized services based on the resident's medical
and social history, strength, and personal goals. The approaches showed alternative community settings
and features included Residential Care Facility for Elderly, Adult Residential Facility, Program of All inclusive
Care for the Elderly, Residential Care Facility for Mentally Ill and Senior Living Facility.
Review of Resident 2's Nurse Practitioner Progress Notes dated 5/17, 6/21, 9/13, and 10/11/23, showed
Resident 2 asked to be discharged .
Review of Resident 2's social services notes dated 7/19, 7/23, and 8/21/23, showed Resident 2 desired to
move out of the facility.
Review of Resident 2's Psychiatric Following up Note dated 8/28/23, showed Resident 2 would like to be
discharged from the facility and speak to a social worker. Resident 2 was diagnosed with dementia with
behavioral disturbance and depression.
Review of Resident 2's Weekly Summary dated 10/6/23, under the ADL Self-Performance/ADL Support
section showed Resident 2 was able to perform bed mobility, dressing, eating, toileting, personal hygiene,
bathing and walking with supervision.
On 10/24/23 at 1125 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 was observed alert,
oriented, calm, and ambulated independently. Resident 2 stated he felt he could never leave the facility and
needed help. Resident 2 stated he wanted the physician to let him find somewhere else to live.
On 10/24/23 at 1215 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the
SSD. The SSD stated Resident 2 had no contact information, and the IDT was authorized for Resident
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555520
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555520
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/24/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Leisure Court Nursing Center
1135 Leisure Court
Anaheim, CA 92801
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
2's medical decision. The SSD confirmed Resident 2's request to be discharged inJuly 2023 was not
followed up. The SSD stated they needed to get the psychiatrist to re-evaluate Resident 2 to discharge him
to a lower level of care such as a memory care assisting living. The SSD stated she also needed to drive
the resident to DMV to get an ID to start with the process of discharge. The SSD confirmed the IDT
discharge planning was not met for Resident 2.
Residents Affected - Few
On 10/31/23 at 1045 hours, a follow-up telephone interview was conducted with the SSD. The SSD stated
she needed to contact the Care Coordinator from public guardian office to go over the resident's
information to decide if Resident 2 needed a public guardian and application for conservatorship. The SSD
stated Resident 2 had no family member to apply for a public guardian.
On 11/1/23 at 1215 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the MDS
Coordinator. The MDS Coordinator stated the care plan was updated based on the recommendation from
the PASRR. The IDT team would meet to see if the resident was capable of being discharged . If Resident 2
had no family and had no capacity to make decision, Resident 2 would need help to apply for the
conservatorship to medical decision and discharge.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555520
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3