F 0600
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment,
and neglect by anybody.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one
of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when on 7/13/25 the activity assistant (AA) 2 was physically and
verbally aggressive toward Resident 1 during the smoking break.This failure resulted in verbal and physical
abuse toward Resident 1 and placed Resident 1 in an unsafe living environment.Findings:During a review
of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes
patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and
other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with
diagnosis for Anxiety (excessive worry and fear), expressive language disorder (condition that affects a
person's ability to use language, both written and spoken), dysphasia (disorder that affects the ability to
understand, produce or use language).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set [MDS a resident
assessment tool used to identify cognitive (mental processes) and physical functional level assessment]
dated 3/3/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS screening tool
used to assess resident cognitive level) score was 0 out of 15 (0 - 7 indicated severe cognitive impairment
[memory loss, poor decision making skills] 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, (13 -15) cognitively intact)
which indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment.During an interview on 10/17/25 at 10:05 a.m.
with the interim administrator (IADM), the IADM stated she had received a report on 7/15/25 from Resident
3, stating she had witnessed a AA 2 hitting Resident 1 with a clothing protector during the smoke break and
yelling at Resident 1 on 7/13/25. The IADM stated the facility initiated an investigation that revealed
Resident 2 and Resident 3 were both witnesses to the incident. The IADM stated the allegation was found
to be substantiated and AA 2 was suspended pending termination.During a review of Resident 3's
admission Record, the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for
Anxiety (excessive worry and fear).During a review of Resident 3's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated
Resident 3's BIMS score was 14 out of 15 which indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact.During a
concurrent observation and interview on 7/17/25 at 10:39 a.m. with Resident 1 and Resident 3, both
residents were observed outside during their smoke break. Resident 3 stated on 7/13/25, Resident 1,
Resident 2 and Resident 3 were outside preparing for a smoke break accompanied by AA 2. Resident 3
stated AA 2 approached Resident 1 with the clothes protector used while smoking. Resident 3 stated AA 2
placed Resident 1's clothing protector with enough force to hear a thump from Resident 1's chest. Resident
1 observed moving his head to indicate yes in agreement. Resident 3 stated, Resident 1 reacted by
standing up in front of AA 2, then AA 2 was heard raising his voice stating, Hit me so I can put you in jail for
hitting a healthcare worker. Resident 3 stated Resident 1 had not reacted even though AA 2 tried to
provoke and instigate a fight. Resident 1 observed moving his head to indicate yes in agreement.During a
review of Resident 2's admission Record, the AR
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 5
Event ID:
555539
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555539
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Coalinga Regional Medical Ctr Dp/Snf
1191 Phelps Ave.
Coalinga, CA 93210
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0600
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for Anxiety (excessive worry and
fear).During a review of Resident 2's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 2's BIMS score was
15 out of 15 which indicated Resident 2 was cognitively intact.During a review of Resident 2's, Nurse's
Note, dated 7/15/25, the note indicated, . [Resident 2] reported that on Sunday 7/13/25 [Resident 1] was in
a foul mood and was walking outside because that's what he likes to do. Later he went outside to smoke,
and [AA 2] was real upset with [Resident 1] because he would not go inside earlier and when it came time
to put on the smoking vest [AA 2] approached [Resident 1], who was reportedly sitting down on the bench,
and very sharply shoved the vest into [Resident 1] chest, you could hear the thump. [Resident 1] stood up
and got into a fighting stance and for the first time ever I heard [Resident 1] speak. [Resident 2] then stated
that [AA 2] replied with try to touch me, if you do, you'll go to prison for assaulting a healthcare worker.
[Resident 2] reported that she did not know exactly what [Resident 1] had said, because Resident 1 did not
speak most of the time and when he does you cannot understand him, but she recalls [AA 2] response.
After [AA 2] had made that statement [Resident 1] reportedly turned around, put his cigarette out, which he
never does, he always finishes it and went back inside. [Resident 1] did not go back outside the rest of the
shift until [AA 2] went home for the night. [Resident 2] reports feeling safe in the facility.During an interview
on 7/17/25 at 10:47 a.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated that on 7/13/25, Resident 1, Resident 2 and
Resident 3 were outside preparing for a smoke break accompanied by AA 2. Resident 2 stated AA 2
approached Resident 1 with the clothes protector used while smoking. Resident 2 stated AA 2 placed
Resident 1's clothing protector with enough force to hear a thump from Resident 1's chest. Resident 2
stated, Resident 1 reacted by standing up in front of AA 2, then AA 2 was heard in a volatile voice stating,
Hit me I dare you so I can put you in jail for hitting a healthcare worker. Resident 2 stated Resident 1 took
off his clothing protector and turned off his cigarette and proceeded to walk inside not reacting to the
incident.During an interview on 7/17/25 at 11:00 a.m. with AA 1, AA 1 stated Resident 3 had reported that
on 7/13/25, an incident had occurred with Resident 1 and AA 2. AA 1 stated Resident 3 reported AA 2 was
aggressive and yelling toward Resident 1 during their smoking break. AA 1 stated, Resident 3 reported AA
2 was instigating a fight with Resident 1, telling him to Hit him so he can go to jail for hitting a healthcare
worker. AA 1 stated the incident was verbal abuse and the facility process was to attempt to de-escalate
resident behavior and ensure safety.During an interview on 7/17/25 at 11:22 a.m. with certified nursing
assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated the incident that had occurred on 7/13/25 between AA 2 and Resident 1
was a form of abuse. CNA 1 stated when AA 2 escalated the situation by yelling and instigating a fight, he
placed Resident 1 in an unsafe environment.During a telephone interview on 7/24/25 at 3:10 p.m. with AA
2, AA 2 stated he was the AA on 7/13/25. AA 2 stated he recalled an incident in which Resident 1 had
stood up suddenly when AA 2 went to put on the clothing protector. AA 2 stated, Resident 1 looked as if he
was going to hit him because Resident 1 took a step toward AA 2 and puffed his chest. AA 2 stated he
stepped backward and immediately went to alert LVN 1 and informed LVN 1 that Resident 1 was
threatening to hit him. AA 2 stated, LVN 1 had responded by stating, tell him if he hit you he would go to jail
for hitting a healthcare worker. AA 2 stated he then went back outside and told Resident 1 what LVN 1 had
stated. AA 2 stated Resident 1 continued to walk toward AA 2 as AA 2 walked backwards. AA 2 stated after
the incident, Resident 1 took off the clothing protector and threw his cigarette on the floor. AA 2 stated, he
did not feel it was verbal abuse because he was simply relaying the message that LVN 1 told him to
de-escalate the situation by telling Resident 1, he would go to jail.During a review of the facility's policy and
procedure (P&P) titled, Recognizing signs and Symptoms of
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555539
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555539
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Coalinga Regional Medical Ctr Dp/Snf
1191 Phelps Ave.
Coalinga, CA 93210
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0600
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Abuse/Neglect, dated 2011, the P&P indicated, . Abuse is defined as willful infliction of injury, unreasonable
confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Neglect is
defined as failure to provide goods and services as necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or
mental illness. Signs of Actual Physical Neglect. Caregiver indifference to resident's personal care and
needs.During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Resident Rights, dated 1/2024, the P&P indicated, .
Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Federal and state laws guarantee
certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a dignified
existence, be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity, be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of
property, and exploitation, be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555539
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555539
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Coalinga Regional Medical Ctr Dp/Snf
1191 Phelps Ave.
Coalinga, CA 93210
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0658
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review the facility failed to follow facility's policies and procedures and meet
professional standards of quality for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1), when staff did not
document Resident 1's change of condition (COC) or Situation, Background, Assessment and
Recommendation communication form (SBAR- communication tool that provides critical information and
ensures that important details are clearly communicated) for a staff to resident allegation of abuse on
7/13/25.This failure had the potential to result in the inaccurate assessment of Resident 1, delay in care
and was at risk for further abuse.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a
summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history,
insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR
indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for Anxiety (excessive worry and
fear), expressive language disorder (condition that affects a person's ability to use language, both written
and spoken), dysphasia (disorder that affects the ability to understand, produce or use language). During a
review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set [MDS a resident assessment tool used to identify cognitive
(mental processes) and physical functional level assessment] dated 3/3/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident
1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS screening tool used to assess resident cognitive level) score
was 0 out of 15 (0 - 7 indicated severe cognitive impairment [memory loss, poor decision making skills]
8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, (13 -15) cognitively intact) which indicated Resident 1 had severe
cognitive impairment.During a review of Resident 2's, Nurse's Note, dated 7/15/25, the note indicated, .
[Resident 2] reported that on Sunday 7/13/25 [Resident 1] was in a foul mood and was walking outside
because that's what he likes to do. Later he went outside to smoke, and [AA 2] was real upset with
[Resident 1] because he would not go inside earlier and when it came time to put on the smoking vest [AA
2] approached [Resident 1], who was reportedly sitting down on the bench, and very sharply shoved the
vest into [Resident 1] chest, you could hear the thump. [Resident 1] stood up and got into a fighting stance
and for the first time ever I heard [Resident 1] speak. [Resident 2] then stated that [AA 2] replied with try to
touch me, if you do, you'll go to prison for assaulting a healthcare worker. [Resident 2] reported that she did
not know exactly what [Resident 1] had said, because Resident 1 did not speak most of the time and when
he does you cannot understand him, but she recalls [AA 2] response. After [AA 2] had made that statement
[Resident 1] reportedly turned around, put his cigarette out, which he never does, he always finishes it and
went back inside. [Resident 1] did not go back outside the rest of the shift until [AA 2] went home for the
night. [Resident 2] reports feeling safe in the facility.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the
AR indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for Anxiety (excessive worry
and fear).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 2's
Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident 2 was cognitively
intact.During an interview on 7/17/25 at 11:28 a.m. with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated the
facility process was to complete a COC for any change in resident health status. LVN 1 stated there should
have been a COC completed for the alleged staff to resident abuse incident. LVN 1 stated the purpose of
the COC was to accurately document what had occurred and to communicate it through the electronic
medical record (EMR). During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/17/25 at 12:20 p.m. with
interim director of nurses (IDON), Resident 1's electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed. The IDON
stated the EMR indicated there was no COC completed for Resident 1's allegation of staff to resident abuse
that occurred on 7/13/25. The IDON stated it
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555539
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555539
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Coalinga Regional Medical Ctr Dp/Snf
1191 Phelps Ave.
Coalinga, CA 93210
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0658
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
was important to ensure all documentation was completed for Resident 1's incident of abuse, to monitor
Resident 1 for changes in health status and well-being.During a concurrent interview and record review
with the interim administrator (IADM), the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change in a
Resident's Condition or Status, dated 2001, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, . A significant change of
condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally solve itself without
intervention by staff. required interdisciplinary review and/or revision to the care plan. the nurse will make
detailed observation and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider, including information
prompted by the SBAR . The IADM stated there should have been a COC completed for any resident
changes in health status and for the staff to resident abuse incident with Resident 1.During a review of a
professional reference from the American Nurses Association titled, Principles for Nursing Documentation,
dates 2010, the reference indicated, . Clear, accurate, and accessible documentation is an essential
element of safe, quality, evidence-based nursing practice. Documentation of nurses' work is critical as well
for effective communication with each other and with other disciplines. It is how nurses create a record of
their services for use by payors, the legal system, government agencies, accrediting bodies, researchers,
and other groups and individuals directly or indirectly involved with health care. It also provides a basis for
demonstrating and understanding nursing's contributions both to patient care outcomes and to the viability
and effectiveness of the organizations that provide and support quality patient care. Entries into
organization documents or the health record (including but not limited to provider orders) must be Accurate,
valid, and complete, Authenticated; that is, the information is truthful, the author is identified, and nothing
has been added or inserted, Dated and time-stamped by the persons who created the entry.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555539
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 5