Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Eskaton Village Care CenterCMS #5555551 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555555 07/03/2024 Eskaton Village Care Center 3939 Walnut Ave. Carmichael, CA 95608
F 0553 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a medication was discontinued without informing the resident. Residents Affected - Few This failure resulted in Resident 1 not being able to have input into decisions regarding her plan of care. Findings: According to Resident 1's admission record, she was admitted in 4/24 with diagnoses including aftercare following joint replacement surgery and Stage 3 chronic kidney disease (mild to moderate loss of kidney function). It also indicated Resident 1 was her own responsible party (RP, medical decision maker). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had no memory impairment. A review of Resident 1's clinical record included the following documents: A General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) Physician's (MD) Order for Admission, dated 4/16/24, indicated the following orders: 1. Hydrochlorothiazide-spironolactone (medication used to treat high blood pressure and fluid retention), 25mg.-25mg. (milligrams, a unit of measurement), 2 tablets, once daily. 2. Spironolactone (a medication to treat high blood pressure), 50 mg., 1.5 tablets once daily. An MD's Order Report, dated 4/16/24- 5/31/24, indicated the following orders: 1. Spironolactone-hydrochlorothiazide 25mg.-25 mg. tablet, 2 tablets, once daily. The order had a start date of 4/16/24. 2. Spironolactone, 50 mg. tablet, one tablet every other day at 5 p.m., hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure, the pressure in the arteries when the heart contracts) less than 100. The order's start date was 5/1/24. 3. Spironolactone, 50 mg. tablet, one tablet daily at 8 a.m., hold for SBP less than 100. The order's start date was 5/1/24. Page 1 of 2 555555 555555 07/03/2024 Eskaton Village Care Center 3939 Walnut Ave. Carmichael, CA 95608
F 0553 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm An MD note, dated 4/16/24 and written by MD 1, indicated he had met with Resident 1 and the plan was to include routine medications. An MD Order Sheet, dated 4/16/24 and written by MD 1, indicated the order for spironolactone 50 mg, 1.5 tabs daily was to be discontinued. Residents Affected - Few A MD note, dated 5/2/24 and written by MD 2, indicated he had met with Resident 1 on 5/1/24 and she had requested to be put back on her previous dose of spironolactone 50 mg. in the morning and 50 mg. in the evening every other night. The note further indicated the plan for Resident 1 included placing her back on the spironolactone 50 mg. for worsening leg edema (swelling). In an interview, on 7/3/24 at 7:31 a.m., Resident 1 stated she had been taking spironolactone, 50 mg. tablets, 1.5 tablets daily and hydrochlorothiazide-spironolactone 25mg.-25 mg. tablets, 2 tablets daily for at least two years for her high blood pressure and fluid retention. Resident 1 stated after about two weeks at the facility, her left foot had become very swollen and it was at this time she had found out she was not getting both of the medications. Resident 1 stated she believed she had no longer been receiving the spironolactone 50 mg. tablets, 1.5 tablets daily. Resident 1 stated she wanted to know who decided to change her medications without telling her and stated she felt it had violated her rights. In an interview, on 7/9/24 at 1:34 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated it was her expectation that the MD explained to the resident or RP any changes in medications, such as new medications or the discontinuation of routine medications. The DON confirmed Resident 1 was her own RP and the spironolactone 50 mg. tablet, 1.5 tablets daily had been a routine medication for Resident 1 prior to her admission to the facility. The DON confirmed there was no documentation the MD had discussed this change in medication with Resident 1. A review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 12/13/16, stipulated, This community acts in accordance with all of the rights guaranteed to residents under federal and state law. 555555 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0553GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F553 - The right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her

    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 3, 2024 survey of Eskaton Village Care Center?

This was a inspection survey of Eskaton Village Care Center on July 3, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Eskaton Village Care Center on July 3, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.