Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

STANLEY HEALTHCARE CENTERCMS #5556511 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0628 Level of Harm - Potential for minimal harm Residents Affected - Some Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide written information to the residents about a bed-hold information upon the resident transferring to an acute care hospital for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). These failures had the potential for the residents not receiving accurate information to determine if they wanted a bed-hold and to return to the facility. Findings: Review of the facility'sP&P titled Bed-Holds and Returns revised March 2017 showed prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and their representative that explains in detail the residents' rights and limitations regarding bed-holds, the reserve bed payment policy, and the per diem rate to hold a bed beyond the state's bed-hold period. Review of the facility's Bedhold Notification Upon Transfer form showed the form was to be completed upon transfer and to provide a copy to the resident or their responsible party. The form showed the resident, or their responsible party was notified of their options to hold the bed and had check boxes to show if a bed-hold was desired, not desired, not appliable, or not eligible for a bed-hold, but still desired to pay privately for a bed-hold. 1. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 5/29/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and transferred to an acute care hospital on 5/17/25. Review of Resident 1's medical record failed to show the resident was provided information on the bed-hold options. 2. Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 5/29/25. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's EHR census showed the resident went on an acute care hospital on a paid leave on 5/1/25, and returned to the facility on 5/5/25. Review of Resident 2's medical record failed to show the resident or her responsible party was provided with the information on their bed-hold options. 3. Medical record review for Resident 3 was initiated on 5/29/25. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555651 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555651 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 05/29/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Stanley Healthcare Center 14102 Springdale Street Westminster, CA 92683 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628 Level of Harm - Potential for minimal harm Review of Resident 3's EHR census showed the resident went on an acute care hospital on a paid leave 4/30/25, and returned to the facility on 5/7/25. Review of Resident 3's medical record failed to show the resident or responsible party wasprovided with the information on their bed-hold options. Residents Affected - Some On 5/29/25 at 1012 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Residents 1, 2, and 3 was conducted with LVN 1. LVN 1 stated she was the nurse for Residents 1, 2, and 3, when they were transferred to the acute care hospitals. LVN 1 stated the facility obtained the physician's orders for the residents to have bed-holds if admitted to the acute care hospital. LVN 1 stated their process for the bed-hold wasafter receiving the notification from the acute care hospital the resident was being admitted , the LVN was then to call and ask if the resident or responsible party wanted a bed-hold. LVN 1 stated they did not provide anything in writing to the residents or their responsible partyabout bed-hold options. When asked what options LVN 1 discussed with the residents or responsible parties, LVN 1replied she only asked if they wanted a bed-hold and did not know any particulars about who was responsible for the bed-hold payments. On 5/29/25 at 1150 hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated all the residents should be offered written information about the bed-hold options upon transferring out of the facility. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555651 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0628GeneralS&S Bno actual harm

    F628 - Documentation

    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 29, 2025 survey of STANLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of STANLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER on May 29, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at STANLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER on May 29, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.