F 0729
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive
retraining.
Based on interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure an employee working as a
CNA (a healthcare professional who provides basic resident care and support) at the facility held a valid
and up-to-date license and met competency evaluation requirements for training. This failure had the
potential to result in an unlicensed CNA providing direct care to the residents without proper the
certification and training, and placing the residents' safety at risk.Findings:On 1/28/26, CDPH, L&C
Program was forwarded a complaint from the CNA Misconduct, which showed CNA 1 picked up an
afternoon shift on 1/26/26, at the facility. However, the person who showed up and claimed to be CNA 1
was male. The complainant alleged CNA 1 stole a TV out of the utility closet and left the scheduled shift.
Upon further investigation by the facility, showed CNA 1 was a female individual and the male individual
who showed up for the afternoon shift was unlicensed and working under CNA 1's license. On 2/4/26 at
1021 hours, an interview and facility document was conducted with the DON. Reviewed the facility's CDPH
530 (Nursing Staffing Assignment and Sign-in Sheet) form dated 1/26/26 with the DON, which showed
CNA 1's time in and time out on 1/26/26. On 2/4/26 at 1456 hours, an interview was conducted with the
DSD/IP. The DSD/IP stated her responsibilities included the verifying the employees' identity and license,
conducting background check, providing orientations to the new facility staff, completing the schedule,
conducting CNA audits, in-services, and administering vaccines. The DSD/IP stated on 1/26/26, CNA 1
from Registry Company 1 was scheduled to work for the evening shift (1500-2300 hours). When the
evening shift started, the DSD/IP met the male individual, who presented to be CNA 1 and signed the
assignment sheet. The DSD/IP stated she provided the facility orientation to CNA 1. The DSD/IP stated
CNA 2 then provided a brief orientation to CNA 1 regarding the residents' care. The DSD/IP stated she did
not check and/or verify CNA 1's identity using a government issued identification and their CNA license
prior to or upon the start of the shift. In addition, the DSD/IP stated on 1/26/26 around 2200 hours, she
received a message from LVN 1 informing her about CNA 1 leaving the facility with a television from the
utility room and without a notice. Furthermore, the DSD/IP stated she was responsible for checking and
verifying the identity and license of the unidentified male individual from Registry Company 1. The DSD/IP
stated the negative outcome for failing to check and verify the facility staff or the registry staffs' identity and
license was the potential to compromise the residents' safety. The DSD/IP stated she informed the
Administrator and investigated the allegations and on 1/27/26, she found out CNA 1 was a female individual
after she checked CNA 1's profile and identification on Registry Company 1. The DSD/IP stated she called
CNA 1's phone number and CNA 1 verified with the DSD/IP that she did not accept the registry shift and
did not come in to work at the facility on 1/26/26. The DSD/IP stated she did not know if the unidentified
male individual, who presented to be CNA 1 from Registry Company 1 had a valid and current CNA
license, and competency evaluation. On 2/5/26 at 1208 hours, an interview was conducted with the
Administrator. The Administrator stated the DSD/IP and himself had access to
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
555651
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555651
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/05/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Stanley Healthcare Center
14102 Springdale Street
Westminster, CA 92683
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0729
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Registry Company 1, however, the DSD/IP was mainly responsible for requesting the registry staff as
needed. The Administrator stated prior to the incident on 1/26/26 with CNA 1, the facility did not require to
check and verify the registry staffs' identity using a government ID and their license since Registry
Company 1 was supposed to check the registry staffs' identity and license. In addition, the Administrator
stated the facility used only Registry Company 1 to request registry staff. On 2/5/26 at 1446 hours, an
interview was conducted with the DON and DSD/IP. The DSD/IP stated she did not make an employee
personnel file for any of the registry staff. The DSD/IP stated the employee personnel file of CNA 1 was
obtained after the incident on 1/26/26. In addition, the DSD/IP stated she did not check and/or verify the
identity, license, certification, and competency evaluations of all the registry staff from Registry Company 1
prior to 1/27/26. The DSD/IP stated she would not know if the registry staff who accepted the shift posted
on Registry Company 1 was the same individual who showed up to facility to provide care for the residents
and had an active license, since the facility did not check and/or verify their identity, license and their
competency evaluation. On 2/5/26 at 1540 hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator and
DON. The Administrator and DON were informed and acknowledged the above findings.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555651
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2