Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ZUCKERBERG SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSP & TRAUMA SNFCMS #5556601 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0552 Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure result of the Covid-19 test (nasal swab test to detect the current infection with the virus called SARS-CoV-2) was accurately communicated in the language and manner the resident fully understand for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the preliminary positive Covid result was not communicated in the resident ' s native language and with no explanation that a re-run of the test was needed to confirm the validity of the result. This deficient practice caused Resident 1 to get upset about the result and raised concern among the Family Members. Residents Affected - Few The re-run test was done later on the same day (7/20/23), as per facility policy, and indicated a false positive result (False positive, means that a person was told a positive result, but are not actually infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus (covid virus). Findings: Record review of the Face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission H & P dated 7/14/23 indicated, the resident came for rehabilitation therapy following surgery of a fracture (broken) left tibia (define) and fibula (define). Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 7/31/23 indicated, the resident ' s preferred language was Spanish and the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) had the score of 15 (15/15 means the person is awake, alert and oriented to person, time, and place). Interview on 10/17/23 at 11:32 AM, with the Nurse Manage (NM) and Director of Nursing (DON) in the presence of the Regulatory Affair Nurse (RAN 1) and the Regulatory Affair Coordinator (RAC), DON stated, the Physicians and License Nurses can disclose results of covid test to the residents and Covid test was done two times per week in the facility, Mondays and Thursdays, each week. When asked, what was her expectations from the staff when covid test were disclosed, the DON stated, staff would informed the residents in a manner that would avoid potentially alarming situation since there was small percentage of small positive results, to take infection control measures while the resident was still in active phase of the infection, and to educate and respond to any questions the residents may have. The NM stated, the resident tested positive for Covid test on 7/20/23, it was initial (or preliminary), and the re-run test was done later on the same day, and it was negative. The NM stated, the staff would disclose the covid-19 test result after the test has been confirmed. Record review of the Covid-19 test (preliminary) result dated 7/20/23 at 7:59 indicated, Detected (means positive). The re-run Covid-9 test result dated 7/20/23 at 4:40 pm indicated, Not detected (means negative) and the re-run Covid-19 test result dated 7/20/23 at 6:21 pm indicated, Not detected. (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555660 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555660 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 10/17/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hosp & Trauma Snf 1001 Potrero Avenue San Francisco, CA 94110 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0552 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few In an interview on 10/17/23 at 1:09 PM, with the Registered Nurse (RN 1), RN 1 stated, she was a Travelling Nurse, this was her 4th month in the facility, and Spanish was not her native language. The RN 1 stated, on 7/20/23 she took care of one resident with positive covid test and that was her first time to disclose a positive result to a resident. Record review of the Nursing Notes, dated 7/20/23, at 4:00 PM indicated, Resident covid test result # 1 came out positive. MD (physician) made aware and ordered a repeat covid test. Resident was asymptomatic. In a concurrent record review of the Covid-19 Laboratory Test (Covid-19 LT) results and interview on 10/17/23, at 1:12 PM, with the Registered Nurse (RN 1), the Covid-19 LT results were reviewed. The Covid-19 LT results indicated, on 7/20/23 at 7:56 am, the covid-19 test result was positive, the re-run test result done on 7/20/23 at 4:40 pm was negative, and the repeat nasal swab covid -19 test result done on 7/20/23 at 6:21 pm was negative. The RN 1 stated, when she received the covid-19 test result for Resident 1 on 7/20/23, she told the Family Member (FM 1) who was in the room with the resident to leave, he could not stay in the room because the covid result could mean the resident was contagious, and the resident needed to be on isolation. The RN 1 stated, she told the resident the Covid-19 test result was positive, the resident questioned her why the FM had to leave, she (Resident 1) had no symptoms, and after that the resident started calling her FMs and the resident was upset being positive at that time. The RN 1 stated, she did not document the test result was a preliminary positive and confirmed there was no documentation the education was provided to the resident. Interview on 10/17/23, at 12:43 PM, with the Infection Control Program Manager (ICPM) and the Certified Infection Control Nurse (CICN), IPCM stated, nasal swab test was done via PCR (polymerase chain reaction, it ' s a test to detect genetic material from a specific organism, such as a virus). If the preliminary test comes back positive, the test would be re-run on the same day. If the test becomes negative, another nasal swab specimen would be obtained on the same day. If the result was negative, then it ' considered false positive result. Review of the facility ' s undated Protocol handed by the IPMG titled, 4 A Skilled Nursing Facility, Response to Covid-19 positive Event, indicated, Procedure: .12. For resident positive RT-PCR: . c. Lab (laboratory) contacted by Infection Control . to re-run specimen . Second specimen ordered, and run . d. If 2 out of 3 of above results negative, then a false + (positive) is confirmed. Interview on 10/17/23, at 11:01 AM, with the FM 2, FM 2 stated, Resident 1 told her the staff came all panicking, disturbing, and told the FM 1 he had to leave in an abrupt panicky manner. The FM 2 stated, the way the Covid-19 test result was delivered was unprofessional, the resident left the hospital uncomfortable, and was not well. Review of the facility ' s Policy and Procedure titled, Resident ' s Rights and Responsibilities, with the last review date of 2/22 indicated, The resident . 4. To be treated with respect and dignity . 9. To be fully informed in a language that she or he understands . medical condition. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555660 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0552GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F552 - Planning and Implementing Care

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 17, 2023 survey of ZUCKERBERG SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSP & TRAUMA SNF?

This was a inspection survey of ZUCKERBERG SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSP & TRAUMA SNF on October 17, 2023. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ZUCKERBERG SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSP & TRAUMA SNF on October 17, 2023?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.